Table 1 Results from visual single evaluation with regard to detectability of diagnostically relevant findings of n = 40 images (20 images acquired with the standard protocol and 20 processed half-time images)
Processed half-time images | Standard protocol images | |
|---|---|---|
Observer A | ||
Poor | 0 (0 %) | 0 (0 %) |
Sufficient | 17 (85 %) | 1 (5 %) |
Good | 3 (15 %) | 19 (95 %) |
Observer B | ||
Poor | 0 (0 %) | 0 (0 %) |
Sufficient | 11 (55 %) | 3 (15 %) |
Good | 9 (45 %) | 17 (85 %) |
Observer C | ||
Poor | 4 (20 %) | 1 (5 %) |
Sufficient | 11 (55 %) | 6 (30 %) |
Good | 5 (25 %) | 13 (65 %) |
Combined | ||
Poor | 4 (7 %) | 1 (2 %) |
Sufficient | 39 (65 %) | 9 (15 %) |
Good | 17 (28 %) | 50 (83 %) |