Skip to content

Advertisement

EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research Cover Image
  • Original research
  • Open Access

Immuno-PET of epithelial ovarian cancer: harnessing the potential of CA125 for non-invasive imaging

  • 1, 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 2Email author
EJNMMI Research20144:60

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-014-0060-4

©  Sharma et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

  • Received: 2 September 2014
  • Accepted: 24 October 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is characterized by the overexpression of cancer antigen 125 (CA125), a mucinous glycoprotein that serves as a tumor biomarker. Early diagnosis of EOC is plagued by its asymptomatic nature of progression and the limitations of currently used immunoassay techniques that detect CA125 as a shed antigen in serum samples. Presently, there is no technique available for the in vivo evaluation of CA125 expression in malignant tissues. Moreover, there could be an unexplored pathophysiological time window for the detection of CA125 in EOC, during which it is expressed on tumor cells prior to being shed into the bloodstream. A method for the in vivo evaluation of CA125 expression on ovarian neoplasms earlier along disease progression and/or recurrence can potentially contribute to better disease management. To this end, the present work utilizes an anti-CA125 monoclonal antibody (MAb) and a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) labeled with the positron-emitting radionuclide 64Cu for preclinical molecular imaging of CA125 expression in vivo.

Methods

Anti-CA125 MAb and scFv were prepared and functionally characterized for target binding prior to being tested as radiotracers in a preclinical setting.

Results

Immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry revealed specific binding of CA125-targeting vectors to NIH:OVCAR-3 cells and no binding to antigen-negative SKOV3 cells. 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb and scFv were obtained in specific activities of 296 and 122 MBq/mg, respectively. Both radioimmunoconjugate vectors demonstrated highly selective binding to NIH:OVCAR-3 cells and virtually no binding to SKOV3 cells. In vivo radiopharmacological evaluation using xenograft mouse models injected with 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb provided a standardized uptake value (SUV) of 5.76 (29.70 %ID/g) in OVCAR3 tumors 24 h post-injection (p.i.) versus 1.80 (5.91 %ID/g) in SKOV3 tumors. 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 scFv provided an SUV of 0.64 (3.21 %ID/g) in OVCAR3 tumors 24 h p.i. versus 0.25 (1.49 %ID/g) in SKOV3 tumors. Results from small-animal PET imaging were confirmed by ex vivo autoradiography and immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions

Radiolabeling of anti-CA125 MAb and scFv with 64Cu did not compromise their immunoreactivity. Both radioimmunoconjugates presented specific tumor uptake and expected biological clearance profiles. This renders them as potential immuno-PET probes for targeted in vivo molecular imaging of CA125 in EOC.

Keywords

  • Antibody
  • CA125
  • Copper-64
  • Positron emission tomography
  • Epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

Despite its relative rarity in the general population and the availability of standard treatment through surgical intervention and platinum chemotherapy, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) continues to be the most insidious and lethal gynecologic malignancy in the western world. The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program has estimated 21,980 new cases of ovarian cancer to occur in 2014, with 14,270 deaths resulting from this disease in the United States alone [1]. A combination of the asymptomatic nature of this malignancy and the high incidence of recurrence results in a low 5-year survival rate of 44.6% [1].

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is a high molecular weight mucinous glycoprotein overexpressed on the membrane of EOC cells [2]-[4]. It has clinical relevance as a standard-of-care serum biomarker for ovarian cancer surveillance despite expression in some non-gynecologic malignancies and benign conditions such as pregnancy, menstruation, endometriosis, liver disease, and congestive heart failure [3],[4]. Post-treatment elevation of serum CA125 level in EOC patients serves as an indicator of progressive disease and finds clinical application in the management of patients with documented evidence of ovarian cancer [3]-[7]. However, a normal CA125 serum titer does not necessarily imply an absence of the disease. This is exemplified by the fact that an estimated 50% of patients with normal levels of CA125 post-chemotherapy have small volumes of active disease at second-look surgery, and a large portion of this population succumbs to recurrence from the disease [5],[6]. Presently, serial CA125 levels in patients are evaluated using immunoassays.

However, despite their indicative utility, such assays can be far from delivering a true representation of the in vivo pathophysiological pattern and may be limited in their capabilities for early detection of ovarian neoplasms.

On a time scale of events for the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer, it is known that radiological detection of the disease precedes the presentation of clinically diagnosable symptoms by 2 to 3 months. Furthermore, there is a median lag of 2 months between the elevation of CA125 alone and the radiological detection of this disease [5],[6]. Among contemporary imaging modalities, [18F] FDG-PET has shown the highest sensitivity and accuracy in detecting recurrent ovarian cancer, while simultaneous investigations with CT, MRI, and ultrasound which primarily detect morphological features and anatomical changes that can be distorted on account of primary cyto-reductive surgery in patients yielded negative or equivocal results [8]-[11].

Considering these facts, we hypothesized that a non-invasive approach using targeted immuno-PET to directly image the in vivo overexpression of CA125 on epithelial ovarian neoplasms may detect the malignancy at an earlier time, while providing a more accurate in vivo evaluation of tumor load and residual disease. Further, this approach could gain relevance when used in a pathophysiological time window wherein CA125 expression is limited to the surface of ovarian neoplasms prior to its shedding into the bloodstream. Our hypothesis is strengthened further by a mathematical model proposed by Hori and Gambhir [12] whereby an ovarian tumor may grow for 10.6 years before attaining a size of 10.52 mm3 before it starts to shed just enough CA125 antigen (1.5 U/mL) detectable by immunoassay methods used in the clinic.

Owing to its ability for targeting CA125 in ovarian cancer, MAb-B43.13 has been employed as an immunotherapeutic agent in the treatment of EOC [13]-[15]. More recently, immuno-PET has emerged as a strategy that unifies the specificity of antibody-based targeting with the sensitivity for detection imparted by positron-emitting radionuclides in PET in order to render a superlative diagnostic potential [16].

Findings from previous research with MAb-B43.13 and more recent reports for antibody-based radiotracers targeting biomarkers such as PSMA [17] and CA19-9 [18], which have similar pathophysiological nature in prostate and pancreatic cancers, respectively, motivated us to develop an immuno-PET strategy for the in vivo imaging of EOC. Additionally, we developed an antibody fragment of MAb-B43.13, in order to produce a radiotracer that could retain antigen-binding properties like the full-length antibody but achieve faster in vivo clearance and better tumor penetration as a function of its smaller molecular size, which may ultimately yield high-contrast in vivo PET images at earlier time points post-injection. To this end, MAb-B43.13 and its derivative single-chain variable fragment (scFv-B43.13) were labeled with positron emitter 64Cu (t1/2 12.7 h) and analyzed in vitro and in vivo using CA125 overexpressing NIH:OVCAR-3 cells and CA125-negative SKOV3 cells in preclinical EOC xenograft mouse models.

Methods

Expression and purification of anti-CA125 MAb and scFv

The murine monoclonal IgG1 antibody targeting human CA125 was produced from hybridoma B43.13 [19] that was kindly provided by Quest Pharma Tech Inc., Edmonton, Canada. The hybridoma cell culture supernatant was used to purify the MAb-B43.13 by protein G affinity (P-7700, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) on a BioLogic DuoFlow™ chromatography system (760-0135, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). MAb-B43.13-derived anti-CA125 scFv was produced with modifications to previously described constructs [20],[21]. Briefly, the DNA sequence encoding scFv-B43.13 was cloned into a pET22b + vector with a modified inter-chain linker, and the protein was expressed in Escherichia coli Rosetta 2 DE3 (Novagen, 71400-3, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The C-terminal hexa-histidine-tagged scFv was purified from the soluble fraction of recombinant cell lysates by immobilized metal affinity chromatography using a TALON® Superflow resin (635507, Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).

Cell lines and culture conditions

Ovarian cancer cell lines NIH:OVCAR-3 (ATCC® HTB-161™, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and SKOV3 (ATCC® HTB-77™) were used for in vitro and in vivo studies. Cells were cultured in DMEM-F12 medium supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 IU/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin (Gibco®, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). NIH:OVCAR-3 cells were additionally supplemented with 7 μg/mL recombinant human insulin (91077C, SAFC Biosciences, Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA). Cells were cultured using sterile techniques and grown in a 37°C incubator providing humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

Characterization of CA125-targeting vectors

Western blotting

NIH:OVCAR-3 and SKOV3 cells (7.5 × 106) were lysed with CelLytic™ M (C2978, Sigma-Aldrich). The cell lysates were electrophoresed on a 4% to 15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ precast gel (456-1085, Bio-Rad) and transferred to a Trans-Blot nitrocellulose membrane (162-0115, Bio-Rad). The membranes were probed separately to evaluate MAb versus scFv binding to the target antigen in cell lysates. The blots were blocked for 45 min with 5% non-fat dry milk (Carnation) in PBS having 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST). Anti-CA125 MAb (3 mg/mL), mouse anti-β actin IgG (A1978, Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-CA125 scFv (3 mg/mL) were used as primary antibodies to probe the blots at 1:5,000 dilutions for 1 h at room temperature. Goat anti-mouse HRP conjugate (A4416, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as secondary antibody to probe the blot against anti-CA125 MAb and mouse anti-β actin IgG at 1:5,000 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. 6xHis MAb-HRP conjugate (631210, Clontech) was used as secondary antibody at 1:5,000 dilution to probe against anti-CA125 scFv for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were washed with PBST and developed on Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (28906839, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) using Amersham ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection Reagents (RPN2132, GE Healthcare).

Fluorescent labeling of anti-CA125 MAb/scFv

One milligram each of anti-CA125 MAb and scFv at concentrations of 2 mg/mL were fluorescently labeled using the Pierce® fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) antibody labeling kit (53027, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Flow cytometry

NIH:OVCAR-3 cells (1.5 × 106) were harvested by trypsinization, rinsed twice with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (PBS with 0.5% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM EDTA, 0.05% sodium azide), and re-suspended by gentle tapping in an approximately 100 μl FACS buffer. Ten micrograms of anti-CA125 MAb or scFv was incubated with the cell suspension for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were rinsed twice in FACS buffer and incubated for 30 min with 4 μg of Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-mouse antibody (A-11001, Life Technologies) for the MAb samples and 4 μg of Penta • His Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (35310, Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands) for the scFv samples. Cells were rinsed twice with FACS buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry on a BD FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). A dengue virus targeting IgG1-12A1 and a hexa-histidine-tagged anti-RANK receptor binding scFv were used as isotype controls for the experiments. Negative controls included unstained NIH:OVCAR-3 cells and cells incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated antibodies alone.

Immunofluorescence

NIH:OVCAR-3 and SKOV3 cells were plated onto glass coverslips in 35-mm tissue culture dishes (100,000 cells/2 mL medium/dish) and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The cells were rinsed with PBS and fixed in methanol for 30 min at -20°C. The fixed cells were incubated in 5% non-fat dry milk (Carnation) in PBS for 30 min and immunostained separately for 1 h with FITC-labeled versus unlabeled anti-CA125 MAb and scFv. The unlabeled MAb and scFv samples were indirectly stained with corresponding Alexa Fluor 488-labeled secondary antibodies as used for flow cytometry experiments.

Anti-CA125 MAb and scFv (2 mg/mL) were used at 1:250 dilution followed by 1:500 dilutions of secondary antibodies (2 mg/mL) in PBS containing 5% non-fat dry milk. Appropriate blank and control samples were included in the experiments. Antibody incubations were followed by three rinses with PBST for 5 min each. Coverslips were mounted on microscopy slides (Fisherbrand, 12-550-003, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using Mowiol® mounting medium (Calbiochem, 475904, Millipore Co., Billerica, MA, USA) supplemented with DAPI (50 μg/mL). Immunofluorescence was observed through a Zeiss Plan Apochromat 40X/1.3 Oil DIC M27 lens on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 710, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were analyzed using Zen 2011 software. Separately, 30 μg of FITC-labeled anti-CA125 MAb was added to NIH:OVCAR-3 cells grown on coverslips and allowed to incubate under standard cell culture conditions over a period of 48 h to study uptake in live cells. Coverslips were washed and mounted on glass slides for analysis by confocal microscopy at 0.5-, 1-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points.

Surface plasmon resonance

Kinetic constants for association (ka) and dissociation (kd) and affinity constant KD for anti-CA125 MAb-B43.13 and scFv-B43.13 were determined by surface plasmon resonance on a Biacore 3000 instrument (GE Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Upon activation of a CM5 sensor chip with a 1:1 mixture of N-hydroxysuccinimide/N-ethyl-N'-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride, amine coupling of antigen-grade human ovarian cancer native CA125 protein (MBS318371, MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) dissolved in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 5.0 was performed to couple approximately 1,200 relative units. The remaining reactive groups in the control and test lanes were inactivated using ethanolamine from the amine coupling kit (GE Life Sciences). The binding of antibody vectors to CA125 immobilized on the CM5 chip was assessed in duplicates across concentration ranges between 18.7 nM and 9.33 μM for MAb-B43.13 and 19.6 nM and 19.6 μM for the scFv-B43.13, respectively. Each sample of MAb/scFv in the aforementioned concentrations in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0) was injected for 3 min at a flow rate of 30 μL/min to allow binding with the antigen. The binding buffer was allowed to flow over the sensor chip for 15 min at a rate of 30 μL/min to allow for the dissociation of bound MAb/scFv from the antigen on the chip. Next, the regeneration buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.0 supplemented with 800 mM KCl) was passed over the chip surface to achieve dissociation of any remaining bound analyte, followed by 2 min for stabilization before the next injection. BIAcore control software 3.2 was used to analyze the data, and the best 1:1 Langmuir binding fit was used to derive kinetic constants.

Preparation of CA125-targeting radioimmunoconjugates

General

All glassware was rinsed with ultra-pure HCl (Fisherbrand, A508-P500, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Trace metal basis ultra-pure chemicals for buffer preparations were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All buffer solutions were treated with biotechnology-grade Chelex 100 (143-2832, Bio-Rad).

NOTA functionalization

p-SCN-Bn-NOTA [S-2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid] (B-605, Macrocyclics, Dallas, TX, USA) was conjugated to anti-CA125 MAb and scFv to serve as a bifunctional chelator for 64Cu radiolabeling. Briefly, a 6 M excess of p-SCN-Bn-NOTA in DMSO was added to anti-CA125 MAb/scFv in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer pH 9.0 and allowed to react for 1 h at 37 C. NOTA-functionalized anti-CA125 MAb/scFv was purified from excess unconjugated bifunctional chelator while simultaneously achieving buffer exchange into 0.25 M sodium acetate pH 5.5 by using an Econo-Pac 10DG desalting column (732-2010, Bio-Rad). Protein quantification of the column-eluted fractions was performed using A280 measurements on nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific) and bicinchoninic assay (Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit, 23227) using a Synergy H1 multimode microplate reader for A562 absorbance read-out. The number of bifunctional chelates conjugated per MAb and scFv was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS analysis and according to the method described by Cooper et al. [22]. The purified immunoconjugates were used in radiolabeling experiments.

Cu labeling of NOTA-functionalized MAb/scFv

64Cu was produced via a 64Ni(p, n)64Cu nuclear reaction on a CS-15 biomedical cyclotron at Washington University, St. Louis, USA as previously described [23] and supplied as high specific activity 64CuCl2 in 0.1 N HCl. Ammonium acetate (0.1 M; pH 5.5) was added to 64CuCl2 to form 64Cu-acetate 64Cu (OAc)2 solution. To 100 μg of NOTA-functionalized MAb/scFv, 85 MBq of 64Cu (OAc)2 was added and allowed to react on a thermomixer at 30°C, 550 rpm for 1 h. EDTA (1 mM) was added to quench the reaction over 10 min. 64Cu-labeled MAb/scFv radioimmunoconjugates were purified on an Econo-Pac 10DG desalting column pre-equilibrated with 0.25 M sodium acetate, pH 5.5 used as the eluant. Elution fractions (350 μL) were collected from the column, and the radioactivity was measured using an Atomlab 400 dose calibrator (Biodex, Shirley, NY, USA). Fifteen microliters of each elution fraction was electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel under non-reducing conditions and evaluated by autoradiography on a BAS-5000 phosphorimager (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Radiochemical yields and purity were determined by instant thin layer chromatography on ITLC-SG (SGI001, Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), using 10 mM EDTA pH 5.5 as the eluant. Fractions containing high specific activity radioimmunoconjugates were used for in vitro and in vivo radiopharmacological experiments. Monoclonal IgG1 antibody 12A1 was modified into an immunoconjugate and radiolabeled with 64Cu as described above to serve as a non-specific isotype control for in vivo experiments.

Functional characterization of CA125-targeting radioimmunoconjugates

Cell uptake studies

NIH:OVCAR-3 and SKOV3 cells were seeded to obtain 250,000 cells per well in 12-well tissue culture plates. Prior to the uptake experiment, the growth medium was removed and cells were rinsed twice with PBS and incubated in Krebs buffer at 37 C for 1 h. The radioimmunoconjugate (100 KBq) was added to each well except those assigned to measure background activity alone. Cell uptake was terminated at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min by adding ice-cold Krebs buffer and rinsing the wells twice to wash away any unbound radioimmunoconjugates prior to lysing the cells with RIPA buffer.

The cell lysates were transferred to scintillation vials and measured for radioactivity using a γ-counter (Wizard2® 2480 Automatic Gamma Counter, PerkinElmer, Ontario, Canada). Protein levels were quantified using a Pierce™ BCA protein assay kit according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Cell uptake levels were normalized to percentage of the total amount of radioactivity per milligram of protein (% radioactivity/mg protein) and plotted as a function of time. All experiments were performed in triplicates.

Immunoreactivity of the radioimmunoconjugates was assessed by cell binding assays according to the method of Lindmo et al. [24].

In vivo experiments

Xenograft models

All animal experiments were carried out according to guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) and approved by the local animal care committee of the Cross Cancer Institute. Six-week-old BALB/c nude female mice were obtained from Charles River labs (Quebec, Canada). The animals were housed in ventilated cages and provided food and water ad libitum. NIH:OVCAR-3 tumors were induced on the left shoulder by two subcutaneous injections of 15 × 106 and 10 × 106 cells in a 300 μL suspension of 1:1 mixture of PBS and Matrigel (354234, BD Biosciences). The second injection of cells was administered at the same site within 7 to 10 days. NIH:OVCAR-3 tumors grew for 6 to 8 weeks before reaching suitable tumor sizes of 150 to 200 mm3.

SKOV3 tumors were induced on the left shoulder by a single subcutaneous injection of 5 × 106 cells in PBS and were grown for about 2 to 3 weeks before achieving similar tumor sizes.

Animal imaging

Small-animal PET experiments were performed on a MicroPET® R4 or INVEON PET scanner (Siemens Preclinical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA). Mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane in 40% oxygen/60% nitrogen, 1 L/min, while maintaining body temperature at 37°C throughout the experiment; 6 to 10 MBq of high specific activity radioimmunoconjugate (approximately 30 to 40 μg) in 150 to 200 μL of 0.25 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) was administered intravenously via a tail vein catheter. For blocking experiments, 1 mg of unmodified anti-CA125 MAb was administered intraperitoneally 24 h prior to injection of the 64Cu-labeled radioimmunoconjugates. In separate animals, 8 to 10 MBq of 64Cu-labeled 12A1 IgG1 was administered via tail vein injection to evaluate non-specific uptake. Whole-body PET data was acquired by performing static scans for each animal at 24 h post-injection (p.i.) and 48 h p.i. Data acquisition continued for 60 min in 3D list mode. The image files were reconstructed using the maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm. The image files were further processed using the ROVER v 2.0.51 software (ABX GmbH, Radeberg, Germany). Masks for defining 3D regions of interest (ROI) were set, and the ROIs were defined by thresholding. Standardized uptake values [SUV = (activity/mL tissue)/(injected activity/body weight), mL g-1] were calculated for each ROI. Additionally, radioactivity uptake was also analyzed as percentage of injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g). Data are expressed as means ± SEM from n investigated animals.

Ex vivo analyses

An NIH:OVCAR-3 tumor-bearing mouse was injected with 4.55 MBq of 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb via the tail vein. At 24 h p.i., the animal was euthanized by cervical dislocation. The tumor was submerged into OCT medium and flash frozen using a bath of dry ice-cooled methanol. Seven-micrometer slices were cut on a Leica CM 1850 cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Singapore).

Autoradiography

Tissue sections were placed into a BAS-Cassette (2325, Fujifilm) and exposed to a phosphor imaging plate (BAS-MS 2025, Fujifilm) for 15 h at room temperature. The images were developed on a BAS-5000 reader (Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.) and analyzed with Adaptive Image Deconvolution Algorithm (AIDA) Image Analyzer v.450 software.

Immunofluorescence

Upon thawing, tissue sections were fixed with formalin for 30 min. The fixed sections were blocked overnight at 4°C using 0.12 mg/mL unconjugated goat anti-mouse Fab fragment (115-003-007, Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) in 0.5% fish skin gelatin (G7765, Sigma-Aldrich) pH 7.4, supplemented with 0.1% Triton X-100. The sections were rinsed 3× with Tris-buffered saline having 0.5% Tween 20 (TBST) for 5 min each. MAb-B43.13 was used as primary antibody at a dilution of 1:6,000 in Dako antibody diluent (S0809, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and allowed to incubate overnight at 4 C. The sections were rinsed 3× with TBST and incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-mouse antibody (A-11001, Life Technologies) used as secondary antibody at 1:400 dilution in Dako antibody diluent for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes with TBST, the sections were rinsed with water and counterstained using Hoechst H33342 (2 μg/mL) for 5 min. The sections were rinsed and mounted under a coverslip using FluorSave (345789, Calbiochem). The slides were analyzed with a Zeiss Plan Apochromat 10X/0.45 na lens on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 710) using Z-stack for image acquisition. The images were registered using Zen 2011 software (Zeiss) and further processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6.

Immunohistochemistry

To analyze the samples for immunohistochemistry, the same procedures for treatment, fixation, blocking, and probing of tissue with primary antibody were followed. DakoEnVision™ + HRP-conjugated anti-mouse antibody was used as a secondary antibody, and no counterstain was employed. The sections were observed with a Zeiss Fluar 2.5X/0.12 na lens on an Axioskop 2 Plus microscope. Images were processed and analyzed on AxioVision 4.7 (Zeiss) and further processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as means ± SEM. Graphs were constructed using GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software). Where applicable, statistical differences were tested by unpaired Student's t test and were considered significant for p <0.05.

Results

Isolation, characterization, and modification of CA125-targeting vectors

CA125-targeting vectors were purified in yields of 6 mg/L for MAb-B43.13 and 0.7 mg/L for the scFv (Figure 1A). Analysis by Western blot (Figure 1B) and immunofluorescence staining (Figure 2A) ascertained the following: a) expression of CA125 in NIH:OVCAR-3 cells, b) absence of CA125 expression in SKOV3 cells, and c) binding of MAb and scFv to target antigen CA125. Isothiocyanate-based labeling of anti-CA125 MAb and scFv with fluorescein yielded 2 mol of FITC per mole of MAb and scFv. SPR analysis calculated an affinity constant of 2.56 × 10-9 M for MAb-B43.13 and 1.11 × 10-8 M for the scFv, with comparable dissociation constants in the range of 10-4s-1 (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Representative images and Western blots. (A) Representative images of purified anti-CA125 MAb (148 KDa) and scFv (28 KDa) upon SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions. (B) Western blots of SKOV3 (CA125-) and NIH:OVCAR-3 (CA125+) cells with anti-CA125 MAb, anti-β actin antibody (left side of molecular weight marker); anti-CA125 scFv, and anti-β actin antibody (right side of molecular weight marker).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. (A) Confocal microscopy images from immunofluorescence studies. (a-b) Immunostaining of NIH:OVCAR-3 cells with unlabeled versus FITC-labeled anti-CA125 MAb. Goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 IgG (GAM-A488) was used as secondary antibody. (c-d) Immunostaining of NIH:OVCAR-3 cells with unlabeled versus FITC-labeled anti-CA125 scFv. Penta-His Alexa Fluor 488 antibody was used as secondary antibody. (e) Unstained NIH:OVCAR-3 cells - blank. (f) NIH:OVCAR-3 cells stained with GAM-A488 antibody - negative control. (g) NIH:OVCAR-3 cells stained with Penta-His Alexa Fluor 488 antibody - negative control. (h) Immunostaining of NIH:OVCAR-3 cells with MAb 12A1 and GAM-A488 antibody - isotype control. (i-j) Immunostaining of SKOV3 cells with unlabeled versus FITC-labeled anti-CA125 MAb. (k-l) Immunostaining of SKOV3 cells with unlabeled versus FITC-labeled anti-CA125 scFv. Scale bar represents 10 μm. Flow cytometry analysis of (B) anti-CA125 MAb and (C) anti-CA125 scFv binding to NIH:OVCAR-3 cells.

Immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry analysis with the FITC-labeled MAb and scFv demonstrated preserved immunoreactivity by binding to CA125 antigen expressed on the membrane of NIH:OVCAR-3 cells, and no binding was seen with SKOV3 cells (Figure 2A, B, C).

FITC-labeled anti-CA125 MAb remained membrane bound over a period of 48 h with minimal cellular internalization observed upon incubation with live NIH:OVCAR-3 cells in culture (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Confocal microscopy images of NIH:OVCAR-3 cells directly immunostained with FITC-labeled anti-CA125 MAb over 48 h.

Development and functional assessment of CA125-targeting radioimmunoconjugates

MALDI-TOF analyses and isotopic dilution assays revealed an average of 2.4 NOTA molecules conjugated per MAb and 1.9 NOTA molecules conjugated per scFv (Additional file 1: Figures S2 and S3). 64Cu-labeling and purification of radioimmunoconjugates provided isolated radiochemical yields of 65% ±8% (n = 14) with specific activity of 296 ± 37 MBq/mg for anti-CA125 MAb and 56% ±14% (n = 9) with specific activity of 122 ± 44 MBq/mg for anti-CA125 scFv (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Schematic representation of 64 Cu-labeling of NOTA conjugated anti-CA125 MAb and scFv.

Radiochemical purity of the isolated radioimmunoconjugates was greater than 99% as analyzed by ITLC (Additional file 1: Figure S4) and phosphor images of electrophoresed fractions (Additional file 1: Figure S5). Purified radioimmunoconjugates were >95% stable in human AB-type serum over 48 h (Additional file 1: Figures S6 and S7) and demonstrated highly specific binding to CA125 expressed on NIH:OVCAR-3 cells with virtually no binding to SKOV3 cells as evaluated by cell uptake studies (Figure 5A, B). Immunoreactivity of 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb and scFv preparations was found to be >90% as obtained from the inverse of the intercept of plots seen in Figure 5C, D, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Cell uptake and double inverse plots. Graphs for cell uptake of (A)64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb and (B)64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 scFv in NIH:OVCAR-3 and SKOV3 cells. Representative double inverse plots from Lindmo assays performed with (C)64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb and (D)64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 scFv in NIH:OVCAR-3 cells.

In vivo experiments and radiopharmacological evaluation

PET imaging studies performed with 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb and scFv in NIH:OVCAR-3 and SKOV-3 tumor-bearing mice as well as experiments with 64Cu-labeled isotype IgG and [18F] FDG are summarized in Figure 6.
Figure 6
Figure 6

PET images and diagrams. (A-E, G-I) Representative 24-h post-injection small-animal-PET images of xenograft mice injected with radioimmunoconjugates. (F) 1-h p.i. PET image of NIH:OVCAR-3 xenograft mouse injected with 18 F-FDG. Color intensity scale bars represent standardized uptake value (SUV) of radiotracer in animals. Diagrams on the right show (J) SUV in tumors of experimental and control animals using 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb, (K) SUV in NIH:OVCAR-3 tumors after correction for non-specific uptake, (L) tumor SUV obtained from injection of 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb in NIH:OVCAR-3 versus SKOV3 xenograft mice, and (M) tumor SUV obtained from injection of 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 scFv in NIH:OVCAR-3 versus SKOV3 xenograft mice. Numbers of animals (n) are indicated at the bottom of each bar.

In NIH:OVCAR-3 tumors, 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb reached a maximum SUVmean of 5.76 ± 0.85 (29.70 ± 3.34 %ID/g) at 24 h p.i. rising to 7.06 ± 0.67 (41.66 ± 4.38 %ID/g) at 48 h p.i. (n = 4). NIH:OVCAR-3 xenograft mice pre-dosed with unlabeled MAb revealed a SUVmean of 2.90 ± 0.45 (13.10 ± 2.07 %ID/g) at 24 h p.i. (n = 4, p <0.05) and 3.96 ± 0.76 (14.47 ± 3.01 %ID/g) at 48 h p.i. (n = 4, p <0.05). Non-specific tumor uptake using 64Cu-labeled isotype IgG1 was found to have a SUVmean of 1.77 ± 0.44 (9.77 ± 0.44 %ID/g) at 24 h p.i. (n = 3, p <0.05) with no further change at 48 h p.i. A SUVmean of 1.80 ± 0.69 (5.91 ± 3.31 %ID/g) 24 h p.i. (n = 5, p <0.01 vs. uptake in OVCAR3 24 h p.i.) was observed in SKOV3 tumors.

In contrast, PET studies using 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 scFv in xenograft mice revealed a SUVmean of 0.64 ± 0.04 (3.21 ± 0.29 %ID/g) 24 h p.i. (n = 3) in NIH:OVCAR-3 tumors and 0.25 ± 0.11 (1.49 ± 0.68 %ID/g) (n = 3, p <0.05) in SKOV3 tumors.

Overall, in vivo clearance of the radioimmunoconjugates was evaluated from the heart (representing blood pool content), liver, and kidneys (Additional file 1: Figure S8).

After 24 h, SUVmean in the heart and liver of xenograft animals imaged with 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb was found to be 2.40 0.20 (12.61 ± 1.15 %ID/g) and 2.59 ± 0.20 (12.54 ± 1.67 %ID/g) (n = 4), respectively. SUVmean in the kidneys of these animals was 1.64 ± 0.09 (10.35 ± 1.06 %ID/g).

In contrast, injection of 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 scFv led to a SUVmean (n = 3) of 0.31 ± 0.06 (1.55 ± 0.40 %ID/g) in the heart, 0.98 ± 0.11 (4.89 ± 0.89 %ID/g) in the liver, and 13.2 ± 1.2 (66.46 ± 9.20 %ID/g) in the kidneys after 24 h. This information demonstrated the different in vivo clearance profile between the full-length antibody and the fragment.

Ex vivo analysis

The NIH:OVCAR-3 tumor tested positive for CA125 expression as seen from immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry of tissue sections (Figure 7A, B, C, D, E, F).
Figure 7
Figure 7

Autoradiography, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and overlay images. (A) Autoradiography image from a section of NIH:OVCAR-3 tumor indicating hot spots of in vivo targeting by 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb. (B) Immunofluorescence image of the same section staining green in regions of CA125 expression (Alexa Fluor 488) and counterstained blue (Hoechst 33342) for nuclei. (C) Overlay of images (A) and (B) to establish concurrence between signals from independent methods of ex vivo analysis to indicate CA125 expression and targeting. (D) Autoradiography image from a separate section of NIH:OVCAR-3 tumor indicating hot spots of in vivo targeting by 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb. (E) Immunohistochemistry image of corresponding tissue section. Intensity of staining is indicative of CA125 expression across the sample. (F) Overlay of images (D) and (E) to establish concurrence between signals from independent methods of ex vivo analysis to indicate CA125 expression and targeting.

Immunohistochemistry revealed necrotic and apoptotic regions spanned by connective tissue in the tumor's upper half. Overall, the lower half had more radioactive hot spots, stained stronger for CA125 expression, and had more vasculature surrounded by positively staining tumor foci, which collectively formed pockets of high signals. CA125 staining was observed on the surface of neoplastic cells in the tumor. Hot spots representative of in vivo targeting by the radiotracer as seen in autoradiography of tumor slices correlated well with signals from the other two techniques.

A good correlation of all three types of signals was observed in regions of tumor foci interspersed with blood vessels and/or supported by mouse connective tissue.

Discussion

EOC accounts for more than 90% of all ovarian carcinomas presented in the clinic, and 70% of these cases are high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) overexpressing CA125 [25]. This offers a premise to target CA125 for in vivo diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. Here, OVCAR3 human adenocarcinoma cells representative of HGSOCs and SKOV3 cells representative of human clear cell ovarian carcinoma that do not express CA125 were utilized in order to develop a robust preclinical testing platform to validate CA125 expression and targeting. Both the cell lines displayed consistent biochemical characteristics across in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo analyses.

Unlike a previous report [26], we engineered MAb-B43.13 using a standard bioconjugation strategy to radiolabel it with 64Cu towards development of a CA125-targeted radiotracer for immuno-PET. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic report of an immuno-PET strategy for the in vivo targeting and imaging of CA125 in EOC. In contrast to OVCAR3 cells in culture, we found the uptake of [18 F] FDG in OVCAR3 tumors to be relatively low (Figure 6F), due plausibly to the cystic nature of ovarian tumors in vivo[27]. Thus, the utility of a targeted radiotracer that binds to cell surface antigen may be more sensitive and efficient for the in vivo delineation of EOC.

In the present work, an isothiocyanate-based bioconjugation of a fluorescent tag and a macrocyclic chelator within prescribed molar ratios to the anti-CA125 MAb and scFv followed by radiolabeling yielded consistent results without compromising their immunoreactivity. This approach offers a scope for labeling MAb-B43.13-based CA125-targeting vectors with different radionuclides, fluorophores, and functional groups for use in diverse imaging and therapeutic applications. Furthermore, based on indications from a previous report [28] and our own observations for non-internalization of surface antigen-bound MAb-B43.13 over 48 h as shown in Figure 3, pre-targeting applications are currently being explored via conjugation of click components to the anti-CA125 MAb-B43.13.

The present study with CA125-targeting MAb-B43.13 and its derivative scFv in preclinical ovarian cancer models found a higher targeted tumor uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-MAb-B43.13. Specificity of the observed in vivo tumor uptake was validated by pre-dosing OVCAR3 xenograft animals with 1 mg of unmodified anti-CA125 MAb 24 h prior to injection of 64Cu-labeled anti-CA125 MAb and scFv. The non-specific tumor uptake observed in our study was attributed to an enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR) [29], whose numerical value (SUV) fell in range with the uptake of 64Cu-NOTA-MAb B43.13 observed in CA125-negative SKOV3 tumors.

The background radiation in all PET imaging studies using 64Cu-NOTA-MAb B43.13 could be attributed to a) its longer residency time in circulation, b) consistent non-specific muscle uptake of the radiotracer in all experimental animals (Additional file 1: Figure S9), c) hepatobiliary clearance of the radiotracer and its associated immunocomplexes, and d) potential in vivo trans-chelation of 64Cu from NOTA by hepatic enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD). However, NOTA has previously demonstrated high in vivo kinetic stability as a chelator for 64Cu2+ ions [30], and our in vitro challenge experiments for 64Cu-NOTA-MAb B43.13 in the presence of an excess of purified SOD showed negligible trans-chelation (Additional file 1: Figure S10).

In contrast to its favorable in vitro targeting properties and proposed advantages, the 64Cu-NOTA-scFv-B43.13 was less efficient in its role as a radiotracer for in vivo targeting of CA125. These observations are supported by other reports from in vivo use of such monomeric antibody fragments [31],[32]. Although the scFv is expected to be renally cleared, we observed maximum renal trapping of the radioimmunoconjugate as early as 1 h p.i. (Additional file 1: Figure S11). Such a first pass effect precludes the scFv's bioavailability for any substantial tumor accumulation at later time points, thus accounting for the lower tumor uptake observed with this vector. This has prompted us to engineer the scFv into a diabody to achieve competitive avidity and better in vivo performance.

Ex vivo analysis by digital autoradiography reflected successful in vivo tumor accumulation of the 64Cu-NOTA-MAb-B43.13, while immunohistochemistry provided a panoramic view of CA125 expression in the tumor, indicating regions of high vascularity and stromal components in the tumor architecture. The lower half of the tumor was relatively rich in vasculature and formed suitable sites for neoplastic growth that appeared as densely stained tumor foci. Such vasculature also serves as a route of entry for targeted radioimmunoconjugates into the tumor. Most of the correlating signals from results between the three ex vivo techniques described in this study seem localized with strong CA125 staining in areas of dense vascular perfusion. This phenomenon may be a result of the limited penetration of antibody radioimmunoconjugates extravasating across blood vessels that constitute the aberrant tumor vasculature. This is exacerbated by the tumor's interstitial fluid pressure that can further impede the transport of antibodies once they are within the tumor along their pursuit to reach target cells that express CA125 [33]-[35]. Furthermore, the shedding properties of CA125 may create reservoirs of shed antigen within regions of high CA125 expression surrounding the tumor vasculature. This may lead to most of the radiotracer forming high molecular weight immunocomplexes at such junctions that may eventually be cleared via lymphatics.

Although the use of subcutaneous xenograft models of ovarian cancer allowed for easy assessment of tumor burden and an evaluation of the extent of tumor targeting, this advantage also contributes to being a limitation of this study. The next phase of testing this strategy will involve the use of alternative xenograft and/or transgenic animal models that more closely represent human EOC within the natural setting of the peritoneum, accompanied with an inducible recurrence of the disease. However, a drawback to using such a model would be the signal observed from organs of clearance such as the liver and kidneys that may conceal ovarian tumors, closer to these organs in the peritoneal cavity.

A concurrence of in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo data taken from this preclinical proof-of-concept study represents an initial step towards investigating CA125 as a suitable target for the in vivo imaging of EOC. Drawing information from the present study and prior literature reports [12],[36]-[38], it can be speculated that there may be a pathophysiological time interval between the overexpression of CA125 antigen on the surface of ovarian neoplasms and its subsequent shedding into the bloodstream of subjects at high risk for EOC and in recurrence. This time interval could be an existing gap between active small volume disease brewing to relapse out of the peritoneum and the limitations of present-day methods for its detection via CA125 immunoassays. Molecular imaging by immuno-PET may possibly bridge this gap to achieve a timely detection of EOC for better disease management.

Conclusions

In the work at hand, we have described the synthesis and preclinical radiopharmacological evaluation of 64Cu-labeled MAb-B43.13 and its derivative scFv for the PET imaging of CA125 in EOC. This approach offers both an opportunity for early detection of EOC in patients at high risk and a method to monitor patients for recurrence, by providing a non-invasive in vivo assessment of CA125 status. A robust model system was developed for preclinical testing, and antibody-based CA125-targeting radioimmunoconjugates were successfully produced with excellent immunoreactivity. Overall, our findings suggest that the more efficient tumor-targeting capabilities and favorable radiopharmacological profiles of the full-length antibody make it a suitable radiotracer for non-invasive in vivo evaluation of CA125 in EOC.

Authors' contributions

SS was responsible for the synthesis and (radio) pharmacological evaluation of the immunoconjugates. He was responsible for writing the manuscript. MeW was responsible for animal experiments, including analysis of the PET data. MoW was supporting all radiopharmacological experiments. DG supported ex vivo analyses and immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry experiments from tumor sections. BA supported cell culture of OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cells. SEL supported radiolabeling experiments. FW was responsible for the design of the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file

Abbreviations

%ID/g: 

percentage of injected dose per gram tissue

CA125: 

cancer antigen 125

EOC: 

epithelial ovarian cancer

MAP: 

maximum a priori

PET: 

positron emission tomography

ROI: 

region of interest, reversed phase

SEM: 

standard error of means

SUV: 

standardized uptake value

TAC: 

time-activity curve

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mavanur R Suresh and Madi Madiyalakan at Quest Pharma Tech for providing the CA125-targeting vector platform; Razmik Mirzayans, Xuejun Sun, and Geralidine Barron for invaluable support with cell imaging; Jody Groenendyk for help with surface plasmon resonance; Vincent Bouvet for support with 64Cu shipments and lab infrastructure; Jack Moore for mass spectrometry; and John Wilson, David Clendening, and Blake Lazurko from the Edmonton PET Center for excellent technical support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, 8613 - 114 Street, Edmonton, T6G 2H1, AB, Canada
(2)
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, T6G 1Z2, AB, Canada
(3)
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, 63110, MO, USA

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (Eds): SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011, based on November 2013 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Davis HM, Zurawski VR Jr, Bast RC Jr, Klug TL: Characterization of the CA 125 antigen associated with human epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 1986, 46(12 Pt 1):6143–6148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bast RC Jr, Xu FJ, Yu YH, Barnhill S, Zhang Z, Mills GB: CA 125: the past and the future. Int J Biol Markers 1998, 13: 179–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Scholler N, Urban N: CA125 in ovarian cancer. Biomark Med 2007, 1: 513–523. 10.2217/17520363.1.4.513PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pignata S, Cannella L, Leopardo D, Bruni GS, Facchini G, Pisano C: Follow-up with CA125 after primary therapy of advanced ovarian cancer: in favor of continuing to prescribe CA125 during follow-up. Ann Oncol 2011, 22(Suppl 8):viii40-viii44. 10.1093/annonc/mdr470View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcus CS, Maxwell GL, Darcy KM, Hamilton CA, McGuire WP: Current approaches and challenges in managing and monitoring treatment response in ovarian cancer. J Cancer 2014, 5: 25–30. 10.7150/jca.7810PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Markman M: The role of CA-125 in the management of ovarian cancer. Oncologist 1997, 2: 6–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Son H, Khan SM, Rahaman J, Cameron KL, Prasad-Hayes M, Chuang L, Machac J, Heiba S, Kostakoglu L: Role of FDG PET/CT in staging of recurrent ovarian cancer. Radiographics 2011, 31: 569–583. 10.1148/rg.312105713View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Murakami M, Miyamoto T, Iida T, Tsukada H, Watanabe M, Shida M, Maeda H, Nasu S, Yasuda S, Yasuda M, Ide M: Whole-body positron emission tomography and tumor marker CA125 for detection of recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006, 16(Suppl 1):99–107. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00471.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zimny M, Siggelkow W, Schröder W, Nowak B, Biemann S, Rath W, Buell U: 2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001, 83: 310–315. 10.1006/gyno.2001.6386View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gadducci A, Cosio S: Surveillance of patients after initial treatment of ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009, 71: 43–52. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.12.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hori SS, Gambhir SS: Mathematical model identifies blood biomarker-based early cancer detection strategies and limitations. Sci Transl Med 2011, 3: 109ra116. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003110PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baum RP, Noujaim AA, Nanci A, Moebus V, Hertel A, Niesen A, Donnerstag B, Sykes T, Boniface G, Hör G: Clinical course of ovarian cancer patients under repeated stimulation of HAMA using MAb OC125 and B43.13. Hybridoma 1993, 12: 583–589. 10.1089/hyb.1993.12.583View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schultes BC, Zhang C, Xue LY, Noujaim AA, Madiyalakan R: Immunotherapy of human ovarian carcinoma with OVAREX MAb-B43.13 in a human-PBL-SCID/BG mouse model. Hybridoma 1999, 18: 47–55. 10.1089/hyb.1999.18.47View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berek JS: Immunotherapy of ovarian cancer with antibodies: a focus on oregovomab. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2004, 4: 1159–1165. 10.1517/14712598.4.7.1159View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu AM: Antibodies and antimatter: the resurgence of immuno-PET. J Nucl Med 2009, 50: 2–5. 10.2967/jnumed.108.056887View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Holland JP, Divilov V, Bander NH, Smith-Jones PM, Larson SM, Lewis JS: 89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo. J Nucl Med 2010, 51: 1293–1300. 10.2967/jnumed.110.076174PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Viola-Villegas NT, Rice SL, Carlin S, Wu X, Evans MJ, Sevak KK, Drobjnak M, Ragupathi G, Sawada R, Scholz WW, Livingston PO, Lewis JS: Applying PET to broaden the diagnostic utility of the clinically validated CA19.9 serum biomarker for oncology. J Nucl Med 2013, 54: 1876–1882. 10.2967/jnumed.113.119867PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Noujaim AA, Baum RP, Sykes TR, Sykes CJ, Hertel A, Niesen A, Donnerstag B, Boniface G, Hör G: Monoclonal antibody B43.13 for immunoscintigraphy and immunotherapy of ovarian cancer. In Current Tumor Diagnosis: Applications, Clinical Relevance, Trends. Edited by: Munich KR. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, 1994:823–829.Google Scholar
  20. Kriangkum J, Xu B, Gervais C, Paquette D, Jacobs FA, Martin L, Suresh MR: Development and characterization of a bi-specific single chain antibody against T cells and ovarian carcinoma. Hybridoma 2000, 19: 33–41. 10.1089/027245700315770View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang WW, Das D, McQuarrie SA, Suresh MR: Design of a bifunctional fusion protein for ovarian cancer drug delivery: single-chain anti-CA125 core-streptavidin fusion protein. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007, 65: 398–405. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.12.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper MS, Ma MT, Sunasee K, Shaw KP, Williams JD, Paul RL, Donnelly PS, Blower PJ: Comparison of 64Cu-complexing bifunctional chelators for radioimmuno-conjugation: labeling efficiency, specific activity, and in vitro/in vivo stability. Bioconjug Chem 2012, 23: 1029–1039. 10.1021/bc300037wView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kume M, Carey PC, Gaehle G, Madrid E, Voller T, Margenau W, Welch MJ, Lapi SE: A semi-automated system for the routine production of copper-64. Appl Radiat Isot 2012, 70: 1803–1806. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.03.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindmo T, Boven E, Cuttitta F, Fedorko J, Bunn PA Jr: Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies by linear extrapolation to binding at infinite antigen excess. J Immunol Methods 1984, 72: 77–89. 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90435-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Prat J: New insights into ovarian cancer pathology. Ann Oncol 2012, 23(Suppl 10):x111-x117. 10.1093/annonc/mds300View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McQuarrie SA, Baum RP, Niesen A, Madiyalakan R, Korz W, Sykes TR, Sykes CJ, Hör G, McEwan AJ, Noujaim AA: Pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry of 99mTc labeled monoclonal antibody B43.13 in ovarian cancer patients. Nucl Med Commun 1997, 18: 878–886. 10.1097/00006231-199709000-00013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lutz AM, Ray P, Willmann JK, Drescher C, Gambhir SS: 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18] fluoro-D-glucose accumulation in ovarian carcinoma cell lines. Mol Imaging Biol 2007, 9: 260–266. 10.1007/s11307-007-0105-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiao Z, McQuarrie SA, Suresh MR, Mercer JR, Gupta S, Miller GG: A three-step strategy for targeting drug carriers to human ovarian carcinoma cells in vitro. J Biotechnol 2002, 94: 171–184. 10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00424-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fang J, Nakamura H, Maeda H: The EPR effect: unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2011, 63: 136–151. 10.1016/j.addr.2010.04.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dearling JL, Voss SD, Dunning P, Snay E, Fahey F, Smith SV, Huston JS, Meares CF, Treves ST, Packard AB: Imaging cancer using PET - the effect of the bifunctional chelator on the biodistribution of a 64Cu-labeled antibody. Nucl Med Biol 2011, 38: 29–38. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.07.003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wittrup KD, Thurber GM, Schmidt MM, Rhoden JJ: Practical theoretic guidance for the design of tumor-targeting agents. Methods Enzymol 2012, 503: 255–268. 10.1016/B978-0-12-396962-0.00010-0PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneider DW, Heitner T, Alicke B, Light DR, McLean K, Satozawa N, Parry G, Yoo J, Lewis JS, Parry R: In vivo biodistribution, PET imaging, and tumor accumulation of 86Y- and 111In-antimindin/RG-1, engineered antibody fragments in LNCaP tumor-bearing nude mice. J Nucl Med 2009, 50: 435–443. 10.2967/jnumed.108.055608View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Thurber GM, Schmidt MM, Wittrup KD: Factors determining antibody distribution in tumors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008, 29: 57–61.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jain RK: Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1999, 1: 241–263. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.241View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Heldin CH, Rubin K, Pietras K, Ostman A: High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2004, 4: 806–813. 10.1038/nrc1456View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McQuarrie SA, Riauka T, Baum RP, Sykes TR, Noujaim AA, Boniface G, MacLean GD, McEwan AJ: The effects of circulating antigen on the pharmacokinetics and radioimmunoscintigraphic properties of 99mTc monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients. J Pharm Pharm Sci 1998, 1: 115–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Masuho Y, Zalutsky M, Knapp RC, Bast RC Jr: Interaction of monoclonal antibodies with cell surface antigens of human ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res 1984, 44: 2813–2819.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Marth C, Zeimet AG, Windschwendter M, Daxenbichler G: Regulation of CA 125 expression in cultured human carcinoma cells. Int J Biol Markers 1998, 13: 207–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sharma et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement