Open Access

Rapid kit-based 68Ga-labelling and PET imaging with THP-Tyr3-octreotate: a preliminary comparison with DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate

  • Michelle T. Ma1Email author,
  • Carleen Cullinane2, 3,
  • Kelly Waldeck2,
  • Peter Roselt2,
  • Rodney J. Hicks2, 3 and
  • Philip J. Blower1
EJNMMI Research20155:52

DOI: 10.1186/s13550-015-0131-1

Received: 18 August 2015

Accepted: 30 September 2015

Published: 9 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Ge/68Ga generators provide an inexpensive source of a PET isotope to hospitals without cyclotron facilities. The development of new 68Ga-based molecular imaging agents and subsequent clinical translation would be greatly facilitated by simplification of radiochemical syntheses. We report the properties of a tris(hydroxypyridinone) conjugate of the SSTR2-targeted peptide, Tyr3-octreotate (TATE), and compare the 68Ga-labelling and biodistribution of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] with the clinical radiopharmaceutical [68Ga(DOTATATE)].

Methods

A tris(hydroxypyridinone) with a pendant isothiocyanate group was conjugated to the primary amine terminus of H2N-PEG2-Lys(iv-Dde)5-TATE, and the resulting conjugate was deprotected to provide THP-TATE. THP-TATE was radiolabelled with 68Ga3+ from a 68Ge/68Ga generator. In vitro uptake was assessed in SSTR2-positive 427-7 cells and SSTR2-negative 427 (parental) cells. Biodistribution of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] was compared with that of [68Ga(DOTATATE)] in Balb/c nude mice bearing SSTR2-positive AR42J tumours. PET scans were obtained 1 h post-injection, after which animals were euthanised and tissues/organs harvested and counted.

Results

[68Ga(THP-TATE)] was radiolabelled and formulated rapidly in <2 min, in ≥95 % radiochemical yield at pH 5–6.5 and specific activities of 60–80 MBq nmol−1 at ambient temperature. [68Ga(THP-TATE)] was rapidly internalised into SSTR2-positive cells, but not SSTR2-negative cells, and receptor binding and internalisation were specific. Animals administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] demonstrated comparable SSTR2-positive tumour activity (11.5 ± 0.6 %ID g−1) compared to animals administered [68Ga(DOTATATE)] (14.4 ± 0.8 %ID g−1). Co-administration of unconjugated Tyr3-octreotate effectively blocked tumour accumulation of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (2.7 ± 0.6 %ID g−1). Blood clearance of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] was rapid and excretion was predominantly renal, although compared to [68Ga(DOTATATE)], [68Ga(THP-TATE)] exhibited comparatively longer kidney retention.

Conclusions

Radiochemical synthesis of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] is significantly faster, proceeds under milder conditions, and requires less manipulation than that of [68Ga(DOTATATE)]. A 68Ga-labelled tris(hydroxypyridinone) conjugate of Tyr3-octreotate demonstrates specificity and targeting affinity for SSTR2 receptors, with comparable in vivo targeting affinity to the clinical PET tracer, [68Ga(DOTATATE)]. Thus, peptide conjugates based on tris(hydroxypyridinones) are conducive to translation to kit-based preparation of PET tracers, enabling the expansion and adoption of 68Ga PET in hospitals and imaging centres without the need for costly automated synthesis modules.

Keywords

Gallium-68 Bifunctional chelator Somatostatin Molecular imaging Peptide receptor Octreotate Hydroxypyridinone

Background

The positron-emitting isotope gallium-68 (68Ga) possesses decay properties suitable for PET imaging (t ½ = 68 min, 90 % positron yield, 1.9 MeV) and has been utilised in peptide receptor-targeted radiopharmaceuticals including somatostatin- [15], PSMA- [6], GRPR- [7] and GLP-1R-targeted [8] conjugates. Such agents are important as diagnostic agents in theranostic pairs of pharmaceuticals in personalised medicine [9]. The 68Ge/68Ga generator (68Ge t ½ = 270 days) provides hospitals daily access to 68Ga without expensive cyclotron facilities, and a European pharmaceutical-grade generator has recently received marketing authorisation [10]. In terms of simplicity and accessibility, the 68Ge/68Ga generator has the potential to become the “PET equivalent” of the 99Mo/99mTc generator, provided that suitable kit-based chemistry can be developed to facilitate clinical translation.

The macrocyclic chelator DOTA is frequently employed as a chelator for stable coordination of 68Ga3+, but synthesis of this complex requires heating at 80–100 °C for 5–10 min at pH 3–5 (although microwave irradiation can reduce reaction times to 1 min [11]), and often requires a post-synthetic purification step [1118]. As such, it is not optimal for rapid kit-based syntheses of 68Ga-labelled radiotracers. Ideally, kit-based synthesis of such tracers could make use of a chelator that coordinates 68Ga3+ rapidly (<2 min) at ambient temperature to minimise synthesis time and simplify labelling and formulation procedures. Alternative chelators for 68Ga3+ have been reported, including NOTA/NODAGA [1922], TRAP and its derivatives [2326], sarcophagines [27], HBED and its derivatives [6, 28], substituted 6-amino-perhydrodiazepines AAZTA [29], the siderophore FSC [30], and a series of chelators based on substituted pyridine carboxylates (DEDPA) [3133]. The bifunctional chelator HBED-CC is used clinically in the peptide-based 68Ga-labelled radiopharmaceutical, 68Ga-HBED-PSMA, which targets the prostate specific membrane antigen expressed in metastatic prostate cancer [6]. Derivatives of HBED, along with TRAP, NOTA, AAZTA, FSC and DEDPA conjugates have demonstrated desirable radiolabelling properties, with labelling proceeding rapidly at room temperature in all cases. We have reported that a tripodal tris(hydroxypyridinone) ligand coordinates 68Ga3+ via six O-atoms at mild pH (pH 6.5–7.0), at low ligand concentrations (10 μM) in <5 min, and specific activities of up to 80 MBq nmol−1 [34]. Bifunctional 68Ga-labelled derivatives of this compound are stable to demetallation in vivo, accumulate selectively in target tissue and are excreted mainly via a renal route [35].

We now report the synthesis, simple 68Ga-labelling and biodistribution of a somatostatin-2 receptor (SSTR2)-targeting tris(hydroxypyridinone) conjugate, THP-TATE. The SSTR2-targeting radiopharmaceutical [68Ga(DOTATATE)] has demonstrated superior clinical resolution and sensitivity compared to the 111In-labelled SPECT tracer, [111In(DTPA-octreotide)], in identifying tumours expressing SSTR2 in neuroendocrine cancer patients [3]. Despite the multistep radiochemistry required, [68Ga(DOTATATE)] is used routinely in PET clinics, and in conjunction with 18F-FDG [5], is important in determining therapeutic regimes of patients presenting with neuroendocrine tumours [1, 2, 4, 9, 10]. It is instructive to compare DOTATATE with THP-TATE (Chart 1), both in terms of (i) radiosynthesis in a hospital radiopharmacy and (ii) preclinical biodistribution, in order to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this new class of tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators.
Chart 1

Structures of DOTATATE, the bifunctional chelator, THP-NCS and the new peptide conjugate, THP-TATE

Methods

Materials and instrumentation

Mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent 6510 Q-TOF LC/MS mass spectrometer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA). Instant thin-layer chromatography strips (ITLC-SG) were obtained from Varian Medical Systems UK, Ltd. (Crawley, UK), and ITLC strips were visualised using a Raytest Rita-Star TLC scanner. Semi-preparative reverse-phase HPLC was conducted using an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (9.4 × 250 mm, 5 μm) coupled to an Agilent 1200 LC system, with a 3 mL min−1 flow rate and UV spectroscopic detection at 220 nm. Mobile phase A contained water with 0.2 % TFA, and mobile phase B contained acetonitrile with 0.2 % TFA. The gradient started with 100 % A at 0 min, and the concentration of B increased at a rate of 1 % min−1.

Analytical reverse-phase HPLC and radio-HPLC traces were acquired using two different instruments: (1) an Agilent 1200 LC system with an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) and UV spectroscopic detection at 220 nm. The radio-HPLC was coupled to a LabLogic Flow-Count detector with a sodium iodide probe (B-FC-3200). Mobile phase A comprised water with 0.1 % TFA, and mobile phase B comprised acetonitrile with 0.1 % TFA. For method 1, the concentration of B increased at a rate of 1.67 % min−1, with 100 % A at 0 min and 50 % B at 30 min with a flow rate of 1 mL min−1; (2) an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) with a 1 mL min−1 flow rate and UV spectroscopic detection at 220 nm coupled to a Shimadzu HPLC. This was coupled to a radiation detector consisting of an Ortec model 276 Photomultiplier Base with Preamplifier, Amplifier, BIAS supply and SCA and a Bicron 1M 11.2 Photomultiplier Tube. For method 2, the concentration of B increased at a rate of 6.67 % min−1, with 100 % A at 0 min and 80 % B at 12 min.

Analytical size-exclusion radio-HPLC traces were acquired using an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC system and a Phenomenex Biosep 2000 (300 × 7.8 mm) size-exclusion column with a phosphate-buffered saline mobile phase.

For initial radiolabelling and characterisation studies that utilised <400 MBq, an Eckert and Ziegler 68Ge/68Ga generator (Berlin, Germany) was used. For biodistribution studies, and experiments that utilised >600 MBq 68Ga, an iThemba Labs 1.85 GBq 68Ge/68Ga generator (IDB Holland BV, Netherlands) was used.

Synthesis of THP-TATE

The peptide H-PEG2-dPhe-Cys-Tyr-dTrp-Lys(iv-Dde)-Thr-Cys-Thr-OH was synthesised using standard solid-phase peptide synthesis protocols [3639], cyclised using 2,2′-dithiodipyridine and purified using reverse-phase semi-preparative HPLC. PEG2-Lys(iv-Dde)5-TATE (5–6 mg) was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (100–300 μL) and added to THP-NCS (synthesised as previously described [35]) (4 mg) in dimethylsulfoxide (100–300 μL), and diisopropylethylamine (5–10 μL) was added. The reaction solution was heated in a microwave synthesiser (120 °C, 300 W, 30 min) and then applied to a reverse-phase HPLC column (conditions above). Fractions containing the desired (iv-Dde)-protected conjugate eluted at 45–47 min and were combined and lyophilised. MS: m/z [C106H143N19O27S3 + 3H]3+, observed monoisotopic peak = 737.66, calculated = 737.66; [C106H143N19O27S3 + 2H]2+, observed monoisotopic peak = 1105.99, calculated = 1105.99. The (iv-Dde)-protected conjugate was dissolved in a solution of 2 % hydrazine in dimethylformamide (1–2 mL). Within 30 min, the solution was applied to a reverse-phase HPLC column, and fractions containing THP-TATE eluted at 33–35 min and were combined and lyophilised. MS: m/z [C93H125N19O25S3 + 3H]3+, observed monoisotopic peak = 668.95, calculated = 668.95; [C93H125N19O25S3 + 2H]2+, observed monoisotopic peak = 1002.92, calculated = 1002.92, isolated yield ~25 %. Analytical HPLC (220 nm): RT (retention time) = 18.97 min, >97 % purity (method 1, see above).

Radiolabelling

Initial radiolabelling experiments utilised an Eckert and Ziegler 68Ge/68Ga generator. Aqueous HCl solution (0.1 M, 5 mL) was passed through the generator, and the eluate was fractionated (5 × 1 mL). The second fraction (1 mL, containing 90–100 MBq 68Ga) was added directly to an ethanol/water solution (50 %/50 %, 50 μL) of THP-TATE (25 μg) and immediately followed by a solution of ammonium acetate (2 M, 200 μL) to obtain a solution of pH 5–6. This solution was immediately applied to an analytical reverse-phase C18 HPLC column. [68Ga(THP-TATE)]: radiochemical yield >99 % (HPLC), HPLC: RT = 20.23 min (HPLC method 1).

The non-radioactive analogue, [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)] was also prepared. An aqueous solution of Ga(NO3)3 (1 mg mL−1, 4 mM, 5 μL) was added to THP-TATE (25 μg) dissolved in deionised water/ethanol (50 %/50 %, 50 μL). The solutions were applied to an analytical reverse-phase C18 HPLC column as well as being subjected to LCMS analysis. [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)]: HPLC RT = 20.17 min (HPLC method 1); [C93H122N19O25S3Ga + 3H]3+, observed monoisotopic peak = 690.92, calculated = 690.92; [C93H122N19O25S3Ga + 2H]2+, observed monoisotopic peak = 1035.87, calculated = 1035.87.

For in vivo and in vitro studies, generator-produced 68Ga3+ (800–1000 MBq, iThemba Labs generator) was concentrated on an AG 50WX4 (400 mesh) cation exchange cartridge and eluted with 200 μL 0.9 M HCl in ethanol/water (90 %/10 %) [16]. This volume was diluted in deionised water (800 μL) and directly added to THP-TATE (25 μg) at ambient temperature, followed immediately by addition of aqueous ammonium acetate (2 M, 400 μL) to obtain solutions of pH ~6.5, resulting in [68Ga(THP-TATE)]. These solutions were further diluted by addition of saline solution (0.9 % NaCl w/v, 1.1 mL). Within 2–5 min of addition of 68Ga3+ to the conjugates, the solutions were subjected to analytical reverse-phase HPLC and ITLC analysis. [68Ga(THP-TATE)]: radiochemical yield >95 % (ITLC), HPLC: RT = 10.48 min (HPLC method 2).

Synthesis of [68Ga(DOTATATE)] was undertaken using methods previously reported [17]. Briefly, an iThemba Labs generator at approximately 3 months post-calibration was eluted with aqueous HCl (0.4 M, 5 mL). The eluate was passed through an AG 50WX8 (400 mesh) cation exchange resin, and the 68Ga3+ was retained on the resin. The resin was washed with a solution of 80 % acetone/0.15 N HCl (1 mL) to remove residual 68Ge breakthrough, followed by elution of 68Ga3+ (using a solution of 97.6 % acetone/0.05 N HCl, 400 μL) into a pre-heated reaction vial containing DOTATATE (42 μg), ascorbic acid and gentisic acid in sterile Milli-Q water (5 mL). After 10 min at 105 °C, the reaction mixture was passed through a reverse-phase solid-phase extraction cartridge (Strata-X, 30 mg, Phenomenex). The Strata-X cartridge was rinsed with sterile Milli-Q water, and [68Ga(DOTATATE)] was subsequently recovered with ethanol (500 μL). The ethanol solution containing [68Ga(DOTATATE)] was transferred into a vial containing saline for injection (9 mL), and the resultant mixture passed through a low protein-binding filter. Radiochemical yields ranged from 50 to 70 %, and radiochemical purity was greater than 95 %.

Log P OCT/PBS determination

A solution containing [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (10 μL, synthesised using eluate from an Eckert and Ziegler generator as described above) was added to 500 μL of octanol and 490 μL of aqueous phosphate-buffered saline solution. The mixture was agitated using a vortex for 3–4 min, and the phases separated by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 5 min). Aliquots from each phase (50 μL) were counted for radioactivity in a gamma counter. The experiment was repeated six times.

Serum stability

A solution containing [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (150 μL, synthesised using eluate from an Eckert and Ziegler generator as described above) was added to 1.5 mL of fresh human female O+ serum, incubated at 37 °C for 5 h, and the reaction mixture was analysed using size-exclusion HPLC chromatography. Concurrently, a solution of 68Ga3+ in ammonium acetate (0.33 M, 8 MBq, 300 μL) was added to 1.5 mL of serum and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h, followed by analysis using size-exclusion HPLC.

In vitro uptake

The A427 human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (catalogue number: HTB-53). The SSTR2 over-expressing cell line A427-7 was a gift from Prof. Buck Rogers [40]. A427-7 and parental A427 cells were plated in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) containing 10 % FBS at 5 × 105 cells per well in poly-d-lysine-coated 12-well cell culture dishes for 24 h. On the day of the binding assay, cells were washed in PBS and equilibrated in MEM containing 1 % FCS. Cells were then treated with [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (1.5 MBq, 5 μL, 4 μM THP-TATE), with or without blocking TATE peptide (5 μL, 800 μM, 200-fold excess) for 5, 15, 30 and 60 min (A427-7 cells) and 60 min (A427 parental cells) in triplicate. Uptake was terminated by placing the cells on ice. Unbound free tracer was collected, with the supernatant and cold PBS washes combined for this fraction. The surface-bound tracer fraction was collected through two 10-min acid washes (0.1 M glycine in saline, pH 2.3). Finally, the internalised fraction was collected through incubation in 1 M NaOH for 10 min. The activity of these fractions was determined using a gamma counter (Biomedex). Protein concentration in each well was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Amersham) on the internalised fractions collected. Results were calculated as a percentage of added radioactivity and normalised to protein concentration. The experiment was repeated three times.

PET scanning and biodistribution

All animal experiments were performed with approval from the Peter MacCallum animal ethics committee. Six- to eight-week-old Balb/c nude mice (Animal Resources Centre, Western Australia) were implanted subcutaneously on the right flank with three million AR42J cells (sourced from ATCC). Once the tumours reached a volume >150 mm3, the animals (n = 3) were injected intravenously with 23–28 MBq [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (containing 1 μg of THP-TATE). For blocking studies, animals (n = 3) were coinjected with Tyr3-octreotate peptide (400 μg). For [68Ga(DOTATATE)], the animals (n = 3) were injected with 8 MBq of the tracer (containing 1 μg of DOTATATE). At 1 h, the animals were anaesthetised and imaged on a Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner. The images were reconstructed using a 3D RAMLA algorithm and tracer uptake determined as described previously [41]. On completion of the scan, animals were euthanised and tissues harvested, weighed and radioactivity counted using a gamma counter (Biomedex). Quantitation of PET images was performed using in-house software (MARVn 3.31). Regions of interest were drawn around tissues of interest and uptake ratio calculated as the maximum pixel intensity in the tumour divided by the average uptake in a mediastinal background region, liver or kidneys, as appropriate.

Results

Synthesis and radiolabelling of THP-TATE

Reaction of the bifunctional chelator THP-NCS (Chart 1) with H2N-PEG2-Lys(iv-Dde)5-TATE under microwave conditions resulted in the facile formation of THP-PEG2-Lys(iv-Dde)5-TATE. Removal of the iv-Dde group from the Lys5 side-chain resulted in the formation of THP-TATE (Chart 1).

The new THP-TATE peptide conjugate could be radiolabelled with generator-produced eluate that was added directly from the generator or eluate that was preconditioned to concentrate activity and remove any contaminating 68Ge [16]. In both cases, 68Ga3+ in 1 mL HCl solution was added to THP-TATE (10 nmol) at ambient temperature, followed immediately by addition of aqueous ammonium acetate and saline to obtain solutions of pH 5–7, which were then immediately subjected to ITLC and HPLC analysis. This synthetic protocol reproducibly provided the labelled conjugate [68Ga(THP-TATE)] in >95 % radiochemical yield (with <5 % attributable to unchelated 68Ga3+) and in the case where a generator eluting 750–1000 MBq was utilised, specific activities of 60–80 MBq nmol−1. Using lower quantities of THP-TATE (5 nmol) resulted in radiochemical yields of 80–90 %, indicating that for every 1 mL solution containing 68Ga3+, at least 25 μg of THP-TATE is required to reliably achieve radiochemical yields >95 %. Without addition of ammonium acetate solution, radiolabelling of THP-TATE was not observed: complex formation did not occur in highly acidic solutions (such as in the final solution isolated after preconditioning the eluate (0.9 M HCl) or that used to elute the generator (0.1 M HCl)).

HPLC and LCMS analyses of the analogous non-radioactive [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)] compound were undertaken to verify the identity of the radiolabelled product. Only a single product was observed in the total ion chromatogram of the LCMS of [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)]. Only two signals were observed in the resulting mass spectrum, corresponding to the dipositive and tripositive ions of [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)] (Fig. 1, inset). Under the HPLC conditions employed, [68Ga(THP-TATE)] possessed a retention time (RT) of 20.23 min (sodium iodide scintillation detection) (Fig. 1, red trace). Non-radioactive [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)] possessed a RT of 20.17 min (UV detection at 220 nm) (Fig. 1, blue trace), with the difference in retention times a result of the configuration of the detectors in series. The co-elution of the non-radioactive and radioactive Ga3+-labelled peptides was indicative of the formation of a single radiolabelled product (>95 % radiochemical purity) where the Ga3+:THP-TATE stoichiometry = 1:1.
Fig. 1

HPLC traces (λ 220) of THP-TATE (black) and [ nat Ga(THP-TATE)] (blue) and radio-HPLC trace of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (red). Inset: experimental (blue) and simulated (black dashed) mass spectral signal of [ nat Ga(THP-TATE) +2H]2+

Lipophilicity and serum stability studies

The log P OCT/PBS of [68Ga(THP-TATE) measured −3.20 ± 0.09 (n = 6), almost 0.5 units higher than that of [68Ga(DOTATATE)] which possesses a log P OCT/PBS of −3.69 [42], indicating that the Ga3+-coordinated THP complex is significantly more lipophilic than the DOTA complex.

Serum stability studies were undertaken to determine whether [68Ga(THP-TATE)] releases 68Ga3+ to endogenous serum proteins. Addition of generator-produced 68Ga3+ to a solution of human serum resulted in 68Ga-bound protein adducts that possessed distinct retention times of 6.6, 10.4 and 13.8 min when applied to the size-exclusion HPLC column utilised in this study (Fig. 2a). Radiolabelled [68Ga(THP-TATE)] possessed a retention time of 31.8 min (Fig. 2b). After incubation of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] in fresh human serum at 37 °C for 5 h, the size-exclusion chromatogram exhibited a strong signal at the same retention time of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (>98 % integration), as well as small signals between 5 and 15 min (<2 % integration), indicating that less than 2 % of 68Ga3+ bound to THP-TATE underwent transchelation to serum proteins (Fig. 2c) during 5 h.
Fig. 2

Size-exclusion HPLC chromatograms of a a sample of [68Ga(acetate)3] incubated in human serum for 4 h, b [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and c [68Ga(THP-TATE)] after 5 h incubation in human serum at 37 °C

In vitro cell binding and internalisation of [68Ga(THP-TATE)]

To assess the internalisation of [68Ga(THP-TATE)], and specificity of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] for SSTR2 receptors, [68Ga(THP-TATE)] was incubated with SSTR2-positive A427-7 cells [41]. At 5, 15, 30 and 60 min after addition of [68Ga(THP-TATE)], the amount of surface-bound and internalised radioactivity was quantified (Fig. 3). After a 60-min incubation, <4 % of added radioactivity/mg of protein (%AR mg−1) was bound to the cell surface, but over 40 %AR mg−1 was internalised. Indeed, at all time points, surface-bound activity measured <10 %AR mg−1 whilst internalised activity increased over the course of the 60-min experiment.
Fig. 3

SSTR2-positive A427-7 cell uptake of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (black) and [68Ga(THP-TATE)] in the presence of excess TATE peptide (red). a Cell surface-bound activity, b internalised activity and c total activity associated with cells. Uptake is expressed as a percentage of added radioactivity (AR)/mg of protein, with uptake representing the mean from three separate experiments. Error bars correspond to standard error of the mean

A427-7 cells were also co-incubated with [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and an excess of unconjugated Tyr3-octreotate (TATE, 200-fold excess compared to THP-TATE) peptide to determine SSTR2-specific uptake [41]. At all time points, internalised and surface-bound activity measured <1 %AR mg−1 (Fig. 3). Lastly, [68Ga(THP-TATE)] was incubated with the SSTR2-negative A427 parental cell line. After a 60-min incubation with [68Ga(THP-TATE)], uptake (surface-bound and internalised) in A427 cells measured 0.15 ± 0.04 %AR mg−1 vs uptake in A427-7 cells, which measured 50.4 ± 6.9 %AR mg−1.

Biodistribution of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and [68Ga(DOTATATE)]

The biodistribution of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] was assessed in Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing SSTR2-positive AR42J tumours. Each animal was administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and PET scanned at 1 h post-injection (PI) for 10 min, followed by euthanasia and organ harvesting for ex vivo radioactivity counting. To assess specificity of the radiotracer, a separate group of animals was co-administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and TATE peptide, followed by scanning, euthanasia and ex vivo organ counting 1 h PI. To allow for comparison between the biodistribution of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and [68Ga(DOTATATE)], a third group of animals was administered [68Ga(DOTATATE)] followed by scanning, euthanasia and ex vivo organ counting 1 h PI.

In PET scans of animals administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (Fig. 4a), the tumour of each animal could be clearly delineated, as well as the kidneys. The tumour to background (mediastinum), liver and kidney ratios are listed in Table 1. Excretion was largely renal, with significant amounts of activity in the bladders of all animals at 1 h PI. In contrast, tumours in animals co-administered TATE peptide could not be delineated. Animals administered [68Ga(DOTATATE)] exhibited higher tumour to kidney, tumour to liver, and tumour to background ratios than those of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (Table 1).
Fig. 4

a Whole-body PET maximum intensity projection of Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing an AR47J tumour on the right flank 1 h PI of 68Ga-labelled tracers. b Biodistribution of mice administered [68Ga(DOTATATE)] (grey) and [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (red) and co-administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and TATE (blocked, blue) 1 h PI; n = 3 and error bars correspond to standard error of the mean

Table 1

Tumour to organ/background ratios (±SEM) obtained from PET images of animals administered [68Ga(DOTATATE)] and [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (n = 3)

 

[68Ga(DOTATATE)]

[68Ga(THP-TATE)]

Tumour to kidney

5.7 ± 0.2

1.5 ± 0.5

Tumour to liver

27.2 ± 3.9

10.5 ± 2.0

Tumour to mediastinum

51.2 ± 3.8.

36.0 ± 8.1

Ex vivo biodistribution data were consistent with PET data (Fig. 4b). AR42J tumour uptake in animals administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] (11.5 ± 0.6 %ID g−1) was slightly lower than tumour uptake in animals administered [68Ga(DOTATATE)] (14.4 ± 0.8 %ID g−1, mean difference = 2.9 %ID g−1, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.6–5.1 %ID g−1, p = 0.023). Kidney retention in the [68Ga(THP-TATE)] group was significantly higher (22.3 ± 4.2 %ID g−1) compared to that in the [68Ga(DOTATATE)] group (5.6 ± 0.5 %ID g−1, mean difference = 16.7 %ID g−1, 95 % CI = 7.1–26.3 %ID g−1, p = 0.0085). Additionally, increased liver accumulation was observed for [68Ga(THP-TATE)] compared to [68Ga(DOTATATE)] (1.4 ± 0.1 vs 0.4 ± 0.04 %ID g−1, respectively, mean difference = 1.0 %ID g−1, 95 % CI = 0.8–1.2 %ID g−1, p = 0.00010) as well as higher blood retention (0.6 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.08 %ID g−1, respectively, mean difference = 0.3 %ID g−1, 95 % CI = 0.004–0.603 %ID g−1, p = 0.048) 1 h PI.

Compared to animals administered solely [68Ga(THP-TATE)], animals co-administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and TATE peptide demonstrated lower uptake in tumours (11.5 ± 0.6 vs 2.7 ± 0.6 %ID g−1, respectively, mean difference = 8.8 %ID g−1, 95 % CI = 7.0–10.5 %ID g−1, p = 0.00016), very high kidney retention (22.3 ± 4.2 vs 123.3 ± 41.2 %ID g−1, mean difference = 101.1, 95 % CI = 7.1–195.0 %ID g−1, p = 0.040) and higher blood activity (0.6 ± 0.1 vs 4.7 ± 0.7 %ID g−1, mean difference = 4.1 %ID g−1, 95 % CI = 2.6–5.6 %ID g−1, p = 0.0017), and significantly higher activity values were associated with non-target organs and tissue (Fig. 4b).

Discussion

The work described here demonstrates that with suitable design of chelators—in this case, the tripodal hexadentate THP chelator—to facilitate extremely fast chelation under mild conditions and low ligand concentration, rapid kit-based synthesis of 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals is readily achievable and can be performed in a few minutes using a generator, a kit vial, a syringe and appropriate shielding. This has the potential to greatly increase the availability of 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals for the benefit of more hospitals and patients.

Several methods for radiosynthesis of [68Ga(DOTATATE)] have been reported, and although radiochemical yields of between >99 and 95 % can be obtained (obviating a post-synthetic purification step), all require 5–10-min reaction time at 80–100 °C [1118] or microwave heating for 1 min at 90 °C [11] with pH 3–5 (Table 2). Radiochemical syntheses typically require between 7 and 30 nmol of DOTATATE (or DOTATOC), although in the case of microwave heating, 0.5–1 nmol of conjugate is sufficient for quantitative radiolabelling [1118].
Table 2

Comparison of 68Ga3+ labelling conditions commonly employed for radiosynthesis of [68Ga(DOTATATE)] and the conditions employed for radiosynthesis of [68Ga(THP-TATE)]

Reaction variables

[68Ga(DOTATATE)]

[68Ga(THP-TATE)]

Temperature

80–90 °C

20–25 °C

Time

5–10 min

<2 min

Yield

>95 %

>95 %

pH

3–5

5–7

Amount of conjugate

7–30 nmol

10 nmol

In contrast, radiosynthesis to produce [68Ga(THP-TATE)] in specific activities sufficient for in vivo administration could be undertaken in <2 min, at room temperature and formulated to pH 6–7 at the same time the reaction occurs (Table 2). Under the conditions employed here, it is possible that the rate of reaction of 68Ga3+ with THP-TATE is limited only by the rate of diffusion of components in the reaction mixture. Provided 25 μg (equivalent to 10 nmol) of THP-TATE is utilised, radiochemical yields >95 % are routinely achievable. The specific activities achieved (60–80 MBq nmol−1) are comparable to specific activities achieved in the clinical production of [68Ga(DOTATATE)].

Several other chelators are capable of achieving near-quantitative radiochemical labelling at room temperature. NOTA/NODAGA conjugates can be radiolabelled at room temperature in radiochemical yields in excess of 95 % at pH 3.5–4 within 10 min [19]. The DEDPA chelator can similarly be radiolabelled in excess of 97 % yield at pH 4.5 in 10 min at nmol levels [31, 32]. Whilst TRAP and its derivatives have typically been labelled at elevated temperatures in order to achieve extraordinarily high specific activities, at pH 3.3, near quantitative-radiolabelling (~95 %) can be achieved at μM concentrations in 10 min at room temperature [24]. The advent of bifunctional tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators increases the pH range at which biomolecules can be radiolabelled at room temperature, permitting labelling at neutral pH and hence 68Ga PET imaging of fusion proteins, antibody fragments and other proteins that are sensitive to extremes of heat and pH.

Whilst THP-TATE could be labelled using unprocessed, fractionated eluate directly from the generator, a post-processing method to remove any 68Ge (as required in radiopharmaceutical preparations from some 68Ge/68Ge generators) that ultimately provided an ethanolic solution (18 % ethanol in aqueous HCl solution) of 68Ga3+ was utilised in preparations of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] for in vivo experiments [16]. Radiochemical yields of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] prepared using such solutions were high, heating and post-purification were not required, and the final formulation was suitable for injection into mice (Table 2).

The bifunctional chelator THP-NCS provides a facile synthetic route to peptide conjugates bearing tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators [35]. The THP chelator is significantly larger than DOTA, and previous work has suggested that increasing the distance between the THP chelator and the targeting peptide leads to increased receptor affinity [35]. A PEG linker was included in the THP-TATE conjugate to circumvent potential deleterious effects the close proximity of the THP group might exert upon the conjugate affinity for SSTR2 receptors. Synthesis from the Lys(iv-Dde)5 derivative, PEG2-Lys(Dde)5-TATE, ensured selective attachment of the isothiocyanate, THP-NCS, to the N-terminus of the peptide.

Less than 2 % of 68Ga3+ dissociated from [68Ga(THP-TATE)] to serum proteins in competition studies using fresh human serum over a 5-h incubation period, suggesting that [68Ga(THP-TATE)] is of sufficient stability to withstand competition from endogenous proteins in vivo over a time period of at least 1–2 h.

Similar to other agonist conjugates of Tyr3-octreotate [4345], [68Ga(THP-TATE)] underwent rapid internalisation upon SSTR2 binding. Co-incubation of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] with an excess of TATE peptide effectively blocked binding of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] to SSTR2 receptors, and incubation of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] with SSTR-negative cells did not result in either surface-bound or internalised uptake of activity. These qualitative data strongly point to high specificity of [68Ga(THP-TATE)].

The biodistribution profile of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] demonstrated that, like [68Ga(DOTATATE)], [68Ga(THP-TATE)] targets SSTR2-positive tissue and is cleared predominantly via a renal pathway. Tumour uptake for [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and [68Ga(DOTATATE)] is comparable (11.5 ± 0.6 vs 14.4 ± 0.8 %ID g−1) but [68Ga(THP-TATE)] has a longer residence time in the kidney (22.3 ± 4.2 vs 5.6 ± 0.5 %ID g−1), higher uptake in the liver (1.4 ± 0.1 vs 0.4 ± 0.04 %ID g−1) and higher blood retention (0.6 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.1 %ID g−1) 1 h PI, resulting in lower tumour to background/non-target organ ratios for [68Ga(THP-TATE)] compared to [68Ga(DOTATATE)] (Table 1). This is not a result of differences in charge, as the overall charge of both radiotracers is the same. Indeed, log P OCT/PBS measurements indicated that [68Ga(THP-TATE)] is significantly more lipophilic than [68Ga(DOTATATE)] (by almost 0.5 units), and thus, it is most likely that differences in biodistribution, particularly liver uptake, arise from these differences in lipophilicity. We have observed similar in vivo behaviour for an αvβ3 integrin-targeted conjugate of THP-NCS: [68Ga(THP-NCS-RGD)] activity measured 2.94 ± 0.06 %ID g−1 in the liver, 4.76 ± 0.36 %ID g−1 in the kidneys and 0.84 ± 0.09 %ID g−1 in the blood 1 h PI [35]. Lastly, although we did not detect colloids at the point of HPLC and ITLC analysis, the possibility that unchelated 68Ga3+ (<5 %), present in the formulation, resulted in some colloid formation between the point of analysis and the point of in vivo administration, in turn contributing to a small proportion of liver activity in animals administered [68Ga(THP-TATE)], cannot be completely eliminated.

PET scanning experiments and ex vivo biodistribution in animals co-administered TATE peptide (blockade group) demonstrated that TATE peptide effectively blocks SSTR2 receptor binding by [68Ga(THP-TATE)], indicating in vivo specificity of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] for SSTR2. Significantly higher blood and kidney activity in the blockade group was also observed, contrasting most [42, 45, 46] but not all [47] previous reports that compare preclinical biodistribution of SSTR2 radiotracers in blockade and non-blockade groups of SSTR2-positive tumour-bearing mice. It is possible that the significantly higher blood activity observed in the blockade group compared to the non-blockade group (4.7 ± 0.7 vs 0.6 ± 0.1 %ID g−1, respectively) is in part a consequence of persistent presence of the radiotracer in circulation in the absence of receptors available for binding, rather than high non-specific organ uptake. In this scenario, higher blood and kidney activity in the blocked group compared to that of the [68Ga(THP-TATE)] group is a result of blocked SSTR2 sites that are no longer able to function as a “sink” for [68Ga(THP-TATE)] [48]. It is also possible that the observed higher blood and kidney activity in the blockade group is a result of slower clearance of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] from circulation via a renal route in the presence of excess TATE peptide.

Conclusions

Simplicity of labelling with minimal need for complex equipment and radiochemical expertise, which is likely to be a key to the wider availability of 68Ga PET, is afforded by appropriate design of the 68Ga chelator. The tris(hydroxypyridinone) bifunctional chelator, THP-NCS, provides facile access to the peptide conjugate THP-TATE, which can be radiolabelled with generator-produced 68Ga3+ in high radiochemical yield (>95 %) and specific activities of 60–80 MBq nmol−1. Radiosynthesis and formulation is rapid (<2 min), proceeds at ambient temperature and simply requires addition of 68Ga3+ solution to the conjugate and neutralisation with acetate solution. The resulting tracer, [68Ga(THP-TATE)], specifically binds to SSTR2 and, similar to other agonists of SSTR2, is rapidly internalised. In vivo, [68Ga(THP-TATE)] clears rapidly from circulation, accumulates specifically at SSTR2-positive tumours and is cleared predominantly via a renal pathway. In comparison with [68Ga(DOTATATE)], synthesis of [68Ga(THP-TATE)] is significantly faster and occurs at ambient temperature. [68Ga(THP-TATE)] and [68Ga(DOTATATE)] show comparable tumour uptake, but [68Ga(THP-TATE)] exhibits comparatively longer kidney retention.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

MTM acknowledges the support of the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under REA grant agreement number 299009, and the Royal Society of Chemistry through a Researcher Mobility Fellowship. We thank Wayne Noonan, Kerry Ardley, Susan Jackson and Rachael Walker for expert technical support. We thank David C. Muller (Genetic Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer) for his statistical advice and support. This research was supported by the Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering Centre funded by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC under grant number WT088641/Z/09/Z, the King’s College London and UCL Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre funded by Cancer Research UK and EPSRC in association with the MRC and DoH (England), and by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

All applicable national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s College London
(2)
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
(3)
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne

References

  1. Hofman MS, Kong G, Neels OC, Eu P, Hong E, Hicks RJ. High management impact of Ga-68 DOTATATE (GaTate) PET/CT for imaging neuroendocrine and other somatostatin expressing tumours. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56(1):40–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosini V, Campana D, Tomassetti P, Fanti S. 68Ga-labelled peptides for diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic NET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(S1):S52–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Srirajaskanthan R, Kayani I, Quigley AM, Soh J, Caplin ME, Bomanji J. The role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in patients with neuroendocrine tumors and negative or equivocal findings on 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(6):875–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Haug AR, Auernhammer CJ, Waengler B, Schmidt GP, Uebleis C, Goeke B, et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the early prediction of response to somatostatin receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(9):1349–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Conry BG, Papathanasiou ND, Prakash V, Kayani I, Caplin M, Mahmood S, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the detection of recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(1):49–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(1):11–20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Seiz M, Tuettenberg J, Schmieder K, Eisenhut M, Haberkorn U, et al. Pharmacokinetic studies of 68Ga-labeled Bombesin (68Ga-BZH3) and F-18 FDG PET in patients with recurrent gliomas and comparison to grading: preliminary results. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36(2):101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksson O, Velikyan I, Selvaraju RK, Kandeel F, Johansson L, Antoni G, et al. Detection of metastatic insulinoma by positron emission tomography with [68Ga]exendin-4—a case report. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1519–24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum RP, Kulkarni HR. THERANOSTICS: from molecular imaging using Ga-68 labeled tracers and PET/CT to personalized radionuclide therapy—the Bad Berka experience. Theranostics. 2012;2(5):437–47.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Velikyan I. Prospective of 68Ga-radiopharmaceutical development. Theranostics. 2013;4(1):47–80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Velikyan I, Beyer GJ, Langstroem B. Microwave-supported preparation of 68Ga bioconjugates with high specific radioactivity. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004;15(3):554–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Decristoforo C, Knopp R, von Guggenberg E, Rupprich M, Dreger T, Hess A, et al. A fully automated synthesis for the preparation of 68Ga-labeled peptides. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28(11):870–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ocak M, Antretter M, Knopp R, Kunkel F, Petrik M, Bergisadi N, et al. Full automation of 68Ga labelling of DOTA-peptides including cation exchange prepurification. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68(2):297–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Petrik M, Knetsch Peter A, Knopp R, Imperato G, Ocak M, von Guggenberg E, et al. Radiolabelling of peptides for PET, SPECT and therapeutic applications using a fully automated disposable cassette system. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32(10):887–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Decker M, Turner JH. Automated module radiolabeling of peptides and antibodies with gallium-68, lutetium-177 and iodine-131. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27(1):72–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eppard E, Wuttke M, Nicodemus PL, Roesch F. Ethanol-based post-processing of generator-derived 68Ga toward kit-type preparation of 68Ga-radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(6):1023–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhernosekov KP, Filosofov DV, Baum RP, Aschoff P, Bihl H, Razbash AA, et al. Processing of generator-produced 68Ga for medical application. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(10):1741–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller D, Klette I, Baum RP, Gottschaldt M, Schultz MK, Breeman WAP. Simplified NaCl based 68Ga concentration and labeling procedure for rapid synthesis of 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals in high radiochemical purity. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23(8):1712–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Velikyan I, Maecke H, Langstrom B. Convenient preparation of 68Ga-based PET-radiopharmaceuticals at room temperature. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19(2):569–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenwiener K-P, Prata MIM, Buschmann I, Zhang H-W, Santos AC, Wenger S, et al. NODAGATOC, a new chelator-coupled somatostatin analogue labeled with 67/68Ga and 111In for SPECT, PET, and targeted therapeutic applications of somatostatin receptor (hsst2) expressing tumors. Bioconjugate Chem. 2002;13(3):530–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Z, Niu G, Wang F, Chen X. 68Ga-labeled NOTA-RGD-BBN peptide for dual integrin and GRPR-targeted tumor imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(9):1483–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. de Sa A, Matias AA, Prata MIM, Geraldes CFGC, Ferreira PMT, Andre JP. Gallium labeled NOTA-based conjugates for peptide receptor-mediated medical imaging. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:7345–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Simecek J, Schulz M, Notni J, Plutnar J, Kubicek V, Havlickova J, et al. Complexation of metal ions with TRAP (1,4,7-triazacyclononane phosphinic acid) ligands and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid: phosphinate-containing ligands as unique chelators for trivalent gallium. Inorg Chem. 2012;51(1):577–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Notni J, Simecek J, Wester H-J. Phosphinic acid functionalized polyazacycloalkane chelators for radiodiagnostics and radiotherapeutics: unique characteristics and applications. Chem Med Chem. 2014;9(6):1107–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Notni J, Simecek J, Hermann P, Wester H-J. TRAP, a powerful and versatile framework for gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals. Chem Eur J. 2011;17(52):14718–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Simecek J, Notni J, Kapp TG, Kessler H, Wester H-J. Benefits of NOPO as chelator in gallium-68 peptides, exemplified by preclinical characterization of 68Ga-NOPO-c(RGDfK). Mol Pharmaceutics. 2014;11(5):1687–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma MT, Neels OC, Denoyer D, Roselt P, Karas JA, Scanlon DB, et al. Gallium-68 complex of a macrobicyclic cage amine chelator tethered to two integrin-targeting peptides for diagnostic tumor imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;22(10):2093–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Eder M, Schaefer M, Bauder-Wuest U, Hull W-E, Waengler C, Mier W, et al. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012;23(4):688–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Waldron BP, Parker D, Burchardt C, Yufit DS, Zimny M, Roesch F. Structure and stability of hexadentate complexes of ligands based on AAZTA for efficient PET labelling with gallium-68. Chem Commun. 2013;49(6):579–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Knetsch PA, Zhai C, Rangger C, Blatzer M, Haas H, Kaeopookum P, et al. [68Ga]FSC-(RGD)3 a trimeric RGD peptide for imaging αvβ3 integrin expression based on a novel siderophore derived chelating scaffold-synthesis and evaluation. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42(2):115–22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Boros E, Ferreira CL, Cawthray JF, Price EW, Patrick BO, Wester DW, et al. Acyclic chelate with ideal properties for 68Ga PET imaging agent elaboration. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(44):15726–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Boros E, Ferreira CL, Yapp DTT, Gill RK, Price EW, Adam MJ, et al. RGD conjugates of the H2dedpa scaffold: synthesis, labeling and imaging with 68Ga. Nucl Med Biol. 2012;39(6):785–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramogida CF, Cawthray JF, Boros E, Ferreira CL, Patrick BO, Adam MJ, et al. H2 CHXdedpa and H4 CHXoctapa-chiral acyclic chelating ligands for 67/68Ga and 111In radiopharmaceuticals. Inorg Chem. 2015;54(4):2017–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Berry DJ, Ma Y, Ballinger JR, Tavare R, Koers A, Sunassee K, et al. Efficient bifunctional gallium-68 chelators for positron emission tomography: tris(hydroxypyridinone) ligands. Chem Commun. 2011;47(25):7068–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma MT, Cullinane C, Imberti C, Terry SYA, Roselt P, Hicks Rodney J, Blower PJ. New tris(hydroxypyridinone) bifunctional chelators containing isothiocyanate groups provide a versatile platform for rapid one-step labeling and PET imaging with 68Ga3+. Bioconjugate Chem. in press, DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00335.
  36. Merrifield RB. Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85(14):2149–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bycroft BW, Chan WC, Chharbra SR, Hone ND. A novel lysine-protecting procedure for continuous flow solid phase synthesis of branched peptides. Chem Commun. 1993;9:778–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Carpino LA. 1-Hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole. An efficient peptide coupling additive. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115(10):4397–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Carpino LA, Han GY. 9-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl function, a new base-sensitive amino-protecting group. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92(19):5748–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Parry JJ, Eiblmaier M, Andrews R, Meyer LA, Higashikubo R, Anderson CJ, et al. Characterization of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression in stably transfected A-427 human cancer cells. Mol Imaging. 2007;6(1):56–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Paterson BM, Roselt P, Denoyer D, Cullinane C, Binns D, Noonan W, et al. PET imaging of tumours with a 64Cu labeled macrobicyclic cage amine ligand tethered to Tyr3-octreotate. Dalton Trans. 2014;43(3):1386–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schottelius M, Simecek J, Hoffmann F, Willibald M, Schwaiger M, Wester H-J. Twins in spirit—episode I: comparative preclinical evaluation of [68Ga]DOTATATE and [68Ga]HA-DOTATATE. EJNMMI Research. 2015;5(1):1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Reubi JC, Schonbrunn A. Illuminating somatostatin analog action at neuroendocrine tumor receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(12):676–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Waser B, Tamma M-L, Cescato R, Maeke HR, Reubi JC. Highly efficient in vivo agonist-induced internalization of sst2 receptors in somatostatin target tissues. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(6):936–41.Google Scholar
  45. Ginj M, Zhang H, Waser B, Cescato R, Wild D, Wang X, et al. Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists are preferable to agonists for in vivo peptide receptor targeting of tumors. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2006;103(44):16436–41.Google Scholar
  46. Antunes P, Ginj M, Zhang H, Waser B, Baum RP, Reubi JC, et al. Are radiogallium-labelled DOTA-conjugated somatostatin analogues superior to those labelled with other radiometals? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34(7):982–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Froidevaux S, Eberle AN, Christe M, Sumanovski L, Heppeler A, Schmiti JS, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor targeting: study of novel gallium-labeled somatostatin radiopeptides in a rat pancreatic tumor model. Int J Cancer. 2002;98(6):930–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Beauregard J-M, Hofman MS, Kong G, Hicks RJ. The tumour sink effect on the biodistribution of 68Ga-DOTA-octreotate: implications for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(1):50–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ma et al. 2015