EJNMMI Research

Table 2 AIF model selection: comparison of ΔAIC and RSS

From: Dispersion-corrected extracorporeal arterial input functions in PET studies of mice: a comparison to intracorporeal microprobe measurements

MICE ID	\(\Delta AIC\)		RSS
MICE ID	\(AI{F}_{DG}\)	\(AI{F}_{SG}\)	\(AI{F}_{DG}\)	\(AI{F}_{SG}\)
#1	0	379.313	0.0195	0.0211
#2	0	30.624	0.1471	0.1482
#3	0	1047.609	0.0100	0.0122
#4	0	1678.458	0.0055	0.0775
#5	0	528.748	0.0316	0.0352
#6	0	211.848	0.0487	0.0464
#7	0	2503.036	0.0091	0.0149
#8	0	611.748	0.0388	0.0439
#9	0	665.410	0.0449	0.0513

AIC analysis for the two deconvolution models (\(AI{F}_{DG}\) and \(AI{F}_{SG}\); RSS: residual sum of squares for the respective fit)

Back to article page