Open Access

Safety, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and radiation dosimetry of 18F-tetrafluoroborate (18F-TFB) in healthy human subjects

  • Huailei Jiang1,
  • Nicholas R. Schmit1,
  • Alex R. Koenen1,
  • Aditya Bansal1,
  • Mukesh K. Pandey1,
  • Robert B. Glynn1,
  • Bradley J. Kemp1,
  • Kera L. Delaney1,
  • Angela Dispenzieri2,
  • Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez3,
  • Kah-Whye Peng4,
  • Stephen J. Russell4,
  • Tina M. Gunderson5,
  • Val J. Lowe1 and
  • Timothy R. DeGrado1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
EJNMMI Research20177:90

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0337-5

Received: 13 September 2017

Accepted: 16 October 2017

Published: 27 October 2017

Abstract

Background

18F-Tetrafluoroborate (18F-TFB) is a promising iodide analog for PET imaging of thyroid cancer and sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) reporter activity in viral therapy applications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of high-specific activity 18F-TFB in healthy human subjects.

Methods

18F-TFB was synthesized with specific activity of 3.2 ± 1.3 GBq/μmol (at the end of synthesis). Dynamic and whole-body static PET/CT scans over 4 h were performed after intravenous administration of 18F-TFB (333–407 MBq) in four female and four male healthy volunteers (35 ± 11 years old). Samples of venous blood and urine were collected over the imaging period and analyzed by ion-chromatography HPLC to determine tracer stability. Vital signs and clinical laboratory safety assays were measured to evaluate safety.

Results

18F-TFB administration was well tolerated with no significant findings on vital signs and no clinically meaningful changes in clinical laboratory assays. Left-ventricular blood pool time-activity curves showed a multi-phasic blood clearance of 18F-radioactivity with the two rapid clearance phases over the first 20 min, followed by a slower clearance phase. HPLC analysis showed insignificant 18F-labeled metabolites in the blood and urine over the length of the study (4 h). High uptakes were seen in the thyroid, stomach, salivary glands, and bladder. Urinary clearance of 18F-TFB was prominent. Metabolic stability was evidenced by low accumulation of 18F-radioactivity in the bone. Effective doses were 0.036 mSv/MBq in males and 0.064 mSv/MBq in females (p = 0.08, not significant).

Conclusions

This initial study in healthy human subjects showed 18F-TFB was safe and distributed in the human body similar to other iodide analogs. These data support further translational studies with 18F-TFB as NIS gene reporter and imaging biomarker for thyroid cancer and other disease processes that import iodide.

Keywords

Sodium/iodide symporterTetrafluoroborate 18F-fluorinePET imagingBiodistributionDosimetry

Background

The sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) is an intrinsic membrane glycoprotein highly expressed in the thyroid gland and other NIS-expressing cells or tissues [13]. Human NIS (hNIS) was identified and characterized in 1996 [4, 5], which created various new opportunities using hNIS as a reporter gene in viral therapy investigations and imaging of cell migration and differentiation. Non-invasive monitoring of hNIS expression in normal and hNIS-transfected tissues has been performed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with single-photon emitting radioiodides (123I and 125I) and 99mTc-pertechnetate (99mTc-TcO4 ), whereas positron emission tomography (PET) has used 124I-iodide as radiotracer [6]. However, clinical implementation of an 18F-fluorine-based radiotracer in positron emission tomography (PET) has lagged, despite of its superior physical decay properties. 18F-tetrafluoroborate (18F-TFB) has received renewed interest as a promising iodide analog radiotracer for PET imaging in preclinical imaging studies [710]. During preparation of this manuscript, the biodistribution and radiation dosimetry estimates of 18F-TFB in five thyroid cancer patients were reported [11].

Our laboratory [12] and others [13] have reported high-specific radioactivity syntheses of 18F-TFB via the reaction of boron trifluoride (BF3) and 18F-fluoride. We demonstrated the relationship of 18F-TFB-specific radioactivity and PET-delineated radiotracer uptake in NIS-transfected C6-glioma xenograft bearing mice [14], confirming the desirability of high-specific radioactivity to avoid saturation effects at the NIS transporter. In this study, we report PET/CT imaging with 18F-TFB in healthy male and female participants to describe radiotracer pharmacokinetics, metabolite analyses, and estimation of radiation dosimetry estimates.

Methods

Radiotracer synthesis

18F-TFB was prepared and formulated in sterile 0.9% NaCl under Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) conditions as previously described [12]. Decay-corrected radiochemical yields of 32 ± 2% and radiochemical purities (RCPs) > 98% were obtained. Specific radioactivity of 3.2 ± 1.3 GBq/μmol (at the end of synthesis) was achieved from starting 18F-fluoride radioactivity of 20–31 GBq. In vitro radiochemical purity remained > 96% up to 8 h at room temperature.

Human participants

Approval of the study was obtained from the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided informed consent. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Four male (36 ± 14 years) and four female (35 ± 8 years) healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Demographic data are shown in Table S1 (Additional file 1). Participants were excluded that had previous diagnosis of cancer or clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, metabolic, and endocrine (thyroid) diseases. Participants were not required to fast prior to the imaging study but instructed to remain well hydrated.

PET/CT imaging protocol

The imaging protocol is illustrated in Fig. 1. After voiding of the bladder, participants were positioned in a GE 690XT PET/CT scanner (GE HealthCare, Waukesha, WI) in a supine position with the heart in the center of the axial field of view. Intravenous catheters were placed in both arms for radiotracer injection and blood sampling. Computed tomography scans of the thorax were initially acquired in the preparation for a dynamic PET data acquisition over the heart for the first 45 min following commencement of radiotracer administration. 18F-TFB (333–407 MBq) was administered over 1 min into one of the catheters. The frame sequence for initial dynamic PET acquisition was 15 × 4, 8 × 15, 4 × 30, and 8 × 300 s. Following the dynamic heart scan, the participants were allowed a break from the scanner, during which time voided their bladders. Two additional trunk PET/CT scans, from the vertex of the skull to mid-thigh, were performed at 2 and 3.5 h, respectively. The last PET/CT scan was completed ~ 4 h post-injection.
Fig. 1

Imaging protocol. Patients were screened on day 1 and imaged by 18F-TFB-PET/CT on day 2

Measurements in venous blood and urine samples

Urine was collected after each PET/CT scan (approximately 55, 160, 250 min), and venous blood samples were collected at 40, 145, and 235 min, post-injection, as shown in Fig. 1. Blood samples (3–4 mL) were collected in heparinized tubes and placed on ice. The blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 5 min to obtain plasma. Urine was measured for urine volume and radioactivity concentration as measured in a calibrated gamma counter. Analysis for metabolites in plasma and urine was performed by anion chromatography HPLC (Dionex IC-2100, AS19 analytical column 4.7 × 150 mm, eluent 25 mM KOH, sample volume 25 uL, flow rate 1 mL/min, 18F-TFB retention time = 7.8 min), allowing estimation of the fraction of radioactivity as non-metabolized (intact) 18F-TFB. Radioactivity levels were too low to generate radiochromatograms from the in-line radiation monitor. Based on retention times for 18F-fluoride (3 min) and 18F-TFB (7.8 min), HPLC effluent was collected at 2–4 min and 6–9 min to represent activity in the form of 18F-fluoride and 18F-TFB. These fractions were counted in a gamma counter to obtain the percentage of intact 18F-TFB.

Safety measurements for 18F-TFB administration

Vital signs (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respiratory rate, and temperature) were measured prior to 18F-TFB administration and at 45 and 240 min post-injection. Venous blood samples were taken prior to 18F-TFB administration and at ~ 240 min post-injection for a panel of clinical laboratory tests to evaluate the safety of the radiotracer administration.

PET/CT image analysis

All PET scans images were reconstructed using 3-dimensional ordered subset expectation maximization (3D OSEM) and time-of-flight reconstruction. Volumes of interest (VOIs) of organs were manually drawn based on the CT imaging data using PMOD software (Ver. 3.5). The VOIs included the whole organ. Standardized Uptake Values (SUVs) normalized to body weight were then calculated for each VOI. Time-activity curves (TACs) were evaluated from the initial dynamic scan over the heart for left-ventricular blood pool, lungs, and liver regions.

Pharmacokinetic analysis

Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by fitting the left-ventricular blood pool time-activity curves (in units of SUV) to a 3-exponential model: x = A 1 e k 1 t  + A 2 e k 2 t  + A 3 e k 3 t using least squares regression. The time-activity curves were shifted in time to set the peak value at time t = 0.

Radiation dosimetry estimation

Radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated from organ residence times using OLINDA software (Ver. 1.1), assuming a bladder voiding interval of 3.5 h. To compute organ residence times, the decay correction was removed from the VOI data. Since not all tissues were represented in the initial dynamic PET scan over the heart, the unrepresented tissues were assumed to have static distribution of 18F-TFB from time of injection to the measurement at 2 h. Thus, radioactivity concentrations in each organ were obtained from the 2 h time point data corrected for radioactive decay by the multiplicative factor e λ(120 − t), where t is time in minutes post-injection and λ (0.00632 min−1) is the decay constant for 18F. Gender-specific organ masses for the conversion of SUV to disintegrations per organ per unit radioactivity administered (Bq-hr./Bq) were taken from Schlein et al. [15].

Statistics

Descriptive statistics are provided as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or counts and percentages. Comparisons between groups by gender or between subjects at two different scans used Wilcoxon rank sum and signed rank test, respectively. Comparisons for vital statistics used the Friedman rank sum test. Statistical significance was defined as p values < 0.05. Results have not been adjusted for multiple comparisons. Analyses were performed in R (version 3.2.3; Vienna, Austria).

Results

The cohort was composed of four female and four male subjects, 35 ± 11 years of age, with BMI of 28.3 ± 6.9 kg/m2. The mean ± SD injected doses were 333–407 MBq. With the exception of height (p = 0.02), no baseline differences were observed between genders in age, weight, BMI, diabetic status (none were diabetic), or injected dose.

Pharmacokinetics of 18F-TFB

The initial 45-min dynamic PET/CT scan over the heart allowed evaluation of the early kinetics of 18F-TFB in the left-ventricular blood pool (LVBP) as in indication of the pharmacokinetics of this radiotracer (Table 1). Figure 2 shows the time-activity curves in LVBP, lung, and liver in a representative male participant. Peak values of radioactivity concentration were seen at ~ 1 min for LVBP and lung, whereas the peak in liver was at ~ 2 min post-administration of 18F-TFB. The blood clearance kinetics following the peak activity were fit to a 3-exponential model as shown in Fig. 2. Parameter estimates are shown in Table 2. Blood clearance were fit well by a 3-exponential model with a rapid clearance phase (T ½ ~ 5 s), a moderately rapid clearance phase (T ½ ~ 1.5 min), and a slower clearance phase (T ½ > 30 min) proceeding to the end of the 4-h measurement period. There were no significant gender differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters. The slow clearance component (A 3) represented approximately 14 ± 5% and 20 ± 9% of peak activity in males and females, respectively, with no significant gender difference. Continued radiotracer washout was also seen in the lung and liver.
Table 1

Pharmacokinetics of 18F-TFB in healthy participants

Parametera

3-exponential fit parameter estimates

Males

Females

A 1 (SUV)

27.9 ± 9.5

23.2 ± 29.3

k 1 (min−1)

7.6 ± 2.8

9.7 ± 6.8

A 2 (SUV)

8.7 ± 3.0

6.8 ± 2.0

k 2 (min−1)

0.64 ± 0.36

0.44 ± 0.09

A 3 (SUV)

5.9 ± 1.6

5.1 ± 0.3

k 3 (min−1)

0.023 ± 0.023

0.016 ± 0.005

Values are mean ± SD (n = 4)

aSUV values derived from left-ventricular blood pool were fit to 3-exponential model: \( x={A}_1{e}^{-{k}_1t}+{A}_2{e}^{-{k}_2t}+{A}_3{e}^{-{k}_3t} \)

Fig. 2

Time-activity curves of 18F-TFB in healthy male participant. LVBP left-ventricular blood pool. Inset shows first 5 min of data. The LVBP time-activity curves were fit by a 3-exponential model

Table 2

Metabolite analysis of 18F-TFB in plasma and urine of healthy participants

 

40 mina

145 mina

235 mina

Accumulative

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

Whole blood (SUV)

3.0 ± 0.2

3.1 ± 0.9

2.1 ± 0.2

1.7 ± 0.4

1.7 ± 0.2

1.4 ± 0.4

Plasma (SUV)

3.8 ± 0.2

3.8 ± 1.0

2.8 ± 0.3

2.1 ± 0.5

2.0 ± 0.1

1.7 ± 0.5

Urine (%dose)

15 ± 2b

16 ± 3

13 ± 3

18 ± 3

10 ± 2b

12 ± 2

40 ± 5b

46 ± 7

%Intact 18F-TFB

Plasma

97 ± 2

97 ± 3c

d

d

d

d

Urine

96 ± 2

98 ± 1

97 ± 2

98 ± 1

98 ± 1

97 ± 2

Values are mean ± SD (n = 4)

aTime points are shown for blood samples; urine samples were collected ~ 10 min later

bNo urine in third collection of one male subject

cOne plasma sample was not used because precipitate was observed in the HPLC analysis

dMetabolite data were not obtained in second and third plasma samples analysis because the low radioactivity levels were below detection limit

Metabolite analysis

HPLC metabolite analysis of plasma samples at 40 min p.i. showed > 97% of activity to be in the form of metabolically intact 18F-TFB (Table 2). Similarly, all urine samples taken from urine collections at approximately 50, 160, and 250 min showed > 97% of activity in the form of 18F-TFB. The accumulated percentage of administered 18F-TFB in the urine at the end of study (~ 250 min) was 40 ± 5% for males and 46 ± 7% for females. Thus, renal clearance of non-metabolized 18F-TFB is a major excretion pathway for 18F-TFB. There was no difference between genders in the percent dose excreted in urine at each of the three measurement times or in total percent excreted (p = 0.56, 0.25, 0.48, 0.29). Overall, both whole blood and plasma SUV values significantly decreased over time, both from 45 to 145 min post-injection and again between 145 and 235 min (p = 0.008, all pairwise comparisons).

Biodistribution of 18F-TFB

Representative images from the whole-body PET/CT scan at 2 h post-injection are shown in Fig. 3, and the biodistribution data are summarized in Table 3. Robust uptake of 18F-TFB was observed in the thyroid, stomach, salivary glands, and kidneys. Prominent clearance of tracer through the kidneys to bladder was also observed. Minor differences were observed in the SUV values between the first (2 h) and second (3.5 h, Figure S1, Additional file 1) whole-body PET/CT scans, showing the tracer distribution to be stable after 2 h. All organs showed small but positive changes in SUVs between the two whole-body PET/CT scans; these changes were significant except in the breasts, intestines, pancreas, and stomach. In females, a low but moderate uptake was observed in breast tissue. Relative increases in bone uptake from 2 to 3.5 h ranged widely from 2 to 60% in individual participants, possibly due to individual differences in defluorination. However, since bone uptake was > 10-fold lower than for the tissues with high expression of NIS (thyroid, stomach, salivary glands), bone uptake was not remarkable in the PET/CT images.
Fig. 3

Coronal PET/CT images of 18F-TFB in healthy male (a) and female (b) participants at 2 h post-injection. Physiologic distribution of 18F-TFB is seen in the thyroid, salivary glands, stomach, and intestines. Prominent excretion of radioactivity is seen in the urinary bladder

Table 3

PET/CT-derived distribution of 18F-TFB in healthy participants

Organ

2 h post-injection (SUV)

3.5 h post-injection (SUV)

Males

Females

Males

Females

Bone

0.80 ± 0.33

0.74 ± 0.20

1.4 ± 0.5*

1.3 ± 0.9*

Brain

0.39 ± 0.14

0.42 ± 0.15

0.74 ± 0.26*

0.61 ± 0.34*

Breast

2.8 ± 0.4

3.9 ± 1.4

Gallbladder

2.7 ± 1.5

3.7 ± 1.0

4.2 ± 1.7*

5.0 ± 1.6*

Intestines

2.9 ± 1.0

5.0 ± 2.7

4.4 ± 1.0

6.0 ± 3.1

Kidney

7.0 ± 2.5

5.6 ± 0.7

11 ± 3*

6.3 ± 2.4*

Liver

2.3 ± 1.0

2.7 ± 0.5

3.6 ± 1.2*

3.5 ± 1.6*

Lung

1.0 ± 0.4

1.2 ± 0.4

1.7 ± 0.6*

1.5 ± 0.8*

Muscle

0.71 ± 0.31

0.65 ± 0.35

0.96 ± 0.31*

0.78 ± 0.54*

Myocardium

3.2 ± 0.9

2.8 ± 0.5

5.0 ± 0.9*

3.8 ± 1.8*

Pancreas

3.4 ± 0.7

3.1 ± 1.7

6.2 ± 2.1

3.0 ± 1.2

Parotid

11 ± 9

20 ± 11

16 ± 13*

25 ± 15*

Spleen

4.1 ± 1.2

4.3 ± 1.0

6.3 ± 1.1*

5.5 ± 2.8*

Stomach

33 ± 15

72 ± 10

70 ± 32

51 ± 18

Thyroid

55 ± 31

50 ± 11

82 ± 42*

58 ± 12*

Values are mean ± SD (n = 4)

*p < 0.05 versus 2 h

A significant difference was observed between genders in TFB uptake at scan 1 for the stomach, with females showing higher SUVs (females 72.2 ± 10.2, males 33.4 ± 14.7, p = 0.021). Between scan 1 and scan 2, there was also a significant difference between genders in the change in SUV values for the stomach (females  21 ± 17.4, males 36.4 ± 18.9, p = 0.021), as well as the pancreas (females 0.049 ± 1.14, males 2.74 ± 1.40, p = 0.043). At scan 2, there were no significant differences observed between genders. In the cohort as a whole, all organs showed a positive change in SUVs between scan 1 and scan 2; these changes were significant except in the breast, intestines, pancreas, and stomach.

Radiation dosimetry estimates

Table 4 shows organ residence times derived from the biodistribution data. Bladder residence time was estimated by the bladder emptying model within the OLINDA software, assuming a 3.5-h bladder voiding period. Estimated organ absorbed doses are shown in Table 5. The dose-critical organ is the thyroid, with dose estimates of 0.26 and 0.36 mSv/MBq in males and females, respectively. The prominent excretion through the bladder resulted in moderately high doses to the bladder wall, with doses depending on voiding frequency. Effective doses are shown in Table 6. Effective dose was higher in females (0.064 mSv/MBq) relative to males (0.036 mSv/MBq), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). No significant differences in organ residence times were observed between genders for any organ. Significant gender differences in organ effective doses were observed for the gallbladder wall, lower large intestine wall, small intestine wall, stomach wall, lungs, red marrow cells, spleen, and urinary bladder wall (Table 5).
Table 4

Organ residence times of 18F-TFB in healthy participants

Organ

Residence time males (min)

Residence time females (min)

Bone

4.6 ± 1.3

3.1 ± 0.3

Brain

1.2 ± 0.4

1.3 ± 0.2

Breast

2.8 ± 0.9

Gallbladder

0.06 ± 0.03

0.09 ± 0.04

Intestine

5.7 ± 1.9

13 ± 7

Kidney

4.2 ± 1.2

3.9 ± 0.8

Liver

8.3 ± 3.9

10 ± 2

Lung

2.1 ± 0.7

2.4 ± 0.2

Muscle

36 ± 14

26 ± 8

Myocardium

2.1 ± 0.6

1.8 ± 0.3

Pancreas

0.7 ± 0.3

0.58 ± 0.08

Parotid

1.7 ± 1.1

3.3 ± 1.2

Spleen

1.5 ± 0.4

1.6 ± 0.2

Stomach

11 ± 5

24 ± 12

Thyroid

2.0 ± 0.7

2.3 ± 0.9

Bladder

17 ± 2

19 ± 4

Values are mean ± SD (n = 4)

No significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed in organ residence times between genders

Table 5

Estimated absorbed radiation dose for 18F-TFB (mSv/MBq)

Organ

Dose (mSv/MBq)

Males

Females

Adrenals

0.008

0.012

Brain

0.004

0.005

Breast

0.002

0.028

Gallbladder wall*

0.012

0.022

Lower large intestine wall*

0.009

0.015

Small intestine wall*

0.027

0.066

Stomach wall*

0.076

0.184

Upper large intestine wall

0.045

0.109

Heart wall

0.024

0.030

Kidney

0.049

0.052

Liver

0.021

0.033

Lung*

0.009

0.014

Muscle

0.008

0.011

Ovaries

0.020

Pancreas

0.034

0.043

Red marrow*

0.005

0.008

Osteogenic cells

0.008

0.009

Skin

0.003

0.004

Spleen*

0.033

0.047

Testes

0.005

Thymus

0.004

0.005

Thyroid

0.26

0.36

Urinary bladder wall

0.14

0.22

Uterus

0.022

Total body

0.008

0.011

*p < 0.05 between genders

Table 6

Effective dose for 18F-TFB in healthy participants

 

Males

Females

Effective dose (mSv/MBq)

0.036

0.064

18F-TFB safety data

Vital signs (heart rate, diastolic and systolic blood pressures, and respiratory rate) were monitored before 18F-TFB administration and throughout the PET/CT imaging period. No significant changes in the vital signs were found after 18F-TFB administration (Additional file 1: Table S2). No significant differences between pre- and post-injection measurements were observed in any vital signs (heart rate (p = 0.14), blood pressure (DBP, p = 0.41; SBP, p = 0.88), respiratory rate (p = 0.47), and temperature (p = 0.43)). A panel of clinical laboratory blood tests was measured to assess for effects of 18F-TFB administration on blood chemistries, including electrolytes, and liver and kidney functional tests. While some changes in lab values between pre- and post-injections were statistically significant, the magnitudes of these changes were small, and no clinically meaningful differences were observed (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of high-specific radioactivity 18F-TFB in eight healthy human participants. The tracer was well tolerated, and no adverse effects were noted. hNIS is known to be highly expressed in certain tissues (thyroid, breasts, stomach, and salivary glands) as well as hNIS-transfected tissues. Thus, non-invasive PET imaging of hNIS activity could be used to facilitate the treatment of thyroid and breast cancer and gene therapies that employ hNIS as a reporter gene. In principle, the 18F-TFB PET method may also enable quantitative estimation of hNIS activity in tissues. Therefore, it may be useful to monitor changes over time for understanding the progression of disease and serial assessments of therapy response.

Since only high-specific radioactivity 18F-TFB was administered in this study, we did not explore the effects of specific radioactivity over a broader range. However, in our previous preclinical study with NIS-transfected C6 glioma xenografts in mice, we showed that as specific radioactivity was decreased such that TFB administration levels exceeded ~ 0.5 mg/kg, there was decreases seen in both thyroid and tumor uptake. Since thyroid uptake levels in the healthy participants in this study were very high, it is inferred that the specific radioactivity levels were sufficient to avoid any saturation effects do to administered TFB mass.

The regional distribution of 18F-TFB in healthy participants was found to be consistent with known hNIS expression levels throughout the body tissues. The slow accumulation of 18F-radioactivity seen in SUV values between the 2 and 3.5 h imaging time points could be evidence of a minor degree of radiotracer defluorination, but since routine 18F-TFB PET images will likely be acquired in the 1-2 h post-injection period, the impact of this accumulation is of minor significance. Indeed, bone uptake was not qualitatively remarkable in either the 2 or 3.5 h images. Overall, the biodistribution data confirm 18F-TFB to be an excellent iodide analog radiotracer with an excellent in vivo stability. The blood clearance kinetics were found to be adequately fit by a 3-exponential model, with the slowest component representing 14–20% of peak activity and showing a half-clearance time of about 30 min. No gender differences were noted in the pharmacokinetics. For purposes of static PET/CT imaging, an uptake period of 45–60 min should allow good clearance of tracer from blood and tissues with low expression of NIS.

NIS expression in breast cancer has been noted in several reports [16, 17]. The normal uptake of 18F-TFB in breasts of healthy female participants was found to be above adjacent background, showing SUVs in the 2.8–3.9 range (Table 2). Further studies will be required to determine whether 18F-TFB uptake in primary or metastatic breast tumors will be sufficiently higher relative to healthy breast tissue to allow evaluation of breast cancer.

Gene therapy has been extensively applied in various liver diseases, such as liver cancer and hepatitis [18, 19]. In a previous 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging of Pig Y842 [20], in which hepatocytes were transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing the therapeutic fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH) and the reporter NIS genes, significant 18F-TFB uptake was demonstrated in the liver, thus allowing non-invasive evaluation of repopulating cluster of FAH+, while no liver uptake in the control pigs. The result shows 18F-TFB may serve as a promising tracer for human liver gene therapy. The low physiologic uptake of 18F-TFB in the liver is advantageous for monitoring of viral therapies with NIS reporter genes.

The estimated radiation doses were highest in the thyroid, urinary bladder wall, lower large intestine wall, small intestine wall, upper large intestine wall, heart wall, kidneys, liver, pancreas, and spleen, but on par with other 18F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals and appropriate for clinical use. Further decrease in bladder wall doses can be realized with good hydration and more frequent voiding of the bladder. Estimated effective doses were 0.036 mSv/MBq in males and 0.064 mSv/MBq in females, showing a trend of higher effective dose in females that was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The effective dose estimates for 18F-TFB were about twofold higher than those reported for 18F-FDG [21]. Our data on the biodistribution and dosimetry estimates for 18F-TFB are in general agreement with the results very recently published by O’Doherty et al. [11] in five patients with thyroid cancer. In that study, 2 male and 3 female subjects were studied, and the results from both genders were pooled. The specific radioactivity of their 18F-TFB preparations (24 ± 13 MBq/μg) was similar to the specific radioactivity obtained in this study. Quinn et al. [21] investigated 18F-FDG dosimetry estimates in 95 men and 88 women, also finding higher but not statistically different effective doses in the female group. For comparison with other NIS-imaging radiotracers, the effective doses (mSv/MBq) of radioiodines 123I (0.23–0.31), 124I (13–18), and 131I (22–29) are significantly higher than the estimates for 18F-TFB (0.051 mSv/MBq for averaged male and females), whereas that of 99mTc-TcO4 is lower (0.013 mSv/MBq) [22]. The higher effective doses of the radioiodines can be attributed to differences in biodistribution secondary to (1) different affinity of iodine for NIS transporters; (2) organification of iodine within thyroid, incorporation into thyroid hormone molecules, and subsequent redistribution of these metabolites; and/or (3) higher urinary excretion of 18F-TFB and 99mTc-TcO4.

This study had the limitation that the choice to acquire early dynamic imaging over the heart to measure radiotracer pharmacokinetics with high temporal resolution from left-ventricular blood pool regions precluded acquisition of whole-body biodistribution information in the first hour after injection. To allow for collection of urine and give the subjects a rest break from the scanner, the first of two trunk PET/CT scans were commenced at 2 h post-injection. For calculation of radiation dosimetry estimates, the distribution of radioactivity in the regions not represented in the initial dynamic data was assumed to be static (accounting for radioactive decay) between the time of injection and the 2-h time point. This assumption may lead to error in the dosimetry estimates, although the very slow blood clearance kinetics after 1 h (Fig. 2) and the very similar biodistribution pattern seen and 2 and 3.5 h PET/CT scans (Table 2) suggests that there is a minimal 18F-TFB redistribution in the body once the tracer is taken up in tissues. Indeed, O′ Doherty et al. [11] recently acquired serial whole-body images of 18F-TFB immediately after IV injection in five thyroid cancer patients, showing there was very similar biodistribution of radiotracer from about 15 min to 2 h with major uptake organs being salivary glands, thyroid, stomach, and bladder. Their dosimetry estimates were very similar to those obtained in the present study.

Conclusions

18F-TFB was found to be well tolerated by the participants in the study. The rapid pharmacokinetics, absence of metabolism, and specific biodistribution to NIS-expressing tissues of high-specific radioactivity 18F-TFB in healthy human participants support its use as an iodide analog radiotracer for evaluation of thyroid and breast cancers and monitoring of gene therapies that employ the hNIS reporter gene. The radiation dosimetry estimates are on par with other 18F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals with prominent renal excretion (e.g., 18F-FDG) and are acceptable for clinical imaging purposes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Jeffrey Brunette for assistance with radiation dosimetry and Terry Brinkman for her efforts as study coordinator. We appreciate Mark Jacobson and Ping Fang and all the staff in the PET facility for their assistance of 18F-TFB production and QC analysis.

Funding

The work was supported by the NIH (CA196975) and the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic.

Authors’ contributions

HJ developed the radiotracer synthesis, performed metabolite analysis, and drafted the manuscript. NS performed the image analysis. AK performed the image analysis and dosimetry calculations. AB performed the metabolite analysis. MP participated in the radiotracer synthesis. RG performed the PET/CT imaging and plasma and urine sample collection. BK participated in the image analysis. KD participated in the research coordination and clinical data collection. AD and JB-G participated in the conception of study. K-WP and SR contributed in the conception of study and data interpretation. TG performed the statistical analysis. VL contributed to the conception of study and helped to draft the manuscript. TD conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants provided informed consent. Approval of the study was obtained from the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (no. 15-02494). All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

Dr. Stephen Russell owns stock and is founder of Vyriad. Dr. Russell owns stock and is co-founder of Imanis Life Sciences. Dr. Kah Whye Peng owns stock and is co-founder of Imanis Life Sciences. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic
(2)
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic
(4)
Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic
(5)
Department of Clinical Statistics, Mayo Clinic

References

  1. Chung JK. Sodium iodide symporter: its role in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1188–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Penheiter AR, Russell SJ, Carlson SK. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as an imaging reporter for gene, viral, and cell-based therapies. Curr Gene Ther. 2012;12:33–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn BC. Sodium iodide symporter for nuclear molecular imaging and gene therapy: from bedside to bench and back. Theranostics. 2012;2:392–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dai G, Levy O, Carrasco N. Cloning and characterization of the thyroid iodide transporter. Nature. 1996;379:458–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eskandari S, Loo DD, Dai G, Levy O, Wright EM, Carrasco N. Thyroid Na+/I− symporter: mechanism, stoichiometry, and specificity. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27230–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller A, Russell SJ. The use of the NIS reporter gene for optimizing oncolytic virotherapy. Expert Opin on Biol Ther. 2016;16:15–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jauregui-Osoro M, Sunassee K, Weeks AJ, Berry DJ, Paul RL, Cleij M, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of F-18 tetrafluoroborate: a PET imaging agent for thyroid disease and reporter gene imaging of the sodium/iodide symporter. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2108–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Weeks AJ, Jauregui-Osoro M, Cleij M, Blower JE, Ballinger JR, Blower PJ. Evaluation of F-18 -tetrafluoroborate as a potential PET imaging agent for the human sodium/iodide symporter in a new colon carcinoma cell line, HCT116, expressing hNIS. Nucl Med Comm. 2011;32:98–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Marti-Climent JM, Collantes M, Jauregui-Osoro M, Quincoces G, Prieto E, Bilbao I, et al. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution in non-human primates of the sodium/iodide PET ligand F-18-tetrafluoroborate. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Youn H, Jeong JM, Chung J-KA. New PET probe, F-18-tetrafluoroborate, for the sodium/iodide symporter: possible impacts on nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2105–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. O' Doherty J, Jauregui-Osoro M, Brothwood T, Szyszko T, Marsden P, O'Doherty M, et al. 18F-tetrafluoroborate (18F-TFB), a PET probe for imaging sodium-iodide symporter expression: whole-body biodistribution, safety and radiation dosimetry in thyroid cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1666–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang H, Bansal A, Pandey MK, Peng KW, Suksanpaisan L, Russell SJ, et al. Synthesis of F-18-tetrafluoroborate via radiofluorination of boron trifluoride and evaluation in a murine C6-glioma tumor model. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1454–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Khoshnevisan A, Jauregui-Osoro M, Shaw K, Torres JB, Young JD, Ramakrishnan NK, et al. F-18 tetrafluoroborate as a PET tracer for the sodium/iodide symporter: the importance of specific activity. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang H, Bansal A, Pandey M, Peng KW, Suksanpaisan L, Russell SJ, et al. Synthesis of 18F-tetrafluoroborate (18F-TFB) via radiofluorination of boron trifluoride and evaluation in a murine C6-glioma tumor model. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:S2721a.Google Scholar
  15. Schleien B, Slaback LA Jr, Birky BK. Handbook of health physics and radiological health. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1998. p. 12–23.Google Scholar
  16. Tazebay UH, Wapnir IL, Levy O, Dohan O, Zuckier LS, Zhao QH, et al. The mammary gland iodide transporter is expressed during lactation and in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2000;6:871–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Beyer SJ, Zhang X, Jimenez RE, Lee ML, Richardson AL, Huang K, et al. Microarray analysis of genes associated with cell surface NIS protein levels in breast cancer. BMC Research Notes. 2011;4:397.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang JF, Chen PJ, Sze DY, Reid T, Bartlett D, Kirn DH, et al. Oncolytic virotherapy for advanced liver tumours. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:1238–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aravalli RN, Belcher JD, Steer CJ. Liver-targeted gene therapy: approaches and challenges. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:718–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickey RD, Mao SA, Glorioso J, Elgilani F, Amiot B, Chen H, et al. Curative ex vivo liver-directed gene therapy in a pig model of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:349ra99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Quinn B, Dauer Z, Pandit-Taskar N, Schoeder H, Dauer LT. Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates. BMC Med Imaging. 2016;16:41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Mattsson S, Johansson L, Leide-Svegborn S, Liniecki J, Nosske D, Riklund KA, et al. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP publication 128. Ann ICRP 44(2S), 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017