Skip to main content
EJNMMI Research
Download PDF
  • Original research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

EJNMMI Research volume 14, Article number: 42 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), imaging with gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) ligands is an alternative to PSMA-targeted tracers, particularly if PSMA expression is low or absent. [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG is a newly developed GRPR-directed probe for conventional scintigraphy and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. The current study aims to investigate the safety, biodistribution and dosimetry of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PCa.

Results

No adverse pharmacologic effects were observed. Injection of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG resulted in an effective dose of 0.0027 ± 0.0002 mSv/MBq. The urinary bladder was the critical organ with the highest mean absorbed dose of 0.028 ± 0.001 mGy/MBq, followed by the pancreas with 0.0043 ± 0.0015 mGy/MBq, osteogenic cells with 0.0039 ± 0.0005 mGy/MBq, the kidneys with 0.0034 ± 0.0003 mGy/MBq, and the liver with 0.0019 ± 0.0004 mGy/MBq, respectively. No focal tracer uptake suggestive of PCa recurrence could be revealed for any of the patients.

Conclusion

[99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG appears to be a safe diagnostic agent. Compared to GRPR-targeted PET tracers, this 99mTc-labelled SPECT agent could contribute to a broader application and better availability of this novel approach. Further research to assess its clinical value is warranted.

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common solid malignancy in men, with an incidence of 214 diagnosed cases per 1000 men [1]. Recently, positron emission tomography (PET) using ligands addressing the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has attracted the attention of clinicians and imaging specialists and has become the new gold standard for staging of high risk PCa and localising BCR [2, 3]. Even for conventional scintigraphy and SPECT imaging several PSMA ligands are available and have shown comparable results to PET-ligands though suffering from lower sensitivity [4]. However, PSMA expression has only been observed in approximately 90–95% of PCa patients. Thus, alternatives are required [5]. Another promising molecular target for the detection of PCa is the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), a 7-trans-membrane G-protein-coupled receptor activating phospholipase C-signalling, which has been shown to be overexpressed especially in breast and prostate cancer [6,7,8]. In a large study of n = 530 pathological samples, sufficient GRPR expression could be proven in 77% of primary PCa [9]. Noteworthy, receptor expression seems to be inversely correlated with Gleason score [9], which might render it complementary to PSMA. Regarding clinical data, most experience has been gained with the PET agent [68Ga]Ga-RM2 including head-to-head comparisons to PSMA-PET [10, 11] or approaches to use its 177Lu-labelled analog for radioligand therapy [12]. Previously developed bombesin analogs linked to 99mTc showed limited detection rates for bone metastasis and could not detect lymph node metastasis [13, 14].

Given the continuously expanding field of clinical indications for non-invasive in vivo PCa theranostics (even beyond PSMA), development of a ligand amenable to radiolabelling with gamma emitters (such as technetium-99 m) for use in conventional scintigraphy or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with its lower cost and generally better availability would be highly desirable.

This need has been recognized, and has fuelled the recent development and preclinical characterization of 99mTc-labeled tracers, such as [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG (Fig. 1), a novel RM2 analog modified in the pharmacophore to improve activity clearance and thus, tumour-to-organ ratio at early time points [15].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chemical structure of RM2 and N4-BTG. Structural differences are depicted in red. Chelators (DOTA in RM2, N4 in N4-BTG) are depicted in blue

Full size image

In this study, we present the safety, biodistribution and dosimetry for the first four patients examined with [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG, a novel 99mTc-labeled GRPR antagonist. This new probe allows conventional scintigraphy and SPECT imaging addressing GRPR as the target.

Methods

All reported investigations were conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and with national regulations. The local ethics committee (ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany) approved this retrospective analysis (permit number 22–0691). [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was prepared in compliance with the German Medicines Act, AMG § 13 2b, and after notifying the responsible regulatory authority. All participants provided written informed consent for the imaging procedure and publication of the images.

Patient selection

This retrospective analysis includes four consecutive male patients (Table 1) with a mean age of 66 ± 5 years (range, 58 to 70 years) showing biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) following radical prostatectomy. The mean observed PSA level was 1.7 ± 0.6 ng/mL (range, 1.0 to 2.4 ng/mL). Previously performed [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT scans had shown no evidence of local recurrence or metastases, so compassionate use [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG-SPECT/CT scans were performed. Individual patient characteristics can be found in Table 1. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events up to 5 h after administration of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG.

Table 1 Individual patient characteristics and injected activity of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG.
Full size table

Preparation of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG

[99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was prepared by adding up to 0.8 ml Na[99mTc]TcO4 to a mixture of 7.5 nmol N4-BTG peptide, 5 µl SnCl2 solution (1 mg/ml) in sodium ascorbate (3 g/l in 0.01 M HCl), 3 µl 0.1 M disodium hydrogen citrate sesquihydrate in water, and 25 µl 0.5 M Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 9.5). The solution was heated to 98 °C for 10 min, and after cooling for 5 min it was diluted with isotonic saline to a final volume of 10–20 ml. Finally, it was sterile filtered by mean of two 0.22 μm filters in series (Cathivex and Millex GV, Millipore). Chemical and radiochemical purity was determined by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; column: Hypersil GOLD 150 × 3; gradient: 15/85 to 95/5 (v/v) CH3CN/H2O with 0.1% TFA within 8 min; flow: 0.8 ml/min; UV (λ = 220 nm) and radiodetection; tR about 5 min) and thin layer chromatography (silica gel–impregnated glass fibre sheets (Varian) and methyletherketone as eluent; Rf of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG: 0.2). Radiochemical purity was greater than 90% and all other quality parameters (pH, endotoxin level, sterility) were within limits prescribed by the general monograph (Ph. Eur.) for radiopharmaceutical preparations. The radiopharmaceutical was administered via an intravenous bolus injection, followed by a saline flush.

Imaging protocol

All scans were obtained on a GE Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA) SPECT/CT system, equipped with a LEHR collimator and operating within an energy window of 140.5 keV ± 10%. A scatter window ranging from 114 to 126 keV was additionally acquired for planar and SPECT imaging. For SPECT, the imaging field of view was from neck to upper thighs. At each bed position, 60 views were acquired, with a duration of 8 s each. Subsequently, images were reconstructed using an ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm (2 iterations and 10 subsets) with a Butterworth filter (fc = 0.48, n = 10). Scatter and attenuation correction was applied. For whole-body planar imaging, a scan speed of 30 cm/min was employed until 60 min post-injection, after which the acquisition speed was moderated to 12 cm/min for any further data collection. Planar imaging was performed at 5 and 30 min after injection of the radiopharmaceutical. At 60, 120, and 240 min after injection additional SPECT/CT and planar imaging was acquired. An overview of the imaging protocol can be found in Fig. 2. For the scans at 5 and 30 min after injection, no micturition took place. Subsequently, the patients were asked to void their bladder directly prior to each examination. No blood samples were taken.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Imaging protocol for [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG.

Full size image

Image analysis and dosimetry

First, a systematic visual analysis was performed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians (AG, CHP). Potential discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The process included assessing presence of focal tracer accumulation that surpassed background activity at potential sites of tumour lesions.

For dosimetry, organ volumes were determined from the CT dataset of the corresponding SPECT/CT. Time-activity data, derived from the geometric mean of anterior and posterior planar images to compensate in part for attenuation, were assessed using the Xeleris Dosimetry Toolkit (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The first planar image (captured prior to micturition) was utilised to establish the calibration factor. Regions of interest (ROI) were manually delineated on the entire body and the urinary bladder to also estimate the whole-body clearance. Background ROIs were delineated outside the body. Time-activity data based on SPECT/CT were also assessed using the Xeleris Dosimetry Toolkit, with standard activity within the field of view used to ascertain the calibration factor. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn on the CT and then transferred to the SPECT for the pancreas, kidneys, liver, spleen, heart, lungs and lumbar vertebrae 2–4. Additionally, a sphere of about 100 mL was drawn within the region of the right shoulder (mostly covering M. subscapularis) to account for background. For determining the red bone marrow (RBM) source activity, it was assumed that 6.7% of the RBM activity is within lumbar vertebrae 2–4 [16, 17]. Time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) were computed fitting mono-exponential functions to the data using the NUKFIT software [18, 19]. The TIAC of the urinary bladder was estimated using the whole-body clearance rate and the voiding interval of 1 h, 2 h, 4 h and every 3.5 h from then on. Individual patient absorbed doses for the whole body and organs of interest were estimated based on the MIRD schemes using OLINDA/EXM version 1.0 [20] taking into account the patients‘ individual organ masses. The effective dose provided by OLINDA/EXM was corrected using the current tissue-weighting factors from ICRP 103 [21].

Statistics

All continuous data are reported as mean, standard deviation and range.

Results

Radioligand and patient safety

The administered mass of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was 12 ± 1 µg. The overall injected activity (radiochemical purity greater than 98%) ranged from 683 to 836 MBq (mean ± SD, 772 ± 74 MBq). Injection of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was well tolerated by all four subjects. No side effects or changes in vital signs were observed during the study or follow-up period.

Image analysis

Visual image analysis showed swift activity clearance from blood/background via rapid renal excretion. High physiological uptake of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was seen in pancreas, liver and spleen immediately after injection, whereas no focal lesions suggestive for PCa manifestations could be recorded at any measurement. The pancreas exhibited maximum uptake only after 30 min, followed by a fast washout phase. Most of the activity accumulated in liver and spleen at 5 min after injection, and was cleared within the first 30 min after injection. Whole-body planar images at different time points for Patient 1 (P1) are displayed in Fig. 3. Patient 3 (P3) exhibited high tracer retention in the lymphatic tissue of the Waldeyer’s ring, consistent with inflammatory changes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sequential anterior views of whole-body planar scans of a 70-y-old patient (P1; PSA level 1.2 ng/ml). Biodistribution of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG is depcited at 5, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after i.v. administration

Full size image

Biodistribution

The biodistribution of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was determined for all major organs in all patients. The patient individual effective half-lives of the tracer are listed in Table 2. Time-integrated-activity curves, expressed as percentage of injected activity (ID), of P1 are shown in Fig. 4 for various organs and in Fig. 5 for bladder content and whole body. Similar time-activity curves were recorded for all four patients. The highest pancreatic uptake was observed in P1 at 1 h p.i. with approximately 1.2% of ID. The data at later time points showed a decrease below 0.2% at 4 h. For all patients, the mean pancreas uptake at 1 h p.i. was (0.73 ± 0.37)% with a fast effective half-life of about 1 h (Table 2). At 1 h p.i., the highest organ uptake (besides the urinary bladder) was observed in the kidneys of P2 with about 2.1% ID, which decreased below 0.3% at 4 h p.i. In all patients, the mean uptake in the kidneys declined from (1.3 ± 0.6)% at 1 h to (0.44 ± 0.13)% at 4 h after injection.

Table 2 Determined effective half-lives [h] of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG for various organs
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Time-activity curves for Patient 1 (P1) for all delineated organs and the red bone marrow (RBM) showing percentage of injected dose (%ID).

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Time-activity curves for Patient 1 (P1) for bladder content and whole body (WB). Micturition prior to imaging at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h after i.v. administration

Full size image

Dosimetry

Time-integrated activity coefficients of segmented organs were estimated for each patient individually. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated (Table 3). Highest time integrated activity coefficients were determined in the urinary bladder (0.67 ± 0.02 h), red bone marrow (0.071 ± 0.028 h), kidneys (0.065 ± 0.012 h) and liver (0.063 ± 0.011 h). Mean organ absorbed dose coefficients as well as the effective dose for a standard administered activity of 750 MBq are listed in Table 4.

Table 3 Determined time-integrated activity coefficients [MBq-h/MBq] of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG for various organs
Full size table
Table 4 Organ Absorbed Dose Coefficients and Effective Dose of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG.
Full size table

The highest absorbed dose coefficient was observed in the urinary bladder wall (0.028 ± 0.001 mGy/MBq), followed by the pancreas (0.0043 ± 0.0015 mGy/MBq), osteogenic cells (0.0039 ± 0.0005 mGy/MBq), kidneys (0.0034 ± 0.0003 mGy/MBq), and liver (0.0019 ± 0.0004 mGy/MBq).

Across the four patients, the effective dose coefficient was 0.0027 ± 0.0002 mSv/MBq, yielding a total effective dose of 2.04 ± 0.14 mSv (ICRP 103) for an injected activity of 750 MBq of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG. As additional information, the outdated effective dose using the tissue weighting factors of the ICRP 60 would be 2.46 ± 0.13 mSv. A comparison with published data on other tracers used for the detection of PCa is presented in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparison of effective doses for typical administered activities for various GRPR- and PSMA-targeted compounds. a [23]; b [33]; c [34]; d [35]; e [36]; f [37]

Full size image

Discussion

Hybrid imaging with PSMA-directed PET/CT has demonstrated significant advantages in the detection of prostate cancer. However, PSMA expression is observed in only ∼ 90–95% of patients with PCa. As a complementary approach, bombesin-based tracers have shown promising results in lower-grade, well-differentiated tumours [10] but also in advanced and aggressive PCa [10, 11], which no longer show sufficient PSMA expression [22]. However, these tracers have primarily been available as PET vectors, restricting their use to the higher cost and limited availability of PET systems, especially in rural areas.

In contrast, SPECT scanners are more accessible and less expensive, and the isotope technetium-99m used is available worldwide through via 99Mo/99mTc generators. This could open up a niche for particularly smaller hospitals that do not have access to PET. Moreover, due to the expected increase in cancer diseases in the next decades and thus, the need of applicable imaging options, these smaller centres must not be left behind, as the big centres alone cannot cover this demand in the future. However, due to the higher image resolution and better quantification obtainable by PET, (pre-) clinical development currently focuses on the development of improved PET probes. In order to improve SPECT imaging and scintigraphy and thus, strengthen smaller clinics in the detection of cancer diseases, novel tracers have to be designed. Very recently, Günther et al. introduced [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG, a novel pharmacophore-modified GRPR-directed vector for conventional nuclear medicine imaging, which revealed noticeably improved tumour-to-organ ratios in animals when compared to other bombesin derivatives. Based on these promising results, we aimed to translate this compound into four patients for a proof-of-concept evaluation. This study provides the initial clinical results of biodistribution and normal organ radiation absorbed dose analysis with [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG.

[99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG could be easily labelled manually, resulting in high molar activities of Am∼ 100 GBq/µmol and radiochemical yields of greater than 90%. As expected, [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was well tolerated by all patients. No acute or subacute adverse events were observed.

[99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG revealed a favourable biodistribution profile in humans, benefiting from its fast activity clearance from non-tumour organs using the kidneys as the main excretion route, which was already observed in preclinical studies [15]. Similar to previously investigated GRPR antagonists, a rapid activity clearance could be observed, resulting in swift blood clearance. Consequently, background accumulation was low, aiding in image interpretation.

Due to tracer concentration in urine, the urinary bladder uptake was high throughout the whole observation period up to 4 h after tracer injection. The peak pancreatic uptake was noted visually 30 min after injection, followed by a rapid decline until 2 h after injection. Noteworthy, pancreatic uptake showed a high variance in the initial four patients examined, likely due to physiological differences in GRPR-receptor expression, as no pancreatic pathology was found in any of the subjects, although fatty infiltration could potentially reduce uptake [23]. Noteworthy, one patient exhibited high tracer retention in the lymphatic tissue of the Waldeyer’s ring, likely due to inflammation, as observed in previous examinations of bombesin-based tracers [23].

No lesions could be detected in either of these four PCa patients despite rising PSA values following prostatectomy up to 2.4 ng/mL. This is likely due to insufficient or absent GRPR expression or the limited resolution obtainable by 99mTc-based SPECT imaging, alternatively a local recurrent tumour manifestation might have been masked by bladder activity. It must be mentioned that neither of these patients revealed any suspicious lesions in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT. Therefore, further examinations in these patients are warranted in the future.

In comparison with other imaging probes used for the detection of PCa, [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG showed a favourable biodistribution and dosimetry in prostate cancer patients. In comparison to PSMA-targeted compounds, no uptake was observed in the salivary glands, which was expected because GRPR ligands are not known to accumulate in these tissues. With an effective dose of 2.04 ± 0.13 mSv for a standard administered activity of 750 MBq, the effective dose of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was found to be comparable with or even lower than that of clinically applied 68Ga- or 18F-labelled PSMA inhibitors as well as bombesin tracers (Fig. 6). We anticipate that this is due to its fast clearance kinetics already observed in preclinical models [15]. The effective dose could possibly be reduced to even lower levels by increasing the frequency of bladder voiding and the use of diuretics, as demonstrated for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED CC [24]. Based on these preliminary results, we consider [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG safe for further clinical use.

The major limitation of this study is its small patient cohort of only four PCa patients in whom no tumour lesions could be unveiled. Therefore, no information on the optimal imaging time point regarding tumour-to-organ ratio can be given. Hence, further research is highly warranted to gain insight into the ideal clinical parameters and PSA range to identify tumour manifestations in PSMA-negative PCa with [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG.

The last imaging procedures started 4 h after injection. One later imaging time point at e.g. 24 h would have been desirable for a better determination of the effective half-lives leading to a more accurate dosimetry, as a time point between three and five times the effective half-life is recommended e.g. by the Committee on Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) [25] and by Stabin at al [26]. However, imaging was performed for clinical reasons and later imaging was not indicated as no tumour lesions could be detected and excellent background clearance of the tracer could be observed an the earlier time points.

In general, bombesin-based tracers could take a complementary role to PSMA inhibitors for prostate cancer imaging and might also be applicable in the setting of radioguided surgery. Additionally, given the rising interest in PCa theranostics, a significant rise in the number of patients to undergo radioligand therapy is to be anticipated. Given a substantial percentage of up to 5–10% of PSMA-negative PCa [27], the number of subjects eligible for radioligand therapy addressing GRPR might not be negligible. In this vein, recent pre-clinical and clinical studies have reported on the feasibility of GRPR-directed radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled receptor antagonists [12, 28]. Given the widespread availability of gamma camera-based imaging in combination with its lower acquisition costs, [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG might also aid in the selection of potential therapeutic candidates.

Last, imaging (and therapy) of other GRPR-expressing tumour entities including breast cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumours might further broaden the scope of applications for [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG beyond prostate cancer [29,30,31,32].

Conclusions

[99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG appears to be a safe diagnostic agent with a favourable biodistribution. It shows favourable imaging characteristics with fast renal clearance and physiological uptake only in the pancreas, which is mostly cleared within the first two hours after injection.

Compared to GRPR-targeted PET tracers, the 99mTc-labelled agent could contribute to a broader application and better availability of this novel approach, especially in smaller clinical centres. Further evaluation of this novel GRPR ligand is required to elucidate its clinical value for the detection or staging of prostate cancer.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. https://doi.org/10.3322/CA.2007.0010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, Holland-Letz T, Linhart HG, Eder M, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Werner P, Neumann C, Eiber M, Wester HJ, Schottelius M. [(99 cm)tc]Tc-PSMA-I&S-SPECT/CT: experience in prostate cancer imaging in an outpatient center. EJNMMI Res. 2020;10:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00635-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornelio DB, Roesler R, Schwartsmann G. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor as a molecular target in experimental anticancer therapy. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1457–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mansi R, Fleischmann A, Macke HR, Reubi JC. Targeting GRPR in urological cancers–from basic research to clinical application. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10:235–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roesler R, Henriques JA, Schwartsmann G. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor as a molecular target for psychiatric and neurological disorders. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2006;5:197–204. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152706776359673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beer M, Montani M, Gerhardt J, Wild PJ, Hany TF, Hermanns T, et al. Profiling gastrin-releasing peptide receptor in prostate tissues: clinical implications and molecular correlates. Prostate. 2012;72:318–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.21434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Minamimoto R, Hancock S, Schneider B, Chin FT, Jamali M, Loening A, et al. Pilot comparison of (6)(8)Ga-RM2 PET and (6)(8)Ga-PSMA-11 PET in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:557–62. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.168393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liolios C, Schafer M, Haberkorn U, Eder M, Kopka K. Novel Bispecific PSMA/GRPr Targeting Radioligands with optimized pharmacokinetics for improved PET imaging of prostate Cancer. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:737–51. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurth J, Krause BJ, Schwarzenbock SM, Bergner C, Hakenberg OW, Heuschkel M. First-in-human dosimetry of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist [(177)Lu]Lu-RM2: a radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:123–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04504-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mather SJ, Nock BA, Maina T, Gibson V, Ellison D, Murray I, et al. GRP receptor imaging of prostate cancer using [(99m)tc]demobesin 4: a first-in-man study. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16:888–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-014-0754-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ananias HJ, Yu Z, Hoving HD, Rosati S, Dierckx RA, Wang F, et al. Application of (99m)Technetium-HYNIC(tricine/TPPTS)-Aca-Bombesin(7–14) SPECT/CT in prostate cancer patients: a first-in-man study. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:933–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.05.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gunther T, Konrad M, Stopper L, Kunert JP, Fischer S, Beck R, et al. Optimization of the Pharmacokinetic Profile of [(99m)tc]Tc-N(4)-Bombesin derivatives by modification of the pharmacophoric gln-trp sequence. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091133

  16. Ferrer L, Kraeber-Bodere F, Bodet-Milin C, Rousseau C, Le Gouill S, Wegener WA, et al. Three methods assessing red marrow dosimetry in lymphoma patients treated with radioimmunotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116:1093–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sgouros G. Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:689–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kletting P, Schimmel S, Hanscheid H, Luster M, Fernandez M, Nosske D, et al. The NUKDOS software for treatment planning in molecular radiotherapy. Z Med Phys. 2015;25:264–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2015.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kletting P, Schimmel S, Kestler HA, Hanscheid H, Luster M, Fernandez M, et al. Molecular radiotherapy: the NUKFIT software for calculating the time-integrated activity coefficient. Med Phys. 2013;40:102504. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4820367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. Journal of nuclear medicine: official publication. Soc Nuclear Med. 2005;46:1023–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003. ICRP publication 103.

  22. Koller L, Joksch M, Schwarzenbock S, Kurth J, Heuschkel M, Holzleitner N, et al. Preclinical comparison of the (64)Cu- and (68)Ga-Labeled GRPR-Targeted compounds RM2 and AMTG, as Well as First-in-humans [(68)Ga]Ga-AMTG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265771

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Haendeler M, Khawar A, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kürpig S, Meisenheimer M, Essler M, et al. Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetric Analysis of [68Ga]Ga-RM2: a potent GRPR antagonist in prostate carcinoma patients. Radiation. 2020;1:33–44. https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation1010004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfob CH, Ziegler S, Graner FP, Kohner M, Schachoff S, Blechert B, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of (68)Ga-PSMA HBED CC-a PSMA specific probe for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1962–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3424-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Siegel JA, Thomas SR, Stubbs JB, Stabin MG, Hays MT, Koral KF, et al. MIRD pamphlet 16: techniques for quantitative radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis for use in human radiation dose estimates. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:s37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stabin MG, Wendt RE 3rd, Flux GD. RADAR guide: Standard Methods for Calculating Radiation Doses for Radiopharmaceuticals, Part 1-Collection of Data for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:316–22. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.259200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced prostate Cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane Antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77:403–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruigrok EAM, Verhoeven M, Konijnenberg MW, de Blois E, de Ridder CMA, Stuurman DC, et al. Safety of [(177)Lu]Lu-NeoB treatment: a preclinical study characterizing absorbed dose and acute, early, and late organ toxicity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:4440–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05926-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pretze M, Reffert L, Diehl S, Schonberg SO, Wangler C, Hohenberger P, et al. GMP-compliant production of [(68)Ga]Ga-NeoB for Positron emission tomography imaging of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2021;6:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-021-00137-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Montemagno C, Raes F, Ahmadi M, Bacot S, Debiossat M, Leenhardt J, et al. In vivo biodistribution and efficacy evaluation of NeoB, a Radiotracer targeted to GRPR, in mice bearing gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051051

  31. Stoykow C, Erbes T, Maecke HR, Bulla S, Bartholoma M, Mayer S, et al. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor imaging in breast Cancer using the receptor antagonist (68)Ga-RM2 and PET. Theranostics. 2016;6:1641–50. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Morgat C, MacGrogan G, Brouste V, Velasco V, Sevenet N, Bonnefoi H, et al. Expression of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor in breast Cancer and its Association with Pathologic, Biologic, and clinical parameters: a study of 1,432 primary tumors. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1401–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.188011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roivainen A, Kahkonen E, Luoto P, Borkowski S, Hofmann B, Jambor I, et al. Plasma pharmacokinetics, whole-body distribution, metabolism, and radiation dosimetry of 68Ga bombesin antagonist BAY 86-7548 in healthy men. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:867–72. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.114082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gnesin S, Cicone F, Mitsakis P, Van der Gucht A, Baechler S, Miralbell R, et al. First in-human radiation dosimetry of the gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor antagonist (68)Ga-NODAGA-MJ9. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0462-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang J, Niu G, Fan X, Lang L, Hou G, Chen L, et al. PET using a GRPR antagonist (68)Ga-RM26 in healthy volunteers and prostate Cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:922–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.198929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Green MA, Eitel JA, Fletcher JW, Mathias CJ, Tann MA, Gardner T, et al. Estimation of radiation dosimetry for (68)Ga-HBED-CC (PSMA-11) in patients with suspected recurrence of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Biol. 2017;46:32–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.11.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sah BR, Burger IA, Schibli R, Friebe M, Dinkelborg L, Graham K, et al. Dosimetry and first clinical evaluation of the new 18F-radiolabeled bombesin analogue BAY 864367 in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:372–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.147116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank their Nuclear Medicine technicians´ team for their support.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andreas Rinscheid, Alexander Gäble, Constantin Lapa and Christian H. Pfob contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Andreas Rinscheid

  2. Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Alexander Gäble, Georgine Wienand, Alexander Dierks, Malte Kircher, Marianne Patt, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Constantin Lapa & Christian H. Pfob

  3. Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Thomas Günther

  4. Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany

    Marianne Patt, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Constantin Lapa & Christian H. Pfob

Authors
  1. Andreas Rinscheid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Gäble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Georgine Wienand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexander Dierks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Malte Kircher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas Günther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marianne Patt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ralph A. Bundschuh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Constantin Lapa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Christian H. Pfob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CL and CHP contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AR, AG, GW, AD, MK, TG, MP, and RAB. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AR and AG. Writing – review and editing were performed by AD, MK, RAB, CL, and CHP. All authors read the manuscript, commented on it, and approved its final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantin Lapa.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

A patent application on modified GRPR-targeted ligands including [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG, with Thomas Günther as inventor, has been filed. All other authors have no potential conflict of interest.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all patients.

Ethics approval

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The local ethics committee (ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany) approved this retrospective analysis (permit number 22–0691). [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG was prepared in compliance with the German Medicines Act, AMG § 13 2b, and after notifying the responsible regulatory authority.

Consent for participation

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rinscheid, A., Gäble, A., Wienand, G. et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [99mTc]Tc-N4-BTG in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 14, 42 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01105-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01105-6

Keywords