Skip to main content
EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research Cover Image
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.
Download PDF

Synthesis of a novel 89Zr-labeled HER2 affibody and its application study in tumor PET imaging

EJNMMI Research volume 10, Article number: 58 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is an essential biomarker for tumor treatment. Affibody is an ideal vector for preparing HER2 specific probes because of high affinity and rapid clearance from normal tissues, etc. Zirconium-89 is a PET imaging isotope with a long half-life and suitable for monitoring biological processes for more extended periods. In this study, a novel 89Zr-labeled HER2 affibody, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2, was synthesized, and its imaging characters were also assessed.

Results

The precursor, DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2, was obtained with a yield of nearly 50%. The radiochemical yield of [89Zr]Zr -DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 was 90.2 ± 1.9%, and the radiochemical purity was higher than 95%. The total synthesis time was only 30 min. The probe was stable in PBS and serum. The tracer accumulated in HER2 overexpressing human ovarian cancer SKOV-3 cells. In vivo studies in mice bearing tumors showed that the probe was highly retained in SKOV-3 xenografts even for 48 h. The tumors were visualized with good contrast to normal tissues. ROI analysis revealed that the average uptake values in the tumor were greater than 5% IA/g during 48 h postinjection. On the contrary, the counterparts of MCF-7 tumors kept low levels ( ~ 1% IA/g). The outcome was consistent with the immunohistochemical analysis and ex vivo autoradiography. The probe quickly cleared from the normal organs except kidneys and mainly excreted through the urinary system.

Conclusion

The novel HER2 affibody for PET imaging was easily prepared with satisfactory labeling yield and radiochemical purity. [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 is a potential candidate for detecting HER2 expression. It may play specific roles in clinical cancer theranostics.

Introduction

Targeting of a biomarker in cancers with specific agents is a promising strategy in the management of malignancies [1]. Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) is a 185-kDa transmembrane protein and belongs to the family of receptor tyrosine kinases. It is involved in the signal transduction pathways regulating cell motility and proliferation. HER2 is an essential clinical tumor biomarker since it is overexpressed in various solid tumors, including ovarian, gastric, and breast cancers. Also, abundant expression of the receptor is associated with aggressiveness, recurrence, and reduced survival [2,3,4].

Monoclonal antibodies, including trastuzumab and pertuzumab have been used for therapy of HER2-positive cancers [5,6,7]. Current selection of patients for targeted therapy is mainly dependent on the status of HER2, determined by biopsy using immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization [8]. However, the invasive method may not be reliable because the HER2 expression is heterogeneous in the tumors and varies during the progress of the disease [9]. Almost 20% of the outcomes was inaccurate [10].

Noninvasive molecular imaging techniques such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) provide a reliable method for repetitive investigating the distribution of the receptor in the whole body [11, 12]. Compared with the former, PET has higher image resolution and quality. PET scanner can sensitively detect gamma radiation from positron decay of nuclides (e.g., [11C] and [18F]). Due to high sensitivity, PET imaging with trace amount of radiotracers (10−6−10−8 grams) can accurately measure molecular targets in the living body without perturbing the biological system. PET with specific probes is a benefit for disease diagnosis and monitoring therapeutic response [13,14,15]. Radiolabeled antibodies have shown promise in identifying the presence of HER2 in the tumor [16,17,18]. For example, [89Zr]Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT detected unsuspected HER2-positive metastases in patients with HER2-negative primary breast cancer [19]. It also found lesions in patients with metastatic HER2-positive esophagogastric cancer [20]. However, the optimal images with favorable contrasts should be acquired at several days (3–5 days) after the administration of the antibodies [19].

Affibody is an engineered small protein that originated from the IgG-binding staphylococcal protein A and can be used as an alternative ligand towards HER2. It is an ideal compound for recognizing the desired targets due to ease of chemical synthesis, quick tumor accumulation, rapid blood clearance, etc. [21, 22]. ZHER2:342 affibody binds explicitly to HER2, and its derivatives have been labeled with PET nuclides ([18F], [68Ga], etc) [23,24,25]. 18F-labeled ZHER2:342 analog and [18F]F-FBEM–ZHER2:342 showed specific binding towards HER2-positive tumors and could be a benefit for detecting status of the receptor in response to therapeutic interventions [23, 26]. 68Ga-labeled HER2 affibody and 68Ga-ABY-025 discriminated HER2 positive and negative metastatic breast tumor in sixteen patients. After PET/CT scan with the tracer, treatment plans were changed in three patients [27, 28].

Besides the above short half-life radionuclides, few HER2 affibodies labeled with other PET isotopes are reported. Zirconium-89 is an attractive commercially available PET radionuclide with a long half-life (T1/2 = 78.4 h), which allows for imaging of biological processes at late time points [29]. Meanwhile, attachment of zirconium-89 to desferrioxamine (DFO) chelator coupled in bioactive substance (such as protein and peptides) can be achieved under mild conditions with excellent stability [30]. Besides, 89Zr-labeled compounds are also ideal surrogates for the corresponding therapeutic 90Y or 177Lu-labeled radiopharmaceuticals to calculate dosimetry and plan therapy program in preclinical or clinical studies [31].

Previous studies found that 18F or 68Ga-labeled modified HER2 affibody with a novel hydrophilic linker, [18F]FAl/[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-Cys-GGGRDN-ZHER2:342 (denoted as [18F]FAl/[68Ga]Ga-NOTA-Cys-MZHER2), owned satisfactory specific tumor uptakes and favorable tumor-to-muscle and tumor-to-blood ratios during 4 h after injection [32, 33]. Due to short half-life, further evaluating the properties of the affibody was difficult beyond 12 h. To better assess the characters of the modified HER2 affibody, the molecule was firstly coupled with a maleimide derivative of desferrioxamine, MAL-DFO, then the resulting compound was radiolabeled with zirconium-89. The efficiency of the resulting probe, [89Zr]Zr -DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2, was also investigated in tumor models.

Methods

Cys-ZHER2:342 and Cys-MZHER2 were purchased from Apeptide Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). MAL-DFO was purchased from Macrocyclics (Dallas, TX). [89Zr]Zr-oxalate solution was supplied by Cyclotron VU(Netherlands). Human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV-3 and breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 were obtained from Cell Bank of Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences. Female Balb/c nude mice were purchased from SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., China. Analytic and preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were carried out according to the literatures [32, 33]. Radio thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was operated on silica gel impregnated glass fiber sheets and analyzed by a BioScan. Sodium citrate solutions (0.1 M) were used as solvent systems. Mass spectra were acquired from a Waters LC–MS system (Waters, Milford, MA).

Affibody conjugation

MAL-DFO (0.35 mg, 0.50 μmol) was dissolved in 2 ml ammonium acetate solution (2 M, pH = 7 ) and reacted with Cys-MZHER2 (3 mg, 0.40 μmol) at room temperature overnight (Fig. 1). The product was purified with preparative HPLC, followed by lyophilization, as previously described [32]. Mass spectrometry (MS) measured m/z 8077.5 for [MH]+ (C351H560N104O111S2, calculated molecular weight 8076.8).

Fig. 1
figure1

Scheme of synthesis of DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2

Full size image

Preparing of 89Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2

DFO conjugated affibody, DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 (200 μg, 25 nmol), was dissolved in 30 μL deionized water and incubated with 185 MBq [89Zr]Zr-oxalate in 1 mL 2 M Na2CO3 solution (pH = 4) for 20 min at room temperature (Fig. 2). After diluted with 10 mL deionized water, the complex was purified by a Varian BOND ELUT C18 column. After washing the column with 10 mL deionized water again, the product was eluted with 0.3 mL of 10 mM HCl in ethanol. The solution was diluted with 10 mL saline and passed through a 0.2- μm Millipore filter into a sterile vial. Radio HPLC and TLC were used for quality control.

Fig. 2
figure2

Scheme of radiosynthesis of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2

Full size image

In vitro stability

Aliquots of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 solutions were incubated with 1 mL human serum or PBS for 48 h at 37 °C. At the preselected time points, the radiopurity was analyzed by TLC.

Cell lines

Cells were cultured using RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat inactivated fetal bovine serum and grown as a monolayer at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Cell uptake studies

Uptake studies of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in SKOV-3 cells were performed according to the described method [32]. Cells (1 × 106/well) were incubated at 37 °C for various times with 37 KBq-labeled affibody in a 0.5-mL serum-free DMEM medium. The nonspecific binding of the tracer was determined by co-incubation with 5 μM Cys-ZHER2:342. After washed with chilled PBS, the cell pellets in the tube were obtained by centrifugation and measured using a γ-counter (PerkinElmer). The cell uptake was expressed as the percentage of the added activity (%AA/106 cells) after decay correction.

Animal model

All animal experiments were performed according to the national guidelines and approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine. Tumor models were established by subcutaneously implanting 5 × 106 SKOV-3 or MCF-7 tumor cells suspended in 0.2 mL PBS into the shoulder region of mice. When tumor sizes reached 100–300 mm3, the mice were used for the following experiments.

MicroPET imaging

PET imaging was performed on a microPET scanner (Siemens Inc.). After anesthetized using isoflurane, the mice bearing tumors were placed in the center of the scanner and injected intravenously with 3.7 MBq [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in the presence or absence of excessive Cys-MZHER2:342 ( 10 mg/kg body weight) via the lateral tail vein. Static PET images of 10 min were performed at selected times after tracer injection. Quantitative analysis was operated using the reported methods [32, 33].

Biodistribution

Mice were injected with 0.74 MBq of the tracer through the tail vein and sacrificed at 1, 4, 8, 18, 24, 48, and 72 h after administration, respectively. For the blocking study, four mice were coinjected with an excess of Cys-ZHER2:342 (10 mg/kg body weight) and killed at 1 h after administration. Tumor and normal tissues of interest were harvested and weighed. The radioactivity uptake in tissues was measured in the γ-counter and expressed as a percentage of the injected activity per gram of tissue (% IA/g).

Autoradiography and histology

After microPET imaging, the tumors were harvested and sectioned into slices with 5 μm thickness at – 80 °C. Ex vivo autoradiography was conducted using the previous method [34]. To determine the intratumoral distribution of the tracer, the slices were placed on a phosphorimaging plate for 1 h. Phosphorimaging plates were read with a plate reader. Quantitative analysis was carried out using the OptiQuant software.

After radioactive decay, the slices were used for routine HE staining and HER2 analysis by immunohistochemistry. The procedures were processed following the published literature [33]. An epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, X81, Japan) was used to acquire the corresponding images.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Data were analyzed using the unpaired, 2-tailed Student t test. Differences at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Chemistry

DFO conjugated affibody was readily prepared with a yield of 50%. The chemical purity of the compound was greater than 90% determined by analytical HPLC.

Radiolabeling chemistry

The non-decay corrected radiochemical yield for [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 was 90.2 ± 1.2%. Purification using C18 columns provided a radiochemical purity of more than 95%. HPLC analysis of the tracer showed one single peak with a retention time of 14 min (Fig. 3). [89Zr]Zr-DFO- MAL-Cys-MZHER2 showed a typical elution profile (Rf = 0.1–0.3) on radio TLC (Fig. 3). In comparison, free [89Zr]Zr-oxalate runs into the solvent front (Rf = 0.8–1.0) (Figure 1S).

Fig. 3
figure3

a HPLC chromatograms of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2. b TLC chromatograms of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2

Full size image

Stability studies in vitro

[89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 was stable during the investigated periods (Fig. 4). No free [89Zr]Zr-oxalate was found after incubation of the tracer in PBS or serum for 2 days at 37 °C.

Fig. 4
figure4

TLC chromatograms of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in PBS (a) and serum (b) at 37 °C for 48 h, respectively

Full size image

Cell uptake

Cell uptake studies are shown in Fig. 5. The probe quickly accumulated in SKOV-3 and reached plateaus with 10.23 ± 0.94% AA/106cells at 30 min incubation. By contrast, the uptake levels were significantly decreased in the presence of excess unlabeled Cys-ZHER2:342 at the same time points (2.35 ± 0.43%AA/106cells).

Fig. 5
figure5

Cell uptake assay of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in SKOV-3 cells

Full size image

Small-animal PET imaging

MicroPET images of mice were listed in Figs. 6 and 7 and Figure 2S. SKOV-3 xenografts were clearly visualized with good contrast even after 48 h of administration. The SKOV-3 tumor uptakes of the tracer were 11.97 ± 2.52, 11.43 ± 2.51, 10.09 ± 2.83, 8.52 ± 1.15, 7.51 ± 0.39, and 4.99 ± 1.68% IA/g at 1, 4, 8, 10, 24, and 48 h after administration, respectively. In contrast, the radio signals in MCF-7 xenografts were weak. The MCF-7 tumor uptakes were 1.98 ± 0.28, 1.79 ± 0.29, 1.39 ± 0.14, and 1.21 ± 0.10% IA/g at 1, 4, 8, and 24 h after administration, respectively. Presaturation of HER2 in tumors by co-injection of nonlabeled Cys-MZHER2:342 caused a significant reduction of radioactivity accumulation in tumors (2.18 ± 0.23%IA/g at 60 min postinjection).

Fig. 6
figure6

Decay-corrected whole-body PET images of mice bearing SKOV-3 tumors (a) after injection of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2. b Quantification of radioactivities in SKOV-3 xenografts models. The tumors are indicated by the arrows

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure7

Decay-corrected whole-body PET images of mice bearing MCF-7 xenografts (a) after injection of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2. b PET images of mice bearing SKOV-3 xenografts after injection of the tracer under block. c Quantification of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in MCF-7 xenograft models and SKOV-3 xenograft models in the presence of excess block agents (d), respectively. The tumors are indicated by the arrows

Full size image

It also showed that uptake in the liver was deficient, and the highest values were nearly 2% IA/g at 1 h after injection. Accumulated radioactivities were found in kidneys. It suggested that the affibody is mostly excreted through the renal system and urinary tract.

Biodistribution studies

The biodistribution data of 89Zr-labeled affibody in mice bearing tumors are presented in Table 1. Similar with PET imaging, radioactivity concentration in SKOV-3 tumors was higher than those in MCF-7 tumors and other healthy organs except for kidneys. Acclamation in SKOV-3 tumors was 11.27 ± 1.55% IA/g at 1 h after administration and maintained 5.80 ± 0.75% IA/g at 48 h postinjection. [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 uptake in the MCF-7 tumors was 1.76 ± 0.31% IA/g at 1 h postinjection. Under block with unlabeled HER2 affibody, the SKOV-3 tumor uptake of the tracer significantly reduced to 1.87 ± 0.15% IA/g at the same time point (Fig 8).

Table 1 Biodistribution of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in mice bearing tumors at different time points after administration (n = 4 per group)
Full size table
Fig. 8
figure8

a Autoradiographic distribution of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in tumor slices. HE staining (b) and immunohistochemical image (c) of HER2 in tumor slices

Full size image

A rapid washout of radioactivity was noted from receptor-negative tissues except kidney. The uptake ratios of tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle values increased from 8.38 ± 3.73 and 17.80 ± 3.08 at 1 h postinjection to 198.00 ± 12.77 and 393.50 ± 38.18 at 72 h postinjection in mice bearing SKOV-3 tumors, respectively.

Ex vivo autoradiography and histology

Autoradiography studies showed that higher radioactivity accumulated in the periphery of tumors than those at internal tissues (Fig. 8). The ratios of radioactive intensity between the two regions were determined to be 5.03 ± 0.69.

The pathological analysis confirmed that the peripheral of tumor tissue grew vigorously, and the HER2 receptor was overexpressed. On the contrary, the internal tumor tissue grew slowly and even died with low levels of HER2. The results were consistent with the findings by autoradiography.

Discussion

Desferrioxamine is a hexadentate chelator used for treating iron overload. It is consisted of three hydroxamate groups and forms a thermodynamically stable complex with zirconium [35]. For site-specific labeling, desferrioxamine-maleimide (MAL-DFO) was successfully introduced into MZHER2 by conjugated the thiol group in cysteine residue with the maleimide. Zirconium-89 was attached to DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 under mild conditions with nearly quantitative yields. The radiochemical purity was satisfactory determined by both HPLC and TLC. Absence of radiolysis was detected in PBS and serum during in vitro incubation up to 48 h. The stability was similar with those of other [89Zr]Zr-labeled compounds. It means that 89Zr-labeled affibody could be prepared at least 1 day before preclinical or clinical PET studies.

Similar with 18F or 68Ga-labeled affibody, the 89Zr-labeled counterpart specifically binds to HER2-positive SKOV-3 tumor cells by in vitro cell uptake experiments. It meant that coupling the affibody with DFO-MAL could not significantly affect the performance of binding to the receptor.

To better understand the biology characters of the affibody, in vivo experiments including biodistribution studies and microPET imaging were firstly conducted in SKOV-3 and MCF-7 tumor models, which have been often applied for preclinical evaluating the specificity of radiolabeled HER2 affibody. It revealed that [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 rapidly concentrated in SKOV-3 tumors after 1 h postinjection. The uptake values of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 in SKOV-3 tumors at 1 h postinjection (~ 11% IA/g) were similar to reported affibody in the HER2-positive xenografts. For example, the accumulated levels of [18F]F-FBEM-ZHER2:342, [18F]FAl-NOTA-MAL-MZHER2:342, [68Ga]Ga-ABY-002, [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-ZHER2:2395, and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-ZHER2:2395 in SKOV-3 xenografts at 1 h or 45 min postinjection were 9.73 ± 1.91, 18.60 ± 3.89, 7.81 ± 0.70, 15 ± 8, and 15 ± 2 %ID/g, respectively [26, 32, 36, 37]. Also, the corresponding uptake ratios of the tumor to background contrasts such as tumor-to-blood (8.38 ± 3.73) are also similar with those of [18F]F-FBEM-ZHER2:342 (7.5 ± 4.5), [68Ga]Ga-ABY-002 (6 ± 2), [68Ga]Ga -NODAGA-ZHER2:2395 (~ 8), and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-ZHER2:2395 ( ~ 12), respectively [26, 32, 36, 37]. The differences in uptake values or tumor to contrast might be originated from the structure of different chelate agents coupled in the peptides. The uptake in SKOV-3 xenografts was about 10-fold higher than the counterparts of MCF-7 tumors at any time point. Compared with the blood pool and most of healthy tissues, the retention of the probe remained stable in SKOV-3 tumors over time. Even after 48 h postinjection, still, 40% of the initially accumulated radioactivity was observed in the SKOV-3 xenografts, and the image contrast was favorable. The uptake ratios of the tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle after administration of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 at 72 h postinjection are nearly 200 and 400, respectively. The results are comparable to those of reported 18F or 68Ga-radiolabeled HER2 affibody at later time points (at most, 6 h) [26, 32, 36, 37]. It implied that the tracer might be a benefit for monitoring the status of HER2 in tumors with favorable contrast images for long periods at least 72 h.

The radioactivities distributing in the tumor showed significant heterogeneity by ex vivo immunohistochemistry and autoradiography. Abundant HER2 was expressed in the periphery of cancer ,and the corresponding radio signal was strong. On the contrary, weak radioactivity was detected in the internal necrotic tissues. Receptor specificity was also confirmed by decreasing the tumor uptake with excessive HER2 affibody. It implied that the targeting property of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 was consistent with the performances of 18F or 68Ga-labeled MZHER2 affibody [32, 33].

The uptake values in the liver are comparable to those of 18F or 68Ga-labeled affibody (~ 2% IA/g at 1 h p.i. then decrease to ~ 1% IA/g at 4 h p.i.). It suggested that the modification with a hydrophilic linker was effective to decline abdomen background. Similar to other 89Zr-labeled affibody such as [89Zr]Zr-DFO-ZEGFR:2377, higher radioactivity was found in the kidney after blocking. The detailed mechanism was not cleared. The scavenger receptor systems recycling proteins from the urines might mediate the re-absorptions of radiometal-labeled peptide in the kidney [38]. Despite this, high renal uptakes may not prevent the visualization of the tumor near the organ. For example, metastases in the adrenal gland were visualized after administration of 111In-labeled HER2 affibody, [111In]In-ABY-025 [39]. Low uptakes (< 2% IA/g) were observed in the bone. It suggested that the in vivo stability of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 was good since free 89Zr accumulates irreversibly in the mineralized bone.

Conclusion

A novel PET tracer targeting HER2, [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2, was successfully prepared by radiolabeling modified affibody with zirconium-89. The preclinical study revealed that [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MAL-Cys-MZHER2 is a candidate radiotracer for specific, noninvasive detection of HER2 levels in tumors.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Oh DY, Bang YJ. HER2-targeted therapies—a role beyond breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(1):33–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pegram MD, Miles D, Tsui CK, Zong Y. HER2-Overexpressing/amplified breast cancer as a testing ground for antibody–drug conjugate drug development in solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(4):775–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Domínguez-Ríos R, Sánchez-Ramírez DR, Ruiz-Saray K, Oceguera-Basurto PE, Almada M, Juárez J, et al. Cisplatin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for HER2 targeted ovarian cancer therapy. Colloid Surf B-Biointerfaces. 2019;178:199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mazzotta M, Krasniqi E, Barchiesi G, Pizzuti L, Tomao F, Barba M, et al. Long-term safety and real-world effectiveness of trastuzumab in breast cancer. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2). pii: E254.

  6. 6.

    Bonelli P, Borrelli A, Tuccillo FM, Silvestro L, Palaia R, Buonaguro FM. Precision medicine in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;11(10):804–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Eiger D, Pondé NF, de Azambuja E. Pertuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: current use and perspectives. Future Oncol. 2019;15(16):1823–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen Y, Liu L, Ni R, Zhou W. Advances in HER2 testing. Adv Clin Chem. 2019;91:123–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jauw YW, O’Donoghue JA, Zijlstra JM, Hoekstra OS. Menke-van der Houven CW, Morschhauser F, et al. 89Zr-Immuno-PET: toward a noninvasive clinical tool to measure target engagement of therapeutic antibodies in vivo. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(12):1825–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Massicano AV, Lee S, Crenshaw BK, Aweda TA, El Sayed R, Super I, et al. Imaging of HER2 with [89Zr] pertuzumab in response to T-DM1 therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2019;34(4):209–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liang Q, Kong L, Zhu X, Du Y, Tian J. Noninvasive imaging for assessment of the efficacy of therapeutic agents for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01431-5.

  12. 12.

    Mankoff DA, Farwell MD, Clark AS, Pryma DA. Making molecular imaging a clinical tool for precision oncology: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(5):695–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Menon H, Guo C, Verma V, Simone CB. The role of positron emission tomography imaging in radiotherapy target delineation. PET Clin. 2020;15(1):45–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Provost J, Garofalakis A, Sourdon J, Bouda D, Berthon B, Viel T, et al. Simultaneous positron emission tomography and ultrafast ultrasound for hybrid molecular, anatomical and functional imaging. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(2):85–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Marcu LG, Moghaddasi L, Bezak E. Imaging of tumor characteristics and molecular pathways with PET: developments over the last decade toward personalized cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102(4):1165–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Aluicio Sarduy E, Ellison PA, Barnhart TE, Cai W, Nickles RJ, Engle JW. PET radiometals for antibody labeling. J Lablled Compd Rad. 2018;61(9):636–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Woo S-K, Jang SJ, Seo M-J, Park JH, Kim BS, Kim EJ, et al. Development of 64Cu-NOTA-Trastuzumab for HER2 targeting: a radiopharmaceutical with improved pharmacokinetics for human studies. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(1):26–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moek KL, Giesen D, Kok IC, de Groot DJA, Jalving M, Fehrmann RS, et al. Theranostics using antibodies and antibody-related therapeutics. J Nucl Med. 2017; (Suppl 2):83S-90S.

  19. 19.

    Dehdashti F, Wu N, Bose R, Naughton MJ, Ma CX, Marquez-Nostra BV, et al. Evaluation of [89 Zr] trastuzumab-PET/CT in differentiating HER2-positive from HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169(3):523–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    O'Donoghue JA, Lewis JS, Pandit-Taskar N, Fleming SE, Schöder H, Larson SM, et al. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry for 89Zr-trastuzumab in patients with esophagogastric cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(1):161–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    De A, Kuppusamy G, Karri VVSR. Affibody molecules for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery in the management of breast cancer. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;107(Pt A): 906-919.

  22. 22.

    Gebauer M, Skerra A. Engineering of binding functions into proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;60:230–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kramer-Marek G, Bernardo M, Kiesewetter DO, Bagci U, Kuban M, Omer A, et al. PET of HER2-positive pulmonary metastases with 18F-ZHER2:342 affibody in a murine model of breast cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(6):939–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yanai A, Harada R, Iwata R, Yoshikawa T, Ishikawa Y, Furumoto S, et al. Site-specific labeling of F-18 proteins using a supplemented cell-free protein synthesis system and O-2-[18F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine:[18F] FET-HER2 affibody molecule. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21(3):529–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Velikyan I, Schweighöfer P, Feldwisch J, Seemann J, Frejd FY, Lindman H, et al. Diagnostic HER2-binding radiopharmaceutical, [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025, for routine clinical use in breast cancer patients. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;9(1):12–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kramer-Marek G, Kiesewetter DO, Martiniova L, Jagoda E, Lee SB, Capala J. [18F] FBEM-Z HER2: 342-affibody molecule—a new molecular tracer for in vivo monitoring of HER2 expression by positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(5):1008–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sandström M, Lindskog K, Velikyan I, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Sandberg D, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the anti-HER2 affibody molecule 68Ga-ABY-025 in breast cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(6):867–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sörensen J, Velikyan I, Sandberg D, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Tolmachev V, et al. Measuring HER2-receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer using [68Ga] ABY-025 Affibody PET/CT. Theranostics. 2016;6(2):262–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Heskamp S, Raavé R, Boerman O, Rijpkema M, Goncalves V, Denat F. 89Zr-immuno-positron emission tomography in oncology: state-of-the-art 89Zr radiochemistry. Bioconjug Chem. 2017;28(9):2211–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Brandt M, Cardinale J, Aulsebrook ML, Gasser G, Mindt TL. An overview of PET radiochemistry, part 2: Radiometals. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(10):1500–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dilworth JR, Pascu SI. The chemistry of PET imaging with zirconium-89. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47(10):2554–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Xu Y, Bai Z, Huang Q, Pan Y, Pan D, Wang L, et al. PET of HER2 expression with a novel 18FAl labeled affibody. J Cancer. 2017;8(7):1170–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xu Y, Wang L, Pan D, Yu C, Mi B, Huang Q, et al. PET imaging of a 68Ga labeled modified HER2 affibody in breast cancers: from xenografts to patients. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1104):20190425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mason C, Kossatz S, Carter L, Pirovano G, Brand C, Guru N, et al. A 89Zr-HDL PET tracer monitors response to a CSF1R inhibitor. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(3):433–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Raavé R, Sandker G, Adumeau P, Jacobsen CB, Mangin F, Meyer M, et al. Direct comparison of the in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, DFO* and DFOcyclo* for 89Zr-immunoPET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(9):1966–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tolmachev V, Velikyan I, Sandström M, Orlova A. A HER2-binding Affibody molecule labelled with 68Ga for PET imaging: direct in vivo comparison with the 111In-labelled analogue. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(7):1356–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Altai M, Strand J, Rosik D, Selvaraju RK, Eriksson Karlström A, Orlova A, et al. Influence of nuclides and chelators on imaging using affibody molecules: comparative evaluation of recombinant affibody molecules site-specifically labeled with 68Ga and 111In via maleimido derivatives of DOTA and NODAGA. Bioconjug Chem. 2013;24(6):1102–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Garousi J, Andersson KG, Mitran B, Pichl M-L, Ståhl S, Orlova A, et al. PET imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours using 89Zr-labelled ZEGFR:2377 affibody molecules. Int J Oncol. 2016;48(4):1325–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sörensen J, Sandberg D, Sandström M, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Tolmachev V, et al. First-in-human molecular imaging of HER2 expression in breast cancer metastases using the 111In-ABY-025 affibody molecule. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(5):730–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participating staff members of Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine for the study.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (81472749,5147307,31671035), National Significant New Drugs Creation Program(2017ZX09304021), Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Team (CXTDA2017024), Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (BK20161137, BK20170204, BE2016632), Jiangsu Health International Exchange Program(JSH-2018-015), Jiangsu talent projects (LGY2017088), Jiangsu Provincial Commission of Health and Family Planning Fundation(H2017031, QNRC2016628), Wuxi Commission of Health and Family Planning Fundation (Q201729).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lizhen Wang and Donghui Pan contributed equally to the manuscript.

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Ministry of Health, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Wuxi, 214063, Jiangsu, China

    Yuping Xu, Lizhen Wang, Donghui Pan, Junjie Yan, Xinyu Wang, Runlin Yang & Min Yang

  2. Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010110, Inner Mongolia, China

    Mingzhu Li

  3. Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China

    Yuping Xu, Yu Liu & Min Yang

Authors
  1. Yuping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lizhen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donghui Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junjie Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Runlin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingzhu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Min Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study design was set up by Yuping Xu, Lizhen Wang, Donghui Pan, and Min Yang. Data collection and interpretation was carried out by Lizhen Wang, Xinyu Wang and Yu Liu. Yuping Xu, Junjie Yan, and Donghui Pan were responsible for the production of the tracer. The corresponding in vitro and in vivo experiments were performed by Xinyu Wang , Runlin Yang, Mingzhu Li, and Yu Liu. Dr Min Yang was the principal investigator of this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were performed according to the national guidelines and approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Wang, L., Pan, D. et al. Synthesis of a novel 89Zr-labeled HER2 affibody and its application study in tumor PET imaging. EJNMMI Res 10, 58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00649-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2
  • PET
  • Affibody
  • Zirconium-89