Open Access

[18F]tetrafluoroborate as a PET tracer for the sodium/iodide symporter: the importance of specific activity

  • Alex Khoshnevisan1,
  • Maite Jauregui-Osoro1,
  • Karen Shaw1,
  • Julia Baguña Torres1,
  • Jennifer D. Young1,
  • Nisha K. Ramakrishnan1,
  • Alex Jackson2,
  • Gareth E. Smith2,
  • Antony D. Gee1 and
  • Philip J. Blower1Email author
EJNMMI Research20166:34

DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0188-5

Received: 23 February 2016

Accepted: 11 April 2016

Published: 22 April 2016



[18F]BF4 , the first 18F-labelled PET imaging agent for the sodium/iodide symporter (NIS), was produced by isotopic exchange yielding a product with limited specific activity (SA, ca. 1 GBq/μmol) posing a risk of sub-optimal target-to-background ratios (TBR) in PET images due to saturation of NIS in vivo. We sought to quantify this risk and to develop a method of production of [18F]BF4 with higher SA.


A new radiosynthesis of [18F]BF4 was developed, involving reaction of [18F]F with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate under anhydrous conditions, guided by 11B and 19F NMR studies of equilibria involving BF4 and BF3. The SA of the product was determined by ion chromatography. The IC50 of [19F]BF4 as an inhibitor of [18F]BF4 uptake was determined in vitro using HCT116-C19 human colon cancer cells expressing the human form of NIS (hNIS). The influence of [19F]BF4 dose on biodistribution in vivo was evaluated in normal mice by nanoPET imaging and ex vivo tissue counting.


An IC50 of 4.8 μΜ was found in vitro indicating a significant risk of in vivo NIS saturation at SA achieved by the isotopic exchange labelling method. In vivo thyroid and salivary gland uptake decreased significantly with [19F]BF4 doses above ca. 10 μg/kg. The new radiosynthesis gave high radiochemical purity (>99 %) and moderate yield (15 %) and improved SA (>5 GBq/μmol) from a starting activity of only 1.5 GBq.


[18F]BF4 produced at previously reported levels of SA (1 GBq/μmol) can lead to reduced uptake in NIS-expressing tissues in mice. This is much less likely in humans. The synthetic approach described provides an alternative for production of [18F]BF4 at higher SA with sufficient yield and without need for unusually high starting activity of [18F]fluoride, removing the risk of NIS saturation in vivo even in mice.

Trial registration



Sodium/iodide symporter Tetrafluoroborate Fluorine-18 PET Specific activity Thyroid


The Na+/I symporter (NIS) is an important molecular target in the field of nuclear medicine [1, 2]. Accumulation of radioiodide at sites of NIS expression such as salivary gland, gastric mucosa and lactating mammary gland [3] and especially thyroid and thyroid cancers [4], has found use in gamma camera imaging using iodide in the form of [131I] and [123I]I and radionuclide therapy using [131I]I. In addition, following the cloning of its human form human sodium/iodide symporter (hNIS) [5], it has been widely used in reporter gene imaging to study in vivo trafficking of metastatic cancer cells [6], stem cells [7] and immune cells [8]. Anion transport by NIS is not specific to iodide [9]; other anions with similar charge and ionic radius are also transported (Additional file 1) including [99mTc]pertechnetate, which is an important NIS tracer for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, and [186Re]perrhenate [10], [188Re]perrhenate [11] and [211At]astatide [12, 13], which have potential for NIS-targeted radionuclide therapy. While planar scintigraphy and SPECT have been the mainstay of clinical molecular imaging of hNIS, a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent would potentially bring improved sensitivity, resolution and quantification. PET imaging with [124I]I has been shown to enhance sensitivity [14] compared to imaging with [131I]I, but its long half-life, high positron energy and low positron yield are problematic for both dosimetry and image quality. The potential of [18F]BF4 as a PET tracer for imaging NIS was recently reported in mice [15] and non-human primates [16]. This offered improved image quality and dosimetry compared to SPECT and 124I PET, as well as in vitro and in vivo stability and ease of production in PET centres. The radiolabelling method for [18F]BF4 entailed isotopic exchange of [18F]F with [19F]BF4 under acidic aqueous conditions [15] leading to a final product with a relatively low specific activity (SA) of 1 GBq/μmol (i.e. with only one in 6.25 × 106 BF4 ions labelled), from a starting activity of 10 GBq. With a reported [17] IC50 of 1.6 μM for [19F]BF4 in vitro, this low SA presents a risk that NIS saturation may occur in vivo, reducing uptake in target tissues when activities sufficient for high-quality PET imaging are injected, especially in mice [18] owing to higher injected radioactivity per kilogram.

In this investigation, we sought to quantify the minimum SA required to combine good-quality PET images in mice with maximum target-to-background ratio (TBR) in NIS-expressing tissue and to develop an alternative method of radiolabelling that gives sufficient SA to avoid the risk of saturation and sub-optimal TBR. A radiolabelling strategy that does not entail isotopic exchange would be expected to lead to higher SA. Here, we report production of [18F]BF4 predicated on addition of [18F]fluoride to BF3 rather than isotopic exchange with [19F]BF4 .



Reagents and materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK) unless otherwise stated. Ultrapure water (resistivity > 18.2 MΩ) was used throughout. [18F]F was obtained by proton irradiation of [18O]H2O (97 at.%, Rotem Industries Ltd., Israel) with a CTI RDS 112 cyclotron (11 MeV, 30 μA beam current). Quaternary methyl ammonium (QMA) cartridges (Sep-Pak QMA Light, Waters, UK) were preconditioned with 1 M NaCl (5 mL) and H2O (10 mL), and neutral alumina cartridges (Alumina N Plus Lite Sep-Pak, Waters, UK) were preconditioned with H2O (10 mL), acetone (10 mL) and air (10 mL) unless otherwise stated.


In order to determine the concentration of 15-crown-5 (15C5) in formulated [18F]BF4 , 1H spectra were acquired of decayed [18F]BF4 samples in the presence of an internal reference using a Bruker Ultrashield 400WB PLUS 9.4-T spectrometer. The 15C5 integral with respect to that of the internal reference was then compared to that of 15C5 standards (5–0.01 mg/mL) of known concentration. Both standards and samples were analysed as solutions in D2O/H2O (3:2) with potassium hydrogen phthalate (1 mg/mL) as the internal reference. Data were analysed using MestReNova LITE (v5.2.5). 19F and 11B nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired using a Bruker AVIII Ultrashield Plus WB with a field strength of 9.4 T, operating at frequencies of 375.878 and 128.166 MHz for 19F and 11B, respectively. Data were acquired and processed using Topspin 2.1.

Hydrolysis of NaBF4 was studied by 19F and 11B NMR in water and under conditions similar to those used for the isotopic exchange synthesis of [18F]BF4 [15] but without 18F. Briefly, NaBF4 was dissolved in 1.0 M hydrochloric acid at a concentration of 4 mg/mL. The solution (5 mL) was heated to 100 °C for 10 min, cooled to 25 °C and passed through a silver ion-loaded cation exchange cartridge (OnGuard II AG, Dionex, Leeds, UK, conditioned with 10 mL water and 10 mL air) to remove chloride and raise the pH, and then through an alumina column (Alumina N Plus Lite Sep-Pak, Waters, UK, conditioned with 10 mL water and 5 mL air) and a sterile Millex-GS 0.22-μm filter unit (Millipore UK, Watford, UK). 19F and 11B NMR spectra of the sample were acquired at each stage of the process.

Radiochemistry optimisation

A range of conditions were examined for the reaction of [18F]F with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3·OEt2). Briefly, [18F]F- was trapped by passing the irradiated [18O]H2O through a QMA cartridge and eluted with various salt solutions depending on which fluoride salt was required. The [18F]F solution was then dried manually in a glass vial by repeated azeotropic distillation with acetonitrile (MeCN) (3 × 0.5 mL), before adding BF3·OEt2 (10–0.0001 μL) in MeCN (1 mL, solutions prepared by serial dilution). The reaction was then allowed to occur, with or without elevated temperature, before quenching with H2O (1 mL) and analysing by radioTLC to determine crude radiochemical yield (RCY) by radioTLC (see below) as a measure of reaction step efficiency. Further details of conditions and results are shown in Additional file 2.

Radioanalytical methods

RadioTLC was carried out using a neutral alumina stationary phase (Macherey-Nagel, 10 × 80 mm, Polygram ALOX N/UV254) with methanol (100 %) as the mobile phase. The thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates were scanned using a radioTLC linear scanner (LabLogic Mini-Scan™) with β+ probe (LabLogic B-FC-3600). The purity of the crude product in the reaction solution was determined as the radioactivity associated with the BF4 peak (R f = 0.6, c.f. R f = 0 for fluoride) as a percentage of the total detected chromatogram radioactivity. Radiochemical identity and purity of the final product were measured by ion chromatography (Metrohm 930 Compact IC Flex) with in-line conductimetric and gamma detectors using a Shodex IC I-524A column (4.6 × 100 mm) with 2.3 mM phthalic acid and 2.3 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (pH 5.0) in H2O as the eluent. The flow rate was 1.5 mL/min, and column temperature was 40 °C. The concentration of [19/18F]NaBF4 in the final product was determined from the ion chromatography data by reference to a calibration curve.

Optimised radiosynthesis and automation

[18F]F in H2O was trapped on a QMA ion exchange column and eluted with 0.9 % NaCl (0.5 mL). The eluate was then dried under a stream of N2 at 95 °C, followed by azeotropic distillation with MeCN (3 × 0.5 mL). 15C5 (24 mg) in MeCN (0.5 mL) and BF3·OEt2 (0.1 μL (0.8 μM), prepared by serial dilution) in MeCN (0.5 mL) were then added and the mixture heated to 80 °C for 10 min. The reaction mixture was passed over a neutral alumina cartridge into a vial containing H2O (1 mL). This mixture was then passed over a QMA cartridge. The alumina and QMA cartridges in tandem were washed with H2O (2 mL), and the QMA cartridge containing the product was then washed with further H2O (4 mL). The purified product was then eluted from the QMA cartridge with 0.9 % NaCl (0.5 mL). This protocol was automated using a GE FASTLab™ with a custom cassette layout and ~1.5-GBq starting radioactivity (see Additional file 3).

Cellular uptake study

HCT116-hNIS-C19 cells (hNIS-transfected human colon carcinoma cell line [17]) were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 0.5 × 106 cells/well and incubated with 5 % CO2 at 37 °C for 24 h prior to experiments. Each well was washed twice with Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) before incubation with [19F]NaBF4 in HBSS (700 μL) for 30 min. [18F]NaBF4 (0.1 MBq, produced by method described above) in HBSS (50 μL) was then added to give a final concentration of [19F]BF4 ranging from 10−2 to 10−12 M. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for a further 30 min. The medium was then removed from each well and the cells washed with HBSS (2 × 750 μL) and the medium and washings reserved for counting. Cell-bound activity was then extracted with 1 M NaOH (750 μL). Bound and unbound radioactivity were then measured in a gamma counter and the uptake of the radiotracer expressed as a percentage of the total radioactivity per well.

PET imaging

Imaging experiments were performed using a nanoScan® PET/CT (Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary). PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging of [18F]BF4 produced by the optimised high-specific-activity methods described above was performed in 4–8-week-old female BALB/c mice (n = 3 per SA group). Animals were anaesthetised by isoflurane inhalation (3 %, Animalcare, York, UK, in oxygen) and placed on the scan bed in a prone position. The SA of the [18F]BF4 radiotracer was adjusted to produce five samples with SA of 5, 1, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.01 GBq/μmol by addition of [19F]NaBF4 in 0.9 % NaCl. With an injected radioactivity of 2.5 MBq (≤150 μL) per mouse, these correspond to injected BF4 doses of 25, 125, 625, 1250 and 12,500 nmol/kg. Syringe activity was measured before and after injection using a dose calibrator to determine injected activity. Each sample with chosen SA was injected into one of five groups of mice (n = 3, 2.5 MBq per mouse) through a cannula inserted into the lateral tail vein. A sixth group was injected with only 0.5 MBq of the 5 GBq/μmol sample to achieve a reduced total BF4 dose of 5 nmol/kg. Dynamic PET (400–600-keV energy window; 1:5 coincidence mode; 5-ns coincidence window, 0.30 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm3 voxel size) was acquired for 30 min followed by a CT scan (180 projections, 45 kVp, 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.21 mm3 voxel size). Respiration rate and bed temperature were monitored throughout the scan. Anaesthesia was maintained at 2–2.5 % isoflurane during scanning.

PET image analysis

All PET/CT datasets were reconstructed using the Monte Carlo-based full-3D iterative algorithm Tera-Tomo (Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary) [19]. Raw PET data were reconstructed into 5-min bins using reconstruction settings (4 iterations, 6 subsets, 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3 voxel size) as well as intercrystal scatter correction. Decay correction to injection time was applied. All reconstructed datasets were analysed using VivoQuant software (v2.0, inviCRO, LLC, Boston, USA). Regions of interest (ROIs) for different organs (thyroid, salivary glands, stomach and bladder) were manually defined around each organ (vide infra) in order to express 18F uptake in each organ as a standardised uptake value (SUV). The SUV was calculated as the ratio of radioactivity in each ROI (MBq) per gram of organ tissue (weighed post-mortem) and radioactivity in the whole-body ROI (MBq) per whole-body weight (excluding tail). The total radioactivity present in each organ was determined by drawing an approximate ROI encompassing the whole organ, using a threshold of 10 % of the maximum count to define the edge of the ROI. The binned images corresponding to 25–30 min post-injection were used for the ROI analysis. For calculations involving the thyroid, which is difficult to dissociate from trachea and weigh accurately, a previously reported standard thyroid tissue mass of 3.6 mg [15, 20] was used as the weight of the organ.

Ex vivo biodistribution

At the end of the imaging experiment, mice were culled by cervical dislocation (45 min post-injection) and all major organs were explanted, weighed and gamma-counted (LKB Wallac 1282). Urine expelled during cervical dislocation by some animals was collected on absorbent material, and this radioactivity was counted and considered as part of the urine/bladder activity. The thyroid was extracted while attached to the trachea, and a standard thyroid tissue mass of 3.6 mg was used for reasons explained above. 18F concentration in each organ was expressed as SUV (also presented as % ID/g in Additional files 4 and 5). The total injected dose was defined as the sum of organ counts (including excreted activity) and carcass counts (excluding tail).


In vitro 19F-BF4 competition study

Varying the concentration of 19F-BF4 to inhibit uptake of tracer levels of [18F]BF4 produced by the method described here gave a typical saturable sigmoid curve (Fig. 1) from which an IC50 of 4.7 μM was calculated, in reasonable agreement with previously reported values [17]. Uptake was measured at 30 min and has previously been examined over periods of up to 2 h [15, 17]. Thus, as expected, carrier BF4 at sufficient concentrations (>0.1 μM) can reduce uptake of tracer [18F]NaBF4. Using [18F]BF4 at specific activities in the range previously reported, initial in vivo extracellular BF4 concentration may well exceed this level after administration of radioactivity doses sufficient for high-quality PET imaging in mice. Therefore, in order to assess the effect of SA, [18F]BF4 samples of higher SA than those previously reported [15] were required which could then be diluted to the required SA.
Fig. 1

Inhibition curve for blocking [18F]BF4 accumulation with 19F-BF4 in vitro in HCT116-hNIS-C19 cells. Dashed lines labelled (a) to (f) represent estimated prospective in vivo initial extracellular concentrations of 18/19F-BF4 at varying SA following injection of ~2.5 MBq radiotracer into a mouse: (a) 5 nmol/kg, (b) 25 nmol/kg, (c) 125 nmol/kg, (d) 625 nmol/kg, (e) 1250 nmol/kg and (f) 12.5 μmol/kg. Error bars represent 1 SD

NMR study of BF4 purification and hydrolysis equilibria

To understand the factors that limit specific activity during production, investigation of the chemical processes occurring during the published [15] aqueous production and purification of [18F]BF4 were conducted using 11B and 19F NMR spectrometry. NaBF4 in solution (H2O and D2O) showed a single peak in the 11B spectrum (δ −0.5 ppm, quintet, J = 1.3 Hz, Additional file 6) and two peaks in the 19F (δ −151.52 ppm, septet, and δ −151.57 ppm, quartet, J = 0.5 and 1.3 Hz, respectively, Additional file 7) corresponding to the ratio of 10B/11B isotopic abundance (septet and quartet, respectively). After addition of 1.5 M HCl to this NaBF4 solution, an additional species was observed in both the 19F (δ −147.5 ppm, quartet, J = 8.6 Hz, Additional file 8) and 11B NMR spectra (δ 0.2 ppm, quartet, J = 8.5 Hz, Additional file 9) contributing 20 % to the total integrated signal. Its identity was assigned as a species containing one boron and three equivalent fluorine atoms (e.g. BF3OH) owing to the quartet splitting pattern observed in the 11B spectrum, its similarity to the 11B spectrum of BF3·OEt2 in water (Additional file 10) and line broadening through quadrupolar relaxation due to loss of tetrahedral symmetry. This change in speciation was not observed without addition of acid. It was also accompanied by the appearance of an additional peak in the 19F spectrum corresponding to the release of fluoride and etching of the glass tube at acidic pH (SiF6 2− δ −131 ppm, broad singlet, 13 % total integrated signal, Additional file 11). This interpretation is supported by the fact that this peak is also evident in the 19F spectrum of NaF in HCl (Additional file 12). After passing the acidified solution over an Ag+ cation exchange and an alumina column in tandem (to raise the pH of the solution by removing HCl and to remove fluoride, respectively), the suspected BF3OH species was no longer observed. Instead, the 19F spectrum showed only BF4 (Additional file 7), while the 11B spectrum (Additional file 13) showed both BF4 and an additional peak corresponding to boric acid B(OH)3, as confirmed by comparison to a standard solution of B(OH)3 (Additional file 14). As this transformation occurred upon passing over the alumina cartridge, and not the Ag+ cartridge, it was concluded that the alumina cartridge was catalysing this process.

Radiosynthesis of [18F]BF4 from BF3·OEt

To evaluate production of [18F]BF4 from BF3·OEt (addition reaction) rather than from NaBF4 (isotopic substitution reaction), we initially investigated the use of several [18F]fluoride sources under anhydrous conditions. No labelled product was observed using [18F]KF/K[2.2.2]/K2CO3, but both [18F]NaF/15C5 and [18F]TBAF were found to give the desired product with high crude RCY (Additional file 2). To limit the amount of H2O present, [18F]NaF/15C5 was selected as the fluoride source to avoid the hygroscopic tetra n-butylammonium (TBA) salts. Precursor amount, temperature and time were then optimised further leading to a RCY of 86 % for the reaction step, as measured by TLC. Following alumina and QMA cartridge purification, this translated into an isolated decay-corrected RCY of 18.9 % (n = 2, decay-corrected to [18F]F trapping on QMA) and a synthesis time of 59 min from initial fluoride trapping. Most product loss occurred during the trapping of [18F]BF4 on the QMA cartridge during purification, where ~50 % of the product failed to trap and was lost. Without the azeotropic drying step (i.e. in the presence of 0.9 % NaCl (0.4 mL)), no product was observed. Translation of the protocol to the GE FASTlab™ allowed production of [18F]BF4 with radiochemical purity >95 %, decay-corrected RCY of 13.2 ± 5.9 % (n = 5) and synthesis time of 39 min from delivery of 18F, in 0.9 % NaCl (final volume ~0.6 mL). The 15C5 in this product solution was 15–30 μg/mL (9–18 μg total, by 1H NMR, n = 3), and the pH was 7. The specific activity of the final product was 5.7 ± 3.5 GBq/μmol (n = 5) at the end of synthesis based on a starting radioactivity of ~1.5 GBq.

In vivo imaging and biodistribution

As a basis for determining the effects of specific activity, [18F]BF4 produced by the high-specific-activity method described in the “Methods” section was used and diluted with carrier 19F-BF4 to produce samples of varying specific activity. As expected, significant uptake of the radiotracer in the thyroid, salivary glands and stomach was observed both by PET/CT (30 min post-injection, Fig. 2) and by ex vivo tissue counting (45 min post-injection, Fig. 3, shown as %ID/g in Additional files 4 and 5), with tracer excretion proceeding via the renal route. Uptake in the olfactory mucosa was visible in the PET images but was not analysed, and the tissue was not removed for ex vivo examination. Some trachea uptake was also observed in the ex vivo data, although this was not apparent in any of the images and hence may be attributable to incomplete removal of thyroid tissue from the trachea sample. SUV calculations for both the ex vivo biodistribution and the PET ROI analysis (Fig. 4, shown as %ID/g in Additional files 4 and 5) displayed a clear trend of decreasing uptake with increasing total BF4 dose in both thyroid and salivary glands. Thyroid SUV reached a plateau at BF4 doses below 125 nmol/kg but was significantly reduced at higher doses: for each of the three highest dose groups, it was significantly lower than for each of the two lowest dose groups (p < 0.05), with an ID50 of approximately 1000 nmol/kg. Similarly, salivary gland SUV reached a plateau at BF4 doses below 125 nmol/kg but was significantly reduced at higher doses; at the highest dose, it was significantly lower than at the next highest dose (p < 0.05) and each of the four lowest doses (p < 0.01), with an ID50 of approximately 1000 nmol/kg. No discernible trend was apparent in the stomach, where uptake was highly variable within the groups. Statistical evaluation of inter-group differences by unpaired t test revealed no significant differences in any of the stomach data (Additional file 15).
Fig. 2

Side and anterior PET/CT maximum intensity projections of a normal BALB/c mouse 25–30 min post-injection of [18F]BF4 (2.5 MBq, SA = 5 GBq/μmol) showing uptake in the thyroid, stomach, salivary gland and olfactory mucosa

Fig. 3

Ex vivo biodistribution data for [18F]BF4 in BALB/c mice 45 min post-injection at varying doses of BF4 (n = 3 for each dose) showing data for all tissues. Uptake is shown as a standardised uptake value (SUV). Error bars represent 1 SD. Of note is the trend of increasing/plateauing thyroid and salivary gland uptake as BF4 dose (nmol/kg) decreases

Fig. 4

SUV for the thyroid (upper) and salivary glands (lower) in BALB/c mice estimated by ex vivo biodistribution (open circles) and PET ROI analysis (filled squares) at varying doses of 18/19F-BF4 (n = 3 for each dose). Error bars represent 1 SD. Significance bars relate to the ex vivo data: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01


The IC50 of BF4 determined here (4.7 μM) and previously (1.6 μM [17]), as an inhibitor of hNIS in vitro suggests that the quantity of 19F-BF4 in the radiopharmaceutical prepared by the published method [15] and administered in a dose sufficient for high-quality PET imaging could be in the range capable of adversely affecting radiotracer uptake via NIS. To avoid this risk, instantaneous in vivo extracellular BF4 concentration should be kept below 0.1 μM. At the SA previously reported (1 GBq/μmol [15]), a typical human injection of (for example) 300 MBq [18F]BF4 would contain 26 μg 18/19F-BF4 (300 nmol) which upon initial in vivo dilution to an extracellular fluid volume of 14 L [21] would give a concentration of 21 nM before excretion takes effect. This concentration is well below that which might be expected to cause NIS inhibition. Predicted (based on the estimation described above) in vivo concentrations of BF4 resulting from a 2.5-MBq injection of [18F]BF4 into a BALB/c mouse (~20 g in weight, assuming an extracellular fluid volume of ~5 mL [22]) are illustrated on the IC50 curve depicted in Fig. 1. These estimates suggest that for a mouse injected with 2.5 MBq at the previously reported specific activity of 1 GBq/μg, the concentration would be 0.5 μM (corresponding to group (c) in Fig. 1). This is potentially sufficient to reduce the target uptake of the tracer and warrants experimental investigation of potential inhibition and development of a radiosynthesis that affords higher specific activity.

Our experience with the previously described isotopic exchange labelling method showed that the efficiency of the method was limited not only by the statistical need for a large excess of BF4 (to achieve high yield in the isotopic exchange) but also by the alumina column used to remove residual [18F]fluoride. Despite the high incorporation of [18F]fluoride into [18F]BF4 during the labelling reaction, a large proportion of the [18F]BF4 was lost during this purification step, causing a substantial loss of yield. Further investigation of the species present at each stage of the labelling and purification by NMR led to the following conclusions:
  1. 1.

    BF4 in aqueous solution at neutral pH exists as a single species with no appreciable B-F dissociation.

  2. 2.

    In strong acid, however, a minor but detectable proportion dissociates/hydrolyses to form a species containing a BF3 moiety, but no detectable further hydrolysis occurs to give species containing BF2 or BF moieties, nor further hydrolysis to borate during the time of the experiment. This is consistent with the observations of Wamser [23] that, under acidic conditions, BF4 exists at equilibrium with BF3OH and F.

  3. 3.
    Passage of the acidified solution through an alumina column traps fluoride, shifting the equilibrium (and probably catalysing the hydrolysis depicted in Fig. 5) to cause further hydrolysis of BF4 ultimately to produce fluoride (which is retained on the column) and borate (which passes through the column and is detected by 11B NMR). This process has a major deleterious effect on the radiochemical yield but does not diminish the SA. The absence of BF2 and BF species in this instance indicates that these intermediates are unstable and their hydrolysis to borate is too rapid to be observed.
    Fig. 5

    Sequential hydrolysis of BF4 to B(OH)3


These equilibria are dependent on water, implying that aqueous acidic media for the labelling reaction cannot provide an efficient, high-specific-activity labelling reaction. Hence, there may be an advantage in developing a radiolabelling method that used only non-aqueous solvents until the final aqueous reconstitution stage.

Figure 6 lists a set of reaction equations representing possible scenarios to be considered in the reaction of BF3 with [18F]fluoride in the presence of traces of water. In the best case (equation I), simple addition of [18F]fluoride (or rather, substitution of diethyl ether) to BF3 would lead to [18F]BF4 , which in theory is separable from unreacted BF3. In this case, the SA would be limited only by the SA of the starting 18F (theoretical maximum 63,418 GBq/μmol [24]). In practice, due to systemic contamination with 19F from reagents and materials involved in production, a more typical SA is >5500 GBq/μmol [25]. This experimentally achievable SA is still >1000-fold higher than that obtained for [18F]BF4 ; therefore, equation I alone is not sufficient to describe the labelling reaction. If fluoride exchange between BF3 and BF4 (equation II) occurs to an appreciable extent under the reaction conditions, the yield would be diminished as well as the SA. Because of the very large excess of BF3 over the [18F]BF4 product (which is limited by the trace amount of [18F]F added), the equilibrium represented by equation II would lead to very low yield; hence, the observed yield in excess of 80 % shows that equation II does not contribute significantly under these conditions. It is unrealistic to assume that water is completely absent even after azeotropic drying; therefore, equations III–V must also be considered. Both the SA and the yields observed are higher than achievable via equation III. Equation V would result in the lowest SA because all the 19F present in the precursor BF3·OEt2 would become incorporated into the final labelled BF4 product which would contain 75 % of the starting boron. Using the amount of BF3·Et2O described in our method (0.115 mg) and 1.5 GBq of [18F]F, the resulting SA would be 2.5 GBq/μmol, if the maximum possible yield of 100 % is achieved. As the observed SA is significantly higher than this, we can conclude that the reaction outlined in equation V is not a good fit to the data. Of the hydrolysis processes described in equations III to V, only equation IV is consistent with the observed yield and SA; it is likely that the other reactions contribute to a minor degree. The hydrolysis represented by equation IV has a minor deleterious effect on yield but a severely deleterious effect on SA; therefore, the primary requirement to achieve high specific activity is to eliminate water as far as possible, to maximise the contribution of equation I and minimise that of equation IV. If it is accepted that total exclusion of water is unrealistic and so some hydrolysis of BF3 [26] is inevitable, it then becomes important also to minimise the amount of BF3·Et2O used in the reaction and to avoid acidic pH (which catalyses hydrolysis).
Fig. 6

Theoretical chemical processes occurring in labelling conditions during production of [18F]BF4 from BF3

The optimised labelling conditions reflect these requirements, by removing water and reducing the amount of BF3·Et2O to a minimum consistent with acceptable radiochemical yield and avoiding use of acid which catalyses hydrolysis. Labelling was entirely unsuccessful under typical K[2.2.2]/K2CO3 labelling conditions owing to the basic conditions and therefore [18F]NaF was selected as the fluoride source to maintain neutral pH and avoid H2O from being carried into the reaction mixture by TBA salts. A phase transfer catalyst, 15C5, was used to promote the nucleophilic reactivity of the fluoride but may also be capable of complexing BF3 [27]. The final reaction conditions produced the desired compound in a RCY and synthesis time suitable for clinical and preclinical use. Because of hydrolysis of BF3·Et2O, the SA reported here (5.7 GBq/μmol from a starting activity of 1.5 GBq) does not approach that theoretically attainable via equation I but is a marked improvement on that attainable by the previously published method (1 GBq/μmol from a starting activity of 10 GBq). While increasing the starting radioactivity of [18F]fluoride would not improve the SA in the absence of hydrolysis (equation I), under realistic reaction conditions, the SA should increase further with increasing starting radioactivity. This method was therefore adopted to produce [18F]BF4 for in vivo investigation of the effect of varying specific activity.

Both the ex vivo biodistribution data and ROI analysis of PET/CT images indicate a trend of increasing uptake in thyroid and salivary gland tissue with increasing SA (Fig. 4), with an ID50 of around 1000 nmol/kg and thyroid and salivary gland SUV plateauing above 100 nmol/kg. The stomach, by contrast, did not display any discernible relationship between SUV and BF4 dose, perhaps because of high variance and interference from alternative anion-transporting proteins and alternative weakly competing substrates of NIS in the gastric mucosa. The in vivo data (Fig. 4) are thus broadly consistent with projections from the in vitro data (Fig. 1), which suggest that to achieve maximum target-to-background ratio, the instantaneous extracellular BF4 concentration in vivo should not exceed 0.1 μM. To achieve this in mice with an injected activity of 2.5 MBq would require a SA of at least 5 GBq/μmol assuming an extracellular volume of 5 mL. This SA is readily achievable with the addition reaction described here, but not with the previously published isotopic substitution method [15].


To avoid saturation of [18F]BF4 uptake by NIS-expressing tissues, the administered mass of BF4 should be kept below 100 nmol/kg (~11 μg/kg NaBF4) in mice. This is achievable in humans even with the low-SA synthesis reported previously [15], but in mice, it demands a higher SA. This difference between mouse and human imaging has been noted previously [18]. Therefore, we have developed a fully automated radiosynthesis which optimises the SA that can realistically be achieved. While the SA reported herein (5.7 GBq/μmol from a starting radioactivity of only 1.5 GBq) is sufficient to avoid compromising uptake, it could be improved further by increasing the starting radioactivity. The improved SA is particularly important in view of the growing use of hNIS PET as a preclinical research tool for reporter gene imaging.

Statement of ethics approval

Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with Medical Research Charities’ and UK Research Councils’ guidance on Responsibility in the Use of Animals in Bioscience Research, under a UK Home Office licence and approved by a local KCL animal ethics committee.





boron trifluoride diethyl etherate


computed tomography


Hanks’ balanced salt solution


human sodium/iodide symporter


ion chromatography


half-maximal inhibitory concentration


half-maximal inhibitory dose


Kryptofix 2.2.2




sodium/iodide symporter


nuclear magnetic resonance


positron emission tomography


quaternary methyl ammonium


radiochemical yield


region of interest


specific activity


single photon emission computed tomography


standardised uptake value


tetra n-butylammonium


tetra n-butylammonium fluoride


target-to-background ratio


thin-layer chromatography



This work was supported by the EPSRC, GE Healthcare and the Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. AK was supported by a CASE studentship (EPSRC and GE Healthcare). This research was also supported by a MRC Confidence in Concept Award administered by King’s Health Partners, the Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering funded by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC under grant number WT088641/Z/09/Z, and the King’s College London and UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre funded by the CRUK and EPSRC in association with the MRC and DoH (England). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the DoH. PET scanning equipment was funded by an equipment grant from the Wellcome Trust.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London
The Grove Centre, GE Healthcare


  1. Riesco-Eizaguirre G, Santisteban P. A perspective view of sodium iodide symporter research and its clinical implications. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155:495–512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung J-K. Sodium iodide symporter: its role in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1188–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dohán O, De la Vieja A, Paroder V, Riedel C, Artani M, Reed M, et al. The sodium/iodide symporter (NIS): characterization, regulation, and medical significance. Endocr Rev. 2003;24:48–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahn B-C. Sodium iodide symporter for nuclear molecular imaging and gene therapy: from bedside to bench and back. Theranostics. 2012;2:392–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai G, Levy O, Carrasco N. Cloning and characterization of the thyroid iodide transporter. Nature. 1996;379:458–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fruhwirth GO, Diocou S, Blower PJ, Ng T, Mullen GED. A whole-body dual-modality radionuclide optical strategy for preclinical imaging of metastasis and heterogeneous treatment response in different microenvironments. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:686–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Terrovitis J, Kwok KF, Lautamäki R, Engles JM, Barth AS, Kizana E, et al. Ectopic expression of the sodium-iodide symporter enables imaging of transplanted cardiac stem cells in vivo by single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1652–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Seo JH, Jeon YH, Lee YJ, Yoon GS, Won D-I, Ha J-H, et al. Trafficking macrophage migration using reporter gene imaging with human sodium iodide symporter in animal models of inflammation. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1637–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eskandari S, Loo DDF, Dai G, Levy O, Wright EM, Carrasco N. Thyroid Na+/I− symporter: mechanism, stoichiometry, and specificity. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27230–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Riese CGU, Seitz S, Schipper ML, Behr TM. Effective treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours transfected with the sodium iodide symporter gene by 186Re-perrhenate in mice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1767–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dadachova E, Bouzahzah B, Zuckier LS, Pestell RG. Rhenium-188 as an alternative to Iodine-131 for treatment of breast tumors expressing the sodium/iodide symporter (NIS). Nucl Med Biol. 2002;29:13–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Willhauck MJ, Samani B-RS, Wolf I, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R, Stark H-J, Meyer GJ, et al. The potential of 211Astatine for NIS-mediated radionuclide therapy in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1272–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Petrich T, Helmeke H-J, Meyer G, Knapp W, Pötter E. Establishment of radioactive astatine and iodine uptake in cancer cell lines expressing the human sodium/iodide symporter. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:842–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Jentzen W, Pink R, Knust J, Görges R, et al. Value of 124I-PET/CT in staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2092–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jauregui-Osoro M, Sunassee K, Weeks AJ, Berry DJ, Paul RL, Cleij M, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of [18F]tetrafluoroborate: a PET imaging agent for thyroid disease and reporter gene imaging of the sodium/iodide symporter. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2108–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Marti-Climent JM, Collantes M, Jauregui-Osoro M, Quincoces G, Prieto E, Bilbao I, et al. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution in non-human primates of the sodium/iodide PET ligand [18F]-tetrafluoroborate. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Weeks AJ, Jauregui-Osoro M, Cleij M, Blower JE, Ballinger JR, Blower PJ. Evaluation of [18F]-tetrafluoroborate as a potential PET imaging agent for the human sodium/iodide symporter in a new colon carcinoma cell line, HCT116, expressing hNIS. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:98–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hume SP, Gunn RN, Jones T. Pharmacological constraints associated with positron emission tomographic scanning of small laboratory animals. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:173–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Magdics M, Szirmay-Kalos L, Toth B, Legrady D, Cserkaszky A, Balkay L, et al. Performance evaluation of scatter modeling of the GPU-based “Tera-Tomo” 3D PET reconstruction. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. New York, USA: IEEE; 2011;4086–8.Google Scholar
  20. Rugh R. The mouse thyroid and radioactive iodine (I131). J Morphol. 1951;89:323–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology, 11th Ed, 2006, Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, p293. Google Scholar
  22. Chapman ME, Hu L, Plato CF, Kohan DE. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for the estimation of body fluid volumes in mice. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2010;299:280–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wamser CA. Hydrolysis of fluoboric acid in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc. 1948;70:1209–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Feliu AL. The role of chemistry in positron emission tomography. J Chem Educ. 1988;65:655.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Bergman J, Solin O. Fluorine-18-labeled fluorine gas for synthesis of tracer molecules. Nucl Med Biol. 1997;24:677–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wamser CA. Equilibria in the system boron trifluoride—water at 25°. J Am Chem Soc. 1951;73:409–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. McLaughlin DE, Tamres M, Searles S. The addition compounds of cyclic ethers with boron trifluoride. J Am Chem Soc. 1960;82:5621–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Khoshnevisan et al. 2016