Comparative study of 64Cu/NOTA-[D-Tyr6,βAla11,Thi13,Nle14]BBN(6-14) monomer and dimers for prostate cancer PET imaging
© Fournier et al; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 26 September 2011
Accepted: 14 February 2012
Published: 14 February 2012
Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors [GRPR] are highly over-expressed in multiple cancers and have been studied as a diagnostic target. Multimeric gastrin-releasing peptides are expected to have enhanced tumor uptake and affinity for GRPR. In this study, a 64Cu-labeled 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid [NOTA]-monomer and two NOTA-dimers of [D-Tyr6,βAla11, Thi13, Nle14]bombesin(6-14) ] [BBN(6-14)] were compared.
Monomeric and dimeric peptides were synthesized on solid phase support and radiolabeled with 64Cu. NOTA-dimer 1 consists of asymmetrically linked BBN(6-14), while NOTA-dimer 2 has similar spacer between the two BBN(6-14) ligands and the chelator. In vitro GRPR-binding affinities were determined with competitive binding assays on PC3 human prostate cancer cells. In vivo stability and biodistribution of radiolabeled compounds were assessed in Balb/c mice. Cellular uptake and efflux were measured with radiolabeled NOTA-monomer and NOTA-dimer 2 on PC3 cells for up to 4 h. In vivo biodistribution kinetics were measured in PC3 tumor-bearing Balb/c nude mice by μ-positron emission tomography [μPET] imaging and confirmed by dissection and counting.
NOTA-monomer, NOTA-dimers 1 and 2 were prepared with purity of 99%. The inhibition constants of the three BBN peptides were comparable and in the low nanomolar range. All 64Cu-labeled peptides were stable up to 24 h in mouse plasma and 1 h in vivo. 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 featuring a longer spacer between the two BBN(6-14) ligands is a more potent GRPR-targeting probe than 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 1. PC3 tumor uptake profiles are slightly different for 64Cu/NOTA-monomer and 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2; the monomeric BBN-peptide tracer exhibited higher tumor uptake during the first 0.5 h and a fast renal clearance resulting in higher tumor-to-muscle ratio when compared to 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2. The latter exhibited higher tumor-to-blood ratio and was retained longer at the tumor site when compared to 64Cu/NOTA-monomer. Lower ratios of tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle in blocking experiments showed GRPR-dependant tumor uptake for both tracers.
Both 64Cu/NOTA-monomer and 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 are suitable for detecting GRPR-positive prostate cancer in vivo by PET. Tumor retention was improved in vivo with 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 by applying polyvalency effect and/or statistical rebinding.
KeywordsBombesin homo-dimer 64Cu PET imaging gastrin-releasing peptide receptors PC3 tumor.
Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths for males in the USA. One promising approach in prostate cancer diagnosis is the utilization of target-specific radiolabeled peptides for positron emission tomography [PET] imaging. Previous researches have shown that bombesin [BBN] analogs can be used to target gastrin-releasing peptide receptors [GRPR] with high affinity and selectivity. Gastrin-releasing peptide [GRP] is a 27-amino acid peptide that displays a wide range of physiological effects, including gastric and pancreatic secretions, nervous system stimulation, smooth muscle contraction, blood pressure and the regulation of cell growth in some malignant cell lines [1, 2]. The presence of GRPR has been documented in small cell lung cancers , prostate cancers [4, 5], breast cancers [6–8] and others . In prostate cancer, the GRPR expression has been tied to neoplastic transformation , cell migration [11, 12], proliferation [10, 13] and invasion capacity [14–16]. GRPR is overexpressed on 84% of all human prostate cancers according to a study by Markwalder and Reubi . These receptors represent an interesting molecular target for radiolabeled BBN analogs as diagnostic or radiotherapeutic applications for prostate cancer. BBN, a 14-amino acid-potent GRPR agonist found in the skin of the fire-bellied toad Bombina bombina, was first described by Anastasi et al. . BBN is involved in regulating exocrine secretion, smooth muscle contraction and gastrointestinal hormone release , and it is widely expressed in the central nervous system . [D-Tyr6,βAla11, Thi13, Nle14]BBN(6-14) [BBN(6-14)] is a potent modified GRPR agonist peptide that binds to GRPR with high affinity . Various BBN analogs have been labeled with radiometals and used for PET imaging of GRPR-positive tumors. Schuhmacher et al. labeled a 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N, N', N'', N'''-tretraacetic acid [DOTA]-PEG [polyethylene glycol]2-BBN(6-14) with 68Ga  for PET imaging, while Chen et al. used DOTA-Lys3-bombesin with 64Cu . Smith et al. successfully labeled modified BBN(7-14) analogs with 64Cu for potential use in diagnostic imaging using 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid [NOTA] or NO2A as chelating agents and obtained stable compounds [23, 24].
To improve peptide-binding affinity, a multivalency approach has been introduced . Traditionally, this approach involves the use of peptide homodimers or homomultimers in which peptide ligands of the same type are constructed with suitable linkers. The key for bivalency, binding to two receptors at the same time, is the distance between the two peptide motifs. The ability of a dimer peptide to achieve bivalency depends also on the receptor density . If the receptor density is very high, the distance between two neighboring receptor sites will be short, which makes it easier for the dimer peptide to achieve the bivalency. While GRPR density on PC3 tumor cells is widely documented in vitro and in vivo, its expression is heterogeneous making it difficult to establish an average distance between the receptors . Even if the distance between the two peptide motifs is not optimal, the local BBN peptide levels may still be high in the vicinity of GRPR sites once the first BBN ligand is bound. The detachment of the dual action ligand from the receptor is more likely to be followed by re-attachment if there are GRPR binding copies close to it, resulting in higher receptor affinity for homodimers and better tumor uptake with longer tumor retention . Potential benefits of multimeric targeting peptides are accepted, but many questions concerning the mechanisms are still to be answered. A few studies on BBN-based homodimers have been reported with varying results. Carrithers and Lerner observed modest improvement in affinity for GRPR with their homodimer , while Gawlak et al. noted no difference in affinity between their monomer and homodimer . Abiraj et al. observed higher cellular uptake and retention of their homodimers radiolabeled with 177Lu on GRPR-over-expressing PC3 cells .
All chemicals and solvents (reagent grade) were used as supplied from the vendors cited below without further purification, unless otherwise noted. NovaSyn® TGR resin and Sieber amide resin were obtained from EDM/NovaBiochem(Gibbstown, NJ, USA). Fmoc-protected amino acids and benzotriazol-1-yl-oxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate [PyBOP] were obtained from EMD NovaBiochem® (Gibbstown, NJ, USA) or Chem-Impex International Inc. (Wood Dale, IL, USA). 1,4,7-Triazacyclononane was obtained from TCI America (Portland, OR, USA). 2-(1H-7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate [HATU] was purchased from Chem-Impex International Inc., and 6-Chloro-1-hydroxy-1H-benzotriazole [ClHOBT] was purchased from ChemPep (Wellington, FL, USA) and Matrix Innovation (Quebec, QC, CA). 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid [HEPES], amphothericin B, Ham's F-12, phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], trypsin, penicillin, streptomycin and fetal bovine serum were purchased from Wisent (St-Bruno, Quebec, Canada). N, N-Diisopropylethylamine [DIEA], thioanisole were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Bovine serum albumin [BSA] and bombesin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company (Saint-Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile [MeCN], dichloromethane [DCM], N, N-dimetylformamide [DMF] and isopropyl alcohol were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). 125I-bombesin was purchased from Perkin Elmer Life Science Products (Boston, MA, USA). Finally, T47D human breast cancer and PC3 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). DMF was dried over 4 Å molecular sieves at least 1 week to remove trace amount of amine present in the solvent and filtered before its use.
We recently reported the synthesis, the characterization and the biological activity of NOTA-BBN(6-14) peptide  . The general procedure for the preparation of NOTA-BBN(6-14) dimers on solid support is summarized in Figure 2. The south BBN peptide segment was synthesized on amide Sieber resin by a continuous flow method on a Pioneer™ Peptide Synthesis System (PerSeptive Biosystems; Framingham, MA, USA) using the Fmoc strategy. A two-fold excess of Fmoc-protected amino acid over available resin substitution sites was used for coupling in amine-free DMF. Fmoc-protected amino acids were activated for coupling with an equi-molar amount of HATU and two equivalents of DIEA. Fmoc deprotection was performed in 20% piperidine in DMF and monitored through absorbance at 364 nm. The resin was washed three times with DMF, MeOH, DMF, MeOH and DCM, subsequently. The partially protected peptide-resin was swelled in 2 mL of DMF and, then, treated with 3 mL of DMF containing succinic anhydride (10 equivalents) and DIEA (10 equivalents). This coupling procedure was performed twice (30 min and 1 h). The resin was washed as described above, and the desired peptide was cleaved from the support by treatment with a cocktail of 4% trifluoroacetic acid [TFA] in10 mL DCM at room temperature under mechanical agitation for 3 min. The solution was filtered into a flask containing 5% Et3N in MeOH. The cleavage step was repeated 10 times. Combined filtrates containing the partially protected peptide were evaporated under reduced pressure to 5% of the volume. Cold water (40 mL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was cooled with ice to aid the precipitation of the product. The precipitated peptides were centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 15 min. The water solution was decanted, and the white solid was dried under vacuum. Purity of the crude peptide was verified by high performance liquid chromatography [HPLC] and, its identity was confirmed by API 3000 LC/MS/MS (Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX, Concord, Ontario Canada).
The north BBN peptide segment was synthesized on NovaSyn® TGR resin and the automated system following the procedure described above. After completion of the BBN fragment, the Fmoc-NH-(PEG)1-CO2H and Fmoc (ivDde)Lys-OH were coupled manually to the peptide on resin. The Fmoc-NH-(PEG)1-CO2H (2.5 equivalents) was dissolved in 2 mL of DMF at 0°C, DIEA (2.5 equivalents) and PyBOP (2.5 equivalents) were added to the cold solution. After 15 min of stirring, the mixture was added to the partially protected peptide-resin pre-swelled with DCM and mixed with ClHOBt (2.5 equivalents) and DIEA (2.5 equivalents), while mechanical agitation was maintained for 2 h at room temperature. The resin was washed three times with DMF, MeOH, DMF, MeOH and DCM, subsequently. Fmoc deprotection was performed in 20% piperidine in DMF during 15 min, and the resin was washed as described above. For the preparation of the NOTA-dimer 1, steps 1 and 2 of Figure 2 were not performed. The Fmoc-Lys(ivDde)-OH was dissolved in 2 mL of DMF at 0°C, and HATU (2.5 equivalents) was added to the cold solution. The mixture was added to the partially protected peptide-resin pre-swelled with DCM and DIEA (2.5 equivalents) and, then, mechanically stirred for 1 h. The resin, the Fmoc group and the last Fmoc-NH-(PEG)1-CO2H were respectively washed, deprotected and coupled as described above. The resulting N-terminal Fmoc was deprotected in 20% piperidine in DMF for 15 min, and the resin was washed as described above. The coupling and the Fmoc deprotection steps were followed by a Kaiser's test on resin; the reaction between resin and ninhydrin was followed colorimetrically whereby free primary amines after Fmoc deprotection were detected as blue beads, and their absence as yellow beads. The resin was washed as described above.
Coupling of the north BBN segment to the south peptide
The solution of HO-Suc-partially protected-BBN(6-14) was activated with PyBOP (1.5 equivalents), ClHOBt (1.5 equivalents) and DIEA (3 equivalents) in DMF:NMP (1:1 v/v). The pre-activation mixture was stirred for 15 min and, then, added to the NH2-PEG-Lys(ivDde)-(PEG)-Gly-BBN-peptide on TGR resin pre-swelled in DMF (2 mL). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 12 h at room temperature under mechanical agitation. The coupling was performed twice with another equivalent of the HO-Suc-partially protected-BBN(6-14). After the north BBN segment coupling, the NOTA group was built on solid phase as described previously by our group . The resin was washed as described above, and the peptide was deprotected and cleaved from the support by treatment with a cocktail of TFA/H2O/thioanisole (92:2:6, v/v/v) for 4 h at room temperature under mechanical agitation to yield the desired peptide. The resin was removed by filtration and washed with TFA. Combined filtrates were added dropwise to cold diethyl ether. For each 1 mL of TFA solution, 10 mL of diethyl ether was used. The precipitated peptides were centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 15 min. The ether solution was decanted, and the white solid was dissolved in water, frozen and lyophilized. The crude peptide was purified by flash chromatography on a Biotage SP4 system (Biotage, Charlotte, NC, USA) equipped with a C18 column. Purity of the peptides was verified by HPLC, and their identity was confirmed by API 3000 LC/MS/MS (Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX) and MALDI. Analytical HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1200 system (Agilent Technologies, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 5M4, Canada) equipped with a Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 reversed-phase column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μ) and Agilent 1200 series diode array UV-Vis detector (Agilent Technologies) using a linear gradient of 0% to 100% acetonitrile in water with 0.1% TFA over 30 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Following these methods, NOTA-PEG-BBN(6-14) (denoted as NOTA-monomer), BBN(6-14)-Suc-PEG-Lys(NOTA)-Gly-BBN(6-14) (denoted as NOTA-dimer 1) and BBN(6-14)-Suc-PEG-Lys(NOTA)-PEG-Gly-BBN(6-14) (denoted as NOTA-dimer 2) were prepared.
The human prostate cancer PC3 cell line was used in their 8th to 12th passage after receipt and was cultured in Ham's F12 medium supplemented with 2.5 mM glutamin, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 ng/mL amphothericin B and 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were grown in 5% CO2 in air at 37°C; the medium was changed three times per week.
Competitive binding assays
Competition assays were performed in 24-well plates using PC3 cells. The cells were cultured until near confluence, and the medium was replaced by 400 μL of reaction medium (RPMI complemented with 2 mg/mL BSA, 4.8 mg/mL HEPES, 1 U/mL penicillin G and 1 μg/mL streptomycin). For the assay, equal volumes of radioactive and non-radioactive ligands were added. The concentration of [125I-Tyr4]bombesin (74 TBq/mmol; Perkin Elmer Life Science Products, Boston, MA, USA) was 10-12 M. Increasing concentrations (10-6 to 10-14) of the GRPR ligand were added. The plates were incubated for 40 min at 37°C with agitation. After the incubation, the reaction medium was removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS at room temperature. The cells were harvested and counted in a gamma counter (Cobra II auto-gamma counter, Packard, MN, USA). Experiments were realized three times in triplicate. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5 Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) to determine the IC50. Finally, the Ki was determined using Cheng and Pursoff's formula . The Kd value for [125I-Tyr4]bombesin has been determined from experiments done under similar conditions and is 1.5 × 10-10 M.
Peptide radiolabeling with 64Cu
In vivo stability studies
Plasma and in vivo stability studies were realized as previously described by our group . Briefly, after peptide reconstitution, studies were carried out by incubating the tracers in mouse plasma for a period of 24 h and by injecting around 15 to 25 MBq (400 to 650 μCi; 100 μL) of 64Cu/peptide to female Balb/c mice; 3 mice per peptide. After 24 h, a portion of the incubation mixtures in plasma or blood samples taken from the back paw were quenched with equal amounts of MeCN, chilled (4°C) and centrifuged, and the supernatant was assayed by HPLC. The stability was also determined by radio-TLC directly from plasma and blood samples without further handling; free 64Cu and purified radiolabeled peptides were used as standards. The radio-TLCs were eluted on C-18-coated plastic sheets with 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer at pH 5.5 using an instant imager system for the radio-detection.
Biodistribution studies in Balb/c mice
To determine the in vivo GRPR-targeting efficacy of labeled peptides, biodistribution of female Balb/c mice were realized with a minimum of 4 mice for each condition. Briefly, mice were injected with 370 to 740 kBq (10 to 20 μCi; 100 μL) of either 64Cu/NOTA-monomer, 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 1 or 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 via the caudal vein. The animals were sacrificed with CO2 at 30 min post-injection [p.i.]. Organs of interest were then collected, weighed and measured in a gamma counter. The results were expressed as percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue [%ID/g].
Cellular uptake and efflux
Cellular uptake and efflux studies were realized three times in triplicate on PC3 cells in presence of NOTA-monomer and NOTA-dimer 2 radiolabeled with 64Cu. First, PC3 cells were seeded in 12-wells plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well 48 h prior to the experiment. Before the experiment, the cells were washed three times with PBS, then 950 μL of culture medium was added. For cellular uptake, PC3 cells were incubated 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min with 37 kBq (1 μCi; 50 μL) of radiolabeled peptide per well at 37°C with agitation. Once the incubation was over, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed three times with PBS. The cells were harvested and counted in a gamma counter. The results were expressed as percentage of added dose retained per 105 cells (%AD/105 cells). For efflux studies, plated-PC3 cells were incubated 1 h with 37 kBq (1 μCi; 50 μL) of radiolabeled peptide. Then, the cells were washed with PBS and fresh medium was added. After 0, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min, the cells were washed thrice with PBS. Finally, the cells were harvested and counted in a gamma counter. The results were expressed as percentage of activity retained by cells relative to baseline at 0 min.
PET scans were performed using a LabPET8 (Gamma Medica-IDEAS Inc., Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada) small-animal scanner with a field of view of 7.5 cm. Female Balb/c nude mice were implanted with 107 PC3 prostate cancer cells. Cells were injected in 150 μL of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and PBS (2:1). Tumors were given 3 weeks to grow to the size of 5 mm in diameter. For μPET studies, PC3 xenografted female Balb/c nude mice were injected with 3.7 to 7.4 MBq (100 to 200 μCi; 100 μL) of 64Cu/NOTA-monomer or 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 via the caudal vein under isoflurane anesthesia with a minimum of 3 mice for each tracer. Each animal had a 2-h dynamic scan from the injection. The images were reconstructed by a 2-dimensional MLEM algorithm implemented on an analytically derived system matrix . Region of interest [ROI] was traced for tumor, liver, kidney and muscle. The activity contained in each organ was measured at multiple time points, resulting in time-activity curves.
Biodistribution studies in PC3 tumor-bearing Balb/c nude mice
Tumor-bearing Balb/c nude mice were injected with 370 to 740 kBq (10 to 20 μCi; 100 μL) of 64Cu/NOTA-monomer and 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 via the caudal vein and sacrificed with CO2 at different periods of time after injection. Organs of interest were then collected and weighed. -Radioactivity was measured in a gamma counter. The blocking experiments were realized by co-injecting 0.1 μmol of non-radiolabeled peptide. The results were expressed as %ID/g with a minimum of 3 mice for each condition.
Analytical data for NOTA-BBN(6-14) monomer and dimmers
yield d (%)
0.59 ± 0.32
2.51 ± 1.54e
South BBN peptide segment
2.00 ± 1.59
1.76 ± 1.30
Competitive binding assays
All three peptide conjugates inhibited the binding of [125I-Tyr4]bombesin to GRPR of PC3 cells in a concentration-dependant manner. The Ki values for NOTA-monomer, NOTA-dimer 1 and NOTA-dimer 2 were 2.51 ± 1.54, 2.00 ± 1.59 and 1.76 ± 1.30 nM, respectively (see Table 1). Natural bombesin was used as a standard, and a Ki value of 0.59 ± 0.32 nM was obtained under the same conditions (Table 1). No significant difference was observed between the different compounds in terms of GRPR affinity.
Peptide radiolabeling with 64Cu, purification and in vivo stability
Biodistribution in Balb/c mice
Cellular uptake and efflux
Biodistribution in Balb/c nude mice
Biodistribution and tumor to non-target organ ratios for 64Cu/NOTA-monomer and 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2
1.35 ± 0.47
12.72 ± 3.42
3.13 ± 0.67
1.34 ± 0.15
3.32 ± 2.78
2.48 ± 0.63
21.69 ± 6.16
5.27 ± 1.27
2.45 ± 0.27
6.14 ± 4.89
4.29 ± 1.13
16.57 ± 0.37
9.23 ± 5.01
11.56 ± 4.91
3.63 ± 2.43
0.65 ± 0.54
3.22 ± 4.29
1.86 ± 0.81
0.68 ± 0.61
3.46 ± 2.74
10.42 ± 1.29
75.13 ± 36.20
17.02 ± 6.24
26.37 ± 8.13
23.00 ± 5.37
1.63 ± 1.82
3.29 ± 0.16
5.31 ± 1.43
5.50 ± 2.61
3.31 ± 0.95
5.10 ± 2.50
4.57 ± 2.65
4.60 ± 0.57
13.35 ± 7.38
1.43 ± 0.61b
5.38 ± 8.12
8.12 ± 0.70
41.79 ± 5.58
23.11 ± 2.36
12.20 ± 2.78b
1.05 ± 0.91
4.65 ± 0.33
4.42 ± 1.59
2.68 ± 0.13
1.58 ± 0.80
1.77 ± 1.28
14.26 ± 1.58
7.22 ± 2.73
5.07 ± 1.58
34.42 ± 23.31
0.40 ± 0.33
3.45 ± 2.06
1.59 ± 1.16
1.13 ± 0.62
1.41 ± 0.98
0.43 ± 0.46
1.52 ± 0.58
0.78 ± 0.21
0.83 ± 0.19
1.15 ± 0.44
0.08 ± 0.07
0.63 ± 0.09
0.38 ± 0.06
0.22 ± 0.05
0.16 ± 0.09
1.79 ± 0.46
4.82 ± 0.91
3.95 ± 0.26
6.28 ± 2.87
3.25 ± 1.15
1.49 ± 0.41
0.38 ± 0.01b
1.39 ± 0.30
4.09 ± 1.79
1.04 ± 0.60b
7.42 ± 3.17
1.59 ± 0.44b
3.95 ± 1.98
4.46 ± 1.86
2.31 ± 1.46
2.07 ± 1.13
0.60 ± 0.13
0.10 ± 0.01
0.22 ± 0.07
0.24 ± 0.09
0.17 ± 0.04
0.07 ± 0.01b
0.28 ± 0.09
0.22 ± 0.11
0.12 ± 0.03
0.44 ± 0.17
1.18 ± 0.32b
0.89 ± 0.11
0.36 ± 0.09
1.80 ± 0.39b
In this study, we investigated the potential benefits of dimeric BBN-based peptide radio-tracers for GRPR-mediated prostate cancer PET imaging. Multimeric compounds are expected to have higher affinity, when targeting receptor at the surface of tumor cells, and a higher tumor uptake and retention than their monomeric counterparts . The binding affinity for GRPR on PC3 cells of NOTA-monomer, NOTA-dimer 1 and NOTA-dimer 2 was similar in the low nanomolar range. The incorporation of the NOTA chelator seems to have a minimal effect on the receptor binding affinity of the peptides . Competitive binding assays demonstrated no advantage in terms of receptor affinity through dimerization. Previous studies also suggested that homodimers show no or modest improvement in affinity for GRPR [27, 28].
The specific activities of the dimers were slightly higher than that of the monomer when calculated on a molar basis. Although the amount of peptide conjugate was kept constant for the labeling, i.e. 5 μg, the quantity of radioactivity varied in each case, explaining the observed variations in specific activity. 64Cu/NOTA monomer and 64Cu/NOTA dimer 2 are stable after 24-h incubation in mouse plasma and 1 h in vivo as no trace of free 64Cu or metabolite was detected by radio-HPLC (Figure 4). Although 64Cu/NOTA complexes of the monomer and the dimer 2 are stable over 24 h in vivo (Figure 5), the stability of the peptide itself cannot be established by radio-TLC because the peptide separation from its potential metabolites may be extremely difficult using this method. The biodistribution in female Balb/c mice demonstrated that our monomeric and dimeric peptides have different biodistribution profiles (Figure 6). Both dimers presented slightly higher blood retention and a significantly increased uptake in the spleen, lungs, kidney and liver as compared to the monomer. These results appear to correlate to a higher molecular weight rather than GRPR-mediated polyvalency effect since none of these organs express high level of GRPR. The same observation was reported by Liu while testing their dimer and tetramer of RGD . Higher uptake in liver for both dimers seems to indicate a different elimination pathway and kinetics. The liver is an important organ in the metabolism of copper. However, in vivo stability studies indicated absence of free 64Cu in the blood circulation at all the time points studied (Figure 5), demonstrating that the observed liver uptake is due to hepatobiliary excretion of the dimers. Higher uptake in the kidneys for both dimers can be explained by the higher molecular weight since larger molecules are more slowly excreted, but also, under physiological conditions, our dimers are more positively charged than the monomer. Positively charged molecules are known to be more retained in the kidneys than neutral molecule  which could also explain our results. Labeled NOTA-dimer 2 exhibited a 3.6-fold higher pancreas uptake compared to NOTA-monomer or NOTA-dimer 1 in Balb/c mice. This augmentation cannot be explained by the molecular weight difference. Therefore, this higher uptake could be associated to polymeric effect. We further investigated this effect on PC3 cells in vitro and in vivo with NOTA-monomer and NOTA-dimer 2. Since NOTA-dimer 1 did not present any advantage over the two other tracers, we stopped its further development.
During in vitro experiments, 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 exhibited lower cellular uptake but higher tumor retention on PC3 when compared to 64Cu/NOTA-monomer. The lower cellular uptake could reflect differences in biological activities between the two peptides. Our efflux experiments supported the multimeric effect: 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 was retained by PC3 cells longer than 64Cu/NOTA-monomer in the same conditions.
PET imaging in PC3 tumor-bearing mice was used to compare the pharmacokinetics and distribution of the monomeric and the dimeric BBN. Dynamic PET was used to obtain time-activity curves describing the activity profile of the tracer for each ROI as a function of time. Time-activity curves for liver, kidney, muscle and tumor with 64Cu/NOTA-monomer and 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 showed that liver and kidney uptake was higher at all times for the dimer, while muscle uptake was similar for both tracers. These results correspond to the pattern observed in the biodistribution studies. Results from cellular uptake studies predicted higher tumor uptake for 64Cu/NOTA-monomer. In fact, PC3 tumor uptake was higher for 64Cu/NOTA-monomer for the first 30 min post-injection. Afterwards, the tumor uptake of the dimer was significantly higher than the monomer. This can be explained by the slower tumor washout of the dimer. The longer retention of the dimer by PC3 cells observed in the efflux studies is also observed in vivo. Blocking studies by biodistribution in PC3 tumor-bearing mice were realized to validate the results obtained by PET imaging, confirming the GRPR-mediated uptake of the tracer. After co-injection of the non-radiolabeled peptide, the radioactivity level of 64Cu/NOTA-monomer slightly decreased in the pancreas. Surprisingly, an important increase of 64Cu/NOTA-monomer in all other organs was noticed by co-injection of the non-radiolabeled peptide. In this study, 0.1 μmol of non-radiolabeled peptide were co-administered intravenously with radiotracer injection, which apparently led to serious damage to the kidney functions and significant inhibition of blood clearance of the radiotracer, as suggested by a 9-fold increase in the blood radiotracer level and a more than 7-fold increase in the kidney levels over animals not receiving the non-radiolabeled peptide. Therefore, the absence of any blocking effect of the non-radiolabeled peptide in the tumor and other organs may be explained by interference from an increased influx of the radiotracer from the blood. At 1 h after the injection of 64Cu/NOTA-monomer, the radiotracer was still in the form of its parent in the blood suggesting that the increased uptake of the tracer may not be related to the uptake of metabolites for the blocking experiments. Meanwhile, lower tumor-to-blood ratio of 0.38 ± 0.01 and tumor-to-muscle ratio of 1.59 ± 0.44 were obtained 0.5 h p.i for blocked 64Cu/NOTA-monomer, with 1.49 ± 0.41 and 7.42 ± 0.41 for the unblocking experiments respectively (p < 0.05, Table 2), showing that the tumor localization of 64Cu/NOTA-monomer was a result of the GRPR. For dimer 2, the uptake in blood, kidney, spleen and muscle is non-specific since no difference is noted by co-injection of the non-radiolabeled peptide. The co-injection of the non-radiolabeled peptide significantly reduced the pancreas uptake from 13.35 ± 7.38 to 1.43 ± 0.61%ID/g (p < 0.05, Table 2). Since GRPRs are highly express in this organ, this confirms that pancreas uptake of 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 is GRPR-mediated. The liver uptake of 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 was also reduced by co-injection of unlabeled peptide (p < 0.05). Since GRPR expression in the liver is very low, it is likely that diminution of liver accumulation may reflect saturation of the hepatobiliary elimination pathway by the non-radiolabeled peptide. PC3 tumor uptake of 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 was modestly lowered from 6.28 ± 2.87%ID/g to 3.25 ± 1.15%ID/g following the co-injection of the non-labeled peptide, again, indicating a GRPR dependant response.
To demonstrate that the higher tumor retention of 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 observed in vivo is not only due to higher molecular weight, we compared the tumor-to-non-target tissue ratio of radiolabeled NOTA-monomer and NOTA-dimer 2. If tumor uptake was only due to size difference among the monomer and the dimer, then muscle uptake would have increased accordingly, resulting in similar ratios of tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle for both tracers. Results indicate that the 64Cu/NOTA-monomer offers the highest tumor-to-muscle ratio during the course of our study (Table 2). 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 exhibits higher tumor-to-blood ratio after 2 h and is also retained longer at the tumor site. In addition, this tracer displays lower tumor-to-liver ratio and similar ratios of tumor-to-kidney and tumor-to-pancreas than the NOTA-monomer at all time points. These ratios are modulated by the different elimination pathway and kinetics of both tracers.
Multimeric compounds could have enhanced affinity due to statistical rebinding or simultaneous binding to receptors. All peptides in the current research feature only short linkers, limiting the possibility of multiple binding to targets simultaneously. Therefore, statistical rebinding seems to be the major factor explaining the results observed at the pancreas for the dimer 2. The receptor binding of one BBN(6-14) unit will significantly enhance the local concentration of the other BBN(6-14) unit in the vicinity of the receptor which might facilitate further binding. However, statistical rebinding is dependent on the density of receptor present at the surface of the cell. GRPRs are characterized by the presence of high and low affinity states to agonist depending on the coupling of guanine nucleotide (GDP or GTP) on the G-protein . Therefore, available receptors that could bind with our peptides at the tumor are likely even lower than expected. In fact, we observed significantly higher uptake in mouse pancreas, which has a very high density of GRPR, but no difference in uptake for PC3 tumors that have a lower GRPR density . This difference in receptor densities might be a factor reducing the efficacy of our dimer. Longer spacers in the dimer might allow bivalency, implying that both BBN(6-14) units can bind simultaneously to GRPR. However, it is important to note that tumor retention did not seem to be altered by lower receptor densities. It is possible that, in the case of the dimeric tracers, different mechanisms are involved in tumor uptake and retention. Overall, our data show that 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 presents similar affinity for GRPR and PC3 uptake in vivo, greater tumor retention in vitro and in vivo but also higher uptake in the liver and kidney when compared to 64Cu/NOTA-monomer.
Monomeric and dimeric BBN(6-14) peptides have been successfully synthesized and labeled with 64Cu as potential tracers for prostate cancer PET imaging. In this study, we present (to our knowledge, for the first time) in vivo characterization of radiolabeled dimeric BBN-based peptides. Both 64Cu/NOTA-monomer and 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 are suitable for detecting GRPR-positive prostate cancer in vivo by PET. Tumor retention was improved in vivo with 64Cu/NOTA-dimer 2 by applying polyvalency effect and/or statistical rebinding. Our study is the first step in developing effective dimeric BBN-based tracers in prostate cancer PET imaging.
- The abbreviations for the common amino acids are in accordance with the recommendations of . Additional abbreviations:
%ID/g: percentage of the injected dose per gram
micro-positron emission tomography
[D-Tyr6,βAla11: Thi13: Nle14] bombesin(6-14)
bovine serum albumin
gastrin-releasing peptide receptor
high performance liquid chromatography
- Ki :
positron emission tomography
benzotriazol-1-yl-oxytripyrrolidino phosphonium hexafluorophosphate
region of interest
GB and LeR are members of the Centre de recherche clinique Étienne-Le Bel funded by the Fonds de recherché en santé du Québec (FRSQ). The work was financially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR, grant no. MOP-89875) and the BC Leadership Chair in Functional Cancer Imaging. FP had support from graduate scholarships (CIHR 98147 and FRSQ 21116).
- Mantey S, Frucht H, Coy DH, Jensen RT: Characterization of bombesin receptors using a novel, potent, radiolabeled antagonist that distinguishes bombesin receptor subtypes. Mol Pharmacol 1993, 43: 762–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yegen BC: Bombesin-like peptides: candidates as diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Curr Pharm Des 2003, 9: 1013–1022. 10.2174/1381612033455134PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moody TW, Bertness V, Carney DN: Bombesin-like peptides and receptors in human tumor cell lines. Peptides 1983, 4: 683–686. 10.1016/0196-9781(83)90018-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reile H, Armatis PE, Schally AV: Characterization of high-affinity receptors for bombesin/gastrin releasing peptide on the human prostate cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU-145: internalization of receptor bound 125I-(Tyr4) bombesin by tumor cells. Prostate 1994, 25: 29–38. 10.1002/pros.2990250105PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markwalder R, Reubi JC: Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in the human prostate: relation to neoplastic transformation. Cancer Research 1999, 59: 1152–1159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pagani A, Papotti M, Sanfilippo B, Bussolati G: Expression of the gastrin-releasing peptide gene in carcinomas of the breast. Int J Cancer 1991, 47: 371–375. 10.1002/ijc.2910470310PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halmos G, Wittliff JL, Schally AV: Characterization of bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in human breast cancer and their relationship to steroid receptor expression. Cancer Research 1995, 55: 280–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gugger M, Reubi JC: Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors in non-neoplastic and neoplastic human breast. Am J Pathol 1999, 155: 2067–2076. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65525-3PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reubi JC, Wenger S, Schmuckli-Maurer J, Schaer JC, Gugger M: Bombesin receptor subtypes in human cancers: detection with the universal radioligand (125)I-[D-Tyr(6), beta-Ala(11), Phe(13), Nle(14)] bombesin(6–14). Cli Cancer Res 2002, 8: 1139–1146.Google Scholar
- Albrecht M, Doroszewicz J, Gillen S, Gomes I, Wilhelm B, Stief T, Aumüller G: Proliferation of prostate cancer cells and activity of neutral endopeptidase is regulated by bombesin and IL-1beta with IL-1beta acting as a modulator of cellular differentiation. Prostate 2004, 58: 82–94. 10.1002/pros.10288PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aprikian AG, Tremblay L, Han K, Chevalier S: Bombesin stimulates the motility of human prostate-carcinoma cells through tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and of integrin-associated proteins. Int J Cancer 1997, 72: 498–504. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970729)72:3<498::AID-IJC19>3.0.CO;2-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagakawa O, Ogasawara M, Fujii H, Murakami K, Murata J, Fuse H, Saiki I: Effect of prostatic neuropeptides on invasion and migration of PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Cancer Letters 1998, 133: 27–33. 10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00186-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bologna M, Festuccia C, Muzi P, Biordi L, Ciomei M: Bombesin stimulates growth of human prostatic cancer cells in vitro. Cancer 1989, 63: 1714–1720.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Festuccia C, Angelucci A, Gravina G, Eleuterio E, Vicentini C, Bologna M: Bombesin-dependent pro-MMP-9 activation in prostatic cancer cells requires beta1 integrin engagement. Exp Cell Res 2002, 280: 1–11. 10.1006/excr.2002.5609PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishimaru H, Kageyama Y, Hayashi T, Nemoto T, Eishi Y, Kihara K: Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide in human prostate cancers and their lymph node metastases. Acta Oncologica 2002, 41: 289–296. 10.1080/02841860260088845PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Festuccia C, Guerra F, D'Ascenzo S, Giunciuglio D, Albini A, Bologna M: In vitro regulation of pericellular proteolysis in prostatic tumor cells treated with bombesin. Int J Cancer 1998, 75: 418–431. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980130)75:3<418::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anastasi A, Erspamer V, Bucci M: Isolation and structure of bombesin and alytesin, 2 analogous active peptides from the skin of the European amphibians Bombina and Alytes. Experientia 1971, 27: 166–167. 10.1007/BF02145873PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Delle Fave G, Annibale B, De Magistris L, Severi C, Bruzzone R, Puoti M, Melchiorri P, Torsoli A, Erspamer V: Bombesin effects on human GI fonctions. Peptides 1985, 6: 113–116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez V, Tache Y: Bombesin in the brain-gut axis. Peptides 2000, 21: 1617–1625. 10.1016/S0196-9781(00)00293-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pradhan TK, Katsuno T, Taylor JE, Kim SH, Ryan RR, Mantey SA, Donohue PJ, Weber HC, Sainz E, Battey JF, Coy DH: Identification of a unique ligand which has high affinity for all four bombesin receptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol 1998, 343: 275–287. 10.1016/S0014-2999(97)01527-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schuhmacher J, Zhang H, Doll J, Maecke HR, Matys R, Hauser H, Henze M, Haberkorn U, Eisenhut M: GRP receptor-targeted PET of a rat pancreas carcinoma xenograft in nude mice with a 68 Ga-labeled bombesin(6–14) analog. J Nucl Med 2005, 46: 691–699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen X, Park R, Hou Y, Tohme M, Shahinian AH, Bading JR, Conti PS: MicroPET and autoradiographic imaging of GRP receptor expression with 64 Cu-DOTA-[Lys 3 ]bombesin in human prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. J Nucl Med 2004, 45: 1390–1397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prasanphanich AF, Nanda PK, Rold TL, Ma L, Lewis MR, Garrison JC, Hoffman TJ, Sieckman GL, Figueroa SD, Smith CJ: [ 64 Cu-NOTA-8-Aoc-BBN(7–14)NH 2 ] targeting vector for positron-emission tomography imaging of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-expressing tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104: 12462–12467. 10.1073/pnas.0705347104PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lane SR, Nanda P, Rold TL, Sieckman GL, Figueroa SD, Hoffman TJ, Jurisson SS, Smith CJ: Optimization, biological evaluation and microPET imaging of xenografted mouse model. Nucl Med Biol 2010, 37: 751–761. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.04.016PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Chen X: Peptide heterodimers for molecular imaging. Amino Acids 2011, 41: 1081–1092. 10.1007/s00726-010-0546-yPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Handl HL, Vagner J, Han H, Mash E, Hruby VJ, Gillies RJ: Hitting multiple targets with multimeric ligands. Exp Opin Ther Targets 2004, 8: 565–586. 10.1517/14728184.108.40.2065View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carrithers MD, Lerner MR: Synthesis and characterization of bivalent peptide ligands targeted to G-protein-coupled receptors. Chem Biol 1996, 3: 537–542. 10.1016/S1074-5521(96)90144-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gawlak SL, Kiener PA, Braslawsky GR, Greenfield RS: Homodimeric forms of bombesin act as potent antagonist of bombesin on swiss 3T3 cells. Growth Factor 1991, 5: 159–170. 10.3109/08977199109000280View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abiraj K, Jaccard H, Kretzschmar M, Helm L, Maecke HR: Novel DOTA-based prochelator for divalent peptide vectorization: synthesis of dimeric analogues for multimodality tumor imaging and therapy. Chem Commun 2008, 28: 3248–3250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams HA, Robinson S, Julyan P, Zweit J, Hastings D: A comparison of PET imaging characteristics of various copper radioisotopes. Eur J Nucl Mol Imaging 2005, 32: 1473–1480. 10.1007/s00259-005-1906-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guérin B, Ait-Mohand S, Tremblay M-C, Dumulon-Perreault V, Fournier P, Bénard F: Total solid-Phase synthesis of NOTA-functionalized peptides for PET or SPECT imaging. Org Lett 2010, 12: 280–283. 10.1021/ol902601xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng Y, Prusoff WH: Relationship between the inhibition constant ([K i ]) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition ([I 50 ]) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 1973, 22: 3099–3108. 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zeisler SK, Pavan RA, Orzechowski J, Langlois R, Rodrigue S, van Lier JE: Production of 64 Cu on the Sherbrooke TR-PET cyclotron. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2003, 257: 175–177. 10.1023/A:1024782318219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McCarthy DW, Shefer RE, Klinkowstein RE, Bass LA, Margeneau WH, Cutler CS, Anderson CJ, Welch MJ: Efficient production of high specific activity 64 Cu using a biomedical cyclotron. Nucl Med Biol 1997, 24: 35–43. 10.1016/S0969-8051(96)00157-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ait-Mohand S, Fournier P, Dumulon-Perreault V, Keifer GE, Jurek P, Ferreira CL, Bénard F, Guérin B: Evaluation of 64 Cu-labeled bifunctional chelate-bombesin conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem 2011, 22: 1729–1735. 10.1021/bc2002665View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Selivanov V, Picard Y, Cadorette J, Rodrigue S, Lecomte R: Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET. IEEE T Nucl Sci 2000, 47: 1168–1175. 10.1109/23.856565View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu S: Radiolabeled cyclic RGD peptides as Integrin α v β 3 -targeted radiotracers: maximizing binding affinity via bivalency. Bioconjugate Chem 2009, 20: 2199–2213. 10.1021/bc900167cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Behr TM, Goldenberg DM, Becker W: Reducing the renal uptake of radiolabeled antibody fragments and peptides for diagnosis and therapy: present status, future prospects and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med 1998, 25: 201–212. 10.1007/s002590050216PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conklin BR, Bourne HR: Structural elements of Gα subunits that interact with Gβγ, receptors and effectors. Cell 1993, 73: 631–641. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90245-LPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature: Nomenclature and symbolism for amino acids and peptides. Eur J Biochem 1984, 138: 9–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.