Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of pairwise comparisons between methods

From: A novel genomic signature predicting FDG uptake in diverse metastatic tumors

Models RMSE
(t test adjusted p values)
R 2
(Wilcoxon test adjusted p values)
PLS vs PCR 0.08936 0.3108
PLS vs RF 5.3E−07 0.01667
PLS vs SVM 0.0002238 0.000962
PCR vs RF 2.087E−11 5.925E−5
PCR vs SVM 2.198E−07 0.001221
RF vs SVM 5.05E−06 0.2839