Fig. 6From: Effects of erlotinib therapy on [11C]erlotinib uptake in EGFR mutated, advanced NSCLCArterial and venous sampling. Whole blood SUVs (meanāĀ±āSD) obtained from venous and arterial samples, in patients off (a) and on (b) erlotinib therapy. Bland-Altman plots demonstrating the arterial-venous parent fraction difference (%) per mean parent fraction value in patients off (c) and on (d) erlotinib therapy. In patients(Eā) and patients(E+), a bias of ā4.8āĀ±ā4.6 and ā0.7āĀ±ā3.5Ā % was seen, respectively. Dotted lines indicate the mean bias and the 95Ā % limits of agreement. Next, Bland-Altman plots demonstrating the arterial-venous TBR40ā50 difference (%) per mean V T value, in ten patients(Eā) (e) and 11 patients(E+) (f) that had evaluable arterial and venous TBR values. The horizontal line indicates zero difference between arterial and venous TBR40ā50 measures, values above the zero difference line indicate lower venous TBR40ā50 values (i.e., an underestimation). In patients(Eā) and patients(E+), a bias (i.e., average of the differences) of 26āĀ±ā12 and 9āĀ±ā9Ā % was seen, respectively. Dotted lines indicate the mean bias and the 95Ā % limits of agreement. Abbreviations: TBR tumor-to-blood ratio, SUV standardized uptake value, Eā without erlotinib therapy, E+ with erlotinib therapyBack to article page