Skip to main content

Table 4 Predictors of PFS by univariate analysis based on PET/CT results after application of IMPeTUs

From: The prognostic significance of [18F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma according to novel interpretation criteria (IMPeTUs)

IMPeTUs criteria

PFS

Median [95% CI]

Baseline PET/CT

Follow-up PET/CT

Bone marrow uptake, DS score

  

≤ 3

47.2 [31.8–69.6]

31.8 [22.6–51.8]

> 3

34.7 [17.9–72.1]

41.2 [41.2–NA]

No. of focal, hypermetabolic lesions

  

F1 (none)

NA [72.1–NA]*

43.5 [22.6–NA]**

F2 (1–3)

47.5 [34.5–69.6]*

37.1 [28.5–NA]**

F3 (4–10)

38.2 [31.6–NA]*

15.2 [1.8–NA]**

F4 (> 10)

21.4 [13.3–NA]*

13.3 [7.0–NA]**

Uptake of the hottest focal lesion, DS

  

≤ 3

NA

31.7 [22.6–51.8]¶

> 3

NA

24.0 [7.0–NA]¶

No. of lytic lesions

  

L1 (none)

42.8 [24.8–NA]

NA [36.1–NA]

L2 (1–3)

54.1 [36.8–NA]

46.7 [28.4–NA]

L3 (4–10)

24.8 [20.1–NA]

11.3 [1.8–NA]

L4 (> 10)

39.3 [31.6–61.7]

26.9 [19.6–59.1]

Presence of at least one fracture

  

No

47.5 [31.8–72.1]

41.4 [26.9–NA]

Yes

35.7 [24.8–61.1]

28.5 [19.6–59.1]

Presence of PMD

  

No

49.3 [38.2–NA]#

35.6 [22.6–51.8]

Yes

34.5 [24.8–54.5]#

NA°

Presence of EMD

  

No

43.9 [31.8–61.7]§

37.6 [22.6–59.3]

Yes

17.2 [9.4–NA]§

24.8 [2.2–NA]

  1. NA, not applicable
  2. NA°, not applicable, since no patient showed PMD on follow-up PET/CT
  3. *,#,§p < 0.05, after usage of log-rank test for univariate comparison of PFS
  4. **p < 0.05, after usage of log-rank test for univariate comparison of PFS, based on the dichotomization presence (F1) vs. absence (> F1) of focal lesions on follow-up PET/CT
  5. ¶The herein presented evaluations in follow-up PET/CT were performed based on Approach 2. According to Approach 1, the number of patients with DS ≤ 3 is too small (n = 1 patient) to perform survival analysis based on this cut-off value