From: Post-radioembolization yttrium-90 PET/CT - part 1: diagnostic reporting
Item | Recommendation |
---|---|
Continuity of care | Post-radioembolization 90Y PET/CT is best reported by the same attending nuclear medicine physician who has followed through the entire planning-therapy continuum from exploratory angiography, predictive dosimetry, to 90Y radioembolization. |
PET display threshold setting for non-target 90Y activity detection | For detection of non-target 90Y activity, the operator should actively adjust the upper PET visual display threshold setting to deliberately increase the background noise to moderate levels. |
Criteria for technical success | 1. 90Y activity present in the majority of targeted tumors, or good overall activity coverage of large targeted tumors; and |
2. The absence of clinically significant non-target 90Y activity; and | |
3. All findings are in keeping with pre-therapy radiation planning expectations. | |
Criteria for a technically unsuccessful 90Y radioembolization | 1. The complete, or near-complete absence of 90Y activity in the majority of targeted tumors, or poor overall activity coverage of large targeted tumors; or |
2. The presence of any non-target 90Y activity where 90Y PET dose quantification predicts a high likelihood of clinically significant radiation toxicity; or | |
3. Any other situation where the 90Y activity biodistribution is adversely inconsistent with pre-therapy radiation planning expectations. | |
Criteria for non-target 90Y activity | 1. Non-random pattern of activity distribution; and |
2. Conforms morphologically to an untargeted anatomical structure on CT; with or without | |
3. A plausible vascular etiology to account for its presence. | |
Criteria for noise spikes | 1. Small, discrete, ovoid activity foci; and |
2. Random pattern of distribution which do not conform to underlying anatomy on CT; and | |
 | 3. No plausible vascular etiology to account for its presence. |