Skip to main content
EJNMMI Research
Download PDF
  • Original research
  • Open access
  • Published:

Lymphoscintigraphy findings in patients with chylothorax: influence of biochemical parameters

EJNMMI Research volume 13, Article number: 72 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chylothorax is a condition that can be challenging to diagnose due to its nonspecific clinical presentation. Several biochemical parameters of chylous pleural effusion have been identified as important indicators for the diagnosis of chylothorax. Lymphoscintigraphy is utilized to assess chylothorax and determine the location of chyle leakage. The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the biochemical parameters of chylous pleural effusion and 99mTc-dextran (99mTc-DX) lymphoscintigraphy in diagnosing chylothorax.

Material and methods

A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study, 83 of the patients with unilateral chylothorax, and 37 with bilateral chylothorax. All patients underwent both 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy and pleural effusion laboratory analysis. The 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy images were categorized as positive or negative groups based on the presence or absence of abnormal radioactive tracer accumulation in the thorax, respectively. The biochemical parameters of the two groups were subsequently compared.

Results

Among these patients, 101 (84.17%) had exudative effusions, while 19 (15.83%) had transudative effusions, as determined by the levels of pleural effusion protein, lactate dehydrogenase and cholesterol. Abnormal tracer accumulation in thorax was observed in 82 patients (68.33%). Our findings indicated that lymphoscintigraphy results were not associated with exudative and transudative chylothorax (P = 0.597). The lymphoscintigraphy positive group displayed significantly higher levels of pleural effusion triglyceride and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio in all biochemical parameters, compared to the negative group (P = 0.000 and P = 0.005). We identified cutoff values of 2.870 mmol/L for pleural effusion triglycerides and 4.625 for pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio, respectively, which can facilitate differentiating the positive and negative cases on lymphoscintigraphy.

Conclusion

Lymphoscintigraphy technique is a dependable diagnostic tool for the qualitative assessment of chylous pleural effusion. Higher pleural effusion triglyceride level and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio indicate a positive result in patients with chylothorax on lymphoscintigraphy, with the cutoff values of 2.870 mmol/L and 4.625 aiding in the diagnosis.

Introduction

Chylothorax is an infrequent medical condition characterized by the leakage of chyle from the lymphatic system into the pleural space [1]. Chyle, a milky fluid composed of triglycerides, protein, lymphocytes, and immunoglobulins, is produced in the lacteal system of the intestine and transported to the bloodstream via the thoracic duct [2,3,4]. The diagnosis of chylothorax is typically made upon the identification of milky pleural effusion. [5,6,7,8,9]. Unfortunately, fewer than 50% of the chylothorax cases present with this classic appearance of pleural effusion [10]. The untimely identification of chylothorax may lead to persistent depletion of chyle fluid, ultimately resulting in malnourishment, compromised immunity, metabolic disorders, and even fatality [11, 12].

Accurate diagnosis is imperative for the efficacious management of chylothorax progression [13]. Diagnostic process entails an examination of the pleural fluid, whereby a chylous effusion typically exhibits elevated triglyceride levels exceeding 110 mg/dl, reduced cholesterol levels below 200 mg/dl, and the presence of chylomicrons [10, 14, 15]. The identification of chylomicrons in the pleural fluid through lipoprotein electrophoresis serves as the definitive diagnostic criterion for chylothorax. Nonetheless, it should be noted that certain medical institutions may lack the capability to perform the lipoprotein electrophoresis test. Furthermore, most (80%) chylous pleural effusions are likely to be classified as exudative according to the Light’s criteria [10, 14]. And the pleural fluid to serum triglyceride ratio should be greater than 1 and the pleural fluid to serum cholesterol ratio less than 1 [14].

Lymphoscintigraphy has emerged as a prevalent and efficacious approach for qualitative diagnosis of chylothorax and identifying the location of the ruptured sites of the lymph vessel [5, 16,17,18]. This imaging technique is convenient, minimally invasive, and devoid of any known adverse effects [19, 20]. As an imaging agent for lymphoscintigraphy, 99mTc-dextran (99mTc-DX) is a polysaccharide nonprotein macromolecule with varying molecular weight. It metabolized by the liver and excreted by the kidneys. Its rapid uptake from the injection site is a notable advantage. In the context of chylothorax, the tracer can traverse damaged lymphatic vessels and enter the pleural cavity, facilitating effusion visualization. Despite several case reports indicating the diagnostic potential of lymphoscintigraphy for chylothorax [21, 22], the impact of laboratory examination parameters(e.g., triglycerides, cholesterol, and proteins, etc.) on its results remains unclear. In this study, we conducted an investigation into the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy in identifying of chylothorax patients, as well as exploring the potential correlation between 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy and the biochemical parameters of chylous pleural effusion.

Material and methods

Population

All patients with chylothorax who underwent 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy and pleural effusion laboratory analysis from January 2017 to December 2021 in the Department of Nuclear Medicine of Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria for chylothorax were the triglyceride level of pleural effusion greater than 1.24 mmol/L. All patients with pleural effusion underwent thoracocentesis or drainage to extract pleural effusion samples, which were then subjected to laboratory biochemical tests. The median time interval between lymphoscintigraphy and pleural effusion laboratory analysis was 6 days (range, 0–30 days). In the case of chylothorax patients, the blood biochemical parameters and pleural effusion laboratory analysis were conducted simultaneously. The medical records were reviewed by the electronic medical record system, including clinical data, laboratory data, and the results of 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy as well as operative notes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patient selection for this retrospective case‒controlled study

Full size image

Lymphoscintigraphy imaging

Images were acquired with a dual-head gamma-camera with a low-energy, high-resolution collimator in whole-body scanning. The parameters of the scan included an energy peak of 140 keV, window width of 20%, acquisition matrix of 256 × 1024 pixel, and zoom of 1 at a scan speed of 17 cm/min. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) (Symbia T16, Siemens Medical Systems, Germany) fusion images of the main affected area were obtained 3 h after the injection of radiotracer. SPECT imaging was performed using a 128 × 128 matrix with a spacing of 3.0 mm, 62 projections over 360°, and 45 s per projection. CT scan of the same anatomical region was obtained with 130 kV, 190mAs, and pitch 0.65. Perform iterative reconstruction of the SPECT data using a Flash 3D algorithm; 8 iterations and 4 subsets. 99mTc-DX (Beijing Atomic Technology Co., Ltd.) was injected subcutaneously at two points on each foot, one between the first and second toes and another between the fourth and fifth toes. The dose of each injection point was 55.5–92.5 MBq, and the injection volume was 0.1–0.15 mL. Whole-body images from head to foot were acquired at 10 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h postinjection.

Image analysis

The lymphoscintigraphy images were analyzed by two independent, experienced nuclear medicine physicians who reached a consensus on each scan. Analysis of the imaging characteristics of the scans first determined whether the lymphatic drainage was normal. Normal lymphatic drainage was defined as normal uptake of linear lower limbs lymphatic ducts and ilioinguinal lymph nodes without backflow in the subcutaneous tissues of the lower limbs and trunk. Second, and more importantly, the analysis focused on whether there was persistent visualization of radioactive accumulation in the thorax corresponding to the known chylothorax suggesting a chylous pleural effusion and regarded as a positive result on lymphoscintigraphy. Abnormal radioactive accumulation was defined as that the radioactivity on the affected side is higher than that on the healthy side or gradually increases with time delay. Otherwise, it was considered as a negative result. If there was a focal accumulation of radiotracer in the mediastinum or the affected pleural cavity, it suggested a suspected site of chyle leakage. Whether there was abnormal radioactive-tracer distribution in other areas, such as the abdominal cavity, was also analyzed.

Pleural effusion evaluation

Chylous pleural effusions were classified as exudation or transudation according to following criteria [10]. A chylous pleural effusion was exudative if one of the following conditions was met: (1) pleural effusion protein level greater than 29 g/L, (2) pleural effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level greater than two-thirds of the upper limit of the normal serum value (the normal serum LDH level referred to 120 U/L to 250 U/L), and (3) pleural effusion cholesterol level greater than 1.166 mmol/L. Chylous effusion was classified as transudation if none of the above conditions were met or if the following two conditions were met: (1) pleural effusion LDH level two-thirds or less than the upper limit of the normal serum value; (2) pleural effusion cholesterol level of 45 mg/dL or less.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics (Version 24.0, IBM). Chylous effusion biochemical parameters between the positive and negative groups on lymphoscintigraphy were compared using an independent t test or nonparametric tests. Comparison of lymphoscintigraphy results between the exudative chylothorax and transudative chylothorax was performed using the Pearson Chi-square test. The results were considered to be statistically significant when the P value was less than 0.05. If there was a significant difference in chylous effusion laboratory analysis between the positive and negative groups on lymphoscintigraphy, additional receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC) value. The optimal cutoff value was calculated, as well as the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results

Population study

This study retrospectively collected 120 patients, including 57 males (47.5%) and 63 females (52.5%), with a median age of 41.0 years (range, 1–77 years). Chylothorax was unilateral in 83 patients (69.17%). Of these 83 patients, the chylothorax involved the right hemithorax in 52 patients (6 cases with ascites) and the left hemithorax in 31 patients (2 cases with ascites). Chylothorax was bilateral in the remaining 37 patients (30.83%) (6 cases with ascites). Of the 37 patients with bilateral pleural effusion, laboratory examinations were performed on one side of the pleural effusion samples. Patient’s clinical symptoms were documented in 101 patients (84.17%). Dyspnea was the most common symptom, presenting in 72 patients. Cough was presented in 8 patients, abdominal distension in 14 patients, and limb swelling in 7 patients. The reason of chylothorax was idiopathic in 62 patients (51.67%), lymphatic disorder in 34 patients (28.33%), surgery and trauma in 10 patients (8.33%), malignancies in 4 patients (3.33%), and others in 10 patients (8.33%).

Lymphoscintigraphy performance

Of these 83 patients with unilateral chylothorax, 54 patients showed persistent radioactive-tracer accumulation on the affected side on lymphoscintigraphy imagings, while the remaining 29 patients did not. In the cases of the 37 patients with bilateral chylothorax, 28 displayed persistent radioactive-tracer accumulation on both sides, while 9 exhibited no visually abnormal activity. Two patients were identified with suspected sites of chyle leakages (Fig. 2). Additionally, 7 patients with known limb swelling presented with abnormal activity in the lower extremity. Two patients exhibited imaging findings of limb lymphedema despite the absence of subjective symptoms of limb swelling. Among the 14 patients presenting with both chylothorax and ascites, 9 showed abnormal radioactive tracer accumulation in both the thoracic and abdominal cavities, while 5 showed elevated radioactivity in the abdominal cavity but not in the thoracic cavity (Fig. 3). Of the 14 patients with lymphangioma, lymphangioma was visualized in only one patient (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A 29-year-old female with idiopathic chylothorax (bilateral). A continuous drainage tube was placed in the right pleural cavity, and laboratory analysis confirmed the right pleural effusion as a transudation. A The anterior (upper row) and posterior (lower row) planar images of the lymphoscintigraphy were acquired at 10 min–6 h. A localization site of lymphatic leakage was seen in the thoracic duct region (diaphragmatic level) at 1 h anterior (blue arrow). Radioactive tracer could be seen in the right thoracic drainage tube at 3 h anterior (red arrow). Visualization of radioactivity was observed in the left lower thorax and the right thorax at 3–6 h, suggesting a chylothorax on both sides (black arrows). B The thorax region SPECT/CT images (upper row CT image; middle row SPECT image; lower row hybrid SPECT/CT image) acquired at 3 h. The focal accumulation of radioactive tracer in the thoracic duct region had disappeared. Abnormal activity was seen in well-defined pleural effusion in the left lower thorax and the right thorax (thick red arrows)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

A 14-year-old male with bilateral pleural effusion and ascites. The right-sided pleural effusion confirmed exudative chylothorax. A The anterior lymphoscintigraphy images acquired at 10 min–6 h showed no elevated radioactivity in the bilateral thoracic cavities and arc-shaped abnormally elevated radioactivity in the pelvic cavity (black arrows). B, C The CT aerial views of the chest and pelvis showed massive liquid in the bilateral thoracic cavities and abdominal cavity

Full size image
Figure. 4
figure 4

A 29-year-old female with lymphangioma and left exudative chylothorax. A The anterior (upper row) and posterior (lower row) planar images of the lymphoscintigraphy were acquired at 10 min–6 h. The visualization of radioactivity was observed in the left hemithorax at 3–6 h anterior and posterior, suggesting a chylothorax (black arrows). Two focal accumulations in the right lower abdomen were observed (empty arrowheads) corresponding to lymphangioma on MRI scan (empty arrows) B. C An MRI scan revealed left-sided pleural effusion (empty arrow)

Full size image

Correlation between laboratory analysis and lymphoscintigraphy

Medical records for 120 chylous pleural effusion samples revealed that 66 samples (55.0%) were described as milky or bloody chyle, and 54 samples (45.0%) were not chyle, which could be bloody, orange, yellow or straw-colored. For all the biochemical parameters of chylous pleural effusion, statistically significant differences were observed in the median of triglyceride level and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio between the positive and negative groups on lymphoscintigraphy (P = 0.0001; P = 0.005) (Fig. 5). In accordance with the aforementioned standards, 101 samples (84.17%) were classified as exudative, while 19 samples (15.83%) were categorized as transudative. The etiologies of the 19 transudative chylothoraces included liver cirrhosis (4 patients), surgery (2 patients), lymphatic disorder (8 patients), and idiopathic cause (5 patients). However, there was no correlation between chylous pleural effusion types and lymphoscintigraphy results (P = 0.597) (Table 1).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Laboratory examination characteristics between positive and negative groups shown by lymphoscintigraphy. A Pleural effusion triglyceride; B Pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio; C Pleural effusion lactate dehydrogenase; D Pleural effusion cholesterol; E Pleural effusion cholesterol/serum cholesterol ratio; F Pleural effusion protein

Full size image
Table 1 Correlation between chylous pleural effusion types and lymphoscintigraphy
Full size table

Performance of laboratory analysis for predicting lymphoscintigraphy

When the chylous pleural effusion triglyceride cutoff value from the ROC curve for lymphoscintigraphy was set to 2.870 mmol/L (ROC AUC, 0.869; 95% CI, 0.805–0.932; P = 0.0001), the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.4%, 63.2%, and 75.8%, respectively. When the pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio cutoff value from the ROC curve for lymphoscintigraphy was set to 4.625 (ROC AUC, 0.836; 95% CI, 0.763–0.910; P = 0.005), the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 53.5%, 76.3%, 64.9%, respectively (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

ROC curves. ROC curves analyses suggested both pleural effusion triglyceride and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio could predict lymphoscintigraphy

Full size image

Discussion

All pleural effusions with a triglyceride level exceeding 1.24 mmol/L have been demonstrated to be chylothorax [14, 23,24,25]. The composition of chyle is contingent upon dietary factors, and an increase in lymph flow through the thoracic duct is observed during the absorption phase of digestion, making the chyle liquid show the typical milky appearance [26,27,28,29]. Conversely, a decrease in lymph flow during fasting may result in chyle effusion having a clear appearance. Milky effusions have been found to have significantly higher levels of triglycerides compared with non-milky effusions, although other fluid characteristics, such as protein, LDH, and cholesterol levels, were similar [10]. Therefore, the examination of pleural effusion for triglycerides plays an important role in diagnosing chylothorax.

Lymphoscintigraphy is considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of lymphedema and can be used to evaluate chylothorax in patients even with dyspnea [30]. In our study, we found that 68.33% of patients with chylothorax had an abnormal accumulation of radioactive tracer in the thorax during lymphoscintigraphy. Furthermore, our analysis of the biochemical parameters of chylous pleural effusion revealed that only triglyceride and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio showed a significant difference in the lymphoscintigraphy positive group and negative group. The cutoff values of pleural effusion triglyceride and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio are 2.870 mmol/L and 4.625, respectively, which is helpful in indicating lymphoscintigraphy results in patients with chylothorax. Interestingly, the cutoff value of triglyceride for suggesting lymphoscintigraphy results was greater than the standard value used for laboratory diagnosing chylous effusion. This discrepancy may be explained by the fact that some patients switched from a normal diet to a high-fat diet after negative results were found on lymphoscintigraphy, which may have stimulated chyle activity in the effusion [31]. It should be noted that when chylothorax coexists with chylous ascites and too many radioactive tracer leaks into the peritoneal cavity, it may lead to insufficient tracer to visualize the chylothorax. However, 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy was not ideal for identifying the location of lymphatic leakage, with only two patients in the study showing suspicious chyle leakage points.

Chylothorax is nearly always exudative. The incidence of the exudative condition in our chylothorax patient accounts for 84.17%, which is consistent with previous reports [10, 32]. Transudative chylothorax is extremely rare and mostly is associated with hepatic cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome, amyloidosis, and obstruction of the superior vena cava [11, 33,34,35]. In our study, typical causes of such transudative chylothorax were found in 19 patients, including hepatic cirrhosis (4 patients), surgery (2 patients), lymphatic disorder (8 patients), and idiopathic (5 patients). These observations were not completely similar to what was reported previously [11]. Exudative and transudative chylothorax were only related to the levels of proteins, LDH, and cholesterol in the pleural effusion [10], which were not significantly different in the lymphoscintigraphy positive group and negative group. There was no correlation between chylous pleural effusion types and results on lymphoscintigraphy. Therefore, it can be concluded that the lymphoscintigraphy results of chylothorax are not affected by the types of chylothorax.

Our results showed that lymphoscintigraphy not only confirmed chylothorax in most patients but also found extra thorax lymphatic system lesions. Such example is lymphangiomas, which are rare, benign lymphatic pathological change that arise due to the failure of the individual lymphatic tissues to connect with the general lymphatic system, and may or may not communicate with the rest of the system [36,37,38]. In our study, 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy did not find as many lesions as reported in the literature [39]. Only one patient with lymphangioma exhibited radioactive accumulation at the focus during lymphoscintigraphy. In addition, lymphoscintigraphy detected all lymphedema in our study.

There are several limitations to our study. Only the chylothorax patients with pleural effusion triglyceride levels greater than 1.24 mmol/L were included in the study, despite evidence indicating that 14% of pleural effusions may be related to chylothorax even when triglyceride levels are below this threshold [11]. Furthermore, while lipoprotein electrophoresis considered the gold standard for diagnosis of chylothorax should be conducted to select patients, this test was not available at our institute [24]. Consequently, patients with pleural effusion triglyceride levels below 1.24 mmol/L were excluded from the study, which may have led to an inevitable selection bias. In addition, we did not specify the diet of patients before imaging. Those chylothorax patients who are fasting might affect the results of lymphoscintigraphy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, 99mTc-DX lymphoscintigraphy is convenient to be performed in patients of any age, including neonates, and it can be repeated in a short interval. It is a reliable diagnostic tool for qualitative evaluation of chylous pleural effusion. In patients who decline thoracocentesis, lymphoscintigraphy can also serve as a qualitative diagnostic tool for chylothorax. Higher pleural effusion triglyceride level and pleural effusion triglyceride/serum triglyceride ratio suggest a positive result in patients with chylothorax on lymphoscintigraphy, with cutoff values of 2.870 mmol/L and 4.625 improving diagnosis potentially. According to the findings of this study, it is advisable to defer lymphoscintigraphy for individuals suspected of chylothorax whose pleural effusion triglyceride levels are less than 2.870 mmol/L to prevent erroneous negative outcomes. Furthermore, lymphoscintigraphy can also effectively assess rare lymphatic disorders such as lymphedema and lymphangioma in chylothorax patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due relevant data protection laws.

Abbreviations

99mTc-DX:

Technetium (99mTc) dextran

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

AUC:

Area under the curve

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SPECT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography

References

  1. McGrath EE, Blades Z, Anderson PB. Chylothorax: aetiology, diagnosis and therapeutic options. Respir Med. 2010;104:1–08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudrappa M, Paul M. Chylothorax. National library of medicine. 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459206/. Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

  3. Duletzke NT, Kiraly LN, Martindale RG. Chylothorax and chylous ascites: overview, management, and nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2023;38:557–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu K, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Takamochi K, Nakahara R, Nagai K. Treatment strategy for chylothorax after pulmonary resection and lymph node dissection for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:499–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen C, Che G, Wang Y. (99m)tc-sulphur colloid lymphoscintigraphy and spect/ct in multiple primary lung cancer with chylothorax twice postoperatively. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11:4231–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattarai B, Schmidt F, Devkota A, Policard G, Manhas S, Oke V, et al. A case of chylothorax in a patient with sarcoidosis: a rare and potentially fatal complication. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015;5:28300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Skouras V, Kalomenidis I. Chylothorax: diagnostic approach. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010;16:387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang CY, Liao CY, Huang SC, Yeh YC. Budd-chiara syndrome and chylothorax. QJM. 2016;109:211–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohmoto O, Kawabe K, Ono H, Yanagimoto R, Arimoto J, Hatada A, et al. Chylothorax associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Intern Med. 2016;55:3641–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Maldonado F, Hawkins FJ, Daniels CE, Doerr CH, Decker PA, Ryu JH. Pleural fluid characteristics of chylothorax. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:129–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bender B, Murthy V, Chamberlain RS. The changing management of chylothorax in the modern era. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanina S, Vivekananthan C, Randhawa R, Bhattacharya M, Thomas P, Kavidasan A. Spontaneous chylothorax complicating small cell lung cancer—review of aetiology and diagnosis. Respir Med Case Rep. 2015;15:51–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yadav N, Taywade S, Kumar R, Prashanth A, Saxena R. Role of 99mtc sulphur colloid lymphoscintigraphy in a rare case of chylothorax and lymphocele formation post esophageal duplication cyst excision. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2021;5:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Braun CM, Ryu JH. Chylothorax and pseudochylothorax. Clin Chest Med. 2021;42:667–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yasuura Y, Konno H, Hayakawa T, Terada Y, Mizuno K, Kayata H, et al. Chylothorax after pulmonary resection and lymph node dissection for primary lung cancer; Retrospective observational study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Polomska AK, Proulx ST. Imaging technology of the lymphatic system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;170:294–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia X, Shao F, Hu F, He Y, Cao W. (99m)tc-dextran lymphoscintigraphy spect/ct unveils the hidden leakage site in recurrent chylothoraxes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:e465–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shima T, Hara T, Sato K, Kan N, Kinjo T. Fusion imaging of single-photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance lymphangiography for post-fontan chylothorax. Radiol Case Rep. 2023;18:1471–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bae JS, Yoo RE, Choi SH, Park SO, Chang H, Suh M, et al. Evaluation of lymphedema in upper extremities by mr lymphangiography: comparison with lymphoscintigraphy. Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;49:63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wen Z, Tong G, Liu Y. Potential utilization of lymphoscintigraphy in patients with klippel-trenaunay syndrome. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Momose M, Kawakami S, Koizumi T, Yoshida K, Kanda S, Kondo R, et al. Lymphoscintigraphy using technetium-99m hsa-dtpa with spect/ct in chylothorax after childbirth. Radiat Med. 2008;26:508–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kayano D, Taki J, Wakabayashi H, Kinuya S. Tc-99m human serum albumin lymphoscintigraphy with spect/ct in chylothorax. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:1056–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Riley LE, Ataya A. Clinical approach and review of causes of a chylothorax. Respir Med. 2019;157:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferreiro L, Toubes ME, San JM, Suarez-Antelo J, Golpe A, Valdes L. Advances in pleural effusion diagnostics. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020;14:51–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huggins JT. Chylothorax and cholesterol pleural effusion. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;31:743–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Bender CE, Whitley D, Stanson AW, Deschamps C. Treatment of symptomatic primary chylous disorders. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:785–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brennan PA, Blythe JN, Herd MK, Habib A, Anand R. The contemporary management of chyle leak following cervical thoracic duct damage. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:197–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Q, Bai X, Bao H, Li Y, Men W, Lv L, et al. Invasive treatment of persistent postoperative chylothorax secondary to thoracic duct variation injury: two case reports and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e31383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reisenauer JS, Puig CA, Reisenauer CJ, Allen MS, Bendel E, Cassivi SD, et al. Treatment of postsurgical chylothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida RY, Kariya S, Ha-Kawa S, Tanigawa N. Lymphoscintigraphy for imaging of the lymphatic flow disorders. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;19:273–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Turpin S, Lambert R. Lymphoscintigraphy of chylous anomalies: chylothorax, chyloperitoneum, chyluria, and lymphangiomatosis-15-year experience in a pediatric setting and review of the literature. J Nucl Med Technol. 2018;46:123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Agustin M, Yamamoto M, Tongma C, Chua LA, Torres M, Shay S. Spontaneous chylothorax following septic pulmonary embolization. Case Rep Pulmonol. 2020;2020:3979507.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhardwaj H, Bhardwaj B, Awab A. Transudative chylothorax in a patient with liver cirrhosis: a rare association. Heart Lung. 2015;44:363–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Koshima Y, Miyazaki S, Ninomiya J, Kuno Y, Ikeda T. Transudative chylothorax associated with alcoholic cirrhosis. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2019;2019: z19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Garcia J, Aleman C, Jauregui A, Vazquez A, Persiva O, Fernandez DST. Chylothorax in adults. Characteristics of 17 patients and a review of the literature. Arch Bronconeumol. 2017;53:407–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Waheed S, Seetlani NK, Ashfaq F, Tahir MJ, Abbasher HMAK, Kumari V, et al. Rare finding of duodenal lymphangioma in a patient with helicobacter pylori associated gastritis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e31455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shayesteh S, Salimian KJ, Fouladi DF, Blanco A, Fishman EK, Kawamoto S. Intra-abdominal lymphangioma: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16:123–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Iwamuro M, Kawai Y, Takata K, Okada H, Yamamoto K. Observation of lymphangioma of the duodenum by a magnifying endoscope with a narrow-band imaging system. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2013;7:229–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hou G, Jiang Y, Jing H, Xu W, Xu KF, Chen L, et al. Usefulness of 99mTc-ASC lymphoscintigraphy and spect/ct in the evaluation of rare lymphatic disorders: gorham-stout disease, lymphangioma, and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99: e22414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lei Liu for his efforts during statistical analysis of the data.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171970, 81871385), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ21025), and the Peking University Medicine Fund of Fostering Young Scholars’ Scientific & Technological Innovation (BMU2022PY006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 10 Tie Yi Rd, Haidian Dist., Beijing, 100038, China

    Li Zhang, Zhe Wen & Guansheng Tong

  2. Department of Lymphatic Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China

    Kun Hao

  3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China

    Xiaoyue Zhang, Yongkang Qiu & Lei Kang

Authors
  1. Li Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoyue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhe Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guansheng Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kun Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yongkang Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lei Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LZ participated in the design of the study, data acquisition, statistical analysis, and drafting of manuscript; YXZ participated in statistical analysis and drafting of manuscript; SGT, KH, and YKQ participated in the imaging data analysis; ZW and LK participated in study design and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhe Wen or Lei Kang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by ethics committee of Bejing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University according to relevant national and international guidelines, including the principles expressed in the “Declaration of Helsinki”. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or if participants are under 16, from a parent and/or legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Wen, Z. et al. Lymphoscintigraphy findings in patients with chylothorax: influence of biochemical parameters. EJNMMI Res 13, 72 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01014-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01014-0

Keywords