Open Access

Tracking dendritic cell migration into lymph nodes by using a novel PET probe 18F-tetrafluoroborate for sodium/iodide symporter

  • Sang Bong Lee1, 2,
  • Ho Won Lee1,
  • Hongje Lee3,
  • Yong Hyun Jeon1, 4,
  • Sang-Woo Lee1, 3,
  • Byeong-Cheol Ahn1,
  • Jaetae Lee1, 5 and
  • Shin Young Jeong1Email author
EJNMMI Research20177:32

DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0280-5

Received: 2 February 2017

Accepted: 22 March 2017

Published: 4 April 2017

Abstract

Background

Recently, 18F-tetrafluoroborate (TFB) was used as a substrate for the human sodium/iodide symporter (hNIS) reporter gene. This study evaluated the feasibility of performing molecular-genetic imaging by using the new radiotracer (18F-TFB) for the hNIS gene, to track dendritic cell (DC) migration in live mice. A murine dendritic cell line (DC2.4) co-expressing the hNIS and effluc genes (DC/NF) was established. To confirm the functional cellular expression of both effluc and NIS in the inoculated DC/NF cells by bio-medical imaging, combined bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and 18F-TFB positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging was performed after intramuscular injection with parental DCs and DC/NF cells. For DC-tracking, parental DCs or DC/NF cells were injected in the left or right mouse footpad, respectively, and 18F-TFB PET/CT and BLI were performed to monitor these cells in live mice.

Results

In vivo PET/CT and BLI showed a clear signal in DC/NF injection sites but not in parental DC injection sites. The signal intensity in DC/NF cells was correlated with time. In vivo 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging showed higher radiotracer activity in the draining popliteal lymph nodes (DPLNs) in DC/NF injection sites than those in DC injection sites on day 2. BLI also showed DC/NF cell migration to the DPLNs on day 2 after the injection.

Conclusions

Migration of DCs to the lymph nodes was successfully monitored using 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging of the NIS gene and optical imaging of the effluc gene in live mice. These data support the feasibility of using 18F-TFB as a substrate for hNIS reporter gene imaging to track the migration of DCs to the lymph nodes in live animals. The use of 18F-TFB may facilitate enhanced PET imaging of the hNIS reporter gene in small animals and humans in future studies.

Keywords

18F-tetrafluoroborate Sodium/iodide symporter Dendritic cell Immunotherapy

Background

Tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DCs) are used as a cancer vaccine to prevent tumors development and to eradicate existing tumors. DCs strongly express histocompatibility molecules (MHC class I and II molecules), co-stimulatory molecules (B7), and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, ICAM-3, and LFA-3). Antigen-presenting DCs stimulate helper and killer T cells in vivo [13]. Antigen-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells induced by DC-targeted vaccines eliminate virally infected cells and cancer cells. DC-based immunotherapy employs DCs loaded with antigens such as tumor-associated antigens. DC-based immunotherapy has been successfully used for treating many aggressive cancers [46]. However, to be truly effective and practical, noninvasive imaging tools are needed to evaluate the efficacy of DC-based immunotherapies to accurately track the migration of DCs to lymphoid organs.

Several non-invasive imaging techniques including gamma scintigraphy with In-111 [7], magnetic resonance imaging with iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles [8, 9], and near-infrared nanoparticles [10], and reporter gene-based imaging [11, 12] have been reported for visualization the migration of DCs. Optical imaging has a high sensitivity with low background, which enables tracking the early distribution of infused DCs. However, use of optical imaging techniques in large animals is difficult because of depth limitations. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) provide high sensitivity without depth limitation, and can allow quantitative analysis of data for pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics studies. However, they have low spatial resolution and concern about radiation safety [13, 14]. I-124 has been used for PET tracer for human sodium/iodide symporter (hNIS) gene. Previously, we successfully monitored the migration of DCs to lymphoid organs in live mice using I-124 PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging of hNIS gene in conjunction with optical imaging of the effluc gene [15].

In a recent study, Jauregui-Osoro et al. labeled 18F-tetrafluoroborate (TFB) by using current 18F-fluoride production and purification methods [16]. They demonstrated 18F-TFB uptake in normal tissues expressing NIS such as the thyroid, stomach, and salivary glands, and the inhibition of 18F-TFB uptake by perchlorate. They also showed that 18F-TFB was an effective hNIS probe in hNIS-transfected colon carcinoma cell line, HCT116 [17].

In the present study, we investigated the feasibility of performing molecular-genetic imaging with the new radiotracer 18F-TFB for the hNIS gene in live mice. DC2.4, an immortalized DC cell line [18], has been well characterized and is widely used for immunologic research [19, 20]. For visualizing DCs migration, DC2.4 cells that simultaneously express a dual reporter gene system were established and used for both optical and nuclear molecular imaging. Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging were performed to assess the initial distribution and subsequent migration of infused DCs toward the draining lymph nodes in live mice.

Methods

Cell line

The murine dendritic cell line, DC2.4, was cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. DC2.4 cells were retrovirally transduced to express both the effluc and Thy1.1 genes [15]. Thy1.1-positive cells were sorted using CD90.1 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). DC2.4 cells expressing the effluc gene were then retrovirally transduced to express both the hNIS and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) genes. After staining the cells with an APC-Cy7-conjugated anti-Thy1.1 antibody (BD Biosciences), Thy1.1+/- EGFP+ cell population was enriched using FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences). The established stable cells co-expressing effluc and hNIS were referred to as DC/NF cells.

18F-TFB synthesis

18F-TFB was synthesized using a labeling protocol developed previously [16]. Briefly, 18F-fluoride (12–18 GBq) trapped in a QMA cartridge was eluted using 1.5 mol/L HCl into a reactor containing sodium tetrafluoroborate. The reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C for 10 min, cooled to 25 °C, passed through a silver ion-loaded cation exchange cartridge and two Sep-Pak Light Alumina N, and sterile filtered.

18F-TFB analytical methods

Labeling was monitored by performing thin-layer chromatography (TLC) with alumina TLC strips, fluorescent indicator (length, 100 mm; Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK), and methanol as the mobile phase. The strips were scanned using Bio-scan 2000 radio TLC scanner. Presence of TFB at Rf: 0.60–0.65 was determined by scraping alumina from the TLC plate.

18F-TFB uptake assay

Indicated number of cells was plated in 24-well plates. After 1 day, the cells were incubated with 500 μL Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (bHBSS), 3.7 kBq carrier-free 18F-TFB, and 10 μmol/L sodium iodide (specific activity 740 MBq/mmol) at 37 °C for 30 min. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold bHBSS buffer as quickly as possible and were lysed using 500 μL 2% SDS. Radioactivity was measured using Packard Cobra II gamma-counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).

Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation was determined using cell counting kit (CCK)-8 (Dojindo Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, parental DC2.4 cells and DC/NF cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. After 1 day, 10 μL CCK-8 solution was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm by using BMG Lab Tech microplate reader.

Phenotypic analysis

Parental DC2.4 and DC/NF cells were stained with PE-conjugated CD54, CD86, H-2Kb (MHC class I), and I-A/I-E (MHC class II), and APC-conjugated CD205 (DEC-205) at 4 °C for 30 min. The cells were washed twice with 0.1% BSA/PBS and analyzed using FACS Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Isotype-matched monoclonal antibodies were used as controls.

In vivo imaging (PET/CT imaging and BLI)

  • Study 1: 18F-TFB was injected into the via tail vein of mice (n = 5) and PET/CT images were acquired at 30 min after the injection.

  • Study 2: Animal experiments were conducted as depicted in Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Figure S1. Parental DC and DC/NF cells (1 × 107 each) were intramuscularly injected into the left and right hind thighs of mice (n = 5), respectively. BLI and 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging were performed on days 1 and 4 after the injection.
    Fig. 1

    Schematic representation of the in vivo tracking of DC migration by performing multimodal reporter gene imaging. The multimodal reporter system involves the NIS, Luc2, and Thy1.1 genes, which act as nuclear reporter, optical reporter, and surrogate for the NIS and Luc2 genes, respectively. The multimodal reporter genes were introduced into DCs retrovirally, and the reporter-tagged DCs were injected into the muscles and footpads of mice. Next, combined PET/CT imaging (18F-TFB) and BLI (d-luciferin) was performed

  • Study 3: Migration of DCs toward lymphoid organs was monitored by performing animal experiments, as depicted in Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Figure S2. Parental DC2.4 cells and DC2.4/NF cells (1.5 × 106 DCs/mouse) were subcutaneously injected into the left and right hind footpads of mice (n = 5), respectively, and BLI and 18F-TFB PET/CT images were obtained on day 2 after the injection.

For PET/CT imaging, a 20 min (tumor imaging) scan was performed using the Triumph II PET/CT system (LabPET8, Gamma Medica-ideas, Waukesha, WI). CT scans were performed using an X-ray detector (fly acquisition; number of projections, 512; binning setting, 2 × 2; frame number, 1; X-ray tube voltage, 75 kVp; focal spot size, 50 μm; magnification factor, 1.5; and matrix size, 512) immediately after acquisition of the PET images. The PET images were reconstructed using 3D-OSEM iterative image reconstruction, and the CT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projections. All mice were anesthetized using 1–2% isoflurane gas during imaging. The PET images were co-registered with anatomical CT images by using a 3D image visualization and analysis software VIVID (Gamma Medica-ideas, Northridge, CA). To measure uptake (counts) for volumes of interest (VOIs), VOIs from each image were manually segmented from co-registered CT images by using VIVID and PMOD software (PMOD Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). Uptake in the region of interest (ROI) was measured using PMOD 3.5 software.

BLI was performed using IVIS Lumina III imaging system (PerkinElmer) 10 min after an intraperitoneal injection of d-luciferin (3 mg/mouse; PerkinElmer). Grayscale photographic images and bioluminescent color images were superimposed using LIVINGIMAGE software (version 2.12; PerkinElmer) and IGOR Image Analysis FX software (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR, USA). Bioluminescent signals are expressed as photons per cm2 per second per steradian (P/cm2/s/sr).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired Student’s t test, with Graph Pad Prism version 5 (GraphPad software Inc.). Differences with p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Synthesis and characterization of 18F-TFB

Previously, Jauregui-Osoro et al successfully established 18F-TFB, an hNIS imaging agent, as a novel imaging agent for PET/CT imaging (Additional file 1: Figure S3A) [16]. Fluorination reaction was performed by using a Na18F labeling TFB solution. The reaction was completed within 20 min as monitored using the radio-TLC scanner (eluent: methanol). After reaction completion, the solution was column filtrated for Na18F to remove the unreacted radioactive Na18F. After purification, radiochemical purity of 18F-TFB was found to be over 90% (Additional file 1: Figure S3B).

NIS gene uptake and in vivo PET imaging of intravenously injected 18F-TFB in normal mice

Rapid accumulation of 18F-TFB was observed in hNIS-expressing DCs (DC/NF cells). 18F-TFB uptake increased in a cell number-dependent manner in DC/NF cells, but not in parental DCs (Fig. 2). Uptake in DC/NF cells was dramatically inhibited by potassium perchlorate (KClO4) a well-established specific inhibitor of 18F-TFB uptake by NIS. In DC/NF cells, 18F-TFB uptake was 4.1-fold and 3.2-fold-higher than that in parental DCs and KClO4-treated DC/NF cells, respectively (R 2 = 0.8274).
Fig. 2

In vitro 18F-TFB uptake into DC and DC/NF cells. Data are means ± S.D., n = 5

Next, we monitored the in vivo distribution of intravenously injected 18F-TFB in mice to demonstrate the imaging agents. Mice received 18F-TFB via tail vein injection, and PET imaging was performed at 30 min after the injection. Uptake of 18F-TFB was observed NIS-expressing organs such as the thyroid and stomach at 30 min after the injection.

Effect of hNIS gene transduction on the function of DCs

The effects of cellular labeling by virus infection in the immune cells confirm the cell proliferation and phenotype marker expression levels in parental DCs and DC/NF cells. The cell viability assay (CCK-8) indicated no significant difference in the proliferation of parental DCs and DC/NF cells (Fig. 3a). Moreover, phenotype marker analysis showed that the expression of DC-specific markers such as MHC class I and II, CD86, CD54, and DEC205 was not different between parental DCs and DC/NF cells (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Effect of hNIS transduction on DC function. a Cell proliferation rates of parental DC and DC/NF cells. No significant difference was observed in the proliferation rate of the two cell lines. b Phenotypic analysis of parental DC and DC/NF cells. Cells were stained with PE-conjugated CD54, CD86, and H-2Kb (MHC class I) and I-A/I-E (MHC class II) and APC-conjugated CD205 (DEC-205), respectively. Red histograms represent isotype control. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 5

In vivo 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging and BLI of DC and DC/NF cells in mice

Combined BLI and 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging was performed after the intra-muscular injection of parental DCs and DC/NF cells to confirm the functional cellular expression of both effluc and NIS in the inoculated DC/NF cells by bio-medical imaging (Fig. 4a, b). In vivo BLI and PET/CT showed an evident signal in DC/NF injection sites, but not in parental DC injection site. Moreover, BLI and PET/CT images clearly demonstrate DC/NF uptake in the right hind thigh on days 1 to 4. Signal intensity in DC/NF cells was correlated with time. Quantification showed a time-dependent correlation between bioluminescence signals and 18F-TFB uptake (Fig. 4c, d). Bioluminescence signal within the DC/NF injection site on day 4 was 8.3-fold higher than that on day 1, and 18F-TFB uptake within the DC/NF injection site on day 4 was 7.2-fold higher than that on day 1.
Fig. 4

In vivo 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging and BLI of intramuscularly injected DCs. Parental DC and DC/NF cells were intramuscularly injected into the left and right thighs of mice, respectively, and combined 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging and BLI was performed. a In vivo BLI and b 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging of parental DC and DC/NF cells on days 1 and 4 after the intramuscular injection. The red and yellow circles indicate the DC and DC/NF injection sites, respectively. ROI analysis of c bioluminescent and d PET/CT images. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 5

In vivo imaging of DC migration by the hNIS and effluc genes in live mice

To monitor the migration of DC/NF cells toward draining popliteal lymph nodes (DPLNs), parental DC and DC/NF cells were subcutaneously injected in to the respective footpads, as described in Additional file 1: Figure S2. BLI of d-luciferin were obtained on day 2 after injection of DCs. Strong bioluminescence signals were detected in the DC/NF cell-injected footpads (upper figure of Fig. 5a). However, the DPLNs of DC/NF cell-injected footpads did not show any BLI signals because the DC/NF cell-injected footpad has strong BLI signals. In vivo BLI was performed after masking the DC/NF footpads to allow the detection of distinct signals in DPLNs. Migrated DC/NF cells were clearly observed in DPLNs of DC/NF cell-injected footpads (bottom of Fig. 5a). Quantification analysis of bioluminescence signals in the DC-injected footpads (1), DPLNs of DC-injected footpads (3), DC/NF cell-injected footpads (2), and DPLNs of DC/NF cell-injected footpads (4) were 1.3 × 108 ± 1.8 × 107, 4.6 × 107 ± 4.7 × 106, 2.3 × 1010 ± 6.2 × 109, and 2.3 × 108 ± 4.5 × 107 P/cm2/s/sr, respectively (Fig. 5c, d).
Fig. 5

In vivo combined BLI and 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging of DC migration after their subcutaneous injection into footpads. a In vivo BLI (upper panel: without masking the footpads; lower panel: after masking the footpads) and b 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging of DC/NF cell migration to the DPLNs after their injection into mouse footpads. Quantitative analysis of c, d bioluminescence signals (P/cm2/s/sr) and e, f radioactivity (count per minute) in DC-injected footpads and DPLNs. The red and yellow circles indicate the DC and DC/NF injection sites and DPLNs, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 5

18F-TFB uptake was more intense in DC/NF cell-injected footpads and DPLNs of DC/NF cell-injected footpads than in parental DC-injected footpads and DPLNs of paternal DC-injected footpads (Fig. 5b), which was consistent with the results of BLI. Uptake values of DC/NF cell-injected footpads, DPLNs of DC/NF cell-injected footpads, and DC-injected footpads and DPLNs of DC-injected footpads were 829.7 ± 92.2, 530.9 ± 7.84, 1066.6 ± 135.4, and 718.2 ± 102.3 counts, respectively (Fig. 5e, f).

Discussion

Recent studies have investigated the hNIS gene as a reporter gene in gene therapy and for imaging cell migration and differentiation [2123]. TFB is a fluorine-containing ion that interacts with hNIS. Anbar et al. suggested that labeled TFB has a good potential for thyroid imaging [2426] because TFB inhibits iodide uptake in the thyroid in vivo and specifically accumulates in the thyroid [25, 27]. Jauregui-Osoro et al. established 18F-TFB as a new PET imaging agent for hNIS. They demonstrated that 18F-TFB rapidly accumulated in a thyroid cell line that was stimulated by the thyroid-stimulating hormone and that 18F-TFB uptake was inhibited by perchlorate. Rapid specific accumulation of 18F-TFB was also observed in NIS-expressing normal tissues such as the thyroid, stomach, and the salivary glands and this accumulation was also inhibited by perchlorate [16]. In the present study, we successfully developed 18F-TFB by using an isotopic exchange methods. The radiochemical purity of 18F-TFB exceeded 90%, which was consistent with that reported in a previous study. In the present study, in vitro 18F-TFB uptake increased in NIS expressing cells and was inhibited by KClO4, a well-established specific inhibitor of iodide uptake by hNIS. Furthermore, 18F-TFB biodistribution in normal mice was similar to the physiological distribution of NIS. PET/CT imaging by using 18F-TFB clearly differentiated among the thyroid tissue, gastric mucosa, and bladder, with a high signal-to-noise ratio. These results are consistent with those of a previous study showing normal distribution of 18F-TFB [16].

Traditionally, radioiodides ([131I]iodine and [123I]iodine) and 99mTc-pertechnetate, which emit γ-rays, have been used for imaging endogenous and exogenous hNIS. However, imaging with these radioiodides is associated with limitations such as reduced resolution and relatively long half-life of these radionuclides. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) by using 99mTc-pertechnetate was used for the in vivo tracking of NIS-expressing cell. Fruhwirth et al. detected NIS-expressing tumor cells by performing SPECT with 99mTc-pertechnetate in a preclinical metastasis model [28]. SPECT by using 99mTc-pertechnetate provides high-resolution images. However, PET imaging offers better image resolution and detection sensitivity than SPECT. Furthermore, PET imaging allows quantitative analysis. Recent studies have used 124I for dose planning in radionuclide therapy and immune cell tracking studies [15, 2931]. However, PET imaging of NIS by using 124I also is associated with some drawbacks. PET imaging with 124I is not as efficient as expected, because of its complex decay scheme, with a low abundance of positrons (23%) and emission of high-energy γ photons. The high-energy γ photons have an energy close to 511 keV energy window and compete in abundance with positron decay (Emax = 1.69 MeV, 10%). These may interfere with annihilation photons leading to increased background noise and poor image quality. Moreover, 124I has a long half-life (4.18 days), which cause a high absorbed dose of radiation and availability of 124I is limited due to its complex production.

In contrast, an ideal PET tracer would be based on 18F because 18F has good imaging characteristics such as appropriate half-life (110 min), high positron yield (97%), low positron energy (Emax = 0.634 MeV), and easy accessibility due to production using a medical cyclotron. The utility of the new radiotracer, 18F-TFB, to visualize the thyroid and other NIS-expressing organs has been previously described in a preclinical study assessing PET/CT images of rodents [16]. Thus, our results indicate that nuclear medicine imaging with the hNIS gene is a feasible technique for tracking the migration of DCs to lymphoid organs in live mice. By performing 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging, we successfully demonstrated the proliferation of DC/NF cells in mice from days 1 to 4 after their intramuscular injection. Furthermore, in vivo 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging as well as BLI showed the migration of DCs to DPLNs of DC/NF cell-injected footpads on day 2 after their injection. Results of 18F-TFB PET/CT imaging obtained in the present study are similar to those obtained of 124I PET/CT imaging for tracking DC/NF cells in our previous study [15]. However, because of the high signal-to-noise ratio, visualization of migrated DCs in DPLNs was better in 18F-TFB PET/CT images than in 124I PET/CT images. These results first demonstrated the use of 18F-TFB PET/CT for immune cells in addition to thyroid tissues and exogenous cancer cell expression, suggesting that NIS combined with 18F-TFB PET imaging is a good tool for cell tracking.

In the present study, we demonstrated that nuclear medicine imaging with the NIS gene is a feasible technique for tracking the migration of DCs to lymphoid organs in live mice. Because in vivo imaging with the NIS gene is hampered by both high background noise and signals emitted from normal tissues and non-specific organs, it is difficult to visualize the initial distribution and low population of infused DCs. To overcome these hurdles for tracking DCs with the NIS gene, we combined in vivo nuclear medicine imaging with BLI based on the effluc gene, which allows tracking the early distribution of DCs and verifying the feasibility of the NIS gene as a reporter for tracking the migration of DCs to lymphoid organs. Thus, an effluc reporter gene was additionally adopted for tracking the migration of DCs and dual reporter DCs expressing both the NIS and effluc genes were successfully established using a viral vector system expressing the reporter genes.

In vivo DC migration efficiency is unsatisfactory (typical rate ≤ 4%) when DCs are administered through an intradermal injection, which is the most common method used in DC-based immunotherapy. In the present study, in vivo DC migration efficiency was approximately 1% on day 2. The most commonly used method to improve the migration of DCs is the pre-injection of pro-inflammatory cytokines that helps provide a suitable inflammatory microenvironment for the migration of DCs through lymphatic vessels [32]. Pre-injection of mouse tumor necrosis factor (TNF) increased the number of DCs reaching the LNs by approximately 10-fold [33]. Alternatively, increasing the expression levels of specific DC-homing receptors also facilitates their migration [34]. For example, DCs adenovirally transduced with the C-C motif chemokine receptor 7 gene, which encodes a chemokine receptor responsible for the migration of DCs toward lymphatics, increases the migration efficiency of DCs by approximately sixfold relative to that of control DCs [35]. Thus, DC migration monitoring using the hNIS gene and 18F-TFB could be a valuable approach in experiments for improving the migration efficiency and antitumor efficacy of DCs.

Although 18F-TFB is a promising PET imaging probe for hNIS, the 18F-TFB synthesis method used at present involving isotopic exchange provides 18F-TFB with a suboptimal radiochemical yield and specific activity. The specific activity of 18F-TFB was found to be approximately 1 GBq/μmol in a previous study [16], which was similar to that obtained in the present study (0.65 GBq/μmol). Recently, Khoshnevisan et al. developed a method for synthesizing 18F-TFB with high specific activity and sufficient yield [36]. Jiang et al also reported a new 18F-TFB synthesis method which was achieved via direct radiofluorination of boron trifluoride using an automated synthesis system [37]. Using these new synthesis methods, high-specific-activity synthesis of 18F-TFB was achieved. The increased specific activity of 18F-TFB may allow for enhanced PET imaging of the hNIS reporter gene in future human and animal studies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully monitored the proliferation of DCs and their migration to lymph nodes in live mice by performing 18F-TFB PET imaging of the NIS gene and optical imaging of the effluc gene. Together, these results highlight the potential of 18F-TFB as a new NIS imaging probe for cell tracking. Further studies should be performed to use this probe for tracking other immune cells such as cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Allophycocyanin

BLI: 

Bioluminescence imaging

CCK: 

Cell counting kit

CT: 

Computed tomography

DCs: 

Dendritic cells

DPLNs: 

Draining popliteal lymph nodes

EGFP: 

Green fluorescent protein

HBSS: 

Hank’s balanced salt solution

hNIS: 

Human sodium/iodide symporter

KClO4: 

Potassium perchlorate

MHC: 

Major histocompatibility complex

PE: 

Phycoerythrin

PET: 

Positron emission tomography

ROI: 

Region of interest

SPECT: 

Single-photon emission computed tomography

TFB: 

Tetrafluoroborate

TLC: 

Thin-layer chromatography

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

VOIs: 

Volumes of interest

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital (2014).

Authors’ contributions

S.B.L acquired and analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. HWL, HL, and YHJ acquired and analyzed data. SWL, YHJ, JL, and BCA enhanced the intellectual content of and reviewed the manuscript. SYJ conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed data, revised the manuscript, and approved the final content of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

Ethics approval

All the described procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care Use Committee at Kyungpook National University (KNU-2012-43) and were performed in accordance with the guiding principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine and Hospital
(2)
Leading-edge Research Center for Drug Discovery and Development for Diabetes and Metabolic Disease, Kyungpook National University Medical Center
(3)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dongnam Institution of Radiological and Medical Sciences
(4)
Laboratory Animal Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation (DGMIF)
(5)
Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation (DGMIF)

References

  1. Cella M, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 1997;9:10–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hart DN. Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood. 1997;90:3245–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Steinman RM. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1991;9:271–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hillerdal V, Essand M. Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. BioDrugs. 2015;29:75–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Leavy O. Immunotherapy: a triple blow for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:258–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Whiteside TL, Demaria S, Rodriguez-Ruiz ME, Zarour HM, Melero I. Emerging opportunities and challenges in cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:1845–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vries IJ, Krooshoop DJ, Scharenborg NM, Lesterhuis WJ, Diepstra JH, Van Muijen GN, et al. Effective migration of antigen-pulsed dendritic cells to lymph nodes in melanoma patients is determined by their maturation state. Cancer Res. 2003;63:12–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Barentsz JO, Verdijk P, van Krieken JH, Boerman OC, et al. Magnetic resonance tracking of dendritic cells in melanoma patients for monitoring of cellular therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:1407–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tavaré R, Sagoo P, Varama G, Tanriver Y, Warely A, Diebold SS, et al. Monitoring of in vivo function of superparamagnetic iron oxide labelled murine dendritic cells during anti-tumour vaccination. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19662.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Noh YW, Lim YT, Chung BH. Noninvasive imaging of dendritic cell migration into lymph nodes using near-infrared fluorescent semiconductor nanocrystals. FASEB J. 2008;22:3908–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eggert AA, van der Voort R, Torensma R, Moulin V, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, et al. Analysis of dendritic cell trafficking using EGFP-transgenic mice. Immunol Lett. 2003;89:17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Creusot RJ, Yaghoubi SS, Chang P, Chia J, Contag CH, Gambhir SS, et al. Lymphoid-tissue-specific homing of bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells. Blood. 2009;113:6638–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang JH, Chung JK. Molecular-genetic imaging based on reporter gene expression. J Nucl Med. 2008;49 Suppl 2:164S–79S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kircher MF, Gambhir SS, Grimm J. Noninvasive cell-tracking methods. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(11):677–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee HW, Yoon SY, Singh TD, Choi YJ, Lee HJ, Park JY, et al. Tracking of dendritic cell migration into lymph nodes using molecular imaging with sodium iodide symporter and enhanced firefly luciferase genes. Sci Rep. 2015;14:9865. doi:10.1038/srep09865.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jauregui-Osoro M, Sunassee K, Weeks AJ, Berry DJ, Paul RL, Cleij M, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of F-18 tetrafluoroborate: a PET imaging agent for thyroid disease and reporter gene imaging of the sodium/iodide symporter. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2108–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Weeks AJ, Jauregui-Osoro M, Cleij M, Blower JE, Ballinger JR, Blower PJ. Evaluation of [F-18]-tetrafluoroborate as a potential PET imaging agent for the human sodium/iodide symporter in a new colon carcinoma cell line, HCT116, expressing hNIS. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:98–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shen Z, Reznikoff G, Dranoff G, Rock KL. Cloned dendritic cells can present exogenous antigens on both MHC class I and class II molecules. J Immunol. 1997;158:2723–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim JH, Kang TH, Noh KH, Bae HC, Kim SH, Yoo YD, et al. Enhancement of dendritic cell-based vaccine potency by anti-apoptotic siRNAs targeting key pro-apoptotic proteins in cytotoxic CD8(+) T cell-mediated cell death. Immunol Lett. 2009;122:58–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargadon KM, Forrest OA, Reddy PR. Suppression of the maturation and activation of the dendritic cell line DC2.4 by melanoma-derived factors. Cell Immunol. 2012;272:275–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shin JH, Chung JK, Kang JH, Lee YJ, Kim KI, Kim CW, et al. Feasibility of sodium/iodide symporter gene as a new imaging reporter gene: comparison with HSV1-tk. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:425–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Groot-Wassink T, Aboagye EO, Glaser M, Lemoine NR, Vassaux G. Adenovirus biodistribution and noninvasive imaging of gene expression in vivo by positron emission tomography using human sodium/iodide symporter as reporter gene. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13:1723–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis MR. A “new” reporter in the field of imaging reporter genes: correlating gene expression and function of the sodium/iodide symporter. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Anbar M, Guttmann S, Lewitus Z. The accumulation of fluoroborate ions in thyroid glands of rats. Endocrinology. 1960;66:888–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Anbar M, Guttmann S, Lewitus Z. Effect of monofluorosulphonate, difluorophosphate and fluoroborate ions on the iodine uptake of the thyroid gland. Nature. 1959;183:1517–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Anbar M, Guttmann S. The isotopic exchange of fluoroboric acid with hydrofluoric acid. J Phys Chem. 1960;64:1896–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lecat-Guillet N, Ambroise Y. Discovery of aryltrifluoroborates as potent sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) inhibitors. ChemMedChem. 2008;3:1207–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fruhwirth GO, Diocou S, Blower PJ, Ng T, Mullen GE. A whole-body dual-modality radionuclide optical strategy for preclinical imaging of metastasis and heterogeneous treatment response in different microenvironments. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:686–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Eschmann SM, Reischl G, Bilger K, Kupferschlager J, Thelen MH, Dohmen BM, et al. Evaluation of dosimetry of radioiodine therapy in benign and malignant thyroid disorders by means of iodine-124 and PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:760–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sgouros G, Kolbert KS, Sheikh A, Pentlow KS, Mun EF, Barth A, et al. Patient-specific dosimetry for 131I thyroid cancer therapy using 124I PET and 3-dimensional-internal dosimetry (3D-ID) software. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1366–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee SB, Ahn SB, Lee SW, Jeong SY, Yoon GS, Ahn BC, et al. Radionuclide-embedded gold nanoparticles for enhanced dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy, sensitive and quantitative tracking of dendritic cells with PET and Cerenkov luminescence. NPG Asia Mater. 2016;8:e281.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Aarntzen EH, Srinivas M, Schreibelt G, Heerschap A, Punt CJ, Figdor CG, et al. Reducing cell number improves the homing of dendritic cells to lymph nodes upon intradermal vaccination. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e24661.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. MartIn-Fontecha A, Sebastiani S, Hopken UE, Uguccioni M, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A, et al. Regulation of dendritic cell migration to the draining lymph node: impact on T lymphocyte traffic and priming. J Exp Med. 2003;198:615–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Verdijk P, Aarntzen EH, Punt CJ, de Vries IJ, Figdor CG. Maximizing dendritic cell migration in cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8:865–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Okada N, Mori N, Koretomo R, Okada Y, Nakayama T, Yoshie O, et al. Augmentation of the migratory ability of DC-based vaccine into regional lymph nodes by efficient CCR7 gene transduction. Gene Ther. 2005;12:129–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Khoshnevisan A, Jauregui-Osoro M, Shaw K, Torres JB, Young JD, Ramakrishnan NK, et al. [(18)F]tetrafluoroborate as a PET tracer for the sodium/iodide symporter: the importance of specific activity. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Jiang H, Bansal A, Pandey MK, Peng KW, Suksanpaisan L, Russell SJ, et al. Synthesis of 18F-tetrafluoroborate via radiofluorination of boron trifluoride and evaluation in a murine c6-glioma tumor model. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1454–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017