Skip to main content

Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy



FDG-PET/CT has a high negative predictive value to detect residual nodal disease in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the positive predictive value remains suboptimal due to inflammation after radiotherapy, generating unnecessary further investigations and possibly even surgery. We report the results of a preplanned secondary end point of the ECLYPS study regarding the potential advantages of dual time point FDG-PET/CT imaging (DTPI) in this setting. Standardized dedicated head and neck FDG-PET/CT images were obtained 12 weeks after CCRT at 60 and 120 min after tracer administration. We performed a semiquantitative assessment of lymph nodes, and the retention index (RI) was explored to optimize diagnostic performance. The reference standard was histology, negative FDG-PET/CT at 1 year, or > 2 years of clinical follow-up. The time-dependent area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) curves was calculated.


In total, 102 subjects were eligible for analysis. SUV values increased in malignant nodes (median SUV1 = 2.6 vs. SUV2 = 2.7; P = 0.04) but not in benign nodes (median SUV1 = 1.8 vs. SUV2 = 1.7; P = 0.28). In benign nodes, RI was negative although highly variable (median RI = − 2.6; IQR 21.2), while in malignant nodes RI was positive (median RI = 12.3; IQR 37.2) and significantly higher (P = 0.018) compared to benign nodes. A combined threshold (SUV1 ≥ 2.2 + RI ≥ 3%) significantly reduced the amount of false-positive cases by 53% (P = 0.02) resulting in an increased specificity (90.8% vs. 80.5%) and PPV (52.9% vs. 37.0%), while sensitivity (60.0% vs. 66.7%) and NPV remained comparably high (92.9% vs. 93.3%). However, AUROC, as overall measure of benefit in diagnostic accuracy, did not significantly improve (P = 0.62). In HPV-related disease (n = 32), there was no significant difference between SUV1, SUV2, and RI in malignant and benign nodes, yet this subgroup was small.


DTPI did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect residual disease 12 weeks after chemoradiation. Due to differences in tracer kinetics between malignant and benign nodes, DTPI improved the specificity, but at the expense of a loss in sensitivity, albeit minimal. Since false negatives at the 12 weeks PET/CT are mainly due to minimal residual disease, DTPI is not able to significantly improve sensitivity, but repeat scanning at a later time (e.g. after 12 months) could possibly solve this problem. Further study is required in HPV-associated disease.


Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard nonsurgical approach in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). Early detection of residual or recurrent disease may allow early intervention, usually in the form of surgical salvage [1]. Evidence that underlines the role of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of residual nodal disease after CRT with high negative predictive value (NPV) has been published [1,2,3]. In a recent meta-analysis by Helsen et al., the reported pooled negative predictive value (NPV) was exceptionally high (98%). However, the positive predictive value (PPV) was suboptimal at 58% (given a pre-test probability of 10%) [3]. A randomized phase III trial (PET-NECK) demonstrated a non-inferior overall survival with FDG-PET/CT-guided surveillance 12 weeks after CRT compared with planned standard neck dissection, resulting in considerably fewer operations and improving cost-effectiveness [4]. Edema, fibrosis, and inflammation after radiotherapy, however, may lead to false-positive results, generating unnecessary further investigations and surgeries [2, 5]. An interval of 10–12 weeks between the end of CRT and FDG-PET/CT scanning shows the best diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT [1, 2].

In the ECLYPS trial, a prospective multicenter study, we confirmed that standardized FDG-PET/CT 12 weeks after CCRT is a reliable imaging technique to rule out residual nodal disease. While overall sensitivity was lower than expected (62.5%), it was shown to be strongly time-dependent with lower detection rates for recurrences beyond 9 months after imaging [6]. Semiquantitative analysis based on an SUV threshold ≥ 2.2 resulted in a small but significant improvement in accuracy over visual assessment, although the increase in sensitivity was offset by a minor reduction in specificity [7]. These limitations could potentially be lifted by dual time point imaging (DTPI). Since FDG uptake in malignant tissue continues to increase for several hours after injection compared to an early washout in benign or inflammatory tissue [8,9,10,11,12], the concept of DTPI to differentiate benign from malignant tissue was first introduced in head and neck cancer in 1999 [13]. In addition, Anderson et al. provided promising data on the use of triphasic dynamic FDG-PET/CT to distinguish post-radiotherapy inflammation from malignancy [14]. By repeating FDG-PET/CT scanning at a later point in time after injection of FDG, the detection of malignancy can potentially be improved due to increased sensitivity (higher tumor-to-background ratio) and specificity (lower false-positive rate).

Moreover, the relative change in SUV over time, named the retention index (RI), has been used as a marker of malignancy. However, the optimal RI cutoff value remains to be determined [15]. To complicate matters, it has been shown that active granulomatous and infectious lesions can behave similarly to malignant lesions regarding FDG uptake even on DTPI [15]. Sathekge et al. could not differentiate malignancy from tuberculomas on DTPI, and Maturu and colleagues demonstrated an increased delayed SUV in mediastinal lymphadenopathies in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis, challenging the proposed role of dual time point FDG-PET/CT imaging in differentiating benign from malignant lesions [16, 17]. Also, regarding specificity, results can be heterogeneous due to tumor heterogeneity. Moreover, we should remain cautious drawing conclusions from the available literature since variations among studies regarding DTPI are significant as they suffer from a lack of standardization in design, variability in delay between acquisition times, and reference standards [15].

As a planned secondary endpoint in the ECLYPS trial, we investigated the added value of semiquantitative DTPI to improve the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of nodal recurrence 12 weeks after CCRT. While visual response assessment using the Hopkins criteria has demonstrated its value [18], DTPI imaging may offer additional benefit in patients with equivocal scores or when assessing head and neck-only acquisitions precluding the use of the Hopkins system. Moreover, we investigated the influence of human papillomavirus (HPV) on DTPI, since it has been reported that FDG-PET/CT may be less reliable in HPV-positive tumors [3].

Materials and methods

Patient population

Patients received dual time point imaging as part of the ECLYPS study protocol. The study design of this single cohort multicenter prospective trial of standardized FDG-PET/CT 12 weeks after treatment with CCRT in newly diagnosed LAHNSCC has been published previously [6]. In short, patients with LAHNSCC (clinical or radiological N2 or N3 disease, any stage and no distant metastases) were eligible. Treatment consisted of concomitant CRT. (Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed.) Patients were excluded in case of a history of another malignancy or other head and neck cancer histology. Patients with a concomitant second primary tumor requiring systematic treatment were also considered ineligible. The institutional review board granted study approval, and informed consent was required for all patients.

HPV status

Assessment of HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) was performed by evaluation of overexpression of the surrogate marker p16 using immunohistochemistry (IHC). A positive test was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Reference standard and follow-up

The reference standard was histology by neck dissection or fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). When the patient refused or if such procedure was not considered appropriate according to the local investigator, nodal involvement had to be confirmed by at least two imaging modalities. Follow-up of patients with a negative FDG-PET/CT consisted of two monthly control visits with additional imaging as deemed necessary by the clinician. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging at one year after treatment to confirm the absence of disease, unless recurrent/residual disease was histologically proven before this point. Patients refusing follow-up imaging required an additional year of negative clinical follow-up, for a total of 2 years.

18F-FDG-PET/CT protocol

The integrated FDG-PET/CT scan protocol that was followed in the five EARL accredited [19] centers has been described previously [7]. In short, a dedicated head and neck acquisition (arms down along the side) was performed 60 min after intravenous FDG injection combined with a low-dose CT scan for attenuation correction according to the manufacturers’ recommended settings. This acquisition was followed by a high-dose CT scan (with IV-contrast, unless contra-indicated) of the head and neck region for anatomical localization of PET-findings and diagnostic purposes. Next, a whole-body PET acquisition (vertex to mid-thigh) with low-dose CT scan used for anatomical localization and attenuation correction was performed. Lastly, sixty minutes after the first series, a second dedicated head and neck FDG-PET/CT series was acquired (120 min after FDG administration).

All patients were fasted for at least 6 h before FDG injection, and blood glucose was confirmed to be below 11 mmol/l. Sufficient hydration was given and, if possible, 20 mg of propranolol was administered 30 min before tracer injection to minimize FDG uptake by muscle tissue and brown fat. During incubation, patients were put in a comfortable position and instructed to avoid motion and unnecessary talking. The FDG dose depended on weight and scanner type but was expected to be 260–370 MBq.

Low-dose CT scans were acquired for attenuation correction, without iodinated contrast, to avoid any influence on SUV. Dedicated PET acquisitions were iteratively reconstructed using a 2–3 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) Gaussian filter and a matrix size of at least 256 × 256 voxels. PET reconstruction was performed according to the EANM FDG-PET and PET/CT procedure [20]. Quality control of the scans included a review of the DICOM headers, uptake times, performing consistency checks, and looking for artifacts.

Image analysis

Lymph node assessment was performed by a nuclear medicine physician with over 20 years of experience. On the dedicated head and neck acquisition at 60 min after injection, the lymph node with the highest FDG uptake was selected for each patient. As dedicated head and neck images were used, Hopkins criteria were not applicable. Consequently, selected lymph nodes were scored using a 5-point scale: (1) clearly negative, (2) probably negative, (3) equivocal, (4) probably positive, and (5) clearly positive. Quantification of selected nodes was performed by manually drawing a volume of interest (VOI) on both the 60 and 120 min acquisition, and the SUV70 (mean value based on 3D isocontour at 70% of the maximum pixel value) was calculated. SUV70 was selected since this metric proved to have the best diagnostic performance in a previous analysis of the whole-body images of the ECLYPS study [7]. When no lymph node was visible, a standard VOI (0.5 cm3) was placed on the location of the pretreatment lymph node with the highest FDG uptake on baseline FDG-PET/CT. The retention index (RI), a measure of relative change in SUV, was calculated in each lesion using the following formula.

$${\text{RI}} = \frac{{{\text{SUV}}_{1} - {\text{SUV}}_{2} }}{{{\text{SUV}}_{1} }} \times 100\%$$

Statistical analysis

General measurements are reported as means with 95% confidence intervals. SUV70 measurements are reported as the median with interquartile range (IQR). A Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare SUV measurements in benign and malignant lymph nodes. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to compare SUV measurements between the 60 and 120 min acquisition. The optimal threshold for the SUV70 parameter on both early and delayed images was determined using a time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves at a time horizon of 12 months after CCRT, under the condition to achieve the highest possible sensitivity, while specificity ≥ 80% [21, 22]. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by 2 × 2 tables, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and AUROC. The predictive values of subgroup analyses were adjusted to the prevalence in the whole study population. The McNemar exact test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM, USA) and R (version 3.0.1).


In ECLYPS, 123 patients received DTPI, of which 12 patients were excluded due to protocol violations such as SUV values in the liver exceeding normal limits (n = 4), exceeding the time limit between scans (n = 5), motion artifacts (n = 2), or difference in time/bed position between scans (n = 1). Additionally, nine patients were excluded as nodal status could not be assessed: Five patients had recurrence at the primary tumor site or a distant relapse without confirmation of neck status at 12 weeks or beyond, and four patients were lost to follow-up or withdrew their informed consent, leaving 102 patients evaluable for this analysis. Patient and tumor characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean interval from therapy to scanning and end of follow-up was, respectively, 12.6 weeks (95% CI: 12.3–12.9) and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.3–24.0). In this cohort, 16 patients (15.7%) had confirmed residual or recurrent nodal disease, of which 15 had residual or recurrent nodal disease within 12 months after therapy. The mean interval from scanning to detection of nodal recurrence was 113.4 days (95% CI: 54.8–172.0) Overall, the mean uptake time of the first and second dedicated head and neck acquisition was, respectively, 64.0 min (95% CI: 63.1–64.9) and 123.1 min (95% CI: 121.6–124.6), resulting in a mean additional uptake time of 59.1 min (95% CI: 57.8–60.5). The mean administered activity of FDG was 277.0 MBq (95% CI: 266.6–287.4).

Table 1 Patient and tumor characteristics

Early (SUV1) versus delayed (SUV2) SUV measurements

The optimal SUV cutoff to differentiate benign from malignant nodes was 2.2 for both early and late images and was independent of the chemotherapy schedule used. Both SUV1 and SUV2 were significantly higher in malignant lymph nodes compared to benign nodes (P = 0.01), although there was a clear overlap (Table 2, Fig. 1A). In malignant nodes, SUV2 was significantly higher compared to SUV1 (median SUV2 = 2.7; IQR 1.9–4.7 vs. SUV1 = 2.6; IQR 1.6–5.9; P = 0.04). In contrast, FDG uptake did not differ significantly between the delayed and early acquisition in benign nodes (median SUV2 = 1.7; IQR 1.5–2.2 vs. SUV1 = 1.8; IQR 1.4–2.2; P = 0.28). An SUV1 cutoff at ≥ 2.2 resulted in a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% CI: 38.4–88.2%), specificity of 80.5% (95% CI: 70.6–88.2%), PPV of 37.0% (95% CI: 25.2–50.7%), and NPV of 93.3% (95% CI: 87.2–96.7%), AUROC 0.74 (Table 3). The SUV2 threshold (optimal cutoff ≥ 2.2) resulted in similar accuracy with one fewer false-negative (FN) case at the expense of 1 additional false-positive (FP) case.

Table 2 Median (IQR) SUV70 measurements
Fig. 1
figure 1

Boxplot of SUV70 measurements and RI of the whole study population and of visually equivocal patients. Top panel: boxplot of SUV70 measurements A and RI B of the whole study population (n = 102). Bottom panel: boxplot of SUV70 measurements C and RI D of visually equivocal patients (n = 24). The boxes represent the interquartile range, and the horizontal line represents the median. The whiskers represent the minimal (Q1 − 1.5*IQR) and maximal (Q3 + 1.5*IQR) values. The dots and asterisk indicate outliers and extreme outliers (beyond Q1 − 3*IQR or Q3 + 3*IQR), respectively. In panels B, C, and D, an extreme outlier was excluded to improve scaling

Table 3 Diagnostic performance of SUV70 measurements regarding nodal recurrence within 12 months after CCRT

The retention index

In benign lymph nodes, median RI was negative although highly variable (median RI = − 2.6; IQR − 16.7–4.5; 21.2), while in malignant nodes median RI was positive (median RI = 12.3; IQR − 11.6–25.6; 37.2) and significantly higher (P = 0.018) compared to benign nodes, although there was a clear overlap (Table 2, Fig. 1B). Exploration of potential RI cutoffs, when used in combination with the SUV1 threshold (≥ 2.2), yielded optimal results at RI ≥ 3%. This combined threshold (SUV1 + RI) significantly reduced FP cases by 53% (n = 9) at the expense of increasing FN cases by 20% (n = 1) compared to the SUV1 threshold alone (McNemar exact P = 0.02). This combination consequently leads to a marked increase in specificity (90.8% vs. 80.5%, + 10.3%) and PPV (52.9% vs. 37.0%, + 15.9%), while NPV remained comparably high (92.9% vs. 93.3%, − 0.4%) (Table 3). However, the difference in AUROC, as overall measure of benefit in diagnostic accuracy, was not significant (P = 0.62).

The “visually equivocal” cohort

Visual assessment of the most intense nodal lesion on the early scan assigned a score of 1 to 72 LNs (70.6%), score 2 to 11 LNs (10.8%), score 3 to 10 LNs (9.8%), score 4 to 3 LNs (2.9%), and score 5 to 6 LNs (5.9%). Excluding patients with either a score of 1 or 5 (clear negative and positive cases, respectively) resulted in a cohort of 24 equivocal cases, of which 6 (25%) patients had residual or recurrent lymph node disease within 12 months after the end of chemoradiation. In this subgroup, 10 patients (41.7%) had HPV-associated OPSCC and 4 patients (16.7%) had HPV-negative OPSCC. On both the early and the delayed acquisition, SUV was significantly higher in malignant nodes compared to benign nodes (Table 2). However, neither malignant nor benign nodes showed significant changes in FDG uptake over time (Table 2, Fig. 1C). Consequently, RI was not significantly higher in malignant nodes compared to benign nodes (P = 0.2) (Table 2, Fig. 1D). Applying the optimal SUV threshold on the early acquisition (SUV1 ≥ 2.2) resulted in a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI: 35.9–99.6%), specificity of 50.0% (95% CI: 26.0–74.0%), PPV of 22.3% (95% CI: 13.8–34.0%), and NPV of 94.6% (95% CI: 73.3–99.1%) with an AUROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.39–0.89). The same threshold on the delayed acquisition reduced FN and FP cases by n = 1 (AUROC = 0.78), leading to an improved sensitivity (100% vs. 83.3%) and specificity (55.6% vs. 50.0%) as compared to the early time point. However, the difference in AUROC was not statistically significant (P = 0.29). Combining the SUV1 threshold with an RI cutoff at 3% yielded an increase in specificity (77.8% vs. 50.0%, + 27.8%) by reducing FP cases (n = 5) at the cost of 1 additional FN case (sensitivity of 66.7% vs. 83.3%; − 16.6%) (Table 3).

Impact of human papillomavirus

Out of the 102 patients in our study, 54 patients had oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC), of which 32 patients had HPV-associated OPSCC, 21 patients were HPV-negative, and in one patient HPV status was not assessed (Table 1). In lymph nodes of patients with HPV-negative OPSCC, SUV1 and SUV2 were significantly higher in malignant nodes compared to benign nodes, whereas in nodes of HPV-associated OPSCC, SUV was not significantly different (Table 4, Fig. 2). Moreover, in nodes of HPV-negative OPSCC, delayed imaging revealed a significant decrease in SUV in benign nodes (P = 0.02) and a borderline significant increase in SUV in malignant nodes (P = 0.07). In contrast, nodes of HPV-associated OPSCC patients had no significant change in SUV over time in neither benign nor malignant nodes (Table 4, Fig. 2), although the small amount of malignant nodes after treatment (n = 3) in HPV-associated disease precludes any firm conclusions.

Table 4 Median (IQR) SUV70 measurements in OPSCC stratified by HPV status
Fig. 2
figure 2

Boxplot of SUV70 measurements and RI in HPV-negative and HPV-associated OPSCC. Top panel: Boxplot of SUV70 measurements A and RI B in HPV-negative OPSCC. Bottom panel: Boxplots of SUV70 measurements C and RI D of HPV-associated OPSCC. The boxes represent the interquartile range, and the horizontal line represents the median. The whiskers represent the minimal (Q1 − 1.5*IQR) and maximal (Q3 + 1.5*IQR) values. The dots represent outliers. In panel D, two extreme outliers were excluded to improve scaling

In HPV-negative OPSCC, the optimal threshold of the SUV1 parameter (≥ 2.2) resulted in a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI: 35.9–99.6%), specificity of 80.0% (95% CI: 51.9–95.7%), PPV of 41.8% (95% CI: 19.7–67.8%), and a NPV of 96.5% (95% CI: 82.1–99.4%), with an AUROC of 0.82. On the delayed acquisition, specificity increased to 93.3% (+ 13.3%), while sensitivity was preserved. This corresponded to a marked increase (+ 26.5%) in PPV (68.3%, 95% CI: 23.9–93.7%), while NPV remained comparably high (97.0%; 95% CI: 84.4–99.5) (Table 3). Analogous to our previous analyses, an optimal RI cutoff was explored in combination with the SUV1 parameter revealing an optimal cutoff at 3%. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the combined threshold was identical to the SUV2 (≥ 2.2) parameter on the delayed acquisition. There was no statistically significant difference in AUROC values. In patients with HPV-associated OPSCC, the diagnostic performance of the SUV1 parameter suffered from low sensitivity (33.3%; 95% CI: 0.8–90.6%). The SUV2 threshold improved the sensitivity, while specificity remained comparable. A combination of the SUV1 threshold with an RI cutoff yielded no benefit in diagnostic performance as it improved specificity at an unacceptable reduction in sensitivity (Table 3).


As a part of the ECLYPS trial, we investigated the potential of dual time point imaging to improve the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of residual nodal disease in LAHNSCC 12 weeks after CRT [1, 2].

Overall, FDG uptake in malignant nodes was significantly higher compared to benign nodes on both early and delayed images. Moreover, FDG kinetics was different with a significantly increased uptake over time in malignant nodes, while in benign nodes the FDG uptake remained stable. Therefore, the retention index was significantly higher in malignant nodes. In the subgroup of HPV + OPSCC patients, different FDG kinetics were observed, even though the low number of true positive lymph nodes in this cohort hampers the interpretation. First, SUV in HPV + malignant nodes was lower compared to those of HPV-negative OPSCC and no longer significantly different from the SUV in benign nodes. Also, the RI between malignant and benign nodes was not significantly different in HPV-associated OPSCC. These observations add to the increasing evidence that the different biology of HPV-associated OPSCC may affect the optimal timing and interpretation of FDG-PET/CT in this setting [3].

While our study confirmed the different FDG kinetics between benign and malignant nodes, the added value of DTPI to improve the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT to detect residual nodal disease was limited since AUROC values for the DTPI metrics (SUV2 and SUV1 combined with RI ≥ 3%) were similar compared to SUV1 alone.

The combination of the SUV1 threshold with an RI cutoff at 3% yielded an increase in specificity at the expense of a minor reduction in sensitivity. This is in line with the review on DTPI by Cheng et al., who observed that delayed imaging, when applying the same criterion to define malignancy as on early imaging, will increase sensitivity at the cost of specificity. In contrast, the use of a stricter criterion (i.e., SUV + RI) may increase specificity, sometimes at the expense of sensitivity [15].

Delayed imaging had a limited effect on sensitivity since only 1 of the 5 false-negative nodes on early imaging showed FDG uptake above the threshold on the late scan (Fig. 3). This node had an equivocal visual score both on early and delayed images and a positive RI (RI = 12.7%). In contrast, the remaining 4 false-negative cases had a visual score of 1 on both time point images and a negative RI. Furthermore, the time interval between FDG-PET/CT and the clinical detection of recurrence was longer in these 4 cases (between 227 and 283 days) compared to only 27 days for the node that was detected only on the delayed acquisition. Since 4 out of 5 false-negative cases on the PET/CT at 12 weeks after CCRT were detected as subclinical but FDG-avid disease on the routinely acquired PET/CT scan 1 year after chemoradiation, we postulate that the false-negative results of FDG-PET/CT at 12 weeks after CCRT were due to either minimal residual disease still below the detection limit of the PET camera or due to early tumor recurrence, not yet present at 12 weeks after CCRT. This finding indicates that not DTPI, but repeat scanning at a later time interval after therapy (for instance, 1 year after CCRT) is required.

Fig. 3
figure 3

PET images of a patient with T2N2cM0 OPSCC. Early axial and coronal A, B and delayed C, D PET images of a patient with T2N2cM0 OPSCC. A suprasternal lymph node with an equivocal visual score and a SUV under the threshold (SUV1 = 2.1) was identified on the early head and neck PET acquisition 60 min after FDG administration (black arrow; A, B). On the delayed PET acquisition, this lymph node remained visually equivocal (black arrow; C, D). However, the SUV increased above the threshold (SUV2 = 2.4; RI = 12.7%). Recurrence was histologically proven by neck dissection

Regarding specificity, the combination of the SUV1 and RI threshold significantly reduced the amount of false-positive cases (n = 9; − 53%) at the expense of 1 additional FN case. This increase in specificity was not observed using only the SUV2 parameter. Based on the analysis of the OPSCC subgroup, the effect of an increased specificity by adding the RI threshold might be tumor-specific, as in HPV-negative OPSCC it increased specificity (reduced FP cases by n = 2) while preserving sensitivity. While in HPV-associated OPSCC increased specificity came at an unacceptable offset in sensitivity. However, as mentioned previously, these findings are prone to bias due to the low amount of malignant nodes in these subgroups, and therefore, we should refrain from drawing definitive conclusions.

In our study, we performed delayed time point imaging at 2 h after injection of FDG, as is the case in most DTPI studies [15]. However, there is no consensus on an optimal delay time for either the initial or delayed time point of image acquisition leading to considerable variability in DTPI studies. Cheng et al. proposed a delay time for DTPI of at least 2 h and ideally even 3 h after FDG injection [15]. In further research on DTPI, a standardized approach toward delayed image acquisition times should be considered.

Finally, we investigated the potential benefit of DTPI in patients with an equivocal visual read for residual neck disease. Standardized qualitative interpretation criteria for response assessment in head and neck cancer are commonly used in clinical practice. In our study, we used dedicated head and neck PET acquisitions both at 60 and 120 min and therefore an adapted 5-point scoring system was used instead of the Hopkins criteria. In this subgroup of 24 patients, SUV values did not alter significantly over time, neither in benign nor malignant nodes. Accordingly, RI was not significantly different, and SUV1 combined with RI did not improve accuracy. These disappointing results could in part be explained by the fact that almost half (41.7%) of the patients in this equivocal group had HPV-associated OPSCC, where the advantage of DTPI is uncertain.


DTPI did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect residual disease 12 weeks after chemoradiation. Due to differences in tracer kinetics between malignant and benign nodes, DTPI improved the specificity, but at the expense of a loss in sensitivity, albeit minimal. Hence, the added value in routine practice will be marginal, since clinicians will opt for histological confirmation of FDG-avid lymph nodes, even if kinetics suggest benign disease, in order to not deny a patient potential curative salvage surgery.

In HPV-associated OPSCC, FDG uptake and tracer kinetics were not significantly different between benign and malignant nodes, probably reflecting the difference in underlying biology in this subgroup. Evaluation in larger patient groups is needed to define the optimal imaging strategy in this subgroup.

False negatives were often associated with late clinical relapses, probably due to minimal residual disease or early recurrence not yet present at the 12 weeks PET/CT scan. Repeat scanning at a later time point during follow-up (e.g., 12 months after chemoradiation) could help to detect these recurrences early, although progressive fibrosis and scarring after irradiation may complicate subsequent salvage surgery at later time points.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Area under the receiver operator characteristics


Confidence interval




Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine


Dual time point imaging


European Association of Nuclear Medicine




False negative


Fine needle aspiration cytology


False positive


Human papillomavirus






Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer


Negative predictive value


Oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer


Polymerase chain reaction


Positron emission tomography/computed tomography


Positive predictive value


Retention index


Standard uptake value


Volume of interest


  1. Isles MG, McConkey C, Mehanna HM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of positron emission tomography in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008;33(3):210–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta T, Master Z, Kannan S, Agarwal JP, Ghsoh-Laskar S, Rangarajan V, et al. Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(11):2083–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helsen N, Van den Wyngaert T, Carp L, Stroobants S. FDG-PET/CT for treatment response assessment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(6):1063–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehanna H, Wong WL, McConkey CC, Rahman JK, Robinson M, Hartley AG, et al. PET-CT surveillance versus neck dissection in advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1444–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Risor LM, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Loft FC, Madsen AR, Vogelius IR, et al. FDG-PET/CT in the surveillance of head and neck cancer following radiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(2):539–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Wyngaert T, Helsen N, Carp L, Hakim S, Martens MJ, Hutsebaut I, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell cancer: the ECLYPS study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(30):3458–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Helsen N, Van den Wyngaert T, Carp L, De Bree R, VanderVeken OM, De Geeter F, et al. Quantification of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake to detect residual nodal disease in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy: results from the ECLYPS study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(5):1075–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamberg LM, Hunter GJ, Alpert NM, Choi NC, Babich JW, Fischman AJ. The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? J Nucl Med. 1994;35(8):1308–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(7):871–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubota K, Itoh M, Ozaki K, Ono S, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28(6):696–703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(9):1412–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng G, Alavi A, Lim E, Werner TJ, Del Bello CV, Akers SR. Dynamic changes of FDG uptake and clearance in normal tissues. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;15(3):345–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hustinx R, Smith RJ, Benard F, Rosenthal DI, Machtay M, Farber LA, et al. Dual time point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neck. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26(10):1345–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson CM, Chang T, Graham MM, Marquardt MD, Button A, Smith BJ, et al. Change of maximum standardized uptake value slope in dynamic triphasic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography distinguishes malignancy from postradiation inflammation in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91(3):472–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng G, Torigian DA, Zhuang H, Alavi A. When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(5):779–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sathekge MM, Maes A, Pottel H, Stoltz A, van de Wiele C. Dual time-point FDG PET-CT for differentiating benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules in a TB endemic area. S Afr Med J. 2010;100(9):598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maturu VN, Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Mittal BR, Bal A, Gupta N, et al. Dual-time point whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging in undiagnosed mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a prospective study of 117 patients with sarcoidosis and TB. Chest. 2014;146(6):e216–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcus C, Ciarallo A, Tahari AK, Mena E, Koch W, Wahl RL, et al. Head and neck PET/CT: therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins Criteria)-interreader reliability, accuracy, and survival outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(9):1411–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aide N, Lasnon C, Veit-Haibach P, Sera T, Sattler B, Boellaard R. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(Suppl 1):17–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(1):181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS. Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):337–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32(30):5381–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references




Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




FS contributed to data and statistical analysis and writing of the manuscript. NH obtained and analyzed patient data and data analysis. LC, OH, LG, MM, KD, KS, RDB, FDG, GZ, CVL, AM, and OL contributed to review of the manuscript. TVDW was involved in data analysis, statistical analysis, and review of the manuscript. SS contributed to final review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Soffers.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study and the informed consent were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp and the University Hospital Antwerp (UA/UZA) (B30020109153). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained for all patients.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soffers, F., Helsen, N., Van den Wyngaert, T. et al. Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy. EJNMMI Res 12, 34 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • HPV