Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | EJNMMI Research

Fig. 6

From: Effects of erlotinib therapy on [11C]erlotinib uptake in EGFR mutated, advanced NSCLC

Fig. 6

Arterial and venous sampling. Whole blood SUVs (meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD) obtained from venous and arterial samples, in patients off (a) and on (b) erlotinib therapy. Bland-Altman plots demonstrating the arterial-venous parent fraction difference (%) per mean parent fraction value in patients off (c) and on (d) erlotinib therapy. In patients(Eāˆ’) and patients(E+), a bias of āˆ’4.8ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.6 and āˆ’0.7ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.5Ā % was seen, respectively. Dotted lines indicate the mean bias and the 95Ā % limits of agreement. Next, Bland-Altman plots demonstrating the arterial-venous TBR40ā€“50 difference (%) per mean V T value, in ten patients(Eāˆ’) (e) and 11 patients(E+) (f) that had evaluable arterial and venous TBR values. The horizontal line indicates zero difference between arterial and venous TBR40ā€“50 measures, values above the zero difference line indicate lower venous TBR40ā€“50 values (i.e., an underestimation). In patients(Eāˆ’) and patients(E+), a bias (i.e., average of the differences) of 26ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12 and 9ā€‰Ā±ā€‰9Ā % was seen, respectively. Dotted lines indicate the mean bias and the 95Ā % limits of agreement. Abbreviations: TBR tumor-to-blood ratio, SUV standardized uptake value, Eāˆ’ without erlotinib therapy, E+ with erlotinib therapy

Back to article page