Table 3 Overview of modeling results
From: FDG PET versus CT radiomics to predict outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients
Performance of model | PFS | OS |
|---|---|---|
FDG PET-model, c-index (95% CI) Training Validation | 0.67 (0.52–0.82) 0.66 ( 0.57–0.78) | 0.72 (0.62–0.84) 0.47 (0.36–0.62) |
CT-model, c-index (95% CI) Training Validation | 0.66 (0.56–0.76) 0.54 (0.44–0.67) | 0.71 (0.59–0.80) 0.59 (0.47–0.74) |
SUVmax, c-index (95% CI) Training Validation | 0.55 (0.44–0.60) – | 0.54 (0.42–0.68) – |
SUVmean, c-index (95% CI) Training Validation | 0.52 (0.40–0.66) – | 0.52 (0.40–0.66) – |
Volume, c-index (95% CI) Training Validation | 0.60 (0.49–0.73) 0.57 (0.48–0.67) | 0.62 (0.52–0.72) 0.63 (0.50–0.75) |