Skip to main content
EJNMMI Research
Download PDF
  • Original research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Validation of dynamic [18F]FE-PE2I PET for estimation of relative regional cerebral blood flow: a comparison with [15O]H2O PET

EJNMMI Research volume 12, Article number: 72 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging is used in the diagnostic work-up in suspected parkinsonian syndromes and dementia with Lewy bodies but cannot differentiate between these syndromes, and an extra brain imaging examination of the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) or glucose metabolism is often needed for differential diagnosis. The requirement of two different imaging examinations is resource-consuming and inconvenient for the patients. Therefore, imaging of both cortical blood flow and DAT imaging with the same radiotracer would be more convenient and cost-effective. The aim of this study was to test whether relative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBFR) can be measured with the DAT-specific positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [18F]FE-PE2I (FE-PE2I), by validation with cerebral perfusion measured with [15O]H2O PET (H2O).

Methods

The rCBFR was quantified by kinetic modeling for FE-PE2I (R1) and H2O (F). The R1 was calculated using the simplified reference tissue model, and F was calculated with a modified Koopman double-integration method. The linear relationship and intraclass correlation (ICC) between R1 and F were tested in image data derived from 29 patients with recent onset parkinsonism and 30 healthy controls.

Results

There was a strong linear correlation across all subjects between R1 and F in the frontal, parietal, temporal, cingulate and occipital cortex as well as in the striatum (r  ≥  0.731–0.905, p  < 0.001) with a good-to-excellent ICC, ranging from 0.727 to 0.943 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that FE-PE2I may be used as a proxy for cerebral perfusion, thus potentially serving as a radiotracer for assessment of both DAT availability and rCBFR in one single dynamic scan. This could be valuable in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes.

Trial registration: EUDRA-CT 2015-003045-26. Registered 23 October 2015 https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-003045-26

Background

Dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging is used to detect dopaminergic deficit in striatum to support the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonian syndromes, i.e., progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multisystem atrophy (MSA), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and dementias with Lewy bodies. To date, only a few studies have shown a differential diagnostic potential for these disorders using DAT positron emission tomography (PET) imaging alone, based on striatal subregional DAT binding [1,2,3]. Consequently, in practice, supplementary cerebral perfusion or glucose metabolism brain imaging is often required to support the differential diagnosis between different parkinsonian conditions and syndromes [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The necessity of two different PET examinations with different tracers is costly and resource-intensive in the diagnostic work-up. Therefore, the idea of using early and late image data collected within one single tracer PET examination for assessment of both cerebral perfusion (as a measure of cortical function) and the specific DAT binding (as a biomarker for presynaptic dopaminergic function) has been successfully validated for some DAT tracers in studies compared with radiopharmaceuticals for perfusion or glucose metabolism [11,12,13,14].

Several published studies have investigated different aspects of DAT imaging with the relatively new, highly selective DAT tracer [18F]-(E)-N-(3-iodoprop-2-enyl)- 2β-carbofluoroethoxy-3β-(4'-methyl-phenyl) nortropane (FE-PE2I) [15] in parkinsonian disease and in healthy individuals [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Similar to 11C-PE2I, the fluorinated variant, i.e., FE-PE2I, allows for high-quality, quantifiable imaging of DAT activity in both the striatum and the substantia nigra [25]. However, the compounds differ, with FE-PE2I having faster kinetics and less metabolites, allowing for a shorter scanning protocol, less complicated quantification, and the longer half-life of 18F is more practical for clinical use [26, 27]. To our knowledge, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) with FE-PE2I has not yet been evaluated.

Perfusion can be measured directly with 15O-labeled H2O and is considered gold standard if arterial blood sampling is used as input to pharmacokinetic modeling of the PET time–activity curve. A relative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBFR) measure can be estimated using reference tissue models when arterial sampling is not available [28]. Measures of both receptor binding, quantified as binding potential (BP) and R1, can be estimated at the same time, using the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) [29, 30].

The aim of this study was to assess the correspondence between rCBFR measured with dynamic FE-PE2I (R1) and 15O-labeled H2O (F). The hypothesis is that FE-PE2I has similar mobility into tissue as water, signified by R1 correlating highly with both absolute and relative rCBF measured with H2O.

A secondary aim was to assess measurable differences in rCBFR, measured with R1 and F, between healthy controls (HC) and patients with recent onset parkinsonism.

Methods

This study presents parts of the secondary end-points of a non-commercial clinical trial evaluating the diagnostic potential of FE-PE2I in early-stage idiopathic parkinsonism, the PEARL-PD study ([18F]FE-PE2I PET/CT study of Dopamine Transporters in Early Parkinsonian disease, Eudra-CT no.: 2015–003045-26) finalized in June 2020.

FE-PE2I- and H2O image data were collected from the PEARL-PD study. Thirty patients with recent onset of idiopathic Parkinsonism according to established clinical criteria [31] without signs of cognitive impairment and 31 HC within the same age range had both an FE-PE2I and an H2O. Two participants, one HC and one patient, were excluded from the analyses as their estimated F was ≥ 2.5 standard deviations (SD) from the mean. Thus, the results presented in this paper are based on 29 patients and 30 HC. In Fig. 1, the selection of patients and HC for analyses in this paper is illustrated. Twenty-five patients had a reduced BP of FE-PE2I in the striatum (i.e., reduced DAT activity). Four patients had normal striatal DAT activity, of whom three had a non-degenerative parkinsonian condition (non-IPS) and one with an atypical parkinsonian syndrome. An overview of the basic characteristics of the 59 participants is given in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

STARD diagram showing the selection of data for this study

Full size image
Table 1 Basic statistics
Full size table

The PET scans with FE-PE2I and H2O were performed on the same day in the majority of cases. In ten cases, the H2O was done separately within a median interval of 14 days (range 3–47 days) from the FE-PE2I due to technical issues. The H2O served as the standard for cerebral perfusion [32,33,34]. In the study protocol, a 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) of the brain was also included. The PET imaging was done at baseline (after inclusion), before start of any pharmacological treatment.

Both patients and HC were clinically examined both at baseline and at follow-up using neurological, cognitive, and olfactory testing. Unbiased by the imaging results, a tentative clinical diagnosis was set at baseline, based on established clinical criteria, and re-evaluated 2 years later. Four of the patients included in this study had no signs of dopaminergic deficit, so-called subjects without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) at the baseline FE-PE2I. Three of these patients were clinically diagnosed with non-idiopathic parkinsonism (e.g., vascular parkinsonism) and one fulfilled the clinical criteria for an atypical parkinsonian syndrome at the clinical re-evaluation at follow-up 2 years later.

Radiosynthesis

The PET radiopharmaceuticals were synthesized on-site at the PET center at the University Hospital of Umeå. [18F]FE-PE2I was synthesized according to previously described methods [35]. The production of [15O]H2O was performed with a Hidex Radiowater Generator system (Hidex Oy, Åbo, Finland).

Imaging protocol

First, a 6-min dynamic H2O was acquired, followed by a short rest (median 17 min) waiting for 15O radioactive decay, after which a 75-min dynamic FE-PE2I was performed. Both acquisitions were performed in the same session including a low-dose computed tomography (CT) for attenuation correction on a Discovery 690 PET/CT (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI),

[15O]H2O PET

The PET scanning commenced at the start of a bolus intravenous infusion of 800 MBq H2O, delivered by the Hidex generator. Total scanning time was 370 s (14 × 5 s, 3 × 10 s, 3 × 20 s, 7 × 30 s).

[18F]FE-PE2I

The FE-PE2I image protocol was described in a previous publication [19]. In short, a 75-min dynamic PET acquisition (9 × 20 s, 3 × 60 s, 5 × 180 s, 9 × 360 s) commenced at the intravenous bolus injection of 2.86 MBq/kg [18F]FE-PE2I.

Image reconstruction

PET series were reconstructed using the built-in “VuePoint HD SharpIR” iterative (24 iterations/6 subsets) OSEM resolution-recovery algorithm, correcting for attenuation, scatter, decay, and using a 3 mm Gaussian post-filter, giving a volume of 256 × 256 × 47 voxels of size 0.97 × 0.97 × 3.27mm3.

Data analysis

The PET image data were preprocessed as described earlier [19], using FMRIB's Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT) (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/), and volumes of interest (VOIs) were created using FreeSurfer version 6.0.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) through automatic segmentation of the individual high-resolution T1-weighted MR images (Discovery MR750, GE Medical Systems) collected in 3D mode (1 mm slice thickness, field of view 25 × 25 cm). The left and right hemisphere segmented gray matter VOIs of the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes, the cingulate gyrus, the striatum and the gray matter of the cerebellum were used in this study.

Both FE-PE2I- and H2O data were collected without arterial blood sampling. Instead, rCBFR was calculated using pharmacokinetic modeling (see below) where, for each tracer, the combined left and right gray matter cerebellum VOIs were used as the reference region. In H2O, the measure of rCBFR, F, was estimated following the double-integration method presented by Koopman et al. [28], but modified to use the cerebellum instead of the whole brain as a fix-point for the perfusion value 0.5 mL × cm−3 × min−1. A similar measure of rCBFR, R1, was calculated from the dynamic FE-PE2I data, using SRTM [29, 30]. It is worth noting that the R1 values are expected to be two times the perfusion values (due to the 0.5 cerebellum fix-point mentioned above). All time points of the dynamic acquisition were used in the modeling. The modeling was performed on VOI level for the time–activity curves of the segmented VOIs.

The same models were also used to create R1 and F rCBFR images. This voxel-level analysis was performed on the dynamic data, smoothed with a kernel of 10 mm. These rCBFR images were used to create correlation images on the voxel level in the following manner:

  1. 1.

    T1 images were segmented into tissues using SPM12, and a brain mask was produced to remove non-brain tissue [36].

  2. 2.

    Skull-stripped T1 images were normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using FMRIB’s Linear Image Registration Tool (FLIRT) and 12 degrees of freedom (DOF) to achieve a preliminary estimation, followed by a nonlinear registration using FMRIB’s Nonlinear Image Registration Tool (FNIRT) [37].

  3. 3.

    The resulting deformation fields were applied to R1 and F volumes to produce normalized images with 2 mm isotropic voxels.

  4. 4.

    The correlation, r, between R1 and F in each voxel was calculated separately for HC and patients using Pearson’s correlation in MATLAB.

  5. 5.

    The resulting volumes were then projected onto cortical surfaces using the Human Connectome Workbench (https://www.humanconnectome.org/software/connectome-workbench) and S1200 data set (https://www.humanconnectome.org/study/hcp-young-adult/document/1200-subjects-data-release).

Statistics

Statistical analysis and figures were made in SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Prior to any inference test, observations ≥ 2.5 SD above the mean were considered as outliers and were excluded. One patient and one HC fulfilled outlier criteria in the estimation of F. There were no outliers in R1. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used for assessing the association between relative cerebral perfusion R1 measured with FE-PE2I and F measured with H2O in the frontal, parietal, temporal and cingulate cortex as well as in the putamen and caudate nucleus. Average measures for ICC estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the “Reliability analysis module” in SPSS based on a two-way mixed-effects model, mean-rating (k = 59) using the consistency definition. Bland–Altman plots were made for the regions that fulfilled the condition of normally distributed differences between R1 and F according to the Shapiro–Wilk test (see Additional file 1: Table s3).

Group differences were analyzed using t-tests. For simplicity, correlation analyses, group comparisons and plots of the r rCBFR in the respective brain areas were calculated using the averaged left and right hemisphere VOI values, i.e., the mean activity of the respective brain areas. P values < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant.

Results

The F and R1 values, averaged over the left and right hemispheres, stratified by patients and HC, are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 rCBFR measured with F and R1 in patients and healthy controls
Full size table

Across all subjects, the linear correlation between R1 and F in all areas investigated was high, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients ranging between 0.747 and 0.920 in HC and 0.677–0.917 in patients (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlations between rCBFR measured by F and R1 by region
Full size table

In Fig. 2, the relationships between R1 and F in the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital cortices are illustrated graphically as plots (correlation plots for the cingulate cortex, caudate and putamen are available in Additional file 2: Fig. s1). For all subjects, R1 was proportional to F but with an R1-offset of approximately 0.4; hence, the consistency definition of ICC was used instead of the absolute agreement definition of ICC. The ICC values are presented in Table 4, and Bland–Altman plots are provided in Additional file 3: Fig. s2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation plots of R1 (FE-PE2I) and F (H2O). Legend (A) Frontal cortex, (B) parietal cortex, (C) temporal cortex, (D) occipital cortex. Values are averaged over the left and right hemispheres

Full size image
Table 4 Intraclass correlation for rCBFR measured by F and R1, whole sample, n = 59
Full size table

The voxelwise correlations between R1 and F over the hemispheres in healthy controls and patients are illustrated in Fig. 3. The correlations were generally high throughout the cortex, but somewhat lower in the occipital cortex and areas belonging to the brain’s default mode network [38].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Voxelwise correlations between R1 and F for healthy controls and patients. Legend Correlations, r, between R1 and F are shown on the cortical surface (https://www.humanconnectome.org/software/connectome-workbench) for healthy controls and patients. High correlations are shown in orange and red color; medium to high correlations are shown in green and yellow

Full size image

On the group level, there was a significant difference between patients and HC in mean rCBFR measured with both F and R1 in the parietal cortex (p = 0.004 and 0.020, respectively) and the occipital cortex (p = 0.009 and 0.043, respectively) as well as in the temporal lobe measured with F (p = 0.024); no significant differences between HC and patients were seen in the other cortical areas (Additional file 4: Table s1).

In Fig. 4, the relation between rCBFR measured in the putamen and caudate with R1and F is illustrated by plots grouped by HC, patients without signs of dopaminergic deficit (“SWEDDs”) and patients with reduced striatal DAT activity.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBFR) in relation to striatal DAT activity. Legend Plots illustrating the relationship between rCBFR in (A) putamen and (B) the caudate, measured by R1 (FE-PE2I) and F (H2O) and striatal DAT activity. Red circles: patients with pathologically reduced striatal DAT uptake. Blue rhombs: patients without signs of dopaminergic deficit, “SWEDD” (i.e., normal striatal DAT activity). Open squares: healthy controls (HC) with normal DAT activity in the striatum

Full size image

No statistical difference was seen in rCBFR (with either R1 or F) in the putamen or the caudate between the SWEDD patients and HC or between the SWEDD patients and the 25 patients with reduced striatal specific binding of FE-PE2I (i.e., reduced DAT activity). There were, however, few observations in these subsamples, and a lack of difference should be interpreted with caution.

In contrast, there was a significant difference in R1 in the putamen between the group of patients with reduced striatal DAT activity and HC (p = 0.012). However, this was not observed in F (p = 0.052). No statistically significant differences were observed in caudate rCBFR measured with F (p = 0.089) or R1 (p = 0.236); see Additional file 5: Table s2.

Discussion

The findings of a strong correlation between F and R1 in cortical and striatal regions are in line with similar studies comparing [18F]FDG PET and the outcome of R1 derived from [11C]PE2I PET in 16 patients with parkinsonism [13], the outcome of R1 derived from [18F]FP-Cit PET in 25 PD patients and 16 HC [35], and the outcome of R1 [18F]FP-Cit PET with [99mTc]ECD single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in 20 patients with PD [11]. Even though the tracers, the methodology and the number of patients differ between the present and the previously published studies, the pattern of correlating outcome is similar.

As illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3, the correlations between R1 and F were generally high throughout the cortex. Notably, in the occipital cortex, and areas belonging to the brain´s default mode network [38], correlations were slightly lower. The lower correlations in these areas might be due to the function of these regions and the fact that R1 and F were not measured simultaneously. For example, rCBFR in the occipital cortex is influenced by having the eyes open or eyes closed, or by mental imagery. We cannot guarantee that these factors were identical between the two scans. Regarding the medial parietal cortex and temporal lobe areas, both areas belong to the brain’s default mode network and are involved with internally generated thought [39]. Conceivably, regions involved with such processes may also differ in blood flow when comparing R1 and F scans separated in time. Accordingly, this may indicate that neither of the above-mentioned regions would be suitable as reference regions for calculating R1 or F.

The findings of lower rCBFR values in patients compared to HC are also in line with similar findings in previous studies with [18F]FDG PET and perfusion SPECT in recent onset, drug naïve and non-demented idiopathic parkinsonism[40,41,42], strengthening the notion of the usefulness of rCBFR assessment with R1 in FE-PE2I. The close linear association and high intraclass correlation between estimation of rCBFR with R1 in FE-PE2I and F in H2O supports the idea that this technique is viable for differential diagnosis. However, since in our study the majority of the patients had early-stage PD, analyses of potential differences in rCBFR between patients with early and later disease stages or atypical parkinsonian syndromes were not possible. Nonetheless, we see no obvious reason why the method of estimating cortical rCBFR with R1 per se would not be purposeful or valid in later-stage PD or in atypical parkinsonism. However, a raise of concern might be the interpretation of rCBFR measured with R1 in the striate, especially in the putamen, which probably should be taken with caution. According to our findings, a significant difference in rCBFR measured with R1 (but not F) was observed in the putamen between patients with a reduced specific DAT binding of FE-PE2I and HC. Possibly, this might be related to the high DAT affinity and fast kinetics of FE-PE2I, with a rapid binding to the DAT in the striatum. One could hypothesize that the activity in the striatum seen in R1 of FE-PE2I in the putamen might reflect a mix of perfusion and DAT binding, appearing “normal” in individuals with preserved DAT integrity and “low” in individuals with significant DAT reduction. This may therefore constitute a limitation in patients with suspected MSA-p, who, according to previous studies, are recognized with a significant reduction in rCBF and glucose metabolism in the striatum and cerebellum (as opposed to, for example, PD patients)[43].

Further validation studies including larger numbers of patients with both early- and late-stage PD as well as patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes or dementia with Lewy bodies are needed to address the usefulness and validity of R1 rCBFR assessment with FE-PE2I to discriminate between parkinsonian syndromes.

A strength of this study is the prospectively collected image data within a clinical trial and the relatively large number of patients and HC compared to previously published studies on this topic. However, a caveat is the lack of arterial input in PET image acquisition, which did not allow for quantification of the absolute CBF. Nevertheless, in a clinical setting, invasive arterial sampling may be inconvenient or risky, and our results demonstrate that it is possible to estimate rCBFR with H2O and FE-PE2I without arterial input. In future studies, a design which allows for comparison between the absolute and relative regional CBF with both methods would be meriting; and such study could also illuminate if absolute perfusion is changed with type of disease and clinical progression.

Conclusions

This is the first study to show that estimation of the relative regional cerebral blood flow with [18F]FE-PE2I PET has a strong association with the relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [15O]H2O PET, both in early-stage of parkinsonian disease and in healthy state. This indicates that both the cortical perfusion and the DAT activity can be imaged with one single dynamic [18F]FE-PE2I PET scan. This could be particularly valuable in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes without necessitating multiple scans and tracers.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DAT:

Dopamine transporter

rCBF:

Regional cerebral blood flow

rCBFR :

Relative regional cerebral blood flow

PET:

Positron emission tomography

FE-PE2I:

[18F]FE-PE2I PET

H2O:

[15O]H2O PET

ICC:

Intraclass correlation

R1 :

rCBFR measured with [18F]FE-PE2I

F :

rCBFR measured with [15O]H2O

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

SRTM:

Simplified reference tissue model

HC:

Healthy controls

SD:

Standard deviations

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

Non-IPS:

Non-degenerative Parkinsonian condition

SWEDD:

Subjects without evidence of dopaminergic deficit

CT:

Computed tomography

MR:

Magnetic resonance

VOIs:

Volumes of interest

SPECT:

Single photon emission computed tomography

References

  1. Oh M, Kim JS, Kim JY, Shin KH, Park SH, Kim HO, et al. Subregional patterns of preferential striatal dopamine transporter loss differ in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple-system atrophy. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(3):3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Im JH, Chung SJ, Kim JS, Lee MC. Differential patterns of dopamine transporter loss in the basal ganglia of progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease: analysis with [123I]IPT single photon emission computed tomography. J Neurol Sci. 2006;244(1–2):103–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HW, Kim JS, Oh M, Oh JS, Lee SJ, Oh SJ, et al. Different loss of dopamine transporter according to subtype of multiple system atrophy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(3):517–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Teune LK, Bartels AL, De Jong BM, Willemsen ATM, Eshuis SA, De Vries JJ, et al. Typical cerebral metabolic patterns in neurodegenerative brain diseases. Mov Disord. 2010;25(14):2395–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berti V, Polito C, Borghammer P, Ramat S, Mosconi L, Vanzi E, et al. Alternative normalization methods demonstrate widespread cortical hypometabolism in untreated de novo Parkinson’s disease. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;56(3):299–308.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura N, Hanaki S, Masuda T, Hanaoka T, Hazama Y, Okazaki T, et al. Brain perfusion differences in Parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord. 2011;26(14):2530–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsui H, Udaka F, Miyoshi T, Hara N, Tamura A, Oda M, et al. Brain perfusion differences between Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005;11(4):227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang CC, Poston KL, Eckert T, Feigin A, Frucht S, Gudesblatt M, et al. Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism: a metabolic imaging study using pattern analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(2):149–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Takaya S, Sawamoto N, Okada T, Okubo G, Nishida S, Togashi K, et al. Differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes using dopamine transporter and perfusion SPECT. Park Relat Disord. 2018;47:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tripathi M, Dhawan V, Peng S, Kushwaha S, Batla A, Jaimini A, et al. Differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(4):483–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chun KA, Kong EJ, Cho IH. Comparison of perfusion 18F-FP-CIT PET and 99mTc-ECD SPECT in parkinsonian disorders. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(34): e27019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin S, Oh M, Oh SJ, Oh JS, Lee SJ, Chung SJ, et al. Differential diagnosis of Parkinsonism using dual-phase F-18 FP-CIT PET imaging. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;47(1):44–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Appel L, Jonasson MM, Danfors T, Nyholm D, Askmark HH, Lubberink M, et al. Use of 11C-PE2I PET in differential diagnosis of Parkinsonian disorders. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(2):234–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng S, Tang C, Schindlbeck K, Rydzinski Y, Dhawan V, Spetsieris PG, et al. Dynamic 18F-FPCIT PET: quantification of Parkinson’s disease metabolic networks and nigrostriatal dopaminergic dysfunction in a single imaging session. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(12):1775–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schou M, Steiger C, Varrone A, Guilloteau D, Halldin C. Synthesis, radiolabeling and preliminary in vivo evaluation of [18F]FE-PE2I, a new probe for the dopamine transporter. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19(16):4843–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki M, Ito H, Kodaka F, Takano H, Kimura Y, Fujiwara H, et al. Reproducibility of PET measurement for presynaptic dopaminergic functions using L-[β-11C]DOPA and [18F]FE-PE2I in humans. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35(3):231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sonni I, Fazio P, Schain M, Halldin C, Svenningsson P, Farde L, et al. Optimal acquisition time window and simplified quantification of dopamine transporter availability using 18F-FE-PE2I in healthy controls and Parkinson disease patients. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(10):1529–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bang JI, Jung IS, Song YS, Park HS, Moon BS, Lee BC, et al. PET imaging of dopamine transporters with [18F]FE-PE2I: effects of anti-Parkinsonian drugs. Nucl Med Biol. 2016;43(2):158–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jakobson Mo S, Axelsson J, Jonasson L, Larsson A, Ögren MJ, Ögren M, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging with [18F]FE-PE2I PET and [123I]FP-CIT SPECT-a clinical comparison. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8(1):100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerstens VS, Fazio P, Sundgren M, Matheson GJ, Franzén E, Halldin C, et al. Reliability of dopamine transporter PET measurements with [18F]FE-PE2I in patients with Parkinson’s disease. EJNMMI Res. 2020;10(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikoma Y, Sasaki T, Kimura Y, Seki C, Okubo Y, Suhara T, et al. Evaluation of semi-quantitative method for quantification of dopamine transporter in human PET study with 18F-FE-PE2I. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29(8):697–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shingai Y, Tateno A, Arakawa R, Sakayori T, Kim W, Suzuki H, et al. Age-related decline in dopamine transporter in human brain using PET with a new radioligand [18F]FE-PE2I. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(3):220–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Delva A, Van Weehaeghe D, van Aalst J, Ceccarini J, Koole M, Baete K, et al. Quantification and discriminative power of 18 F-FE-PE2I PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(8):1913–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lizana H, Johansson L, Axelsson J, Larsson A, Ögren M, Linder J, et al. Whole-body biodistribution and dosimetry of the dopamine transporter radioligand 18F-FE-PE2I in human subjects. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(8):1275–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fazio P, Svenningsson P, Cselényi Z, Halldin C, Farde L, Varrone A. Nigrostriatal dopamine transporter availability in early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2018;33(4):592–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Varrone A, Tóth M, Steiger C, Takano A, Guilloteau D, Ichise M, et al. Kinetic analysis and quantification of the dopamine transporter in the nonhuman primate brain with 11C-PE2I and 18F-FE-PE2I. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(1):132–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morbelli S, Esposito G, Arbizu J, Barthel H, Boellaard R, Bohnen NI, et al. EANM practice guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for dopaminergic imaging in Parkinsonian syndromes 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(8):1885–912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Koopman T, Yaqub M, Heijtel DF, Nederveen AJ, van Berckel BN, Lammertsma AA, et al. Semi-quantitative cerebral blood flow parameters derived from non-invasive [15 O]H 2 O PET studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39(1):163–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage. 1996;4(3):153–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gunn RN, Lammertsma AA, Hume SP, Cunningham VJ. Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. Neuroimage. 1997;6(4):279–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gibb WR, Lees AJ. The significance of the Lewy body in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1989;15(1):27–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kudo K, Terae S, Katoh C, Oka M, Shiga T, Tamaki N, et al. Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurement with dynamic perfusion CT using the vascular-pixel elimination method: comparison with H215O positron emission tomography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(3):419–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Iida H, Law I, Pakkenberg B, Krarup-Hansen A, Eberl S, Holm S, et al. Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow corrected for partial volume effect using O-15 water and PET: I. Theory, error analysis, and stereologic comparison. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20(8):1237–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Law I, Iida H, Holm S, Nour S, Rostrup E, Svarer C, et al. Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow corrected for partial volume effect using O-15 water and PET: II. Normal values and gray matter blood flow response to visual activation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20(8):1252–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stepanov V, Krasikova R, Raus L, Loog O, Hiltunen J, Halldin C. An efficient one-step radiosynthesis of [18F]FE-PE2I, a PET radioligand for imaging of dopamine transporters. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2012;55(6):206–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26(3):839–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):782–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(3):1125–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(2):676–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Nobili F, Campus C, Arnaldi D, De Carli F, Cabassi G, Brugnolo A, et al. Cognitive-nigrostriatal relationships in de novo, drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients: a [I-123]FP-CIT SPECT study. Mov Disord. 2010;25(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nobili F, Morbelli S, Arnaldi D, Ferrara M, Campus C, Brugnolo A, et al. Radionuclide brain imaging correlates of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD). J Neurol Sci. 2011;310(1–2):31–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Borghammer P, Chakravarty M, Jonsdottir KY, Sato N, Matsuda H, Ito K, et al. Cortical hypometabolism and hypoperfusion in Parkinson’s disease is extensive: probably even at early disease stages. Brain Struct Funct. 2010;214(4):303–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu Z, Arbizu J, Pavese N. PET molecular imaging in atypical Parkinsonism. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;142:3–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Umea University. This study was funded by research grants from Västerbotten County Council, Umeå University and the Swedish Parkinson Foundation. The funding body has not been directly involved in either the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Susanna Jakobson Mo & Katrine Riklund

  2. Umeå Centre for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Susanna Jakobson Mo, Jan Axelsson, Lars Stiernman & Katrine Riklund

  3. Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Jan Axelsson

  4. Dept. of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

    Lars Stiernman

Authors
  1. Susanna Jakobson Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Axelsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lars Stiernman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katrine Riklund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SJM was responsible for the conception and design of the work, the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. JA made substantial contributions devising the PET protocols, performing PET modeling and analysis, participated in the statistical analysis and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. LS processed the PET and MRI data, made substantial contributions to the data analyses and the editing of the manuscript. KRÅ made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work and participated in the data analyses and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanna Jakobson Mo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the regional ethical committee at Umeå University, the local radiation safety committee at the Umeå University Hospital and the Swedish Medical Products Agency. All participants gave their informed consent before inclusion. All methods were carried out in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table s3. Test of normally distributed differences between R1 and F. Legend R1 relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [18F]FE-PE2I, F relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [15O]H2O PET.

Additional file 2

: Figure s1. Correlation plots of R1 (FE-PE2I) and F (H2O): cingulate, putamen and caudate. Legend Right: Cingulate cortex, Middle: Putamen, Left: Caudate. Values are averaged over the left and right hemispheres. HC Healthy controls (open squares), Pat Patients (filled red dots).

Additional file 3

: Figure s2. Bland–Altman plots. Legend Bland–Altman plots illustrating the relationship between the difference between R1 (FE-PE2I) and F (H2O) relative regional cerebral blood flow (on the y-axis), and the mean of R1 and F (on the x-axis) in the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes and the cingulate cortex, the putamen and the caudate, respectively. The mean of the difference is indicated by the bold black line. The upper and lower limits of agreement are indicated by dotted red lines. Note Bland–Altman plot was not appropriate for the occipital region due to not normally distributed data (see Supplemental Table s3).

Additional file 4

: Table s1. Difference in rCBFR measured as F (H2O) and R1 (FE-PE2I) between patients and healthy controls (T-test results). Legend Measures are averaged left and right hemisphere rCBFR values. rCBFR: relative regional cerebral blood flow. HC Healthy controls; rCBFR relative regional cerebral blood flow. F relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [15O]H2O PET. R1 relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [18F]FE-PE2I.

Additional file 5

: Table s2. Cerebral flow in the striatum. Healthy controls vs. patients with reduced specific DAT activity in the striatum. Legend Measures are averaged left and right hemisphere rCBFR values. P values are two-sided. rCBFR relative regional cerebral blood flow. F relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [15O]H2O PET. R1 relative regional cerebral blood flow measured with [18F]FE-PE2I.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakobson Mo, S., Axelsson, J., Stiernman, L. et al. Validation of dynamic [18F]FE-PE2I PET for estimation of relative regional cerebral blood flow: a comparison with [15O]H2O PET. EJNMMI Res 12, 72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00941-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00941-8

Keywords