Skip to main content
  • Original research
  • Open access
  • Published:

The association of DAT gene methylation with striatal DAT availability in healthy subjects

A Correction to this article was published on 10 May 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

DNA methylation inhibits gene expression by preventing transcription factors from binding to DNA. Functioning of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons is influenced by the expression of the dopamine transporter (DAT), and genetic variations in the gene encoding DAT contribute to differences in reward processing. We aimed to investigate the action of DAT methylation on DAT protein expression measured by positron emission tomography (PET).

Methods

The emission data were acquired over 90 min with 50 frames after injection of 18F-FP-CIT using PET. Binding potentials (BPNDs) of ventral striatum, caudate nucleus, putamen were measured with the simplified reference tissue method. Genomic DNA was extracted from subjects’ blood sampling. Methylation of 4 regions in SLC6A3 gene was assessed using bisulfite pyrosequencing. The mean percentage of methylation (%) for each cluster was calculated by taking the average of all CpG site methylation levels measured within the cluster. Subjects were assessed with the Generalized Reward and Punishment Expectancy Scales (GRAPES) that consists of 30 items related with the reward and punishment that individuals expect for their behaviors.

Results

Thirty-five healthy males, with an age range between 20 and 30 years, and a mean age of 24.4 ± 2.7 years, were included in this study. The mean percentage of methylation (%) from cluster C showed a trend of positive correlation with DAT availability of ventral striatum (rho = 0.3712, p = 0.0281), not significant after correction for multiple comparisons, and a significant correlation with GRAPES A: reward expectancy scale (rho = 0.7178, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

DAT methylation from peripheral blood showed a trend of positive correlation with DAT availability of ventral striatum in healthy subjects; however, it was not significant after correction for multiple comparison. The degrees of methylation from cluster C of DAT in peripheral blood were significantly correlated with reward scales of GRAPES A: reward expectancy scale. The association between DAT methylation and DAT expression needs to be investigated further.

Background

The dopamine transporter (DAT) is a sodium chloride-dependent transmembrane protein on the presynaptic dopaminergic nerve terminal [1], regulating levels of dopamine by reuptake [2, 3]. As DAT binding is correlated with the density of dopaminergic neurons [4], decreased DAT uptake represents dopaminergic neurodegeneration such as PD [4], a neurodegenerative disease with death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta [5, 6]. The most sensitive imaging techniques for the diagnosis of neurodegeneration are positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) by using ligands that report nigrostriatal dopaminergic function [3], which allow quantifying dopaminergic system in human brain [7].

Epigenetic change is a heritable phenotype change without alterations in the DNA sequence, such as DNA methylation. DNA methylation is an epigenetic process that adds methyl groups to cytosines of the genome, mainly in CpG sites [8]. As DNA methylation inhibits gene expression by preventing transcription factors from binding to DNA [9], DNA methylation is inversely associated with protein expression [10]. Functioning of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons is influenced by DAT, and genetic variations in the gene encoding DAT contribute to differences in reward processing [11, 12]. However, in a previous study by Wiers et al., striatal DAT availability measured by 11C-cocaine PET did not show any significant association with DAT methylation of peripheral blood in healthy subjects [13], which is the only report that investigated the association between them. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the action of DAT methylation on DAT protein expression measured by PET and reward scales measured with the Generalized Reward and Punishment Expectancy Scales (GRAPES) [14].

Methods

PET scan

Thirty-five healthy, male subjects without brain injury, neuropsychological disorders were included in this study. The majority of the participants in this study were included in a previous study [15]. An intravenous bolus injection of 18F-FP-CIT was administered. The emission data were acquired over 90 min with 50 frames of progressively increasing durations (15 s × 8 frames, 30 s × 16 frames, 60 s × 10 frames, 240 s × 10 frames, and 300 s × 6 frames) using the Siemens Biograph 40 Truepoint PET/CT (Siemens Healthcare, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA). The dynamic PET data were collected in the 3-dimensional mode, with 148 slices with image sizes of 256 × 256 and pixel sizes of 1.3364 × 1.3364 mm2. These were reconstructed using iterative method with a Gaussian filter.

Image analysis

For a volume-of-interest-based analysis, an averaged image (0–10 minafterinjection) was created from dynamic PET frames and spatially normalized to 15O-Water PET template in statistical parametric mapping 5 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, United Kingdom). To extract time–activity curves (TACs) of volume of interest from full dynamic PET scans, Oxford-GSK-Imanova striatal atlas (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) for ventral striatum, caudate nucleus, putamen were applied. DAT availability, expressed in terms of binding potential (BPND), was measured by analyzing TACs with the simplified reference tissue method [16] with the cerebellum as a reference using pmod version 3.6 (PMOD Technologies LLC, Zurich, Switzerland).

DNA extraction and methylation analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from subjects’ blood sampling. Methylation of 4 regions in SLC6A3 gene was assessed using bisulfite pyrosequencing. After bisulfite treatment of the DNA (EpiTect Fast DNA Bisulfite Kit, Qiagen, Hilden Germany), polymerase chain reaction test was done with DNA Engine Tetrad 2 Peltier Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). Primer Design was designed with PyroMark Assay Design 2.0 (Qiagen, Hilden Germany). Pyrosequencing was done with PyroMark Q48 Autoprep System (Qiagen, Hilden Germany). PyroMark Q48 Autoprep 2.4.2 Software (Qiagen, Hilden Germany) was used to assess methylation of each CpG site, 4 regions in SLC6A3 gene. The percentage of methylated alleles was divided by the total number of alleles (methylated and unmethylated) to determine the level of methylation at each CpG site. The mean percentage of methylation (%) for each cluster was calculated by taking the average of all CpG site methylation levels measured within the cluster.

Questionnaire

Subjects were assessed with GRAPES [14]. GRAPES consists of 30 items related with the reward and punishment that individuals expect for their behaviors, GRAPES (A) reward expectancy, GRAPES (B) punishment expectancy.

Statistical analysis

Normality was assessed using the D’Agostino & Pearson normality test. Spearman correlation test was done to determine the association of DAT methylation with BPNDs and GRAPES. As 4 clusters of DAT methylation were included in this study, significance was set at ɑ = 0.05/4 (0.0125) to correct for multiple comparisons. All analyses were conducted using Prism (v7.0d, GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Thirty-five healthy males, with an age range between 20 and 30 years, and a mean age of 24.4 ± 2.7 years, were included in this study. Coordinates and the percentage of methylated alleles (%) for all SLC6A3 CpG sites are presented in Table 1. The mean percentages of methylation (%) were 9.9 (cluster A), 76.1 (cluster B), 91.6 (cluster C), 75.1% (cluster D), respectively. The mean percentage of methylation (%) from each cluster did not show any association each other (Fig. 1). The mean percentage of methylation (%) from each cluster was not associated with DAT availability of the ventral striatum, showing a trend of positive correlation between that from cluster C and DAT availability of the ventral striatum without correction (rho = 0.3712, p = 0.0281), which was not significant after correction for multiple comparison. In addition, the mean percentage of methylation (%) from cluster C was positively correlated with GRAPES A: reward expectancy scale (rho = 0.7178, p < 0.0001) (Figs. 2, 3).

Table 1 Coordinates and the percentage of methylated alleles (%) for all SLC6A3 CpG sites
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Distribution of mean percentage of methylation (%) for each cluster and b inter-correlation of mean percentage of methylation (%)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation of mean percentage of methylation (%) with a DAT availability and b GRAPES

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation of mean percentage of methylation (%) from cluster C with a DAT availability and b GRAPES

Discussion

In this study, the degrees of methylation from cluster C (Exon 7) of DAT in peripheral blood showed a trend of positive correlation with DAT availability of the ventral striatum and were significantly correlated with reward scales of GRAPES A: reward expectancy scale.

This is the first study that investigated the association between the degree of methylation of DAT and DAT availability of PET in healthy subjects. Previously, the association of methylation of DAT gene with DAT availability was investigated in patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [13], which is the only study of DAT methylation and PET. Although methylation of DAT gene was not significantly different between patients with ADHD and healthy subjects, DAT availability measured by 11C-cocaine PET was negatively correlated with the degree of DAT methylation in patients with ADHD, not in healthy subjects [13]. This correlation was significant in both caudate nucleus, putamen, and ventral striatum [13]. However, the underlying mechanisms of insignificancy between DAT availability and DAT methylation in healthy subjects remained unclear. In subjects with alcohol dependency, the effect of DAT methylation was investigated with reward processing [10] and depressive symptoms [17] using functional magnetic resonance imaging. DAT methylation in promoter region predicted activation of nucleus accumbens during the anticipation of high and low loss in healthy subjects, not in subjects with alcohol dependency [10]. In addition, subjects with alcohol dependency showed that activity of amygdala to alcohol cue was correlated with DAT methylation only those with low depression scores [17]. Also, higher DAT methylation predicted the relapse of alcohol dependency [17].

Epigenetic change is a heritable phenotype change without alterations in the DNA sequence, such as DNA methylation. DNA methylation is a process that adds methyl groups to cytosines of the genome, mostly in CpG sites [8]. DNA methylation inhibits gene expression by preventing transcription factors from binding to DNA [9]. Therefore, DNA methylation has shown to be inversely associated with protein expression [10]. In rodent, DAT methylation was negatively associated with striatal DAT expression [18]. In humans, only one study reported the association between DAT methylation and DAT availability measured by 11C-cocaine PET as explained above [13]. Inconsistent with the study by Wiers et al., we demonstrated a trend of positive association between DAT methylation and DAT availability measured by 18F-FP-CIT PET. In addition, the mean percentage of methylation (%) from cluster C was strongly correlated with GRAPES A: reward expectancy scale, similar to the study by Muench et al., which predicted striatal responses during reward processing by DAT methylation in healthy subjects, not in alcohol-dependent individuals [10]. DAT methylation in alcohol-dependent individuals [10], or ADHD [13], showed the difference with that in healthy subjects. Therefore, DAT methylation might have an implication on treatment of alcohol dependency or ADHD.

There are several points that should be considered in these results. First, it is unclear that whether DAT methylation obtained from peripheral blood has an association with DAT methylation of brain. In this regard, Wiers et al. proved the significant correlation between DAT methylation of substantia nigra and DAT methylation from peripheral blood both in healthy subjects and patients with ADHD, however, showing moderate correlation in both promotor region (r = 0.44), and CpG site 230 (r = 0.53) of healthy subjects [13]. Second, the mean percentage of methylation was calculated from each cluster and considered as the degree of DAT methylation level. However, the degree of DAT methylation may be different within each cluster, and the region of each cluster may be different. Third, the radiopharmaceuticals used in measurement of DAT availability were different in each study. Theoretically, as DNA methylation inhibits or regresses the binding of transcription factors [9], DNA methylation might be negatively associated with protein expression [10]. However, at least with regard to DAT, this association is unclear until now as we showed a trend of positive association between DAT methylation and DAT availability, and Wiers et al. showed no significant association [13]. The mechanisms underlying these findings might be complex and likely vary across genes. Also, as a small number of subjects were included in this study, further studies of a larger number of subjects with a broader age range should be carried out in the future.

Conclusion

DAT methylation from peripheral blood showed a trend of positive correlation with DAT availability of ventral striatum in healthy subjects; however, it was not significant after correction for multiple comparison. The degrees of methylation from cluster C of DAT in peripheral blood were significantly correlated with reward scales of GRAPES A: reward expectancy scale. The association between DAT methylation and DAT expression needs to be investigated further.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available to corresponding author of the manuscript upon reasonable request.

Change history

  • 06 May 2023

    This article has been corrected since original publication; please see the linked erratum for further details.

  • 10 May 2023

    A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-00991-6

References

  1. Vaughan RA, Foster JD. Mechanisms of dopamine transporter regulation in normal and disease states. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(9):489–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall V, Grosset D. Role of dopamine transporter imaging in routine clinical practice. Mov Disord. 2003;18(12):1415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Booth TC, Nathan M, Waldman AD, Quigley AM, Schapira AH, Buscombe J. The role of functional dopamine-transporter SPECT imaging in parkinsonian syndromes, part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(2):229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Park E. A new era of clinical dopamine transporter imaging using 123I-FP-CIT. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012;40(4):222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nalls MA, Pankratz N, Lill CM, Do CB, Hernandez DG, Saad M, et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson’s disease. Nat Genet. 2014;46(9):989–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rawlik K, Rowlatt A, Tenesa A. Imputation of DNA methylation levels in the brain implicates a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease. Genetics. 2016;204(2):771–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zipursky RB, Meyer JH, Verhoeff NP. PET and SPECT imaging in psychiatric disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52(3):146–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin B, Li Y, Robertson KD. DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy? Genes Cancer. 2011;2(6):607–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(8):597–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muench C, Wiers CE, Cortes CR, Momenan R, Lohoff FW. Dopamine transporter gene methylation is associated with nucleus accumbens activation during reward processing in healthy but not alcohol-dependent individuals. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(1):21–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dreher JC, Kohn P, Kolachana B, Weinberger DR, Berman KF. Variation in dopamine genes influences responsivity of the human reward system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(2):617–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hahn T, Heinzel S, Dresler T, Plichta MM, Renner TJ, Markulin F, et al. Association between reward-related activation in the ventral striatum and trait reward sensitivity is moderated by dopamine transporter genotype. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32(10):1557–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiers CE, Lohoff FW, Lee J, Muench C, Freeman C, Zehra A, et al. Methylation of the dopamine transporter gene in blood is associated with striatal dopamine transporter availability in ADHD: a preliminary study. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;48(3):1884–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Samuel A, Ball MZ. Sensation seeking, Eysenck’s personality dimensions and reinforcement sensitivity in concept formation. Pers Individ Differ. 1990;11(4):343–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pak K, Seo S, Kim K, Lee MJ, Shin MJ, Suh S et al. Striatal dopamine transporter changes after glucose loading in humans. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(1):116–122

  16. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage. 1996;4(3 Pt 1):153–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiers CE, Shumay E, Volkow ND, Frieling H, Kotsiari A, Lindenmeyer J, et al. Effects of depressive symptoms and peripheral DAT methylation on neural reactivity to alcohol cues in alcoholism. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim P, Choi CS, Park JH, Joo SH, Kim SY, Ko HM, et al. Chronic exposure to ethanol of male mice before mating produces attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-like phenotype along with epigenetic dysregulation of dopamine transporter expression in mouse offspring. J Neurosci Res. 2014;92(5):658–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (2020R1F1A1054201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kyoungjune Pak took part in study design and writing the manuscript. Ju Won Seok, Hyun-Yeol Nam, Seongho Seo involved in image analysis. Myung Jun Lee participated in image analysis and study design. Keunyoung Kim took part in image analysis. In Joo Kim involved in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyoungjune Pak.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical permission for the study procedures was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards at Pusan National University Hospital. Subject consent has been obtained by Pusan National University Hospital. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pak, K., Seok, J.W., Nam, HY. et al. The association of DAT gene methylation with striatal DAT availability in healthy subjects. EJNMMI Res 11, 58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00800-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00800-y

Keyword