Open Access

The effect of purification of Ga-68-labeled exendin on in vivo distribution

EJNMMI Research20166:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-016-0221-8

Received: 12 July 2016

Accepted: 4 August 2016

Published: 12 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Ga-labeled radiotracers are increasingly used for PET imaging. During the labeling procedure, formation of 68Ga-colloid may occur. Upon i.v. injection, 68Ga-colloid will accumulate rapidly in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow, resulting in reduced target-to-background ratios. In this study, we applied a thin layer chromatography (TLC) method to measure colloid content and we studied the effect of the purification method on the in vivo characteristics of 68Ga-labeled DOTA-exendin-3.

DOTA-exendin-3 was labeled with 68Ga, and the colloid content was measured by TLC on silica gel ITLC with two mobile phases. The labeling mixture was purified by gel filtration on a 5-ml G25M column, by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) using a C8 column or by solid phase extraction (SPE) on an HLB cartridge. The in vivo characteristics of the preparations were determined in BALB/c nude mice, and PET images were acquired 1 h p.i. using a microPET scanner. In these studies, unpurified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 and 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 were used as a reference.

Results

The colloid content of 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 and unpurified, gel filtration, RP-HPLC- and SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA exendin-3 was <3, 7, 9, <3, and <3 %, respectively. Unpurified 68Ga-DOTA exendin-3 showed high liver and spleen uptake. Gel filtration partly removed 68Ga-colloid from the preparation, resulting in moderate liver and spleen SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA exendin-3 showed very low liver and spleen uptake, that was similar to that of RP-HPLC purified 68Ga-DOTA exendin-3.

Conclusions

We showed that the colloid content can be measured by TLC and that solid phase extraction and HPLC completely remove 68Ga-colloid from 68Ga-labeled tracer preparations, resulting in very low liver and spleen uptake. This study clearly shows the importance of removal of 68Ga-colloid from preparations.

Keywords

68Ga 68Ga-hydroxide Purification Peptides Exendin

Background

68Ga-labeled peptides are increasingly used for positron emission tomography (PET), since 68Ga is a readily available PET radionuclide. Because 68Ga is a generator-produced positron emitter, it is widely available and relatively cheap. PET imaging is advantageous over conventional scintigraphy and SPECT because of its excellent sensitivity in combination with its superior spatial resolution. A recent study in patients with neuro-endocrine tumors (NET) showed that PET imaging with the somatostatin analog 68Ga-DOTA-TOC was more sensitive for detecting NET lesions than conventional somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with 111In-octreotide [1]. Moreover, 68Ga-labeling of peptides conjugated with a chelator (e.g., DOTA, NOTA) is a fast and efficient one-step reaction. Because of all these characteristics, there is an increasing interest in the application of 68Ga-labeled peptides.

It has been shown that for efficient receptor targeting, low peptide doses should be administered, since higher peptide doses could lead to receptor saturation and reduced uptake in the target tissue [25], especially in preclinical imaging studies. In rodents, relatively high activity doses (3–10 MBq) have to be administered to acquire PET images with adequate image quality. Therefore, 68Ga-labeled peptides with a high specific activity should be produced to administer high activity doses at a low amount of peptide. However, when producing 68Ga-labeled compounds with a high specific activity, the formation of insoluble 68Ga-species, such as 68Ga(OH)3 may occur. These insoluble 68Ga-species, generally referred to as “68Ga-colloid” will accumulate in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. Indeed, previous studies showed enhanced uptake in liver and spleen of 68Ga-labeled tracers as compared to the 111In-labeled compounds [3, 6, 7]. This enhanced tracer uptake in liver and spleen might result in decreased target-to-background ratios. We previously showed that insoluble 68Ga-species can be removed from the labeling reaction of 68Ga-labeled DOTA-exendin-3, a tracer targeting the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), using (preparative) reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) [3]. However, this purification method is time consuming and the solution of purified 68Ga-labeled peptide is diluted, making post-purification concentration necessary. Due to the short half-life of 68Ga (68 min), this method is not convenient in clinical practice. Moreover, purification with RP-HPLC requires expensive equipment. Solid phase extraction is an alternative method for purification of radiolabeled compounds and is a fast, simple, and cheap purification method that is now routinely used for 68Ga-tracer purification [8, 9].

In this study, we examined the effect of the purification method on the in vivo characteristics of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 in BALB/c nude mice. 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was purified by RP-HPLC, gel filtration, or solid phase extraction. Unpurified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 and 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 were used as a reference in this study. In addition, we describe a quality control method, based on instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC), to determine the colloid content of the 68Ga-labeled tracer [10].

Methods

Peptides and radionuclides

[Lys40(DOTA)]exendin-3 (DOTA-exendin-3) was purchased from Peptide Specialty Laboratories (Heidelberg, Germany). In this compound, DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) is conjugated to the ε-amino group of the lysine at position 40 (K40) and the C-terminal carboxyl group is amidated [3]. 68GaCl3 was eluted from a TiO2-based 1110 MBq 68Ge/68Ga generator (IGG100, Eckert and Ziegler, Berlin, Germany) with 0.1 N Ultrapure HCl (J.T. Baker, Deventer, The Netherlands). 111InCl3 was obtained from Covidien (Petten, The Netherlands).

Radiolabeling

DOTA-exendin-3 was labeled with 68Ga and 111In as previously described [3]. Briefly, 120 MBq 68Ga in 1000 μl Ultrapure 0.1 N HCl was added to 10 μg DOTA-exendin-3 in 120 μl 2.5 M HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After 20-min incubation at 95 °C, EDTA was added to a final concentration of 5 mM and the reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for another 5 min. Subsequently, 10 % Tween-80 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to a final concentration of 0.1 % to prevent sticking of the radiolabeled peptide to the vessel wall and quality control was performed as described below.

DOTA-exendin-3 was labeled with 111In by adding 10 MBq 111InCl3 to 1 μg peptide in 0.1 M 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), pH 5.5, under similar conditions as described above.

Quality control

Quality control was performed using RP-HPLC on a C18 reversed-phase column (Zorbax Rx-C18; 4.6 mm × 25 cm; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC). The column was eluted with mixture of water containing 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and acetonitrile with a linear gradient from 3 to 100 % acetonitrile in 10 min (flow rate 1 ml/min). ITLC was performed on silica gel ITLC (Pall Corporation Life Sciences, New York, NY, USA). Two mobile phases were used: 0.1 M EDTA in 0.25 M NH4Ac, pH 5.5 (R f = 0: 68Ga-labeled exendin and 68Ga-colloid, R f = 1: 68Ga-EDTA) and 1.25 M NH4Ac, pH 5.5: dimethylformamide (DMF) (1:1) (R f = 0: 68Ga-colloid, R f = 1: 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 and 68Ga-EDTA).

Validation of the quality control by ITLC for the detection of 68Ga-colloid

68Ga-colloid was prepared by adding 1250 μl 2.5 M HEPES to 500 μl 68GaCl3 in 0.1 M HCl. The final pH of this mixture was approximately 6. The mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 15 min, and EDTA was added to a final concentration of 5 mM. The amount of 68Ga-colloid was determined by TLC with 0.1 M EDTA in 0.25 M NH4Ac, pH 5.5 as a mobile phase (R f = 0: 68Ga-colloid, R f = 1 68Ga-EDTA) and 1.25 M NH4Ac, pH 5.5: DMF (1:1) as a mobile phase (R f = 0: 68Ga-colloid, R f = 1: 68Ga-EDTA). The reaction mixture was applied on a disposable PD-10 desalting column, containing SephadexTM G-25 medium (GE Life Sciences, Diegem, Belgium) and was eluted with 6 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5 mM EDTA. The fraction containing the majority of the radioactivity was collected (from 3–4 ml), representing 68Ga-colloid, and quality control was performed by ITLC as described above.

68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was purified by RP-HPLC as described below, and various amounts of the 68Ga-colloid were added to obtain final 68Ga-colloid concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 % (n = 4). The amount of 68Ga-colloid was determined by ITLC with 1.25 M NH4Ac, pH 5.5: DMF (1:1) as the mobile phase (R f = 0: 68Ga-colloid, R f = 1: 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 and 68Ga-EDTA). RP-HPLC-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3, 68Ga-EDTA, and 68Ga-colloid were used as controls. ITLC strips were exposed to an imaging plate (Fuji Film BAS-SR 2025, Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany) for 1 min. Images were acquired with a radioluminography laser imager (Fuji Film BAS 1800 II system, Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany) and analyzed with Aida Image Analyzer software (Raytest). Correlation between the measured 68Ga-colloid fraction and the added 68Ga-colloid content was determined by linear regression using GraphPad Prism 5. The detection limit of the ITLC method was defined by the Y-intercept as determined by linear regression analysis.

RP-HPLC purification of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3

After radiolabeling, the reaction mixture was purified by HPLC, using a C8 reversed-phase column (Zorbax eclipse XDB C8 4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm, Agilent Technologies). The column was eluted with water containing 0.1 % TFA (0–5 min), 40 % ethanol (5–10 min) followed by a linear gradient from 40 to 90 % ethanol in 5 min (flow rate 1 ml/min). The fractions containing 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 (retention time 14–15 min) were collected and diluted with PBS containing 0.5 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) to a final ethanol concentration of less than 10 % before injection into mice (injection volume 0.2 ml). The radiochemical purity of the purified 68Ga-labeled DOTA-exendin-3 preparations was determined using ITLC as described above.

Purification of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 by gel filtration

Purification by gel filtration was performed on disposable PD-10 desalting columns, containing SephadexTM G-25 medium (GE Life Sciences, Diegem, Belgium). The column was preconditioned by eluting with 10 ml PBS containing 0.5 % (v/w) BSA, and the reaction mixture was loaded onto the column. The column was eluted with PBS-BSA (0.5 %), and 0.5 ml fractions were collected. The majority of the radioactivity, representing 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3, was collected in fractions 5 and 6 (2-3 ml). The radiochemical purity of the tracer in the fractions was analyzed by RP-HPLC and ITLC as described above.

Purification of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 by solid phase extraction

Solid phase extraction was performed using a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) reversed-phase sorbent cartridge (Waters Oasis©, Milford, MA, USA). The cartridge was activated by elution with 1 ml ethanol, the residual ethanol was removed with 1 ml water (Versol, Lyon, France), and the column was conditioned with 1 ml 0.1 N HCl:2.5 M HEPES (8:1, similar to the reaction mixture). The reaction mixture was loaded, and 68Ga-EDTA was washed from the column with 2 ml 0.1 N HCl:2.5 M HEPES (8:1). After removal of the residual HCl-HEPES mixture with 1 ml water, 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was eluted with 200 μl ethanol. The radiochemical purity of the tracer in the fractions was analyzed by RP-HPLC and ITLC as described above. Before injection into mice, the eluate containing 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was diluted with PBS containing 0.5 % BSA to a final ethanol concentration of less than 10 %.

Biodistribution studies

Animal experiments were performed after approval of the local ethical committee (RUDEC) for animal experiments. The biodistribution of unpurified, gel filtration-, RP-HPLC-, and SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was determined in BALB/c nude mice. Mice (n = 5) were injected intravenously with 3 MBq 68Ga-labeled exendin-3 at a peptide dose of 0.3 μg (60 pmol). As a control, another group of mice received 370 kBq 111In-DTPA-exendin-3 (60 pmol). The mice were euthanized 1 h post-injection by CO2/O2 suffocation, a blood sample was taken, and samples of relevant tissues were dissected, weighed, and counted.

MicroPET

Mice were injected intravenously with 3 MBq (0.3 μg) unpurified, gel filtratrion, RP-HPLC- or SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3. Mice were euthanized 1 h p.i. by CO2/O2 suffocation and PET images were acquired during 45 min using a small-animal PET/CT scanner (Inveon™; Preclinical Solutions, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, TN, USA). Images were reconstructed by OSEM3D/MAP reconstruction with the following parameters: 256 × 256 matrix, 2 OSEM3D iterations, 18 MAP iterations, and a resolution of 0.075 mm uniform variance. CT images were acquired for anatomical correlation directly after PET imaging (spatial resolution 113 μm, 80 kV, 500 μA, exposure time 300 ms).

Statistical analysis

All mean values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed t test using GraphPad Prism (version 5). In order to determine whether there was a overall difference in blood and kidney accumulation of the various preparations, a one-way ANOVA was performed. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Radiolabeling

DOTA-exendin-3 could be labeled with 68Ga with a specific activity of 110 GBq/μmol (at time of synthesis) with a radiochemical purity >90 % (depending on the purification method) after purification. The colloid content of 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 and unpurified, gel filtration, RP-HPLC- and SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was <3, 7, 9, <3, and <3 %, respectively (Table 1). Of note, the initial colloid content of the labeling mixture varies, which explains the higher colloid content of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 after gel filtration. After purification, the percentage of unincorporated 68Ga was <3 % for all preparations as determined by RP-HPLC.
Table 1

68Ga-colloid content determined by ITLC, liver, and spleen uptake of unpurified, gel filtration, RP-HPLC- and SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 and 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 in BALB/c nude mice (n = 5 per group)

 

68Ga-colloid content (%)

Liver uptake (% ID/g)

Spleen uptake (% ID/g)

111In-DOTA-exendin-3

<3

0.7 ± 0.1

0.3 ± 0.1

68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3

7

6.1 ± 1.0

4.5 ± 0.7

Gel filtration purified

68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3

9

3.0 ± 0.3

1.4 ± 0.3

Solid phase extraction purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3

<3

0.8 ± 0.0

0.5 ± 0.1

RP-HPLC purified

68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3

<3

0.6 ± 0.1

0.4 ± 0.1

Validation of TLC method

The results of the validation of the TLC method to determine the colloid content in preparations of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 are shown in Fig. 1. The colloid content measured by TLC correlated linearly with the amount of colloid present in the reaction mixtures (R 2 = 0.98). The detection limit of the TLC method was a 68Ga-colloid content of 3.2 ± 0.9 %, as determined by the Y-intercept of the trend line.
Fig. 1

ITLC method for determination of the 68Ga-colloid content. a TLC images and profiles of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 with various amounts of 68Ga-colloid (typical examples). b Correlation between the amount of 68Ga-colloid added and the measured colloid content as determined by TLC

Biodistribution studies

The results of the biodistribution studies are summarized in Fig. 2. 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 showed very low accumulation in the liver and spleen: 0.7 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 %ID/g, respectively, representing the liver and spleen uptake of a preparation without colloid. High uptake in the liver and spleen (6.1 ± 1.0 and 4.5 ± 0.7 %ID, respectively) was observed when unpurified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was injected. Gel filtration partially removed 68Ga-hydroxide, resulting in intermediate uptake in the liver and spleen: 3.0 ± 0.3 and 1.4 ± 0.3 %ID/g, respectively). Uptake in the liver and spleen of SPE-purified (0.8 ± 0.0 %ID/g and 0.5 ± 0.1 %ID/g, respectively) and RP-HPLC-purified tracer (0.6 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 %ID/g, respectively) was very low and similar to liver and spleen uptake of 111In-DOTA-exendin-3, indicating very efficient removal of 68Ga-colloid with these purification methods.
Fig. 2

Biodistribution of unpurified, gel filtration, RP-HPLC and SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 in BALB/c nude mice (n = 5 per group). 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 was used as a reference. Values are expressed as percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) ± SD. Mice were dissected 1 h p.i

The uptake in the pancreas was similar for all compounds, except of RP-HPLC purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3, that had a significantly higher pancreatic uptake (10.2 ± 2.5 %ID/g, p < 0.05). A significant difference in radioactivity concentration in the blood and kidneys was found between all groups (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0035 for blood and kidneys, respectively), probably caused by differences in the colloid content of the various preparations.

MicroPET

PET images of BALB/c nude mice after injection of unpurified, gel filtration, RP-HPLC-, or SPE-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 are shown in Fig. 3. With unpurified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3, the liver was clearly visualized in the PET images (Fig. 3a). Liver visualization was less pronounced with 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 purified by gel filtration (Fig. 3b). No liver uptake was visible when 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was purified with RP-HPLC (Fig. 3c) or SPE (Fig. 3d).
Fig. 3

PET images of BALB/c nude mice after injection of 3 MBq 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3. PET was acquired 1 h p.i. after euthanasia with an acquisition time of 45 min. High liver uptake is seen when the unpurified tracer is injected (a). Gel filtration partially removed the 68Ga-colloid (b), whereas no liver uptake was observed when 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 was purified by RP-HPLC (c) or SPE (d)

Discussion

During the radiolabeling procedure of DOTA-conjugated compounds with 68Ga, in most cases, insoluble colloidal 68Ga species are formed, especially when compounds are labeled at a high specific activity. This insoluble 68Ga-colloid results in enhanced accumulation in the liver and spleen when injected in laboratory animals or patients, resulting in reduced image quality. Therefore, prevention of formation or removal of 68Ga-colloid is required. We evaluated three purification methods for the removal of 68Ga-colloid: solid phase extraction (SPE), preparative HPLC, and gel filtration. Solid phase extraction was a fast and simple method that effectively removed 68Ga-colloid from a labeling mixture of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3, resulting in negligible liver and spleen accumulation similar to that of 111In-DOTA-exendin-3. The major advantage of this technique is that purification of the labeling mixture can be performed within 5 min. Purification by preparative RP-HPLC resulted in similar spleen and liver accumulation. However, this technique is more time-consuming and less suited for purification of 68Ga-labeled tracers, due to the short half-life of 68Ga. Remarkably, the uptake of RP-HLPC-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 in the pancreas was significantly higher. This is probably due to a slightly lower peptide dose, which results in higher pancreatic uptake as previously described [3]. Gel filtration removed 68Ga-colloid less efficiently, resulting in higher liver and spleen uptake than SPE and RP-HPLC purification. It should be noted that gel filtration could be more appropriate for the purification of larger compounds such as proteins. The higher molecular weight of proteins combined with the low molecular weight of 68Ga-colloid could result in better separation. However, the feasibility to separate 68Ga-colloid from high molecular weight compounds by gel filtration should be evaluated.

High specific activities of 68Ga-labeled tracers are required to administer high activity doses in combination with low peptide doses. It was shown that high peptide doses lead to reduced uptake in the target tissues due to (partly) saturation of the receptors [25], which is of particular importance in preclinical imaging. Moreover, high peptide doses can lead to (toxic) side effects, especially when biologically active compounds are used as the ligand. The need for a high specific activity generally enhances 68Ga-colloid formation, since incorporation of 68Ga present in the labeling mixture in the presence of low amounts of metal binding ligand might be incomplete. Since 68Ga(OH)3 could be formed at pH 3 in the absence of chelating agents (such as DOTA, DTPA, and EDTA) [11], 68Ga(OH)3 is formed in a labeling mixture at a pH between 3.5 and 4 when 68Ga-incorporation is incomplete. Interestingly, in the pH range generally used for 68Ga-labeling procedures (pH 3.5–4), Ga(III) is predominantly present as polymeric Ga(III) hydroxides, while Ga(OH)3 is the predominant form at pH 7 [12]. Furthermore, at higher pH, the formation of insoluble GaO(OH) can occur [13]. GaO(OH) is particularly formed at high temperature [14], which is of importance since most 68Ga-labeling procedures are carried out at high temperatures (80–100 °C). In contrast to Ga(III) hydroxides, GaO(OH) is only slowly redissolved even at low pH [14].

Wild et al. showed a similar biodistribution of 68Ga-labeled DOTA-exendin-4 [15] as 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 in our study. In the former study, no purification was performed of the 68Ga-labeled compound, and this lead to slightly higher uptake in the spleen as compared to the SPE and RP-HPLC purified tracer used in our study. However, the splenic uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 was lower than that of the unpurified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 in our study. This lower uptake in the spleen of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 reported by Wild et al. is probably due to a lower 68Ga-colloid content in the labeling mixture. The lower 68Ga-colloid content might be due to a lower specific activity of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 and a different labeling protocol. In the study performed by Wild et al., the 68Ga-eluate was purified and the labeling was performed in a microwave for 5 min. The shorter labeling time in combination with the lower specific activity may lead to faster and more complete incorporation of 68Ga, reducing the risk of 68Ga-colloid formation [11]. Several other labeling methods [16, 17] and chelators [1821] for labeling compounds with 68Ga are described with more efficient labeling yields and faster labeling kinetics. These new strategies for 68Ga-labeling of compounds might also reduce the risk of 68Ga-colloid formation.

We validated a TLC method for the detection of 68Ga-colloid in labeling mixtures of 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3 and showed a clear linear correlation between added 68Ga-colloid to the labeling mixtures (free of 68Ga-colloid) and the measured 68Ga-colloid content. These results suggest accurate quantification of 68Ga-colloid in the labeling mixture. Determination of the colloid content is of great importance to calculate the specific activity. Neglecting the presence of 68Ga-colloid might result in overestimation of the specific activity and thus administration of a higher peptide dose as initially planned. This is especially true for exendin, where very low peptide doses need to be administered to prevent receptor saturation resulting in lower uptake in GLP-1R-positive tissues [3]. The detection limit of this method is approximately 3 % making detecting of very low concentrations of colloid difficult. The rather low sensitivity is due to tailing of the radiolabeling peptide hampering the clear delineation between the peak representing the 68Ga-colloid and the peak representing 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3. The sensitivity of this method for the determination of 68Ga-colloid for other peptides might be different due to different migratory characteristics of the 68Ga-peptide on this TLC system compared to exendin.

Enhanced liver and spleen uptake will hamper the detection of lesions in the upper abdomen. Radiolabeled exendin was successfully used for detection of insulinomas [22] and could potentially be used for detection of the pancreatic beta cell mass. Enhanced liver and spleen uptake might reduce the sensitivity of these methods. Previous studies explored the feasibility of tumor imaging and atherosclerotic plaques with 68GaCl3 in mouse models for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and artherosclerosis, respectively [23, 24]. Although the tumor and atherosclerotic plaques could be detected, the PET images suffered from high background signal in the liver and lungs as well as high concentration in the blood. The binding of 68Ga to transferrin (prolonging the circulation time) and the formation of 68Ga-colloid could explain the enhanced background and is in line with our study.

Conclusions

Solid phase extraction using a HLB cartridge is a fast and simple method to remove 68Ga-colloid. The uptake in the liver and spleen of the SPE-purified product was similar to that of 111In-DOTA-exendin-3 or HPLC-purified 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-3, indicating sufficient removal of insoluble 68Ga-colloid. Gel filtration only partly removed 68Ga-colloid species and is not suitable for purification of 68Ga-labeled exendin-3 and most likely other peptides. Moreover, SPE cartridges are routinely integrated in GMP-grade synthesis modules for 68Ga-labeling of peptide, and therefore, this method can be used for purification of 68Ga-labeled compounds for human use. Possibly, gel filtration might be suitable for larger compounds (e.g., antibodies, proteins), since the performance of size exclusion chromatography is expected to be superior for larger compounds. However, the feasibility for the removal of 68Ga-colloid by gel filtration of proteins and compounds where solid phase extraction is not possible should be verified. The studies presented here show the importance of complete removal of 68Ga-colloid before in vivo use.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Bianca Lemmers, Kitty Lemmens, Iris Lamers, and Henk Arnts (Central Animal Facility, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) for their technical assistance with the animal experiments.

Authors’ contributions

MB, GF, and LJ performed the experiments. MB wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in the overall design of the studies and critically reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

References

  1. Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D, Dobrozemsky G, Heute D, Uprimny C, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:508–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Breeman WA, de Jong M, Kwekkeboom DJ, Valkema R, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, et al. Somatostatin receptor-mediated imaging and therapy: basic science, current knowledge, limitations and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1421–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brom M, Oyen WJ, Joosten L, Gotthardt M, Boerman OC. 68Ga-labelled exendin-3, a new agent for the detection of insulinomas with PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1345–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Froidevaux S, Calame-Christe M, Schuhmacher J, Tanner H, Saffrich R, Henze M, et al. A gallium-labeled DOTA-alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analog for PET imaging of melanoma metastases. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:116–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Notni J, Steiger K, Hoffmann F, Reich D, Kessler H, Schwaiger M, et al. Variation of specific activities of Ga-68-Aquibeprin and Ga-68-Avebetrin enables selective PET-imaging of different expression levels of integrins alpha5beta1 and alphavbeta3. J Nucl Med 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.173948.
  6. Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, Waser B, Baum RP, Reubi JC, et al. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:982–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Breeman WA, de Jong M, de Blois E, Bernard BF, Konijnenberg M, Krenning EP. Radiolabelling DOTA-peptides with 68Ga. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:478–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sandstrom M, Velikyan I, Garske-Roman U, Sorensen J, Eriksson B, Granberg D, et al. Comparative biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1755–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Velikyan I, Sundin A, Sorensen J, Lubberink M, Sandstrom M, Garske-Roman U, et al. Quantitative and qualitative intrapatient comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE: net uptake rate for accurate quantification. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:204–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sosabowski JK, Mather SJ. Conjugation of DOTA-like chelating agents to peptides and radiolabeling with trivalent metallic isotopes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:972–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Green MA, Welch MJ. Gallium radiopharmaceutical chemistry. Int J Rad Appl Instrum. 1989;16:435–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hacht B. Gallium(III) ion hydrolysis under physiological conditions. B Korean Chem Soc. 2008;29:372–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamsjage H, Schindle P. Loslichkeitsprodukte Von Metalloxiden Und -Hydroxiden .11. Die Loslichkeit Von Alpha-Gao(Oh) Bei 60 Degrees C in Perchlorsauren Losungen Konstanter Ionenstarke. Helv Chim Acta. 1967;50:2053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Uchida M, Okuwaki A. Potentiometric determination of the first hydrolysis constant of gallium(III) in NaCl solution to 100 degrees C. J Solution Chem. 1998;27:965–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wild D, Wicki A, Mansi R, Behe M, Keil B, Bernhardt P, et al. Exendin-4-based radiopharmaceuticals for glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor PET/CT and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1059–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schultz MK, Mueller D, Baum RP, Leonard Watkins G, Breeman WA. A new automated NaCl based robust method for routine production of gallium-68 labeled peptides. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;76:46–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shetty D, Jeong JM, Ju CH, Kim YJ, Lee JY, Lee YS, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of macrocyclic amino acid derivatives for tumor imaging by gallium-68 positron emission tomography. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18:7338–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eder M, Wangler B, Knackmuss S, LeGall F, Little M, Haberkorn U, et al. Tetrafluorophenolate of HBED-CC: a versatile conjugation agent for 68Ga-labeled small recombinant antibodies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1878–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma MT, Neels OC, Denoyer D, Roselt P, Karas JA, Scanlon DB, et al. Gallium-68 complex of a macrobicyclic cage amine chelator tethered to two integrin-targeting peptides for diagnostic tumor imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2011;22:2093–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Notni J, Pohle K, Wester HJ. Comparative gallium-68 labeling of TRAP-, NOTA-, and DOTA-peptides: practical consequences for the future of gallium-68-PET. EJNMMI Res. 2012;2:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Notni J, Simecek J, Hermann P, Wester HJ. TRAP, a powerful and versatile framework for gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals. Chemistry. 2011;17:14718–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wild D, Macke H, Christ E, Gloor B, Reubi JC. Glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor scans to localize occult insulinomas. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:766–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Silvola JMU, Laitinen I, Sipila HJ, Laine VJO, Leppanen P, Yla-Herttuala S, et al. Uptake of (68)gallium in atherosclerotic plaques in LDLR(−/−)ApoB(100/100) mice. EJNMMI Res. 2011;1:14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ujula T, Salomaki S, Autio A, Luoto P, Tolvanen T, Lehikoinen P, et al. Ga-68-chloride PET reveals human pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts in rats-comparison with FDG. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:259–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016