Skip to main content

Table 1 2T4k+Vb model rate parameter values (with %SE) in muscle, healthy prostate, and tumor tissue

From: Quantitative 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography for prostate cancer: correlation between kinetic parameters and Gleason scoring

  Muscle Healthy prostate Tumor
Patient K 1 k 2 k 3 k 4 K 1 k 2 k 3 k 4 K 1 k 2 k 3 k 4
1 0.04 (21.8%) 0.05a (>100%) 1.14a (>100%) 0a (>100%) 0.16 (39.2%) 0.39a (>100%) 0.66 (80%) 0.01 (66.5%) 0.25 (5.5%) 0.17 (23.3%) 0.23 (13.7%) 0.01 (9.8%)
2 0.05 (10.7%) 0.08a (>100%) 0.83a (>100%) 0a (>100%) 0.32 (6%) 0.18 (15.5%) 0.11 (10.7%) 0.01 (14.7%)
3 0.05 (2.4%) 0.18 (11.2%) 0.33 (5.5%) 0 (31.8%) 0.17 (4%) 0.05 (13.5%) 0.02 (50.8%) 0.01a (>100%) 0.44 (13.8%) 0.11 (62.1%) 0.16 (40.1%) 0.01 (30.6%)
4 0.05 (4.5%) 0.16 (21%) 0.3 (10.3%) 0a (>100%) 0.22 (14.5%) 0.16 (37.7%) 0.09 (30.5%) 0.02 (27.3%) 0.34 (9.8%) 0.16 (27.1%) 0.12 (17.3%) 0 (38.2%)
5 0.05 (23.9%) 0a (>100%) 2.7a (>100%) 0.4a (>100%) 0.18 (28%) 0.04a (>100%) 0.23a (>100%) 0a (>100%)
6 0.04 (61.8%) 0a (>100%) 4.9a (>100%) 1.73a (>100%) 0.37 (7.4%) 0.15 (22.4%) 0.13 (15.7%) 0.01 (13.7%) 0.62 (5%) 0.11 (31.2%) 0.26 (17.2%) 0.01 (15.6%)
7 0.07 (4.8%) 0.11 (38%) 0.4 (19%) 0a (>100%) 0.27 (15.4%) 0.17 (52%) 0.18 (30.1%) 0.01 (25.6%) 0.29 (2.7%) 0.19 (8.4%) 0.18 (4.6%) 0.01 (6%)
8 0.07 (5%) 0.13 (39.7%) 0.42 (22.3%) 0.02 (16.3%) 1.14 (18.52%) 0.13 (71.2%) 0.2 (44.8%) 0.01 (27.9%)
10 0.1 (15.2%) 0.25 (35.9%) 0.16 (18.6%) 0a (>100%) 0.13 (17.1%) 0.11 (72.6%) 0.16 (45.7%) 0.01 (38.5%) 0.38 (6.7%) 0.2 (16.1%) 0.11 (10.2%) 0.01 (21.9%)
  1. aIndividual parameter estimates were not stable in the cases where the 2T4k+Vb model was not optimal