Skip to main content

Table 1 2T4k+Vb model rate parameter values (with %SE) in muscle, healthy prostate, and tumor tissue

From: Quantitative 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography for prostate cancer: correlation between kinetic parameters and Gleason scoring

 

Muscle

Healthy prostate

Tumor

Patient

K 1

k 2

k 3

k 4

K 1

k 2

k 3

k 4

K 1

k 2

k 3

k 4

1

0.04 (21.8%)

0.05a (>100%)

1.14a (>100%)

0a (>100%)

0.16 (39.2%)

0.39a (>100%)

0.66 (80%)

0.01 (66.5%)

0.25 (5.5%)

0.17 (23.3%)

0.23 (13.7%)

0.01 (9.8%)

2

0.05 (10.7%)

0.08a (>100%)

0.83a (>100%)

0a (>100%)

0.32 (6%)

0.18 (15.5%)

0.11 (10.7%)

0.01 (14.7%)

–

–

–

–

3

0.05 (2.4%)

0.18 (11.2%)

0.33 (5.5%)

0 (31.8%)

0.17 (4%)

0.05 (13.5%)

0.02 (50.8%)

0.01a (>100%)

0.44 (13.8%)

0.11 (62.1%)

0.16 (40.1%)

0.01 (30.6%)

4

0.05 (4.5%)

0.16 (21%)

0.3 (10.3%)

0a (>100%)

0.22 (14.5%)

0.16 (37.7%)

0.09 (30.5%)

0.02 (27.3%)

0.34 (9.8%)

0.16 (27.1%)

0.12 (17.3%)

0 (38.2%)

5

0.05 (23.9%)

0a (>100%)

2.7a (>100%)

0.4a (>100%)

0.18 (28%)

0.04a (>100%)

0.23a (>100%)

0a (>100%)

–

–

–

–

6

0.04 (61.8%)

0a (>100%)

4.9a (>100%)

1.73a (>100%)

0.37 (7.4%)

0.15 (22.4%)

0.13 (15.7%)

0.01 (13.7%)

0.62 (5%)

0.11 (31.2%)

0.26 (17.2%)

0.01 (15.6%)

7

0.07 (4.8%)

0.11 (38%)

0.4 (19%)

0a (>100%)

0.27 (15.4%)

0.17 (52%)

0.18 (30.1%)

0.01 (25.6%)

0.29 (2.7%)

0.19 (8.4%)

0.18 (4.6%)

0.01 (6%)

8

0.07 (5%)

0.13 (39.7%)

0.42 (22.3%)

0.02 (16.3%)

–

–

–

–

1.14 (18.52%)

0.13 (71.2%)

0.2 (44.8%)

0.01 (27.9%)

10

0.1 (15.2%)

0.25 (35.9%)

0.16 (18.6%)

0a (>100%)

0.13 (17.1%)

0.11 (72.6%)

0.16 (45.7%)

0.01 (38.5%)

0.38 (6.7%)

0.2 (16.1%)

0.11 (10.2%)

0.01 (21.9%)

  1. aIndividual parameter estimates were not stable in the cases where the 2T4k+Vb model was not optimal