Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of pairwise comparisons between methods

From: A novel genomic signature predicting FDG uptake in diverse metastatic tumors

Models

RMSE

(t test adjusted p values)

R 2

(Wilcoxon test adjusted p values)

PLS vs PCR

0.08936

0.3108

PLS vs RF

5.3E−07

0.01667

PLS vs SVM

0.0002238

0.000962

PCR vs RF

2.087E−11

5.925E−5

PCR vs SVM

2.198E−07

0.001221

RF vs SVM

5.05E−06

0.2839