Open Access

The diagnostic accuracy of dopamine transporter SPECT imaging to detect nigrostriatal cell loss in patients with Parkinson’s disease or clinically uncertain parkinsonism: a systematic review

  • Sven R Suwijn1Email author,
  • Caroline JM van Boheemen2,
  • Rob J de Haan3,
  • Gerrit Tissingh4,
  • Jan Booij5 and
  • Rob MA de Bie1
EJNMMI Research20155:12

DOI: 10.1186/s13550-015-0087-1

Received: 14 January 2015

Accepted: 19 February 2015

Published: 17 March 2015

Abstract

In specialized movement disorder centers, Parkinson’s disease (PD) is wrongly diagnosed in 6 to 25% of cases. To improve the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis, it is necessary to have a reliable and practical reference standard. Dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography (DAT SPECT) imaging might have the potential (high diagnostic accuracy and practical to use) to act as reference standard in detecting nigrostriatal cell loss in patients with (early stage) parkinsonism. We performed a systematic review to evaluate if DAT SPECT imaging can be used as such. Relevant studies were searched in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Studies were selected when they met the following criteria: (1) all patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of PD or clinically uncertain parkinsonism and (2) the study reported original data. In addition, studies needed to fulfill one of the two following criteria: (1) patients underwent at least one DAT SPECT and had a neuropathological confirmed diagnosis and (2) patients underwent at least two DAT SPECT scans, performed at least 2 years apart. The search identified 1,649 articles. Eight studies fulfilled our selection criteria and were included in this review. There was only one study including patients with diagnostic uncertainty. Sensitivity and specificity of DAT SPECT imaging to detect nigrostriatal cell loss were 98%. The other studies included patients with a diagnosis of PD in whom there was no uncertainty. In these studies, sensitivity was 100%. Our systematic review indicates that DAT SPECT imaging seems to be accurate to detect nigrostriatal cell loss in patients with parkinsonism.

Keywords

Diagnostic accuracy Clinical diagnosis Parkinson’s disease Parkinsonism Dopamine transporter Single-photon emission computed tomography Nigrostriatal cell loss

Review

Introduction

Parkinsonism is a clinical syndrome characterized by bradykinesia and at least one of the following symptoms: rest tremor, muscular rigidity, and postural instability. Parkinsonism is most commonly caused by idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1,2]. However, parkinsonism is also a prominent feature in, for example, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), psychogenic parkinsonism, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), vascular parkinsonism, and drug-induced parkinsonism. There is no definite test to confirm the cause of parkinsonism in clinical practice, except for the vascular causes of parkinsonism. Therefore, diagnostic criteria have been developed in the past 20 years [3-6]. Although the diagnosis is straightforward when patients have a classic presentation, establishing the cause of parkinsonism can be challenging, especially in early stages [7,8]. In specialized movement disorder centers, PD is wrongly diagnosed in 6 to 25% of cases [4,9-11]. General neurologists may even make a misdiagnosis up to 35% [7]. In a community-based study in Wales, only 53% of patients, treated with antiparkinson medication in primary care, met the Queen Square Brain Bank criteria for the clinical diagnosis of PD when reexamined by an experienced movement disorder specialist [12].

The different causes of parkinsonism can be classified into two distinct groups; diseases with nigrostriatal cell loss (e.g., PD, MSA, PSP, and DLB) and diseases without nigrostriatal cell loss (e.g., psychogenic parkinsonism, dystonic tremor, dopa-responsive dystonia, and drug-induced parkinsonism). This classification is of clinical importance since the prognosis is considerably worse in parkinsonism characterized by loss of nigrostriatal cells [13]. Patients without nigrostriatal cell loss, except for dopa-responsive dystonia, do not benefit from treatment with dopaminomimetics and require different treatment [5,13,14].

The current reference standard (or gold standard) of parkinsonism is pathological evaluation. Although accurate, it is not a practical standard for the validation of new diagnostic tools because the time between diagnosis and death is often decades. Therefore, there is a need for an alternative in vivo reference standard to detect nigrostriatal dopaminergic cell loss in patients with parkinsonism.

Several different diagnostic tools have been evaluated in their ability to detect nigrostriatal cell loss. The most widely used tests are dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography (DAT SPECT), [18 F]DOPA positron emission tomography (PET), and transcranial sonography (TCS).

Tests used in establishing the cause of Parkinsonism

PET is a radiotracer-based method that can assess the in vivo function of the dopaminergic and other neurotransmitter systems. [18 F]DOPA PET is a reliable tool to establish nigrostriatal cell loss but not very practical in clinical practice because the technique is only available in a limited number of centers, is expensive, and expertise in cerebral PET imaging is essential [15,16].

DAT SPECT imaging - a practical, less expensive, and more widely available technique than [18 F]DOPA PET - has been incorporated in most centers as diagnostic tool [17,18]. DAT tracers like [123I]FP-CIT are typically used. Recent studies have shown that DAT SPECT imaging might be a sensitive method to establish nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration [19-24]. For example, people with subclinical and even preclinical PD already have clear deficits of the nigrostriatal pathway [21,25-28]. Also, if the scan does not show a nigrostriatal deficit, it is highly unlikely that the patient suffers from symptoms caused by nigrostriatal cell loss [11,29,30]. SPECT with tracers labeling postsynaptic dopamine D2/3 receptors (e.g., [123I]Iodobenzamide or [123I]Iodobenzofuran) shows a relatively low diagnostic accuracy, 59 to 80% sensitivity and 46 to 50% specificity in differentiating PD from non-neurodegenerative diseases [31].

Hyperechogenicity in the area of the midbrain has been consistently found in 79 to 90% of patients with PD using TCS [27,32-36]. However, in 6 to 12% of healthy volunteers, hyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra is also found [33,36,37]. This is even higher (16%) in patients with essential tremor [38].

To summarize, DAT SPECT imaging appears to be the most suitable candidate to act as reference standard in detecting nigrostriatal cell loss in patients with (early stage) parkinsonism. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DAT SPECT imaging.

Methods

Literature search

We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE using the entire time scale up to July 2013. Both search strategies are included in Additional file 1. Furthermore, we searched the reference lists of all relevant articles to identify additional published studies for possible inclusion in the review. We did not impose any language restrictions.

Selection of studies

The list of titles and abstracts was screened by two independent reviewers (SRS and CVB) for eligible studies.

Studies were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) all patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of PD or clinically uncertain parkinsonism and (2) the study reported original data. In addition, studies needed to fulfill one of the two following criteria: (1) patients underwent at least one DAT SPECT during their life and had postmortem neuropathological evaluation or (2) patients underwent at least two DAT SPECT scans, performed at least 2 years apart. We anticipated that there were only a few studies with DAT SPECT imaging and neuropathological evaluation as reference test (gold standard) available. Therefore, we also included studies that used a second DAT SPECT scan.

The interval of 2 years was chosen to make sure the second DAT SPECT scan would detect any nigrostriatal cell loss. With an annual decline of 5.5 to 7.1% of dopaminergic neurons in PD and even more in atypical parkinsonian syndromes, a scan at least 2 years later would show a marked decline if nigrostriatal cell loss was present but not visible on the baseline scan [23,39].

All study designs were included with the exception of case reports, case series (less than five patients), and case-control studies. We did not impose restrictions regarding the type of radiotracer used (e.g., [123I]FP-CIT or [123I]β-CIT). If investigators published several reports based on data from a single study population, we selected the most complete report. Articles were excluded if information on diagnostic accuracy (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) could not be derived from the data and could not be obtained from the authors. In all cases, disagreements about study selection were resolved by consensus and a third reviewer (JB) was consulted if disagreement persisted.

Data extraction and risk of bias

Data were extracted by the two reviewers (SRS and CVB) independently using an extraction form designed for this review. We extracted data on the diagnostic accuracy of the studies, the baseline characteristics of studied patients (e.g., disease duration, age at imaging, Hoehn and Yahr score, and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale score). We also extracted data on the SPECT technique, which radiotracer was used, handling of DAT interfering medication, patient preparation, test interpretation, technical failures, and assessors (e.g., knowledge of other test results). Results were compared, and discrepancies between the two reviewers were resolved in a meeting.

The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS 2) checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. The QUADAS 2 tool is structured in a series of questions which should be answered ‘yes’, ‘no’, or ‘unclear’ and aims to evaluate the risk of different types of bias [40].

Statistical analysis and data synthesis

For each study, patient and study characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Diagnostic accuracy was described in terms of sensitivity and specificity rates with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We did not perform a meta-analysis because we included a heterogeneous group of patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD as well as with clinically uncertain parkinsonism in this review. This alters the spectrum of disease and non-disease in the population, which may have strong impact on test accuracy.

Results

Literature search and study selection

Figure 1 shows the results of the Additional file 1 search and the study selection. We identified 2,239 articles. After duplicate removal, 1,649 articles remained. A total of 1,632 articles were excluded because they did not fulfill our selection criteria. The large majority of these studies were excluded because they did not employ multiple DAT SPECT scans or neuropathological evaluation. Seventeen articles were selected for further review. Of these, five were excluded because the study population overlapped with more complete or more recent publications. We contacted the authors of five additional studies that had missing data [41-44]. One author responded [23]. The other four articles were excluded. In the end, eight studies fulfilled our selection criteria.
Figure 1

Flowchart of eligible studies.

Study characteristics

The characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. The eight included studies involved a total of 235 patients. There was only one study that assessed patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism [45], all other studies included patients with a clinical diagnosis of PD (five studies) or pathologically proven PD (two studies). The mean disease duration at first SPECT imaging ranged from 2.4 to 7.9 years.
Table 1

Patient and study characteristics

Author, year

Number of patients

Target population

Inclusion criteria

Prospective or retrospective?

Reference standard

Mean disease duration at 1st scan (y ± SD)

Mean age at imaging (y ± SD)

Mean Hoehn and Yahr score

Mean UPDRS motor score at imaging (OFF state, 0 to 108)

Mean follow-up between scans (y + SD)

Radiotracer

SPECT judged visually, template or drawn

Drug stopped appropriate before SPECT?

SPECT judged blindly for results of reference standard?

Chouker, 2001 [20]

8

Clinical PD

Step 1 + 2 UKPDS criteria + response to dopaminomimetics

Prospective

2nd DAT SPECT

3.6¥, 1 to 6*

57.0, 40 to 76*

2.0 ± 0.8

-

2.0

IPT

Template

Unclear

Unclear

Marek, 2001 [22]

32

Clinical PD

Step 1 + 2 UKPDS criteria

Prospective

2nd DAT SPECT

2.5¥ ± 2.4

60.0 ± 11.7

1.8 ± 0.7

18.2 ± 8.7

2.3 ± 0.9

Beta

Drawn

Unclear

Yes

Pirker, 2002 [23]

36

Clinical PD

Step 1 + 2 UKPDS criteria

Prospective

2nd DAT SPECT

4.7¥ ± 2.9

60.0 ± 11.0

2.1 ± 0.4

-

2.2 ± 0.3

Beta

Drawn

Yes

Yes

Marshall, 2009 [49]

99

Clinically uncertain parkinsonism

Step 1 UKPDS criteria

Prospective

2nd DAT SPECT

2.4ǂ

60.8 ± 4.8

1.5 ± 0.3

9.6 ± 1.3

3.0

fpcit

Visual

Yes

Yes

Isaias, 2010 [48]

13

Clinical PD

Steps 1 to 3 UKPDS criteria

Prospective

2nd DAT SPECT

5.0¥ ± 2.8

63.4 ± 8.5

-

17.2 ± 6.0

3.2 ± 1.0

fpcit

Template

Yes

Unclear

Perju-Dumbrava, 2012 [46]

8

Pathologically proven PD

Neuropathological diagnosis of PD + DAT scan during lifetime

Retrospective

Pathological evaluation

4.1¥ ± 4.8

68.0 ± 7.2

-

-

3.7 ± 3.0ʠ

Beta

Drawn

Unclear

Unclear

Colloby, 2012 [47]

12

Pathologically proven PDD

PDD according to McKeith criteria + DAT scan during lifetime

Retrospective

Pathological evaluation

7.9¥ ± 6.3

70.8 ± 4.3

-

35.8 ± 11.9

3.3 ± 1.7ʠ

fpcit

Template

Unclear

Unclear

Eggers, 2012 [45]

27

Clinical PD

Steps 1 to 3 UKPDS criteria

Retrospective

2nd DAT SPECT

3.9¥

61.7 ± 11.2

-

25.9 ± 5.2

2.5 ± 0.7

fpcit

Template

Yes

Yes

PD, Parkinson’s Disease; SD, standard deviation; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale; beta, [123I] β-carboxymethyoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl) tropane; fpcit, [123I]-fluoropropyl-carbomethoxy-3β-4-iodophenyltropane; IPT, 123I-N-(3-iodopropen-2-yl)-2-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-chlorophenyl) tropane; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; CI, confidence interval; PDD, Parkinson’s disease dementia; DAT, dopamine transporter; UKPDS, United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease society.

*Full range instead of standard deviation.

¥Disease duration calculated from diagnosis.

ǂDisease duration calculated from first symptoms.

ʠIn this study, the interval is referring to the time between DAT SPECT imaging and pathological evaluation.

Two studies used pathological evaluation as the reference standard [46,47]. The other six studies used a second DAT SPECT scan, at least 2 years later, as surrogate reference standard [20,22,23,45,48,49]. The studies using pathological evaluation were retrospective studies. All but one of the studies that used a second DAT SPECT scan was prospective studies.

Risk of bias

The risk of bias in the included studies is shown in Table 2. Most studies had at least one design flaw. Five out of the eight studies had an unclear or a high risk of bias regarding patient selection due to a poor description of patient recruitment. In three out of eight studies, there was a concern regarding patient flow. There was a selection of patients that received the reference standard (second DAT SPECT or pathological evaluation). In two studies, we found previous reports with more patients than the ones selected. However, the reasons for exclusion of the extra patients were not mentioned in the manuscript. In four of the eight studies, it was unclear if the assessor of the index test was blinded for the results of the reference test and/or clinical diagnosis.
Table 2

Risk of bias as assessed with the Quadas-2 tool

Study

Risk of bias

Applicability concerns

Patient selection

Index test

Reference standard

Flow and timing

Patient selection

Index test

Reference standard

Chouker, [20]

+

?

?

+

+

+

+

Marek, [22]

?

+

+

+

+

+

Pirker, [23]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Marshall, [49]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Isaias, [48]

?

?

?

+

+

+

Perju-Dumbrava, [46]

?

?

+

+

+

+

Colloby, [47]

?

?

+

+

+

+

Eggers, [50]

+

+

+

+

+

+Low risk, −High risk, ?Unclear Risk.

Diagnostic accuracy

Only in the study of patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism, a high diagnostic accuracy of DAT SPECT imaging was observed with sensitivity and specificity rates of 98%. Only in two out of 99 patients, DAT SPECT results at follow-up differed compared to the initial DAT SPECT scan [49]. In the other seven studies - that included patients with a clinical or neuropathological diagnosis of PD - DAT SPECT imaging had sensitivity rates of 100%. In six of these seven studies, specificity rates could not be calculated as the reference tests indicated all patients had nigrostriatal cell loss. In the study of Marek and colleagues, 30 patients showed nigrostriatal cell loss at imaging and two did not. Sensitivity and specificity rates were both 100%. An important finding of all seven studies is that the results did not change in the course of 2.0 to 3.7 years.

Discussion

Our study indicates that DAT SPECT imaging may be accurate in detecting the loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic cells. As anticipated, there are only two studies having both DAT SPECT imaging and pathological evaluation. None of these studies performed DAT SPECT imaging in early-stage clinical PD or in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism. However, these two studies show that DAT SPECT imaging at medium-long disease duration (4.1 to 7.9 years) is able to detect nigrostriatal cell loss [46,47].

A limitation of this review is that the majority of included studies performed serial DAT SPECT imaging in patients with a high suspicion of PD. These studies were designed to measure disease progression. In one of the studies, two patients had a negative reference standard. In the other studies, all included patients had a positive reference standard and consequently specificity rates of the index test could not be calculated. However, these results are inline with the only study that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy in patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism (sensitivity and specificity 98%).

Another limitation is that in four studies it is not clear whether the investigators assessing the SPECT images were blinded for signs and symptoms or for the reference standard.

Other (systematic) reviews on the accuracy of DAT SPECT imaging showed somewhat lower sensitivity (79 to 100%) and specificity (80 to 100%) [18,50,51]. These reviews used the clinical diagnosis at follow-up as reference standard. The clinical diagnosis is accurate in 65 to 94% of the patients compared to the final pathological diagnosis [4,9-11]. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis increases with the duration of symptoms [49,52]. However, most studies and clinical trials use the clinical diagnosis 3 to 36 months after the initial diagnosis as reference standard [53-56]. This inaccurate reference standard might explain that the accuracy of DAT SPECT imaging is somewhat lower in these studies.

Therefore, there is a need for an alternative in vivo reference standard to detect nigrostriatal dopaminergic cell loss in patients with parkinsonism. To evaluate new screening methods, and ultimately the accuracy of the clinical criteria for (early) PD, a reliable and practical reference standard to detect nigrostriatal cell loss is needed [57-60]. The current reference standard (gold standard), pathological evaluation, is accurate, however, not very practical to use to evaluate the accuracy of the clinical criteria because the time between the clinical diagnosis and pathological diagnosis is typically long.

For clinical trials, it will be better and more practical to have an accurate in vivo reference standard to ensure no patients with other diagnoses are included. If disease-modifying therapies become available, it will also be desirable to identify patients as early as possible, maybe even in a premotor phase [61,62]. Especially considering that using the clinical criteria, based on motor symptoms, more than 50% of the dopamine producing neurons are lost [61,62].

Conclusions

It seems that DAT SPECT imaging could be used as an in vivo reference standard to detect nigrostriatal cell loss and evaluate new diagnostic (screening) methods. However, considering only one study included patients with diagnostic uncertainty more diagnostic accuracy studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
(2)
Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden
(3)
Department of Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
(4)
Department of Neurology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad
(5)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam

References

  1. de Rijk MC, Tzourio C, Breteler MM, Dartigues JF, Amaducci L, Lopez-Pouza S, et al. Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study. European Community Concerted Action on the Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62:10–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. de Lau LM, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:181–4.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Lees AJ. Improved accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Lewy body Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 2001;57:1497–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jankovic J. Diagnosis and treatment of psychogenic parkinsonism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:1300–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shin DH, Lee PH, Bang OY, Joo IS, Huh K. Clinical implications of cardiac-MIBG SPECT in the differentiation of Parkinsonian Syndromes. J Clin Neurol. 2006;2:51–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jankovic J, Rajput AH, McDermott MP, Perl DP. The evolution of diagnosis in early Parkinson disease. Parkinson Study Group Arch Neurol. 2000;57:369–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tolosa E, Wenning G, Poewe W. The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:75–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ravina B, Marek K, Eberly S, Oakes D, Kurlan R, Ascherio A, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging is associated with long-term outcomes in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2012;27:1392–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Litvan I, MacIntyre A, Goetz CG, Wenning GK, Jellinger K, Verny M, et al. Accuracy of the clinical diagnoses of Lewy body disease, Parkinson disease, and dementia with Lewy bodies: a clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:969–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lees AJ. The accuracy of diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes in a specialist movement disorder service. Brain. 2002;125:861–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Meara J, Bhowmick BK, Hobson P. Accuracy of diagnosis in patients with presumed Parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing. 1999;28:99–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mian OS, Schneider SA, Schwingenschuh P, Bhatia KP, Day BL. Gait in SWEDDs patients: comparison with Parkinson’s disease patients and healthy controls. Mov Disord. 2011;26:1266–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim JS, Oh YS, Kim YI, Yang DW, Chung YA, You IR, et al. Combined use of [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy and dopamine transporter (DAT) positron emission tomography (PET) predicts prognosis in drug-induced Parkinsonism (DIP): a 2-year follow-up study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;56:124–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Whone AL, Watts RL, Stoessl AJ, Davis M, Reske S, Nahmias C, et al. Slower progression of Parkinson’s disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: the REAL-PET study. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:93–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Morrish PK, Sawle GV, Brooks DJ. Clinical and [18 F] dopa PET findings in early Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;59:597–600.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. De la Fuente-Fernandez R. Role of DaTSCAN and clinical diagnosis in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2012;78:696–701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vlaar AM, van Kroonenburgh MJ, Kessels AG, Weber WE. Meta-analysis of the literature on diagnostic accuracy of SPECT in parkinsonian syndromes. BMC Neurol. 2007;7:27.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Benamer TS, Patterson J, Grosset DG, Booij J, de Bruin K, van Royen E. Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]-FP-CIT SPECT imaging: the [123I]-FP-CIT study group. Mov Disord. 2000;15:503–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chouker M, Tatsch K, Linke R, Pogarell O, Hahn K, Schwarz J. Striatal dopamine transporter binding in early to moderately advanced Parkinson’s disease: monitoring of disease progression over 2 years. Nucl Med Commun. 2001;22:721–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fahn S, Oakes D, Shoulson I, Kieburtz K, Rudolph A, Lang A, et al. Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2498–508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marek K, Innis R, van Dyck C, Fussell B, Early M, Eberly S, et al. [123I]beta-CIT SPECT imaging assessment of the rate of Parkinson’s disease progression. Neurology. 2001;57:2089–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pirker W, Djamshidian S, Asenbaum S, Gerschlager W, Tribl G, Hoffmann M, et al. Progression of dopaminergic degeneration in Parkinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonism: a longitudinal beta-CIT SPECT study. Mov Disord. 2002;17:45–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Staffen W, Mair A, Unterrainer J, Trinka E, Ladurner G. Measuring the progression of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease with [123I] beta-CIT SPECT. J Neural Transm. 2000;107:543–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Berendse HW, Booij J, Francot CM, Bergmans PL, Hijman R, Stoof JC, et al. Subclinical dopaminergic dysfunction in asymptomatic Parkinson’s disease patients’ relatives with a decreased sense of smell. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:34–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Iranzo A, Lomena F, Stockner H, Valldeoriola F, Vilaseca I, Salamero M, et al. Decreased striatal dopamine transporter uptake and substantia nigra hyperechogenicity as risk markers of synucleinopathy in patients with idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: a prospective study [corrected]. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1070–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sommer U, Hummel T, Cormann K, Mueller A, Frasnelli J, Kropp J, et al. Detection of presymptomatic Parkinson’s disease: combining smell tests, transcranial sonography, and SPECT. Mov Disord. 2004;19:1196–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stiasny-Kolster K, Doerr Y, Moller JC, Hoffken H, Behr TM, Oertel WH, et al. Combination of ‘idiopathic’ REM sleep behaviour disorder and olfactory dysfunction as possible indicator for alpha-synucleinopathy demonstrated by dopamine transporter FP-CIT-SPECT. Brain. 2005;128:126–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cilia R, Rossi C, Frosini D, Volterrani D, Siri C, Pagni C, et al. Dopamine transporter SPECT imaging in Corticobasal Syndrome. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18301.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scherfler C, Schwarz J, Antonini A, Grosset D, Valldeoriola F, Marek K, et al. Role of DAT-SPECT in the diagnostic work up of parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1229–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vlaar AM, de Nijs T, Kessels AG, Vreeling FW, Winogrodzka A, Mess WH, et al. Diagnostic value of [123I]-ioflupane and [123I]-iodobenzamide SPECT scans in 248 patients with parkinsonian syndromes. Eur Neurol. 2008;59:258–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Becker G, Seufert J, Bogdahn U, Reichmann H, Reiners K. Degeneration of substantia nigra in chronic Parkinson’s disease visualized by transcranial color-coded real-time sonography. Neurology. 1995;45:182–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Berg D, Godau J, Walter U. Transcranial sonography in movement disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:1044–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stockner H, Schwingenschuh P, Djamshidian A, Silveira-Moriyama L, Katschnig P, Seppi K, et al. Is transcranial sonography useful to distinguish scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit patients from Parkinson’s disease? Mov Disord. 2012;27:1182–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gaenslen A, Unmuth B, Godau J, Liepelt I, Di Santo A, Schweitzer KJ, et al. The specificity and sensitivity of transcranial ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease: a prospective blinded study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:417–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Izawa MO, Miwa H, Kajimoto Y, Kondo T. Combination of transcranial sonography, olfactory testing, and MIBG myocardial scintigraphy as a diagnostic indicator for Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:411–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vlaar AM, Bouwmans A, Mess WH, Tromp SC, Weber WE. Transcranial duplex in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2009;256:530–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stockner H, Sojer M, Seppi KK, Mueller J, Wenning GK, Schmidauer C, et al. Midbrain sonography in patients with essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2007;22:414–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrish PK, Rakshi JS, Bailey DL, Sawle GV, Brooks DJ. Measuring the rate of progression and estimating the preclinical period of Parkinson’s disease with [18 F]dopa PET. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64:314–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallet S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Catafau AM, Vander BT TE, DaTSCAN Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndromes Study Group. Impact of dopamine transporter SPECT using 123I-Ioflupane on diagnosis and management of patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord. 2004;19:1175–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Parkinson Study Group. Dopamine transporter brain imaging to assess the effects of pramipexole vs levodopa on Parkinson disease progression. JAMA. 2002;287:1653–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Parkinson Study Group. Mixed lineage kinase inhibitor CEP-1347 fails to delay disability in early Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2007;69:1480–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Bender A, Koch W, Elstner M, Schombacher Y, Bender J, Moeschl M, et al. Creatine supplementation in Parkinson disease: a placebo-controlled randomized pilot trial. Neurology. 2006;67:1262–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Eggers C, Pedrosa DJ, Kahraman D, Maier F, Lewis CJ, Fink GR, et al. Parkinson subtypes progress differently in clinical course and imaging pattern. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46813.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Perju-Dumbrava LD, Kovacs GG, Pirker S, Jellinger K, Hoffmann M, Asenbaum S, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging in autopsy-confirmed Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord. 2012;27:65–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Colloby SJ, McParland S, O'Brien JT, Attems J. Neuropathological correlates of dopaminergic imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementias. Brain. 2012;135:2798–808.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Isaias IU, Marotta G, Hirano S, Canesi M, Benti R, Righini A, et al. Imaging essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010;25:679–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Marshall VL, Reininger CB, Marquardt M, Patterson J, Hadley DM, Oertel WH, et al. Parkinson’s disease is overdiagnosed clinically at baseline in diagnostically uncertain cases: a 3-year European multicenter study with repeat [123I]FP-CIT SPECT. Mov Disord. 2009;24:500–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Bajaj N, Hauser RA, Grachev ID. Clinical utility of dopamine transporter single photon emission CT (DaT-SPECT) with [123I] ioflupane in diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:1288–95.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kagi G, Bhatia KP, Tolosa E. The role of DAT-SPECT in movement disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:5–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bajaj NP, Gontu V, Birchall J, Patterson J, Grosset DG, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in tremulous parkinsonian patients: a blinded video study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1223–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tolosa E, Borght TV, Moreno E. Accuracy of DaTSCAN ([123I]-Ioflupane) SPECT in diagnosis of patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonism: 2-year follow-up of an open-label study. Mov Disord. 2007;22:2346–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ziebell M, Andersen BB, Thomsen G, Pinborg LH, Karlsborg M, Hasselbach SG, et al. Predictive value of dopamine transporter SPECT imaging with [123I]PE2I in patients with subtle parkinsonian symptoms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:242–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jennings D, Siderowf A, Stern M, Seibyl J, Eberly S, Oakes D, et al. Imaging prodromal Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2014;83:1739–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Bajaj N, Hauser RA, Seibyl J, Kupsch A, Plotkin M, Chen C, et al. Association between Hoehn and Yahr, Mini-Mental State Examination, age, and clinical syndrome predominance and diagnostic effectiveness of ioflupane I 123 injection (DaTSCAN™) in subjects with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes. Alzheimer’s ResTherapy. 2014;6:67.Google Scholar
  57. Stephenson R, Siderowf A, Stern MB. Premotor Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and detection strategies. Mov Disord. 2009;24:S665–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lang AE. A critical appraisal of the premotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: potential usefulness in early diagnosis and design of neuroprotective trials. Mov Disord. 2011;26:775–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Siderowf A, Lang AE. Premotor Parkinson’s disease: concepts and definitions. Mov Disord. 2012;27:608–16.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Mahlknecht P, Poewe W. Is there a need to redefine Parkinson’s disease? J Neural Transm. 2013;9:S9–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Langston JW. Predicting Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1990;40:S4.Google Scholar
  62. Hornykiewicz O, Kish SJ. Biochemical pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol. 1987;45:19–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Suwijn et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.