Skip to main content

Advertisement

EJNMMI Research
EJNMMI Research Cover Image
We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Zirconium-89-labelled rituximab PET-CT in orbital inflammatory disease

EJNMMI Research volume 9, Article number: 69 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Orbital inflammatory diseases are a heterogenic group of conditions that often entail a difficult diagnostic process and many patients are treatment resistant. Inflammatory diseases can be visualized by Zirconium-89-labelled rituximab PET-CT (89Zr-rituximab PET/CT). In this study, we describe our experience and possible potential of the 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT for diagnostic and therapeutic management of refractory orbital inflammation.

Results

Retrospectively, 89Zr-rituximab uptake was assessed and related to clinical data. The main outcome measures were the characteristics of the scan and the clinical relation of uptake with the diagnostic process and treatment effectivity. Twelve patients with thyroid eye disease (TED) and suspected idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI) were scanned. Six patients had a strong 89Zr-rituximab uptake and showed a focal distribution within the lesion. Four patients (one TED, three IOI) responded well to rituximab treatment after a positive scan. 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT was essential to the diagnosis of optic nerve meningioma in one patient.

Conclusion

89Zr-rituximab PET/CT has the potential to be a powerful tool for the detection of B cell-mediated disease within the orbit and ocular adnexa. This technique can be a valuable addition for diagnosing diseases around the eye and can potentially predict rituximab treatment response in patients with refractory inflammation.

Background

Orbital inflammatory disease comprises of several inflammatory conditions around the eye with different underlying causes [1]. The most common and well-studied cause is thyroid-associated eye disease (TED), while non-thyroid associated orbital inflammation can be a diagnostic challenge and most are considered idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI) [2, 3]. The most important challenge is the differentiation from malignant entities, especially lymphoid malignancies, because of the grave therapeutic consequences. Currently, the best diagnostic tool available is to perform a biopsy of the orbital process with immunohistochemistry [3]. A biopsy is, unfortunately, not always deemed possible because of deep localization behind the eye and the related risk of complications [4]. From a pathological point of view, biopsies of orbital inflammation often reveal a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate consisting of (cluster of differentiation (CD) 20+) B cells, CD5+ T cells and polytypical plasma cells. Imaging modalities that can directly detect elements of the pathophysiology of the disease, such as CD20+ B cells, may therefore have potential as an aid in the diagnostic process and management strategies. CD20+ B cell infiltrates have previously been visualized in patients with immune diseases and lymphoma with Zirconium-89-labelled (89Zr) rituximab positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) [5,6,7]. The use of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT in orbital disease has not yet been investigated. Here, we describe our experience and the potential of this technique in aiding in the diagnosis of refractive orbital inflammation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we included 12 patients with an 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT in the University Medical Center Utrecht for ophthalmologic pathology. The scans were performed because of suspected orbital inflammatory disease refractory to standard treatment. In five patients, the use of rituximab was considered as alternative treatment and it was given in four patients. At the time of the scan, all patients were rituximab naïve. The standard therapy for IOI and TED consisted of oral prednisone regimen (60 mg) tapered over 3 months or intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (500–1000 mg/day for 3 days depending on the severity of disease), with the continuation of oral prednisone or IV methylprednisolone regimen in case of insufficient response. Refractory to standard therapy was defined as intolerance, failure to respond to, or inability to taper oral prednisone treatment, the use of multiple IV methylprednisolone regimens or systemic immunosuppressive treatment (adapted from Suhler et al. [8]). IOI was diagnosed by assessing clinical indicators, MRI imaging and an extensive laboratory panel and whenever possible a biopsy [9]. A biopsy for diagnostic confirmation was possible for all IOI except for one IOI located within the orbital apex (case 1). One patient was diagnosed with IgG4-related orbital disease (IgG4+ ROD). The research team investigated clinical data, laboratory workup, and histopathology.

Patients

From the 12 patients (detailed description in Table 1), 8 were diagnosed with IOI, 2 patients with TED, 1 patient with IgG4+ ROD, and 1 patient ultimately with an optic nerve meningioma. The patients were refractory to standard treatment in the following way: two patients (cases 5 and 6) received oral prednisolone treatment for more than 12 months with inability for tapering. The other 10 patients did not respond to treatment with oral prednisolone and 1 or multiple intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone treatments (range 1–6 IV methylprednisolone regimens). Four patients (cases 2, 3, 11 and 12) were given additional immunosuppressive treatment (either azathioprine 100–150 mg, tocilizumab 800 mg or methotrexate 20 mg/week). Both patients with TED did not respond to multiple IV methylprednisolone regimens and retained a clinical activity score (CAS) with a score of four (case 4) and five (case 10). Due to the nature of refractory orbital inflammation, all patients were either under oral prednisolone treatment at the time of the scan or were recently given oral or IV steroids.

Table 1 Representation of the cases for diagnosis and PET/CT intensity values
Full size table

89Zr-rituximab PET/CT procedure

Seventy-four megabecquerel 89Zirconium (with a half-life of 78.4 h) was produced and labelled to 10 mg rituximab according to the procedures described previously [10]. No adverse effect occurred on administration of 89Zr-rituximab. Three days after intravenous administration, we performed a PET/CT of the head on a TruePoint Biograph mCT40 scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). We performed a low dose CT scan using Care Dose 4D and Care kV, reference parameters: 40 mAs, 120 kV. Subsequently, the PET was acquired according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) recommendations with a single bed position of 10 min with the following parameters: PET with time-of-flight and point spread function (TrueX) reconstruction, 4 iterations, 21 subsets, with a filter of 7.5 mm full width at half maximum [11]. We used tonsillar, submandibular, submental, pre- and post-auricular, and occipital lymph nodes as a positive control of CD20+ (B cell) targeting. For standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements, we used the lean body mass-corrected formula. We regarded a quantification of the PET-positivity (maximal SUV) above 2.0 to be a strong positivity, consistent with the PET-positivity of lymph nodes and bone marrow in the head and neck area, and a maximum SUV between 1.0 and 2.0 as moderate uptake.

Results

PET-CT analysis

In six patients, we found a high 89Zr-rituximab PET uptake (standardized uptake value (SUV) > 2.0) within the orbital masses (Table 1, example in Fig. 1a). One patient with a strong PET uptake had an active TED with CAS 5. In two patients, a moderate 89Zr-rituximab uptake was seen, of which one patient had an IOI in the orbital apex and one patient was diagnosed with IgG4+ ROD (Fig. 1b). In four patients, there was no pathological 89Zr-rituximab uptake. We diagnosed patients with a negative scan as myositis (two patients), active TED with CAS 4, and meningioma in the orbital apex (case 8) which became most likely after a positive Gallium-68-labelled DOTA-TATE PET/CT (Fig. 2b), as meningiomas usually have a high somatostatin receptor expression [12]. In this last patient, a concurrent sinusitis of the right maxillary sinus coincidentally showed a strong 89Zr-rituximab uptake (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, IOI located in the lacrimal gland or diffuse within the orbit had strong uptake of 89Zr-rituximab, whilst myositis and masses of the apex had moderate to no uptake. Strong 89Zr-rituximab uptake was inhomogeneous with a focal intense uptake within the lesion.

Fig. 1
figure1

Examples of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT uptake. a Strong uptake in fusion image and PET-only image for the axial and coronal planes (arrows point at the lesion, SUVmax> 2.0; case 6). b Moderate uptake in fusion image and PET-only image (arrows point at affected muscles, SUVmax 1.0–2.0, case 5)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Patient with a meningioma in the left orbital apex and sinusitis of the right maxillary sinus (case 8). a Negative 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT (white arrow, SUVmax < 1.0). b Positive 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT, white arrow. c 89Zr-rituximab uptake in a co-existing sinusitis at the contralateral side, white arrows

Full size image

Histopathology

Eight patients had an open incisional biopsy through a lid crease or swinging-eyelid surgical approach, dependent on the localization within the orbit [3]. For all but one (case 5), the histological images were not suggestive for IgG4-related disease. Histopathological examination in seven biopsies showed signs of a chronic inflammation with a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, characterized by both CD20+ B cells and CD3+ T cells. CD138+ plasma cells had a polytypic lambda and kappa distribution and either a predominant IgG or IgA differentiation for orbital and lacrimal gland tissue, respectively. In one biopsy, we only found fatty tissue without inflammation due to sampling error and a deep orbital localization.

Rituximab treatment

Four patients were treated with rituximab (2 × 1000 mg IV, MabThera, Roche) after a positive 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT. All treated patients showed improvement of complaints within the first weeks after treatment. This effect was temporary in 3 out of 4 cases as some of the complaints returned to lesser extent. In one case, all complaints were initially gone (vision > 20/20, no pain and no diplopia), but some complaints returned 6 months later (case 7). A second rituximab treatment was given after 6 months and the patient responded well with remission of complaints. Three other cases (case 9–11) had a significant reduction of complaints (improvement of visual acuity to 20/20, mild or no pain and improvement of eye motility). Of these, one received a second rituximab dose 4 months later (case 10), one had a relapse after 2 months and received additional treatment of oral prednisone (15 mg) and azathioprine (150 mg) (case 11), and one is currently monitored over 6 months whilst still improving (case 9). Two patients had an MRI scan after treatment with rituximab and both showed major radiological improvement with almost complete regression of the mass (case 7 and 9 Fig. 3a–d).

Fig. 3
figure3

Rituximab treatment response (case 7). a 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT fusion image with focal uptake in the lesion, white arrow points at the lesion. b PET only image, black arrow points at the lesion. Initial (c) and post-treatment MRI at 3 months after treatment (d), illustrating treatment response

Full size image

Other treatments

Two patients with a positive scan did not receive rituximab treatment. One patient improved after treatment with oral prednisone and receiving infliximab for coexisting Crohn’s disease (case 3) and the other patient improved on IV steroids (case 6). The latter patient was previously treated with oral prednisone for more than 12 months and had a biopsy after 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT was performed. With a confirmed diagnosis of IOI, this patient was therefore first treated with IV steroids. Patients with a negative scan were not treated with rituximab and had stable disease, refractory to treatment. The patient with IgG4+ ROD (case 5) had a good response after additional IV steroids were given.

Discussion

We describe our experience of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT in 12 patients suspected of refractory orbital inflammation within the University Medical Center Utrecht. We have found a strong 89Zr-rituximab uptake in orbital inflammatory diseases of the lacrimal gland and as a mass or diffuse within the orbit. Idiopathic myositis and involvement of the orbital apex showed 89Zr-rituximab uptake to a lesser extent. A focal density was found in masses with a strong uptake. All four patients treated with rituximab after a positive 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT had a good response during one or multiple treatments.

Five studies previously investigated the use of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT in humans with different disease entities. Two studies investigated B cell lymphoma in a total of 11 patients [7, 13]. Lymphoma masses showed 89Zr-rituximab PET uptake that was greater in the tumour mass without a preload of unlabelled rituximab [7]. The tumour uptake of labelled rituximab correlated with the in-tissue CD20 expression [13]. One study investigated the predictive value of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT for the effectiveness of rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients [5]. A case report described the use of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT in the diagnostic process of neurolymphomatosis in the sciatic nerve [6]. Finally, one study investigated three patients with multiple sclerosis, reporting no penetration of 89Zr-rituximab in the brain [14].

Besides Zirconium-89, intact CD20 labelling with rituximab has been performed with Iodine-124 [15] for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Technetium-99m [16] in several inflammatory conditions, showing feasibility for CD20 imaging. However, Zirconium-89 remains the most suitable for internalizing intact monoclonal antibodies [17]. 89Zr-rituximab has a relatively long half-life and high effective dose of approximately 0.5 mSv/MBq [18]. The radiation dose should therefore be considered and balanced to the clinical benefits.

Surgical (open) biopsies are recommended for the diagnosis of orbital masses [3]. Unfortunately, biopsies deep in the orbit can be difficult, not-representative and potentially lead to severe complications to the optic nerve and extra-ocular muscles [4, 19]. The 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT can be of aid in distinguishing inflammatory and lymphoproliferative disorders from other orbital diseases, as we demonstrate in case 8 (Fig. 2). This technique can, therefore, in combination with clinical and laboratory findings [9] and MRI imaging [20], have additional value for a comprehensive diagnosis in difficult cases.

Our study shows that stronger focal 89Zr-rituximab intensity can occur within the orbital mass (Fig. 3). It was previously suggested that a higher tumour CD20+ expression correlated with a higher PET/CT intensity in lymphoma patients [13]. In our opinion, representable biopsies should yield the densest area of inflammatory cells within the tumour to provide the most information and exclude lymphoma. The yield of the inflammatory area within the biopsies was dependent on the morphology of the inflammation within the normal tissue as well as the depth of the mass within the orbit, reflecting the difficulty of an orbital biopsy. Because we show focal uptake in this study, we believe that the 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT could be used as pre-biopsy orientation for targeting higher intensity areas during incisional biopsies for difficult cases.

The role of rituximab as a treatment in refractive orbital inflammatory disease is currently under investigation. Previous case reports and a phase I/II trial have indicated a strong potential for the effectiveness of rituximab treatment in refractory orbital inflammation [8, 21]. However, not all patients benefit from this treatment, and the non-responders have an unnecessary exposure to potentially severe adverse effects. For IOI, the presence of a mixed B cell and T cell profile in the histopathological analysis of the masses reflects the involvement of both cells in the pathogenesis of the disease [22]. Although theoretically logical, there is no evidence of better rituximab effectivity in IOI patients with a more profound B cell involvement. In TED, varying results have been published of the effectiveness of rituximab treatment [23,24,25,26,27]. Most early reports and a randomized controlled trial [24] describe clinical improvement with treatment in almost all patient, while another randomized controlled trial did not show an overall improvement compared to placebo. The search for factors that can predict the effectiveness of rituximab in TED and other orbital inflammatory diseases continues [28].

The use of 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT to predict rituximab treatment response has been demonstrated in a small cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients by quantification of the uptake [5]. Although limited by the number of patients, we can now extrapolate this theory to orbital inflammatory diseases as we see a good response of rituximab in high-uptake patients in the current study. We would encourage future research investigating the predictive potential of rituximab therapy in inflammatory diseases, including TED, to use 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT as an objective and measurable tool.

Several limitations of this study exist, inherent to the retrospective nature. We were not able to include patients diagnosed with a biopsy-proven orbital lymphoma. We would expect a high uptake in lymphoma patients [7, 10] and a comparison with inflammatory orbital conditions is warranted for the potential for differentiation. Also, not all patients were treated with rituximab, including the patients with a negative scan. We could therefore not compare patients with a positive and negative scan for treatment effectivity.

Conclusion

This study describes our institutional experience with the 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT in orbital inflammatory diseases. This technique has the potential to be a powerful tool for the detection of B cell-mediated disease within the orbit and ocular adnexa. By visualizing the CD20+ B cells, it can be a valuable addition to the diagnostic armamentarium for orbital inflammatory disease. Higher focal intensities within an orbital mass were found that can potentially pinpoint the location for more representative surgical biopsies. Patients with a strong 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT uptake responded well to rituximab treatment. We encourage further research of this technique in the diagnostic process and to predict rituximab treatment response for orbital inflammatory diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

89Zr-rituximab PET/CT:

Zirconium-89-labelled rituximab positron emission tomography/computed tomography

CAS:

Clinical activity score

CD:

Cluster of differentiation

IgG4 + ROD:

IgG4+-related orbital disease

IOI:

Idiopathic orbital inflammation

IV:

Intravenous

TED:

Thyroid-associated eye disease

References

  1. 1.

    Shields JA, Shields CL, Scartozzi R. Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: the 2002 Montgomery lecture, part 1. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:997–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gordon LK. Orbital inflammatory disease: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Eye. 2006;20:1196–206.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mombaerts I, Rose GE, Garrity JA. Orbital inflammation: biopsy first. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61:664–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dagi Glass LR, Freitag SK. Orbital inflammation: corticosteroids first. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61:670–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bruijnen S, Tsang-A-Sjoe M, Raterman H, Ramwadhdoebe T, Vugts D, van Dongen G, et al. B-cell imaging with zirconium-89 labelled rituximab PET-CT at baseline is associated with therapeutic response 24 weeks after initiation of rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    de Jong A, Mous R, van Dongen GAMS, Hoekstra OS, Nievelstein RAJ, de Keizer B. (89) Zr-rituximab PET/CT to detect neurolymphomatosis. Am J Hematol. 2016;91:649–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Muylle K, Flamen P, Vugts DJ, Guiot T, Ghanem G, Meuleman N, et al. Tumour targeting and radiation dose of radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-rituximab in CD20+ B-cell lymphoma as predicted by 89Zr-rituximab immuno-PET: impact of preloading with unlabelled rituximab. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1304–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Suhler EB, Lim LL, Beardsley RM, Giles TR, Pasadhika S, Lee ST, et al. Rituximab therapy for refractory orbital inflammation: results of a phase 1/2, dose-ranging, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:572–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mombaerts I, Bilyk JR, Rose GE, McNab AA, Fay A, Dolman PJ, et al. Consensus on diagnostic criteria of idiopathic orbital inflammation using a modified Delphi approach. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:769–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Verel I, Visser GWM, Boellaard R, Stigter-van Walsum M, Snow GB, van Dongen GAMS. 89Zr immuno-PET: comprehensive procedures for the production of 89Zr-labeled monoclonal antibodies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1271–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Klingenstein A, Haug AR, Miller C, Hintschich C. Ga-68-DOTA-TATE PET/CT for discrimination of tumors of the optic pathway. Orbit. 2015;34:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jauw YWS, Zijlstra JM, de Jong D, Vugts DJ, Zweegman S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Performance of 89Zr-labeled-rituximab-PET as an imaging biomarker to assess CD20 targeting: a pilot study in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169828 Glod JW, editor.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hagens MH, Killestein J, Yaqub MM, van Dongen GA, Lammertsma AA, Barkhof F, et al. Cerebral rituximab uptake in multiple sclerosis: A 89 Zr-immunoPET pilot study. Mult Scler J. 2018;24:543–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tran L, Huitema ADR, van Rijswijk MH, Dinant HJ, Baars JW, Beijnen JH, et al. CD20 antigen imaging with 124I-rituximab PET/CT in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Hum Antibodies. 2011;20:29–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Malviya G, Anzola KL, Podestà E, Laganà B, Del Mastro C, Dierckx RA, et al. (99m)Tc-labeled rituximab for imaging B lymphocyte infiltration in inflammatory autoimmune disease patients. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:637–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    van Dongen GAMS, Poot AJ, Vugts DJ. PET imaging with radiolabeled antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors: immuno-PET and TKI-PET. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:607–15 Springer.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jauw YWS, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Hoekstra OS, Hendrikse NH, Vugts DJ, Zijlstra JM, et al. Immuno-positron emission tomography with Zirconium-89-labeled monoclonal antibodies in oncology: what can we learn from initial clinical trials? Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:131 Frontiers Media SA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chastain JB, Sindwani R. Anatomy of the orbit, lacrimal apparatus, and lateral nasal wall. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39:855–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hiwatashi A, Togao O, Yamashita K, Kikuchi K, Kamei R, Yoshikawa H, et al. Diffusivity of intraorbital lymphoma vs. inflammation: comparison of single shot turbo spin echo and multishot echo planar imaging techniques. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:325–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Abell RG, Patrick A, Rooney KG, McKelvie PA, McNab AA. Complete resolution of idiopathic sclerosing orbital inflammation after treatment with rituximab. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2015;23:176–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mombaerts I, Schlingemann RO, Goldschmeding R, Koornneef L. Idiopathic granulomatous orbital inflammation. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:2135–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stan MN, Garrity JA, Carranza Leon BG, Prabin T, Bradley EA, Bahn RS. Randomized controlled trial of rituximab in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:432–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Salvi M, Vannucchi G, Currò N, Campi I, Covelli D, Dazzi D, et al. Efficacy of B-cell targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with active moderate to severe Graves’ orbitopathy: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:422–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Khanna D, Chong KKL, Afifiyan NF, Hwang CJ, Lee DK, Garneau HC, et al. Rituximab treatment of patients with severe, corticosteroid-resistant thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:133–139.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Silkiss RZ, Reier A, Coleman M, Lauer SA. Rituximab for thyroid eye disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:310–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    El Fassi D, Nielsen CH, Hasselbalch HC, Hegedüs L. Treatment-resistant severe, active graves’ ophthalmopathy successfully treated with B lymphocyte depletion. Thyroid. 2006;16:709–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Stan MN, Salvi M. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: rituximab therapy for Graves’ orbitopathy—lessons from randomized control trials. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176:R101–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Room E 03.136, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Kamil G. Laban
    •  & Rachel Kalmann
  2. Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Kamil G. Laban
  3. Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Roos J. Leguit
  4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Bart de Keizer
Authors
  1. Kamil G. Laban
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Rachel Kalmann
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Roos J. Leguit
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Bart de Keizer
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

KGL, RK and BdK devised the study and handled the clinical and radiological data. RJL handled the pathological data. KGL, RK, RJL and BdK interpreted the data and constructed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript in final form.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil G. Laban.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We performed this study in compliance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments and federal laws in the Netherlands and the European Union. Following review of the study design and protocol, the local Medical Research Ethical Committee (MREC)(Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie Utrecht) confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study and that therefore an official approval of this study by the local MREC is not required under the WMO (protocol number: 18–120). All patients signed written informed consent for participation in this study.

Consent for publication

All patients signed written informed consent for the use of their data in this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laban, K.G., Kalmann, R., Leguit, R.J. et al. Zirconium-89-labelled rituximab PET-CT in orbital inflammatory disease. EJNMMI Res 9, 69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0530-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Idiopathic orbital inflammation
  • Thyroid eye disease
  • 89Zr-rituximab PET/CT
  • Rituximab