Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimates of the SMD as summary measure for the difference in [18F]FDG (SUVmax) uptake between clinical subtypes according to a simplified classification

From: The influence of receptor expression and clinical subtypes on baseline [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparisons

Studies

Patients

Meta-analysis

Subgroup

Egger

No

I2 (%)

SMD

95% CI

P

P

 

Primary analyses

 ER+/HER2− versus HER2+

5

755

302

0.0

 − 0.34

 − 0.53, − 0.16

0.0070

–

0.2633

 ER+/HER2− versus TNBC

6

814

309

56.1

 − 0.89

 − 1.20, − 0.58

0.0008

–

0.0247

 HER2+ versus TNBC

5

302

291

64.7

 − 0.54

 − 0.93, − 0.14

0.0193

–

0.3140

Sensitivity analyses

 ER+/HER2− versus HER2+

8

1153

416

30.9

 − 0.38

 − 0.56, − 0.20

0.0016

0.3985

0.7816

 ER+/HER2− versus TNBC

9

1212

424

43.0

 − 0.91

 − 1.10, − 0.73

 < 0.0001

0.3252

0.0246

 HER2+ versus TNBC

8

416

406

22.9

 − 0.50

 − 0.76, − 0.24

0.0025

0.6884

0.5186

  1. Data derived from the primary and sensitivity analyses are presented
  2. CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; SMD, standardized mean difference; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer