Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean relative deviations of the fitted and reference TIACs averaged over all patients and all organs. For cases I to IV, the combination of omitted measurement points that gave the best and worst results in terms of the lowest and largest relative deviation (above and below the dashed line) are presented

From: Dependence of treatment planning accuracy in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy on the sampling schedule

RD [%]

Standard approach

Iterative approach

Case

Omitted time point

Mean ± SD

Min

Max

Omitted time point

Mean ± SD

Min

Max

0

(Reference)

1 ± 5

−6

13

I

2nd

0 ± 4

−6

9

4th

2 ± 6

−10

13

 

4th

−1 ± 6

−16

9

3rd

0 ± 11

−19

26

II

2nd, 4th

0 ± 6

−11

13

1st, 3rd

0 ± 7

−14

15

 

3rd, 5th

6 ± 39

−36

133

3rd, 5th

1 ± 11

−13

31

III

1st, 3rd, 5th

5 ± 17

−13

51

1st, 3rd, 5th

0 ± 8

−12

18

 

2nd, 3rd, 5th

22 ± 58

−26

175

3rd, 4th, 5th

22 ± 86

−34

309

IV

a

   

1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th

6 ± 13

−15

37

 

a

   

1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th

16 ± 55

−26

188

V

1st–8thb

0 ± 3

−7

9

1st–8thb

1 ± 5

−6

14

  1. aNo fitting was performed for the standard approach, because an equal number of data and fitting parameters were present
  2. bOnly serum measurements omitted