Skip to main content

Table 3 The population mean (SD) values for net influx of FDG (Ki; ml g−1 min−1) from blood to brain by standard IDIF method and four simplified methods

From: Single time point quantitation of cerebral glucose metabolism by FDG-PET without arterial sampling

 

Aarhus (n = 52)

Bern (n = 24)

 

GM

WM

GM

WM

Standard IDIF Ki (ml g−1 min−1)

VD (ml g−1)

0.0350 ± 0.0086

0.55 ± 0.19

0.0143 ± 0.0099

0.51 ± 0.13

0.0345 ± 0.0091

0.55 ± 0.15

0.0153 ± 0.0047

0.45 ± 0.10

Method 1 Ki (ml g−1 min−1)

%error

0.0336 ± 0.0077

− 3.5 ± 7.2%

r = 0.93**

0.0119 ± 0.0026

− 16.7 ± 20.2%

r = 0.44**

0.0354 ± 0.0099

 + 2.5 ± 11.3%

r = 0.86**

0.0135 ± 0.0040

− 11.6 ± 13.1%

r = 0.94**

Method 2 Ki (ml g−1 min−1)

%error

0.0338 ± 0.0090

− 3.7 ± 7.2%

r = 0.71**

0.0119 ± 0.0031

− 16.7 ± 19.2%

r = 0.58**

0.0333 ± 0.0093

− 3.4 ± 10.6%

r = 0.86**

0.0127 ± 0.0037

− 16.7 ± 12.3%

r = 0.94**

Method 3 Ki (ml g−1 min−1)

%error

0.0352 ± 0.0118

 + 0.7 ± 25.1%

r = 0.61**

0.0123 ± 0.0044

− 13.9 ± 31%

r = 0.33*

0.0346 ± 0.0098

 + 0.4 ± 12%

r = 0.88**

0.0132 ± 0.0040

− 13.6 ± 11.7%

r = 0.97**

Method 4 Ki (ml g−1 min−1)

%error

0.0348 ± 0.0090

− 0.7 ± 7.3%

r = 0.68**

0.0124 ± 0.0032

− 13.2 ± 8.1%

r = 0.36*

0.0346 ± 0.0098

 + 0.2 ± 11.4%

r = 0.86**

0.0132 ± 0.0039

− 13.6 ± 12.9%

r = 0.94**

  1. We present population mean (SD) values for net influx of FDG (Ki; ml g−1 min−1) from blood to the entire gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) using data from Aarhus (n = 52) and Bern (n = 24), along with the error relative to the complete IDIF results, and the corresponding ordinate intercepts (VD; ml g−1). We tested four simplified methods based on pharmacokinetic findings from Table 2 with respect to their mean Ki values, the percentage error relative to standard IDIF values, calculated as [(Method-IDIF)/IDIF], where the IDIF method entails linear graphic analysis relative to the brain radioactivity concentrations measured during the interval 12–67 min. In all four simplified methods, the mean GM VD estimate from the IDIF regression (0.55 ml g−1) served to constrain the estimation of Ki. Method 1: From semi-logarithmic analysis of the FDG blood concentration during the interval 35–67 min, we calculated λ3 (min−1), the fractional rate constant for the elimination of FDG from arterial blood. The AUC extrapolated to the time of first appearance of the radioactivity peak corresponded to a mean of 85% of the total measured AUC (Aarhus) or 84% (Bern). Using these correction factors, we estimated the complete AUC, and calculated the terminal theta(52–67 min) relative to the terminal blood concentration (Ca(52–67 min). We then estimated Ki as a two point Patlak plot defined by gold standard population ordinate intercept (VD; ml g−1) and the tracer distribution volume calculated from the mean radioactivity concentrations measured in GM, WM, and blood during the final three frames (52–67 min) of the PET recording. Method 2: From the site-specific empirical relationships between AUC(0–67) as a function of Ca(52–67 min), we similarly calculated Ki from Ca(52–67 min) as a two point Patlak plot. Method 3: We similarly used the site-specific empirical relationships between theta(52–67 min) and λ3 measured during the interval 35–67 min post injection. Method 4: We similarly used the site-specific empirical relationships between theta(52–67 min) and subject age in the two populations. Significance of Pearson correlation coefficients: (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.001