Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography

EJNMMI Research

Table 4 Segmental analysis of rMBF of and surrounding transmural scar by software package

SWP	rMBF in Seg-Scar (mL/min/g)	Lowest segment (mL/min/g)	rMBF in Seg-Border (mL/min/g)	rMBF in Seg-Normal (mL/min/g)	Whole heart rMBF (mL/min/g)	Size of Scar (% LV myocardium)	COV Scar	%Relative uptake
HeartSee	0.29 [0.26–0.40]	0.22 [0.19–0.28]	0.48 [0.43–0.65]	0.65 [.52–0.91]	0.62 [0.47–0.83]	26 [20–31]	0.07	0.46‡ [0.42–0.49]
4DM	0.71 [0.52–1.02]	0.56 [0.39–0.77]	0.82^* [0.70–1.05]	1.02 [0.78–1.20]	0.88^† [0.65–1.00]	26 [20–35]	0.16	0.47‡ [0.44–0.49]
4DM-FDV	0.41 [0.34–0.54]	0.30 [0.20–0.37]	0.82^* [0.67–1.00]	1.17 [0.91–1.41]	0.88^† [0.65–1.00]	26 [20–35]	0.11	0.47‡ [0.44–0.49]
Cedars	0.66 [0.51–0.85]	0.47 [0.31–0.67]	0.87^* [0.69–1.05]	1.00 [0.72–1.24]	0.94^† [0.66–1.11]	25 [19–30]	0.11	0.41 [0.40–0.44]
Emory-V	0.51 [0.43–0.61]	0.40 [0.32–0.50]	0.70 [0.60–0.84]	0.84 [0.73–0.98]	0.76 [0.65–0.88]	26 [21–32]	0.09	0.45‡ [0.41–0.48]
Emory-O	0.37 [0.30–0.42]	0.25 [0.20–0.32]	0.64 [0.49–0.73]	0.80 [0.66–0.90]	0.68 [0.53–0.77]	26 [21–32]	0.08	0.45‡ [0.41–0.48]
p-value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.779	< 0.001	< 0.001