Skip to main content
EJNMMI Research
Download PDF
  • Original research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Mitochondrial complex I density is associated with IQ and cognition in cognitively healthy adults: an in vivo [18F]BCPP-EF PET study

EJNMMI Research volume 14, Article number: 41 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mitochondrial function plays a key role in regulating neurotransmission and may contribute to general intelligence. Mitochondrial complex I (MC-I) is the largest enzyme of the respiratory chain. Recently, it has become possible to measure MC-I distribution in vivo, using a novel positron emission tomography tracer [18F]BCPP-EF, thus, we set out to investigate the association between MC-I distribution and measures of cognitive function in the living healthy brain.

Results

Analyses were performed in a voxel-wise manner and identified significant associations between [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in the precentral gyrus and parietal lobes and WAIS-IV predicted IQ, WAIS-IV arithmetic and WAIS-IV symbol-digit substitution scores (voxel-wise Pearson’s correlation coefficients transformed to Z-scores, thresholded at Z = 2.3 family-wise cluster correction at p < 0.05, n = 16). Arithmetic scores were associated with middle frontal and post-central gyri tracer uptake, symbol-digit substitution scores were associated with precentral gyrus tracer uptake. RAVLT recognition scores were associated with [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in the middle frontal gyrus, post-central gyrus, occipital and parietal regions (n = 20).

Conclusions

Taken together, our findings support the theory that mitochondrial function may contribute to general intelligence and indicate that interindividual differences in MC-I should be a key consideration for research into mitochondrial dysfunction in conditions with cognitive impairment.

Introduction

Mitochondria play a key role in regulating neuronal membrane excitability and provide the majority of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) necessary for normal brain function [1, 2]. Over recent years, there has been increased discussion of mitochondrial function as a contributing factor to general intelligence [3,4,5]. This is an attractive hypothesis, as mitochondrial energy production contributes to the maintenance of synaptic signalling, and to whole brain connectivity [3, 6], and thus could contribute to cognitive performance through these and other mechanisms [7, 8].

Modelling mitochondrial dysfunction in mice has been shown to result in cognitive impairment [9]. Mitochondrial dysfunction has also been implicated in many neurological conditions associated with cognitive dysfunction [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In the human neocortex, reactive oxygen species formation, which is a marker of respiratory chain function, has been linked with intelligence quotient [22]. Thus, one pharmacological approach that attempts to compensate for the energy deficit associated with mitochondrial dysfunction is by targeting the respiratory chain and ATP production [23,24,25]. Mitochondrial complex one (MC-I) is the largest enzyme complex of the respiratory chain, catalysing the rate-limiting step for oxidative phosphorylation, namely the oxidation of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH [26]).

MC-I function can be manipulated pharmacologically using methylene blue, which targets the electron transport chain and can improve performance on cognitive tasks in humans [27]. At low concentrations, methylene blue enters neural mitochondria to form a renewable redox complex that reduces the production of reactive oxygen species and prevents the pathological blockage of MC-I [27, 28]. In rodent models of Alzheimer’s disease, it has been shown to prevent chronic memory impairment and increase cingulo-thalamo-hippocampal connectivity [6, 29]. In healthy subjects, methylene blue has been shown to increase neural activity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)  during short-term memory and sustained attention tasks and improve cognitive performance [30].

A new PET probe, 18F-2-tert-butyl-4-chloro-5-{6-[2-(2-fluoroethoxy)-ethoxy]-pyridin-3-ylmethoxy-2 H-pyridazin-3-one ([18F]BCPP-EF), binds specifically and with low nanomolar affinity to MC-I, making it possible to investigate MC-I in the living brain [31, 32]. Recent studies in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease indicate that [18F]BCPP-EF uptake negatively correlates with cognitive decline in the disease [33, 34] and raises questions regarding how MC-I distribution may relate to cognitive function. Given the evidence discussed above, we set out to test the hypothesis that MC-I distribution is directly related to cognitive function in healthy adults.

Methods

This study was approved by the London-West London and GTAC ethics committee (Integrated Research Application System reference: 209761, study reference 16/LO/1941) and the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (ARSAC, UK). All methods were carried out in accordance with the updated Declaration of Helsinki (2013). All participants received a description of the study prior to providing written informed consent to participate. 20 healthy participants were recruited (3 F, 17 M, mean age 37 years, age range 20–59 years old). Exclusion criteria included: history of or current substance use disorder (other than tobacco), history of head injury or neurological abnormality, use of any psychoactive medications, significant physical, psychiatric or neurological comorbidity (with the exception of minor self-limiting illnesses), and contraindications to PET or MRI scanning. All subjects had adequate command of English, underwent a structural MRI scan and dynamic PET scan with [18F]BCPP-EF and a battery of cognitive tests including the Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), an abbreviated version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale (WAIS-IV), Trail Making A Test (TMAT) and National Adult Reading Test (NART).

Positron emission tomography

[18F]BCPP-EF was synthesized as previously described [31]. Injected dose information is summarized in Supplemental Table 1. [18F]BCPP-EF PET scans were acquired on a Hi-Rez Biograph 6 PET/CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at the Invicro Clinical Imaging Centre, London. A low-dose CT scan (30 mAs, 130 keV, 0.55 pitch) was performed immediately before each PET scan to estimate attenuation. The tracer was administered as a bolus (20 mL over 20 s) at the start of the scan through a cannula inserted into a cubital or forearm vein. A second cannula was inserted into the radial artery to enable arterial blood collection. Dynamic emission data were acquired over 90 min following radiotracer administration and were reconstructed using discrete inverse Fourier transform reconstruction into 26 frames (frame durations: 8 × 15s, 3 × 60s, 5 × 120s, 5 × 300s, and 5 × 600s). Data were corrected for attenuation, randoms, and scatter.

For the first 15 min of the scan whole-blood activity was measured using a continuous automatic blood sampling system (Allogg AB) at a rate of 5 mL/min. Total blood and plasma radioactivity concentration was also measured (Perkin Elmer 1470 10-well g-counter) from blood sampled at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 min after the start of the scan.

Magnetic resonance imaging data acquisition

T1-weighted magnetisation-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) images were for used for co-registering the PET images. They were acquired on a Siemens Magnetom Prisma 3T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) according to the following parameters: repetition time = 2300.0 ms, echo time = 2.28 ms, flip angle = 9°, field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256 mm, 176 sagittal slices of 1-mm thickness, distance factor = 50%, voxel size = 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm.

Image analysis and processing

All image data were analysed using the Invicro in-house PET data quantification tool, MIAKAT (version 4.3.7), which implements MATLAB (version R2018b; MathWorks Inc.) and FSL (version 5.0.11; FMRIB) functions for brain extraction and SPM12 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging) for image segmentation and registration.

Brain extraction, grey matter segmentation and rigid-body co-registration to a standard reference space was performed on each subject’s MR image. PET images were registered to this MR image and corrected for motion using frame-to-frame rigid-body registration. The centrum semiovale (CS) region of interest was generated from the automated anatomical labelling template and non-linearly warped onto each subject’s structural MR image for quantifying tracer uptake in pseudo-MNI space for the CS only. Each subject’s PET data were transformed into standard MNI152 space prior to kinetic modelling.

Tracer kinetic modellings

All time–activity curves (TAC) were fitted in a voxel-wise manner, except for the CS region, where a TAC was plotted for the whole region in pseudo-MNI space to ensure accurate quantification. The multilinear analysis 1 (MA1) model was used to estimate the total volume of distribution (VT). Outlier voxels were removed by thresholding images at a VT of 55, which assumes values above 55 are of supraphysiological level based on previous work using this tracer (described in supplement, supplementary Table 2) [35].

DVRCS−1 parametric maps were calculated as the main outcome measure by dividing VT parametric maps for each subject by the CS VT and subtracting 1 to account for non-specific binding.

Cognitive tests

Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a reliable psychometric instrument used for assessing aspects of episodic memory [36, 37]. The RAVLT consists of a list of 15 words (List A) read to the participant across five consecutive trials. The list is read by the assessor and the participant is immediately asked to recall as many words as they can remember. This procedure is repeated 5 times consecutively (Trials 1 to 5). After that, a new list (List B) of 15 new words is read to the participant and they are asked to immediately recall the words from List B. After this, the examiner asks the participant to recall the words from the first list (Trial 6). After 30 min the participant is asked to recall the words from the first list again (delayed recall). This is followed by the participant being given a grid containing 50 words which include all the words from list A, list B, and additional words that have not appeared previously; participants are asked to circle the words from list A (recognition). Summary scores derived from the RAVLT scores include: total learning (total words remembered trials 1–5), delayed recall score, and recognition scores.

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV; shortened version) was used to measure intellectual quotient in a reliable and time-effective manner [38]. The abbreviated version used in this study consists of four subtests: (1) Symbol digit substitution test, (2) Arithmetic, (3) Information, and (4) Block design. The symbol digit substitution component consists of nine digit-symbol pairs, followed by a list of digits, under which the subject is asked to write the corresponding symbol as fast as possible. Participants are given a time limit of 120 s to complete as much of the task as possible. The arithmetic component is designed to test mental manipulation, concentration, attention, and numerical reasoning ability. It consists of a set of arithmetic questions that are read out loud to the participant who was asked to answer. The questions increase in their level of difficulty and following two wrong answers the test is stopped and the number of correct responses is recorded as the final score. The information component includes a set of general knowledge questions read to the participant, following two consecutive incorrect responses the test is stopped and the final score of correct responses is recorded. The block design tests spatial visualization ability and motor skill. The participant uses hand movements to rearrange blocks that have various colour patterns on different sides to match a pattern, correct responses within permitted time limits are counted. Administration and scoring were conducted in accordance with the manual to produce a measure of IQ, the main outcome measure for the WAIS [39].

Trail Making A Test (TMAT) is primarily a test of motor speed and visual attention and has good construct validity for measuring working memory [40]. The subjects are asked to draw a line between consecutive numbers as fast as possible and their completion time was used as the main outcome measure.

The National Adult Reading Test (NART) is a commonly used method for measuring premorbid intelligence. The NART was administered in accordance with instructions [41, 42] and transformed to calculate an alternative measure of IQ to the WAIS-IV.

Statistical analysis

FSL’s (FMRIB Software Library, v5.0.11) fslmaths was used to concatenate [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 parametric mages into a 4D dataset. To limit statistical analyses to grey matter voxels only, the 4D image was masked using a 75% probability grey mask derived from the MNI152 template. The AFNI (Analysis of Functional NeuroImages, v17.2.17) 3dTcorrelate module was used to run voxel-wise Pearson’s correlations between BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 and cognitive scores for each test, correlating each voxel’s values (across subjects) with the subject’s test scores. A correlation approach to analysis was chosen as it didn’t presume a cause-effect relationship between the measures. Resultant r-coefficient images were transformed to t-statistical images using fslmaths, using formula 1 below, which were then transformed to Z-scores using FSL’s ‘ttoz’ function. FSL’s ‘easythresh’ function was then used to threshold the images at Z = 2.3, with cluster extent brain thresholding applied at p < 0.05 to correct for multiple comparisons across the brain. Final figures were made by creating a binary mask of significant clusters for each analysis and using this to mask the original r-images to show the r-coefficients corresponding to the significant findings. In addition to primary measures, for subjects that had data for all cognitive tests, an exploratory composite measure was derived. This was done by transforming scores into Z-scores that were averaged across cognitive scales. This measure included RAVLT total words, RAVLT recall, RAVLT recognition, NART, TMAT and the four subscales of the WAIS.

Formula 1:

$$t = \frac{{r\sqrt {n - 2} }}{{\sqrt {1 - {r^2}} }}$$

Results

All participants completed a [18F]BCPP-EF scan, a mean parametric image of [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 is shown in Fig. 1. As seen, tracer uptake was greatest in grey matter regions including the cerebellum, occipital lobe and striatum. All participants completed the full RAVLT, except one subject who did not complete the delayed recall and recognition part of the task. 18 participants completed the NART and TMAT. 16 participants completed the WAIS-IV.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean parametric [18F]BCPP distribution volume ratio (DVRCS−1) images from 20 healthy control subjects, slices shown are x=10.5, y=–52.5, z=–3.2 in MNI152 standard space

Full size image

There were no significant associations between [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 and IQ as predicted by the national adult reading test, or between BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 sand Trail Making A scores in any brain region (n = 18, Pearson’s correlation, Z < 2.3, cluster threshold p > 0.05). There were also no significant associations between RAVLT total learning and delayed recall measures (n = 20, Pearson’s correlation, Z < 2.3, cluster threshold p > 0.05). There were significant associations between RAVLT recognition scores and [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in regions spanning occipital, parietal and temporal areas, including the superior and middle temporal gyrus, postcentral gyrus and precuneus (n = 19, Pearson’s correlation, Z > 2.3, cluster threshold p < 0.05). Correlation coefficients for the significantly correlated clusters are shown in Fig. 2, an unthresholded correlation map is shown in supplementary Fig. 1 for reference.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pearson’s correlation coefficients for clusters where [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 was significantly correlated with RAVLT recognition performance in cognitively healthy adults. (n = 19, Pearson’s correlation, Z > 2.3, cluster threshold p < 0.05). Axial slices in MNI152 are: -12 -2 8 18 28; 38 48 56 66 76, results are shown in neurological formal (L = L).

Full size image

There were significant associations between [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 distribution and WAIS-IV predicted IQ in regions spanning the precentral gyrus and parietal lobe (Fig. 3A) (n = 16, Pearson’s correlation, Z > 2.3, cluster threshold p < 0.05). Exploratory analyses into what subcomponents of the WAIS contributed to these results showed that there were significant associations between [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS and the WAIS-IV symbol substitution and arithmetic scores, but not between DVRCS−1 and scores on the block design and information subcomponents of the WAIS-IV. Figure 3 shows regions where MC-I distribution, as measured by [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS, was significantly correlated with WAIS-IV symbol substitution scores (3B), showing regions spanning the precentral gyrus, parietal and occipital regions (n = 16, Pearson’s correlation, Z > 2.3, cluster threshold p < 0.05) and arithmetic scores (3C), showing significant regions spanning the middle frontal gyrus, post-central gyrus and parietal cortex. Unthresholded correlation maps corresponding to Fig. 3 are shown in supplementary Fig. 2 for reference. There were no significant correlations between the composite cognitive measure capturing data from all of the scales used (n = 16) and no significant negative associations between [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 and any cognitive measures assessed in this study.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pearson’s correlation coefficients for clusters where [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 was significantly correlated with WAIS-IV predicted IQ (3A), WAIS-IV symbol-digit substitution scores (3B), WAIS-IV arithmetic scores (3C) (n = 16, Pearson’s correlation, Z > 2.3, cluster threshold p < 0.05). Axial slices in MNI152 are: -12 -2 8 18 28; 38 48 56 66 76, results are shown in neurological format (L = L).

Full size image

Discussion

Our main finding is the positive association between MC-I density, as measured by [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1, in the precentral gyrus and parietal lobes of healthy adults and IQ, as predicted by the shortened WAIS-IV. This was likely driven by the arithmetic and symbol digit substitution components of the WAIS-IV which was used to calculate IQ, where scores were associated with [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in parietal and occipital regions for both tasks. Additionally, [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in the middle frontal gyrus and post-central gyrus was associated with arithmetic scores and [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in the precentral gyrus was associated with symbol-digit substitution performance. We also found that RAVLT recognition was associated with [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1 in the middle frontal gyrus, post-central gyrus, occipital and parietal regions.

Taken together these findings are in regions where we may expect to see effects of MC-I on brain function. Verbal memory recognition has been tied to activation of the posterior parietal cortex [43]. The parietal lobe, particularly the intra-parietal sulcus is also a key region involved in number and magnitude processing [44], with a recent meta-analysis of mental arithmetic fMRI studies identifying parietal regions similar to those we show in this study [45]. As well as this, the frontoparietal network, which spans the dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal cortices is reliably activated during executive function tasks and would underlie the effective completion of the tasks we used in this study [46]. Thus, our findings raise the question of whether increased MC-I density may contribute to better cognitive performance by increasing the overall energy availability within certain brain networks involved in cognitive tasks. Mitochondrial DNA measured in post-mortem human brain samples can also be interpreted as an indicator of mitochondrial availability. It is present in the highest levels in the parietal cortex in the healthy brain and is significantly lower in this region in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease compared to those with no cognitive impairment [47]. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy data also suggests that subtle changes in episodic memory performance in elderly subjects may be linked to increased mitochondrial energy capacity in the precuneus [48], which is a region known to be sensitive to reductions in glucose consumption [49] and exhibits some of the earliest signs of metabolic deficit in Alzheimer’s disease [50]. [18F]FDG PET provides further evidence linking metabolic markers with cognitive decline [51]. For example, reduced glucose metabolism in the posterior cingulate cortex is associated with the transition from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease [52], while in Parkinson’s [18F]FDG PET measures in posterior temporo-parieto-occipital association areas correlate with cognitive performance [53].

The medial temporal lobe, where we saw a relationship between MC-I and RAVLT recognition scores, is a key region involved in recognition memory [54]. In frontotemporal dementia, a patient’s education level has also been found to predict existing [18F]FDG PET hypometabolism in the left temporal lobe where patients had the same cognitive performance [55]. This, together with our study suggests that individual differences in MC-I function and metabolic functional reserve may contribute to variance in disease and are a key consideration for studies investigating this. Mitochondrial oxidative stress is also associated with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and has been investigated as a contributing factor to memory impairment and cognitive dysfunction in epilepsy, via the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) and its downstream signalling pathways [56]. However, one study showed that language and memory impairment in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy is not associated with the activities of mitochondrial enzymes Complex I, Complex II, Complex IV or Succinate dehydrogenase [57]. Given that our study assessed global MC-I distribution an important consideration is that in addition to changes in mitochondrial function, differences in tracer uptake may reflect a greater mitochondrial number, both per cell or per synapse or as a function of greater synaptic density.

Strengths and limitations

[18F]BCPP-EF binds to mitochondrial complex one with high affinity (KI=2.3), and in competition studies is almost completely displaced by rotenone, which is known to be a highly specific inhibitor of MC-I function [32, 58,59,60]. This suggests that non-specific binding for [18F]BCPP-EF in the mammalian brain is low. We reported distribution volume ratio, which is calculated as the volume of distribution in a region or voxel of interest, divided by the non-displaceable binding, with the latter being comprised of non-specific binding and free tissue concentration of the radioligand [61]. In practice, the value for non-displaceable binding is derived from a region presumed to have no, or very low, specific binding [61]. In our study, we calculated DVRCS−1 as the volume of distribution calculated in a particular voxel, divided by the volume of distribution in the centrum semiovale followed by subtracting 1, in line with other recent studies using [18F]BCPP-EF [34, 35]. However, there is substantial evidence that mitochondria are present in white matter, albeit to a lesser extent than in grey matter, where a high density of synapses necessitates higher energy production capacity [62]. Since this means there would be some degree of specific binding in the reference region, this may affect the interpretation of DVRCS−1 for this tracer, as it is relative to a region with MC-I, and reduces the proportion of specific binding that we were able to quantify in this study [61]. In addition to this, our method of evaluating relationships between MC-I and cognitive measures was a correlation-based approach. While this is useful for this type of exploratory analysis, as it does not assume a cause-effect relationship between the measures it limits the conclusions we are able to draw from our results.

Previous research investigating the link between MC-I distribution and cognition has been carried out in a small sample of Alzheimer’s patients and matched controls [63]. Measures of cognition included the Mini-Mental State Examination [64], the Weschler Memory Scale – Revised [65], the Frontal Assessment Battery [66], Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III [67], the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) [68] and that National Adult Reading Test (NART) [41]. These studies found no associations between cognitive measures and [18F]BCPP-EF in any brain region in age-matched controls [33, 34]. However, the cognitive measures used in these studies were designed to distinguish those with disease-associated cognitive impairment from those with normal cognitive functioning and non-disease populations vary relatively little in their scores on such measures [64,65,66]. Our study used measures designed to demonstrate inter-individual differences in cognitive functioning and intelligence in healthy individuals, and as such, is better designed to demonstrate correlations between [18F]BCPP-EF and cognitive function in a sample of healthy controls.

Our study only had one measure in common with one of these previous studies [33], the NART, and we replicated their finding by not demonstrating any correlation between scores on that test and [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1. The NART is a test designed to measure premorbid intelligence in dementia, as knowledge of vocabulary is thought to be relatively preserved in the disease [69]. As such, it is a proxy measure of intelligence during the later stages of neurodevelopment, correlates moderately with IQ at age 11 (r = 0.6), and is not a preferred measure for current intelligence [69]. Furthermore, as a measure of crystallized intelligence, it might not rely on high-energy networks involved in attentional control or executive function [70, 71], unlike tasks like arithmetic and digit-symbol coding which directly engage these systems.

One final limitation of this study is that a sample of 16–20 participants is modest in the context of a cognitive neuroscience study. While this is common within PET literature, our sample lacked the power to detect weak associations across the cognitive measures. Thus, the absence of significant relationships does not preclude a weaker relationship, although the clinical significance of weak associations is questionable.

Implications for understanding of intelligence

Our study shows that scores on a validated measure of general intelligence correlate with uptake of [18F]BCPP-EF in regions including the precentral gyrus and parietal lobe. Variation in [18F]BCPP-EF may be due to variation in MC-I protein concentrations, secondary to genetic variation in genes coding for one of the 45 MC-I subunits [72], variation in one of the many more genes associated with transport assembly or maintenance of MC-I, or degradation of MC-I by reactive oxygen species [73]. Alternatively, variation in [18F]BCPP-EF may be related to overall mitochondrial number or may be reflective of variation in synaptic density, which has also been shown to be altered in numerous disease processes associated with cognitive decline [74,75,76,77].

This study lends some support to the theory that individual differences in mitochondrial functioning may underlie individual differences in intelligence [78]. This theory grew out of observed correlations between measurements of a wide variety of perceptual, sensory and cognitive processes, termed the “positive manifold” [79]. Such measurements undertaken at age 11 were later shown to be correlated with a large number of health outcomes in later life, with higher scores on a range of psychometric testing increasing the odds of surviving past 79 years [80]. Similarly, the decline in psychometric scores that occurs with age correlates with the decline in function of other organ systems, with the correlations observed most strongly between organ systems with higher metabolic demand [81]. There is an abundance of evidence that mitochondrial respiratory function declines with age, that perturbations of mitochondrial function can accelerate the ageing process, that mitochondrial DNA mutations accumulate with age throughout the body, and that measures of mitochondrial function correlate with cognitive decline during the ageing process (reviewed in [81, 82]). Thus, this study raises the question of whether the decline in mitochondrial function with age could underlie decline in cognitive function with age.

The relationship between mitochondrial function and cognition has been largely investigated in the context of either neurological disorders or mitochondrial disorders that are associated with global cognitive dysfunction, as well as focal deficits in cognitive functions [83, 84]. Lactate is produced by anaerobic respiration, and levels of lactate increase when oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria is impaired [85]. Levels of lactate in the cerebral spinal fluid correlate with the degree of cognitive impairment in patients with Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) [85]. This indicates that the degree of mitochondrial impairment, albeit measured indirectly, correlates positively with the degree of neurocognitive impairment in mitochondrial diseases. Similarly, some have claimed that evidence of cognitive dysfunction in obesity (reviewed in [86]), combined with evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction supports a relationship between variation in mitochondrial function, but we are not aware of direct reporting of correlations between mitochondrial dysfunction and cognition in the condition [78, 86]. Recent evidence from humans suggests that uptake of [18F]BCPP-EF correlated positively with cognitive performance in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment [33, 34]. However, we are not aware of other in vivo studies demonstrating a relationship between brain mitochondrial complex one levels and individual differences in measures of current general intelligence cognitively healthy adults. Further research in larger cohorts is required to validate our findings, including in samples with a greater proportion of female participants, across a wider range of normal cognitive ability and wider age range. Pharmacological studies using methylene blue and functional magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalography would also serve as a useful tool to investigate the mechanism through which improving mitochondrial function may improve cognition at the whole-brain level.

Conclusions

MC-I density in the parietal lobe and other regions, as measured with [18F]BCPP-EF DVRCS−1, is associated with IQ, mental arithmetic, symbol-digit substitution and verbal recognition scores in cognitively healthy adults. This lends some support to the theory that mitochondrial function may contribute to general intelligence and has implications for studies investigating the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in cognitive impairment.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Vos M, Lauwers E, Verstreken P. Synaptic mitochondria in synaptic transmission and organization of vesicle pools in health and disease. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010;2:139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee A, et al. Emerging roles of mitochondria in synaptic transmission and neurodegeneration. Curr Opin Physiol. 2018;3:82–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Geary DC. Mitochondria as the Linchpin of General Intelligence and the link between g, Health, and aging. J Intell. 2019;7(4):25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Przemyslaw Ujma P, Kovacs K. The mitochondrial theory of g is incompatible with genetic evidence and does not explain statistical phenomena. J Intell. 2020;8(3):27.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Savi AO, et al. Mitochondrial functioning ≠ general intelligence. J Intell. 2020;8(2):20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Callaway NL, et al. Methylene blue restores spatial memory retention impaired by an inhibitor of cytochrome oxidase in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2002;332(2):83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khacho M, Harris R, Slack RS. Mitochondria as central regulators of neural stem cell fate and cognitive function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20(1):34–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozgen S, et al. Significance of mitochondrial activity in neurogenesis and neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regeneration Res. 2022;17(4):741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bilkei-Gorzo A. Genetic mouse models of brain ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;142(2):244–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ni P, Chung S. Mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia. BioEssays. 2020;42(6):1900202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ben-Shachar D, Karry R. Neuroanatomical pattern of mitochondrial complex I Pathology varies between Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and Major Depression. PLoS ONE, 2008. 3(11).

  12. Whitehurst T, Howes O. The role of mitochondria in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: a critical review of the evidence focusing on mitochondrial complex one. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;132:449–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rezin GT, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and psychiatric disorders. Neurochem Res. 2009;34(6):1021–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plotegher N, Duchen MR. Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in lysosomal storage disorders. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(2):116–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo L, Tian J, Du H. Mitochondrial dysfunction and synaptic transmission failure in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(4):1071–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos MFd, Roxo C, Solá S. Oxidative-signaling in neural stem cell-mediated plasticity: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. Antioxidants. 2021;10(7):1088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stockburger C, et al. Mitochondrial function, dynamics, and permeability transition: a complex love triangle as a possible target for the treatment of brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S455–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shevtsova EF, et al. Mitochondria as a promising target for developing novel agents for treating Alzheimer’s disease. Med Res Rev. 2021;41(2):803–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quntanilla RA, Tapia-Monsalves C. The role of mitochondrial impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease Neurodegeneration: the tau connection. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(11):1076–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nunes C, Laranjinha J. Nitric oxide and dopamine metabolism converge via mitochondrial dysfunction in the mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021;704:108877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Calió ML, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction, neurogenesis, and epigenetics: putative implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis neurodegeneration and treatment. Front NeuroSci. 2020;14:679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Brawek B, et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the human neocortex: role of aging and cognition. Brain Res Bull. 2010;81(4–5):484–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piaceri I, et al. Mitochondria and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2012;322(1–2):31–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marmolejo-Garza A et al. Transcriptomic and epigenomic landscapes of Alzheimer’s disease evidence mitochondrial-related pathways Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research, 2022: p. 119326.

  25. Rai SN, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction: a potential therapeutic target to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2020;57(7):3075–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Telford JE, Kilbride SM, Davey GP. Complex I is rate-limiting for oxygen consumption in the nerve terminal. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(14):9109–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tucker D, Lu Y, Zhang Q. From mitochondrial function to neuroprotection—an emerging role for methylene blue. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(6):5137–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, et al. Methylene blue improves streptozotocin-induced memory deficit by restoring mitochondrial function in rats. Brain Res. 2017;1657:208–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Riha PD, Rojas JC, Gonzalez-Lima F. Beneficial Netw Eff Methylene blue Amnestic Model Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):2623–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez P, et al. Multimodal randomized functional MR imaging of the effects of methylene blue in the human brain. Radiology. 2016;281(2):516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harada N, et al. Development of novel PET probes,[18F] BCPP-EF,[18F] BCPP‐BF, and [11 C] BCPP‐EM for mitochondrial complex 1 imaging in the living brain. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2013;56(11):553–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsukada H, et al. Comparing amyloid-β deposition, neuroinflammation, glucose metabolism, and mitochondrial complex I activity in brain: a PET study in aged monkeys. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(11):2127–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Terada T, et al. Mitochondrial complex I abnormalities underlie neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(5):1324–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Venkataraman AV et al. Widespread cell stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in early Alzheimer’s Disease medRxiv, 2021.

  35. Mansur A, et al. Test–retest variability and reference region-based quantification of 18F-BCPP-EF for imaging mitochondrial complex I in the human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabolism. 2021;41(4):771–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidt M. Rey auditory verbal learning test: a handbook. Volume 17. Western Psychological Services Los Angeles, CA; 1996.

  37. de Sousa Magalhães S, Fernandes Malloy-Diniz L, Cavalheiro A, Hamdan. Validity convergent and reliability test-retest of the rey auditory verbal learning test. Clin Neuropsychiatry, 2012. 9(3).

  38. Bulzacka E, et al. WAIS-IV seven-subtest short form: validity and clinical use in schizophrenia. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(8):915–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology; 1955.

  40. Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the trail making test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nelson HE, Willison J. National adult reading test (NART). Nfer-Nelson Windsor; 1991.

  42. Bright P, Jaldow E, Kopelman MD. The National Adult Reading Test as a measure of premorbid intelligence: a comparison with estimates derived from demographic variables. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8(6):847–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. Posterior parietal cortex and episodic encoding: insights from fMRI subsequent memory effects and dual-attention theory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;91(2):139–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bueti D, Walsh V. The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci. 2009;364(1525):1831–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hawes Z, et al. Neural underpinnings of numerical and spatial cognition: an fMRI meta-analysis of brain regions associated with symbolic number, arithmetic, and mental rotation. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019;103:316–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zanto TP, Gazzaley A. Fronto-parietal network: flexible hub of cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(12):602–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thubron EB, et al. Regional mitochondrial DNA and cell-type changes in post-mortem brains of non-diabetic Alzheimer’s disease are not present in diabetic Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Schreiner SJ, et al. Low episodic memory performance in cognitively normal elderly subjects is associated with increased posterior cingulate gray matter N-acetylaspartate: a 1H MRSI study at 7 Tesla. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;48:195–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weaver KE et al. Posterior cingulate lactate as a metabolic biomarker in amnestic mild cognitive impairment BioMed research international, 2015. 2015.

  50. Sekar S, et al. Alzheimer’s disease is associated with altered expression of genes involved in immune response and mitochondrial processes in astrocytes. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(2):583–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lange C, et al. Brain FDG PET for short-to medium-term prediction of further cognitive decline and need for assisted living in acutely hospitalized geriatric patients with newly detected clinically Uncertain Cognitive Impairment. Clin Nucl Med. 2022;47(2):123–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bailly M et al. Precuneus and cingulate cortex atrophy and hypometabolism in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: MRI and 18F-FDG PET quantitative analysis using FreeSurfer BioMed research international, 2015. 2015.

  53. Wu L et al. Clinical characteristics of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease and its related pattern in 18F-FDG PET imaging Human brain mapping, 2018. 39(12): p. 4652–62.

  54. Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas A, Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Beyer L, et al. Cognitive reserve hypothesis in frontotemporal dementia: a FDG-PET study. Volume 29. NeuroImage: Clinical; 2021. p. 102535.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Xing J, et al. CREB protects against temporal lobe epilepsy associated with cognitive impairment by controlling oxidative neuronal damage. Neurodegenerative Dis. 2019;19(5–6):225–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Osório CM, et al. Neuropsychological functioning and brain energetics of drug resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res. 2017;138:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tsukada H, et al. PET imaging of mitochondrial complex I with 18F-BCPP-EF in the brains of MPTP-treated monkeys. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(6):950–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Terada T, et al. In vivo mitochondrial and glycolytic impairments in patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2020;94(15):e1592–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kazami S, et al. BCPP compounds, PET probes for early therapeutic evaluations, specifically bind to mitochondrial complex I. Mitochondrion. 2019;46:97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zanderigo F, Ogden RT, Parsey RV. Reference region approaches in PET: a comparative study on multiple radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabolism. 2013;33(6):888–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chang DT, Honick AS, Reynolds IJ. Mitochondrial trafficking to synapses in cultured primary cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2006;26(26):7035–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Venkataraman AV, et al. Widespread cell stress and mitochondrial dysfunction occur in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(658):eabk1051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chapman KR, et al. Mini Mental State examination and logical memory scores for entry into Alzheimer’s disease trials. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016;8(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chelune GJ, Bornstein RA, Prifitera A. The Wechsler memory scale—revised, in advances in psychological assessment. Springer; 1990. pp. 65–99.

  66. Dubois B, et al. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1621–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. So M, et al. Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination III: psychometric characteristics and relations to functional ability in dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24(8):854–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Randolph C. Repeatable battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Psychological Corporation San Antonio, TX; 1998.

  69. McGurn B, et al. Pronunciation of irregular words is preserved in dementia, validating premorbid IQ estimation. Neurology. 2004;62(7):1184–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Shokri-Kojori E, et al. Correspondence between cerebral glucose metabolism and BOLD reveals relative power and cost in human brain. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Jung RE, Haier RJ. The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav Brain Sci. 2007;30(2):135–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Koopman WJ, et al. Mammalian mitochondrial complex I: biogenesis, regulation, and reactive oxygen species generation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010;12(12):1431–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lenaz G. Role of mitochondria in oxidative stress and ageing Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 1998. 1366(1–2): p. 53–67.

  74. Onwordi EC, et al. Synaptic density marker SV2A is reduced in schizophrenia patients and unaffected by antipsychotics in rats. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Osimo EF, et al. Synaptic loss in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of synaptic protein and mRNA measures. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(4):549–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Mecca AP, et al. Synaptic density and cognitive performance in Alzheimer’s disease: A PET imaging study with [11 C]. UCB-J. Alzheimer’s & Dementia; 2022.

  77. D’Souza DC, et al. Preliminary in vivo evidence of lower hippocampal synaptic density in cannabis use disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(7):3192–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Geary DC. Efficiency of mitochondrial functioning as the fundamental biological mechanism of general intelligence (g). Psychol Rev. 2018;125(6):1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Lubinski D. Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904)’general intelligence,‘objectively determined and measured. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2004;86(1):96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Čukić I, et al. Childhood IQ and survival to 79: follow-up of 94% of the Scottish Mental Survey 1947. Intelligence. 2017;63:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Devine MJ, Kittler JT. Mitochondria at the neuronal presynapse in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(2):63–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Picard M, McEwen BS. Mitochondria impact brain function and cognition Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014. 111(1): pp. 7–8.

  83. Kartsounis L, et al. The neuropsychological features of mitochondrial myopathies and encephalomyopathies. Arch Neurol. 1992;49(2):158–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Finsterer J. Cognitive decline as a manifestation of mitochondrial disorders (mitochondrial dementia). J Neurol Sci. 2008;272(1–2):20–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kaufmann P, et al. Cerebral lactic acidosis correlates with neurological impairment in MELAS. Neurology. 2004;62(8):1297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Geary DC. Mitochondrial functions, cognition, and the evolution of intelligence: reply to commentaries and moving forward. J Intell. 2020;8(4):42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by the Medical Research Council-UK (no. MC_A656_5QD30_2135), Maudsley Charity (no. 666), and Wellcome Trust (no. 094849/Z/10/Z) grants to Dr Howes and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. Funders of this study did not participate in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Ekaterina Shatalina, Thomas S. Whitehurst, Ellis Chika Onwordi, Sridhar Natesan & Oliver D. Howes

  2. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), Kings College London, London, UK

    Ekaterina Shatalina, Thomas S. Whitehurst, Ellis Chika Onwordi, Tiago Reis Marques, Sridhar Natesan, Eugenii A. Rabiner & Oliver D. Howes

  3. Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Ellis Chika Onwordi

  4. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Barnabas J. Gilbert, Tiago Reis Marques & Matthew B. Wall

  5. Invicro, London, UK

    Gaia Rizzo, Alex Whittington, Ayla Mansur, Eugenii A. Rabiner & Matthew B. Wall

  6. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K, Hamamatsu, Japan

    Hideo Tsukada

  7. Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK

    Matthew B. Wall

Authors
  1. Ekaterina Shatalina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas S. Whitehurst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ellis Chika Onwordi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barnabas J. Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gaia Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alex Whittington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ayla Mansur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hideo Tsukada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tiago Reis Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sridhar Natesan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eugenii A. Rabiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Matthew B. Wall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Oliver D. Howes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: ES, TW, OH. Data collection: ES, TW, ECO, BG, GR, AW, AM, HT, TRM, SN, ER, MW, OH. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: ES, TW, ECO, BG, GR, AW, AM, HT, TRM, SN, ER, MW, OH – all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: ES, TW, ECO, BG, GR, AW, AM, HT, TRM, SN, ER, MW, OH – all authors. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: ES, TW, ECO, BG, GR, AW, AM, HT, TRM, SN, ER, MW, OH – all authors. Statistical analysis: ES, TW. Study supervision: OH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekaterina Shatalina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the London-West London and GTAC ethics committee (Integrated Research Application System reference: 209761, study reference 16/LO/1941) and the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (ARSAC, UK). All methods were carried out in accordance with the updated Declaration of Helsinki (2013).

Consent to participate

All participants received a description of the study prior to providing written informed consent to participate and for their data to be used as part of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Oliver Howes was previously a part-time employee of H Lundbeck A/s. He has received investigator-initiated research funding from and/or participated in advisory/ speaker meetings organised by Angellini, Autifony, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Global Medical Education, Invicro, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Sunovion, Recordati, Roche and Viatris/ Mylan. Neither Dr Howes nor his family have holdings/ a financial stake in any pharmaceutical company. Dr Howes has a patent for the use of dopaminergic imaging. Ilan Rabiner, Matt Wall, Gaia Rizzo, Ayla Mansur are all employees or past employees of Invicro London. Hideo Tsukada is an employee of Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan. Tiago Reis Marques is an employee and founder of Pasithea Therapeutics. Other authors have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shatalina, E., Whitehurst, T.S., Onwordi, E.C. et al. Mitochondrial complex I density is associated with IQ and cognition in cognitively healthy adults: an in vivo [18F]BCPP-EF PET study. EJNMMI Res 14, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01099-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-024-01099-1

Keywords