Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of studies focusing on PET acquisition time

From: Feasibility of equivalent performance of 3D TOF [18F]-FDG PET/CT with reduced acquisition time using clinical and semiquantitative parameters

Author

Study type

[18F]-FDG activity

PET/CT scanner & reconstruction

PET acquisition time

Findings

Halpern et al. [25]

patient (n = 57)

7.77 MBq/kg/bw

Reveal RT PET/CT + 3D OSEM

120s, 60s

60s/BP only for patients < 59 kg

Murray et al. [23]

phantom + patient (n = 20)

350 ± 40 MBq

Gemini TF PET/CT + 3D-RAMLA & OSEM TOF

60s, 30s, 15s, 10s

15s/BP: approved lesion detectability

Sonni et al. [15]

patient (n = 58)

356 ± 37 MBq

Discovery MI PET/CT + 3D PSF TOF

120s, 90s, 60s, 30s

90s/BP with good image quality

Pilz et al.

patient (n = 96)

4 MBq/kg/bw

Ingenuity TF PET/CT + 3D OSEM TOF

75s, 57s

57 s/BP = Approved acquisition time