Open Access

[18F]CFT synthesis and binding to monoamine transporters in rats

  • Sarita Forsback1Email author,
  • Päivi Marjamäki2,
  • Olli Eskola1,
  • Jörgen Bergman1,
  • Johanna Rokka1,
  • Tove Grönroos2,
  • Merja Haaparanta2 and
  • Olof Solin1, 3
EJNMMI Research20122:3

DOI: 10.1186/2191-219X-2-3

Received: 25 November 2011

Accepted: 25 January 2012

Published: 25 January 2012

Abstract

Background

We present the electrophilic synthesis of [18F]2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluoro)tropane [[18F]CFT] and the pharmacological specificity and selectivity of [18F]CFT for monoamine transporters in the brain and peripheral organs of rats. The human radiation dose is extrapolated from the animal data.

Methods

[18F]CFT was synthesized by electrophilic fluorination of a stannylated precursor by using post-target-produced [18F]F2 as a fluorinating agent. The ex vivo18F-activity biodistribution of [18F]CFT in the brain of rats was studied by autoradiography. The binding of [18F]CFT to the monoamine transporters was studied using in vivo blocking experiments with dopamine transporter [DAT], norepinephrine transporter [NET], or serotonin transporter [SERT] inhibitors. In vivo animal positron emission tomography was used as a comparative method to determine tracer kinetics. Human radiation dose was assessed using OLINDA software.

Results

The radiochemical yield of [18F]CFT from the initial [18F]F-, decay corrected to the end of bombardment, was 3.2 ± 1.0%. The specific activity [SA] was 14.5 ± 3.4 GBq/μmol, decay corrected to the end of synthesis. Radiochemical purity exceeded 99%. DAT-specific binding was found in the striatum, locus coeruleus, and pancreas. NET-specific binding was found in the locus coeruleus. SERT-specific binding was not found in any of the studied organs. Effective dose equivalent [EDE] estimated for the standard human model was 12.8 μSv/MBq. Effective dose [ED] was 9.17 μSv/MBq.

Conclusions

Post-target-produced high-SA [18F]F2 was used to incorporate18F directly into the phenyl ring of [18F]CFT. The final product had high radiochemical and chemical purities and a high SA for DAT and NET studies in vivo. In periphery, [18F]CFT showed a specific uptake in the pancreas. EDE and ED corresponded well with other18F-radioligands.

Keywords

[18F]CFT DAT NET electrophilic fluorination monoamine transporters

Background

Dopamine transporters [DAT] are proteins located in the dopaminergic nerve terminals; they regulate the synaptic concentration of dopamine in the brain. Changes in the density and function of DAT in the brain are involved in many neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia. These changes can be imaged using positron emission tomography [PET].

Many radioligands, including [11C]CFT [1] and several [18F]F-labeled phenyl tropane analogs of cocaine [2], have been used to study dopamine reuptake in living subjects. However, none of these fulfill the requirements for an optimal radioligand for DAT imaging. [11C]CFT suffers from slow kinetics compared with the short half-life of11C (T 1/2 = 20.4 min). The phenyl tropane analogs have a high or moderate affinity with other monoamine transporters (i.e., serotonin transporters [SERT] and norepinephrine transporters [NET]), or they undergo extensive metabolism. More recently, the new [18F]F-labeled phenyl tropane analog [18F]FE-PE2I has shown promise as a radioligand for DAT [3], despite its relatively fast metabolism [4].

Previously, electrophilic fluorination of a stannylated precursor, 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-trimethylstannylphenyl)tropane (precursor) to achieve 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-[18F]-fluorophenyl)tropane [[18F]CFT] (product) (see Figure 1) and preliminary evaluation of the radioligand in rats were reported by Haaparanta et al. [5] and by Bergman et al. [6]. A report on the ability of [18F]CFT to reflect nigral dopaminergic cell loss in a rat model of Parkinson's disease [7] as well as a study comparing the brain accumulation, metabolism, and kinetics of [18F]CFT and [18F]CFT-FP [8] have shown that [18F]CFT can be used to image DAT in rats. The suitability of [18F]CFT as a radioligand for in vivo studies of DAT in humans has been evaluated [9], and [18F]CFT has been used in human studies of Parkinson's disease [1015], schizophrenia [16, 17], and detached personality [18]. [18F]CFT was proven to be a suitable radiotracer to image DAT by PET in humans due to its high target-to-nontarget ratio and low metabolism [9] although [3H]CFT has also been shown to have some affinity to SERT and NET [19, 20]. The kinetics of [18F]CFT are relatively slow, but the half-life of18F (T 1/2 = 109.8 min) allows equilibrium between specific and nonspecific binding during a human PET study.
Figure 1

Scheme depicting the use of a stannylated precursor to synthesize [ 18 F]CFT product.

A PET radioligand suitable for DAT must have a moderate to high specific activity [SA] to avoid saturation of transporter sites (with associated pharmacological effects) in patients. High SA can be easily achieved by nucleophilic fluorination. The18F label is usually incorporated into a molecule via an alkyl side chain, as in the case of [18F]FE-PE2I [3] or [18F]CFT-FP [21]. However, side chains are often prone to fast metabolism. A more metabolically stable configuration can be achieved by inserting18F directly into the phenyl ring via electrophilic fluorination. [18F]F2 is traditionally produced by either20Ne(d,α)18F with an added F2 carrier [22] or18O(p, n)18F using18O2/F2 as target [23]. The latter method is more efficient than the former [24]. However, both production methods suffer from low SA. Post-target-produced [18F]F2 has 100- to 1,000-fold higher SA than the traditional methods [25]. Therefore, post-target-produced [18F]F2 offers the possibility of producing high-affinity radioligands through electrophilic labeling.

In the present study, we report the optimized electrophilic synthesis of [18F]CFT with high SA and its quality assurance for clinical PET studies. The pharmacological specificity and selectivity of [18F]CFT for monoamine transporters ex vivo are reported. The distribution of18F activity in the brain and peripheral organs of rats is reported ex vivo and in vivo in order to compare the methods in the determination of tracer kinetics. The human radiation dose is extrapolated from the animal data using organ level internal dose assessment [OLINDA]/EXM 1.0 software (OLINDA EXM, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA) [26].

Methods

Chemicals and equipment

The stannylated precursor and the reference compound, 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane, were supplied by ABX (ABX GmbH, Radeberg, Germany). All other reagents that were purchased from commercial suppliers were either of synthesis grade or analytical grade and were used without further purification.

Semi-preparative high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC] was performed using a Merck-Hitachi L-6200 HPLC pump (Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany) and a Waters μBondapak C18 column (7.8 × 300 mm, 10 μm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). A Merck-Hitachi L-7400 UV-absorption detector (λ = 215 nm) and a 2 × 2-in NaI crystal for18F-activity detection were used. The column was eluted with 0.01 M H3PO4/CH3CN (7:3; flow rate of 3 ml/min).

Analytical HPLC was conducted using a Merck-Hitachi L-7100 HPLC pump, an Atlantis dc18 column (5 μm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), a Merck-Hitachi L-7400 UV-absorption detector (λ = 215 nm) and a 2 × 2-in NaI crystal for18F-activity detection. The eluent used was 0.01 M H3PO4/CH3CN (75:25; flow rate 1.1 ml/min).

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry [LC/MS] was performed with a PE SCIEX API 150 EX mass spectrometer (PerkinElmer SCIEX, Toronto, Canada) equipped with a turbo ion-spray source, a PerkinElmer series 200 micro pump (PerkinElmer Instruments, Branford, CT, USA), and a Waters Symmetry C18 column (2.1 × 30 mm, 3.5 μm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) were used to measure the concentration of CFT. The column was eluted with MeOH/0.2% HCOOH(aq) (flow rate 0.1 ml). A Supor Acrodisc (0.2 μm, 13 mm; Pall Corporation, NY, USA) sterile filter was used to formulate [18F]CFT for injection.

Production of [18F]F-

[18F]F- was obtained via the nuclear reaction18O(p, n)18F by irradiating 700 μl18O-enriched water with a 17-MeV proton beam produced by an MGC-20 cyclotron (Efremov Institute of Electrophysical Apparatuses, St Petersburg, Russia).

Production of [18F]F2

[18F]F2 was synthesized in an electrical discharge chamber by the18F/19F exchange reaction. The18F source was [18F]fluoromethane, which was mixed with a low amount (290 to 400 nmol) of carrier fluorine in neon (Ne/0.5% F2) inside the discharge chamber. [18F]Fluoromethane was produced from methyl iodide by a nucleophilic substitution reaction with a [18F]F-/Kryptofix K2.2.2 complex in acetonitrile. A detailed description of the [18F]F2 synthesis is presented elsewhere [25].

Synthesis of [18F]CFT

The stannylated precursor (precursor, 250 to 500 μg, 0.6 to 1.2 μmol) was dissolved in a mixture of trichlorofluoromethane (Freon-11, 600 μl) and dry acetic acid (100 μl). [18F]F2 was bubbled through this mixture at room temperature. Freon-11 was evaporated using neon flow, and 600 μl of preparative HPLC eluent was added to the residue. With no further modifications, this solution was then loaded onto the preparative HPLC column.

[18F]CFT was purified by semi-preparative HPLC using the system described in the 'Chemicals and equipment' section. The 3-ml fraction containing the [18F]CFT was collected (Figure 2). The fraction was evaporated to dryness with a vacuum evaporator, formulated into a 0.9% NaCl/0.1 M phosphate buffer (phosphate buffer pH 7, 3:2, v/v), and passed through the sterile filter into the end product vial.
Figure 2

Sample chromatogram of a semi-preparative HPLC separation of [ 18 F]CFT from the reaction mixture.

Quality of [18F]CFT

The18F activity, pH, and volume were measured from the end product. A sample from the end product was evaluated by the analytical HPLC system described in the 'Chemicals and equipment' section. Determinations of chemical purity, radiochemical purity [RCP], and SA were conducted by comparing HPLC retention times and peak intensities with a reference compound of known concentration and18F-activity concentration. Radiochemical yields [RCY] were calculated from the initial amount of [18F]F- and decay corrected to the end of bombardment [EOB]. The SA of the product was decay corrected to the end of the semi-preparative HPLC separation [EOS].

The SA of the final product was also determined with LC/MS by measuring the [19F]CFT mass concentration using the same reference as was used with analytical HPLC. The analyses were performed in positive selected ion monitoring mode for m/z = 278 (corresponding to the protonated molecule [MH+] of [19F]CFT), and the SAs are decay corrected to the EOS.

Animals

Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN, USA) weighing 251 ± 59 g (15 females, 20 males) were used in this study. The rats were housed under standard conditions (temperature 21°C; relative humidity 55 ± 5%; 12-h light/dark cycle) with free access to tap water and standard food. Animal care was in accordance with the guidelines of the International Council of Laboratory Animal Science. The Turku University ethics committee for animal experiments and the Animal Experiment Board of the Province of Southern Finland approved this study.

Biodistribution studies

[18F]CFT in 0.9% NaCl/0.1 M phosphate buffer (3:2, v/v, pH 7) was injected into the tail vein of rats that are sedated with CO2/O2 (50:50 vol.%). The18F activity injected via [18F]CFT per rat was 57 ± 24 MBq (range, 12 to 181 MBq). This corresponds to a 23 ± 10-nmol/kg (5 to 40 nmol/kg) administration of CFT, as calculated from the SA that was determined using the HPLC method at the time of injection. The animals were killed in a CO2 chamber at 10 min (n = 2), 20 min (n = 3), 40 min (n = 6), or 120 min (n = 3) after injection of the tracer. The brains were rapidly removed, and a piece from the cerebellar cortex of each brain was dissected, measured for18F activity in a calibrated 3 × 3-in NaI(Tl) well counter (Bicron, Newbury, OH, USA), and weighed. After decay correction, these data, expressed as the percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue [%ID/g], were used to calibrate the absolute uptake of18F activity in autoradiographic brain images. The rest of the brain was frozen in isopentane, chilled with dry ice for sectioning with a cryomicrotome, and handled as described in the 'Digital autoradiography' section.

Other organs and tissue samples were rapidly dissected, weighed, and measured for18F activity. The decay-corrected uptake of18F activity in the organs and tissues was expressed as %ID/g.

Pharmacological studies

The specificity of [18F]CFT binding to DAT in the brain in pretreated rats was assessed with a selective DAT antagonist, GBR12909 (5 mg/kg, Sigma-RBI, St. Louis, MO, USA). Selectivity was examined by injecting rats with a 5-mg/kg dose of fluoxetine, a selective antagonist for SERT (Sigma-RBI, St. Louis, MO, USA), or with a 5-mg/kg dose of nisoxetine, a selective antagonist for NET (RBI, Natick, MA, USA). Binding profiles of the antagonists are presented in Table 1. GBR12909, fluoxetine, or nisoxetine dissolved in distilled H2O/0.9% NaCl (50:50, v/v, 2 mg/ml) were injected intravenously into rats 60 min prior to the injection of [18F]CFT. The rats were killed by CO2 inhalation 40 min after injection of [18F]CFT. The brains and organs were handled as in the biodistribution studies. The regional distribution of18F activity in the brains of control rats (n = 6) and in the brains of rats that were pretreated with GBR12909 (n = 7), fluoxetine (n = 6), or nisoxetine (n = 6) were determined using digital autoradiography.
Table 1

Binding profiles of the monoamine transporter antagonist used in this study

Antagonist

DAT

SERT

NET

CFT [37]

22.9 ± 0.4

100 ± 13

38.6 ± 9.9

GBR12909 [38]

10.6 ± 1.9a

132 ± 0b

496 ± 22c

Fluoxetine [39]

3600 ± 100

0.81 ± 0.02

240 ± 10

Nisoxetine [40]

477

383

5.1

aHalf maximum inhibitory concentration [IC50] (nanomolar [nM]) of [3H]CFT;bIC50 (nM) of [3H]citalopram;cIC50 (nM) of [3H]nisoxetine. DAT, dopamine transporter; SERT, serotonin transporter; NET, norepinephrine transporter. Values are Ki (nM) ± SEM, unless otherwise stated.

Digital autoradiography

Coronal brain sections (20 μm) were thaw-mounted onto microscope slides, air dried, and apposed to an imaging plate (Fuji Imaging Plate BAS-TR2025, Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan) for 4 h. The imaging plates were scanned with the Fuji Analyzer BAS-5000.

The digital autoradiographic images were analyzed for count density (photo-stimulated luminescence per unit area [PSL/mm2]) with a computerized image analysis program (Tina 2.1, Raytest Isotopenmessgeräte, GmbH, Straubenhardt, Germany). Regions of interest [ROIs] were drawn over the frontal cortex, striatum, locus coeruleus, and cerebellum, which were anatomically identified from the cryomicrotome sections using a rat brain atlas [27]. At least 10 sections were analyzed for each brain region, and the count densities for background areas were subtracted from the image data. PSL/mm2 values were converted into %ID/g values as previously described in the 'Biodistribution studies' section.

PET imaging

Two PET scans were carried out using an Inveon multimodality PET/computed tomography [CT] (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA) designed for rodents and other small laboratory animals. The device provides 159 transaxial slices, a 10.0-cm transaxial field of view [FOV], and a 12.7-cm axial FOV. Rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane approximately 15 min before measurements. The body temperature of each rat was maintained with a heating pad on which the rat lies. Following the transmission scan for attenuation correction using the CT modality, an emission scan was acquired for 120 min in three-dimensional [3-D] list mode with an energy window of 350 to 650 keV. The scans started immediately after intravenous injection of [18F]CFT (dose 27.9 MBq, mass 830 ng, SA 9.3 GBq/μmol and dose 38.0 MBq, mass 1,200 ng, SA 8.8 GBq/μmol at time of injection, respectively). List mode data were stored in 3-D sinograms, which were then Fourier-rebinned into two-dimensional [2-D] sinograms (45 frames with dimensions of 20 × 15 s, 15 × 600 s, 10 × 600 s). The image was reconstructed using 2-D-filtered back projection with a 0.5-mm RAMP filter. ROIs were placed on the striatum, cerebellar cortex, frontal cortex, and liver using the Inveon Research Workplace Image Analysis software (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Knoxville, TN, USA) and with a CT template as an anatomical reference.

Dosimetry

The animal %ID/g tissue data was extrapolated to humans using the percentage kilogram per gram method [28]. In this method, the animal %ID/g value is first multiplied with the animal's weight and then multiplied with the human organ weight/human weight ratio. Human radiation dose was estimated from these values using OLINDA/EXM 1.0 software [26].

Data analysis and statistical procedures

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means were considered significantly different when p < 0.05. Comparison of SAs was tested using Student's t test (paired, two samples for mean assuming unequal variances).

Effects of the pretreatments were tested using repeated measurement analysis of variance. Results are expressed as means ± SD for the indicated number of observations.

Results

Synthesis and quality of [18F]CFT

Electrophilic fluorination was applied to a stannylated precursor (Figure 1) to synthesize [18F]CFT product (n = 24). The initial [18F]F- activity was 37 ± 3 GBq (range, 32 to 42 GBq), and the average synthesis time was 43 ± 3 min, including the synthesis of [18F]F2, radiofluorination, and semi-preparative purification. In a semi-preparative HPLC purification, the [18F]CFT fraction eluting at 10.5 min was collected (Figure 2). Evaporation to dryness and formulation for injection took an additional 10 min.

The RCY calculated from initial [18F]F- (decay corrected to EOB) was 3.2 ± 1.0%, and18F activity of [18F]CFT was 917 ± 278 MBq (501 to 1,395 MBq) at EOS. The SA measured by analytical HPLC was 14.5 ± 3.4 GBq/μmol (8.9 to 23.6 GBq/μmol with all values decay corrected to EOS). From analytical HPLC studies (Figure 3), the RCP exceeded 99% in all cases. The pH of the final product was 7. The final product was radiochemically stable for up to 6 h.
Figure 3

Sample chromatogram of radio-HPLC analysis of formulated [ 18 F]CFT.

From selected batches (n = 19), the SA of the final product was determined by LC/MS. The SA of these batches measured by analytical HPLC was 14.9 ± 3.1 GBq/μmol. The SA measured by LC/MS was 18.2 ± 5.9 GBq/μmol. SAs calculated using the analytical HPLC method differed significantly from the SAs calculated using the LC/MS method (p = 0.04).

Biodistribution and pharmacological studies

The18F-activity accumulation in the striatum, locus coeruleus, frontal cortex, and cerebellum of control rats and monoamine inhibitor-pretreated rats 40 min after [18F]CFT injection is presented in Table 2. Pretreatment with GBR12909 significantly reduced the [18F]CFT uptake in the striatum (p = 0.006) and locus coeruleus (p = 0.02). In nisoxetine-pretreated rats, the [18F]CFT uptake decreased significantly in the locus coeruleus (p < 0.005). Fluoxetine pretreatment had no effect on the accumulation of the18F activity in any region studied. Autoradiograms of representative brain sections from a control rat and from rats pretreated with GBR12909, fluoxetine, or nisoxetine are shown in Figure 4.
Table 2

18F-activity uptake 40 min after injection of [18F]CFT into the brains of control and pretreated rats

Brain region

Control

n= 6

GBR12909

n= 7

Nisoxetine

n= 6

Fluoxetine

n= 6

Striatum

1.55 ± 0.78

0.49 ± 0.18*

1.48 ± 0.22

1.38 ± 0.75

Locus coeruleus

0.67 ± 0.29

0.37 ± 0.11**

0.23 ± 0.05*

0.47 ± 0.16

Frontal cortex

0.32 ± 0.08

0.23 ± 0.04

0.26 ± 0.03

0.33 ± 0.13

Cerebellum

0.20 ± 0.04

0.15 ± 0.04

0.17 ± 0.02

0.23 ± 0.09

*p < 0.01 compared with control;**p < 0.05 compared with control. Uptake values are in percent injected dose per gram tissue. All values are means ± SD. The effect of pretreatment was compared with the uptake values of control rats. Means were considered significantly different when p < 0.05.

Figure 4

Representative [ 18 F]CFT autoradiographic images. Brain slices from control rats and from rats pretreated with GBR12909, fluoxetine, or nisoxetine.

The region-to-cerebellum ratios at different time points from the ex vivo and in vivo studies are shown in Figure 5a,b, respectively. In ex vivo studies, the striatum-to-cerebellum ratio increased from 2.1 ± 0.2 at 10 min to 8.8 ± 2.2 at 120 min. The locus coeruleus-to-cerebellum ratio was 2.2 ± 0.3 at 10 min and 3.5 ± 1.6 at 120 min. The frontal cortex-to-cerebellum ratio was constant, ranging from 1.4 to 1.6 at all time points and with all pretreatments. All monoamine inhibitors used in this study significantly decreased the locus coeruleus-to-cerebellum ratio. Pretreatment with GBR12909 significantly reduced the striatum-to-cerebellum ratio.
Figure 5

The time courses of the brain region-to-cerebellum ratios. They are from the ex vivo study after [18F]CFT injection where n = 2 to 4/time point (a) and from the in vivo animal PET study where n = 2 (b).

The18F-activity accumulation in the peripheral organs and tissues after the injection of [18F]CFT is presented in Table 3. The accumulation of [18F]CFT-derived18F activity peaked at 20 min in most tissues and decreased thereafter (Figure 6). High levels of18F activity were recorded in the liver, kidneys, and spleen. In the liver, the highest uptake (8.3 ± 1.2% ID/g) was measured 120 min after injection of [18F]CFT.18F-activity accumulation in the bone increased slowly with time, but it was still low (0.19 ± 0.15% ID/g) at 120 min.
Table 3

18F-activity uptake after injection of [18F]CFT in the organs of control and pretreated rats

Organ

10 min

n= 2

20 min

n= 3

40 min

n= 4

120 min

n= 3

GBR12909

n= 3

Nisoxetine

n= 3

Fluoxetine

n= 2

Blood

0.06 ± 0.03

0.07 ± 0.01

0.05 ± 0.02

0.03 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.02

Liver

0.65 ± 0.45

5.17 ± 1.99

4.90 ± 3.74

8.26 ± 1.16

3.38 ± 0.94

5.86 ± 0.10

4.22 ± 1.22

Adrenal gland

0.28 ± 0.14

0.36 ± 0.01

0.24 ± 0.03

0.17 ± 0.06

0.23 ± 0.07

0.25 ± 0.02

0.24 ± 0.11

Spleen

0.36 ± 0.24

0.88 ± 0.28

0.49 ± 0.05

0.26 ± 0.13

0.50 ± 0.19

0.44 ± 0.07

0.44 ± 0.02

Pancreas

0.28 ± 0.10

0.53 ± 0.04

0.35 ± 0.11

0.16 ± 0.01

0.17 ± 0.05*

0.31 ± 0.02

0.22 ± 0.12

Kidney

0.72 ± 0.16

0.91 ± 0.11

0.66 ± 0.31

0.28 ± 0.07

0.53 ± 0.13

0.47 ± 0.02

0.41 ± 0.18

Stomach

0.12 ± 0.09

0.53 ± 0.38

0.19 ± 0.05

0.08 ± 0.05

0.47 ± 0.37

0.11 ± 0.01

0.17

Lung

0.51 ± 0.37

0.46 ± 0.07

0.29 ± 0.08

0.17 ± 0.06

0.20 ± 0.05

0.25 ± 0.01

0.25 ± 0.04

Heart

0.14 ± 0.06

0.16 ± 0.03

0.11 ± 0.02

0.07 ± 0.02

0.10 ± 0.03

0.11 ± 0.01

0.13 ± 0.02

Muscle

0.07 ± 0.02

0.15 ± 0.03

0.09 ± 0.03

0.05 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.02

0.10 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.03

Urinary bladder

0.14 ± 0.14

0.51 ± 0.23

0.31 ± 0.13

0.24 ± 0.13

0.30 ± 0.12

0.28 ± 0.01

0.22 ± 0.04

Bone

0.03 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.02

0.07 ± 0.04

0.19 ± 0.15

0.06 ± 0.01

0.31 ± 0.20

0.09 ± 0.04

Marrow

0.22 ± 0.16

0.63 ± 0.17

0.47 ± 0.10

0.20 ± 0.05

0.39 ± 0.12

0.49 ± 0.05

0.40 ± 0.04

Fat, subcutaneous

0.03 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.03

0.03 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.02

0.07 ± 0.01

0.05 ± 0.03

*p < 0.05 compared to 40 min. Uptakes (percent injected dose per gram tissue) occurred in the organs of control rats at different time points and in organs of pretreated rats at 40 min. All values are means ± SD. The effect of pretreatment was compared with the uptake values of control rats at 40 min. Means were considered significantly different when p < 0.05.

Figure 6

Time course of the [ 18 F]CFT uptake (percent injected dose per gram tissue) by selected organs. The uptake values for the liver are presented in the y-axis on the right.

Pretreatment of the rats with GBR12909 significantly decreased the uptake of18F activity in the pancreas (p = 0.03). No significant changes in the18F-activity uptake were recorded in the periphery of the rats pretreated with nisoxetine or fluoxetine.

PET imaging

The in vivo distribution and uptake of18F activity after [18F]CFT injection in the brain of rats are presented in Figure 7. The uptake of18F activity in the striatum and cerebellum peaked during the first 5 to 10 min and decreased thereafter. The striatum-to-cerebellum ratio reached the maximum value of approximately 9 at 60 min. The time courses of the striatum-to-cortex and cortex-to-cerebellum ratios are shown in Figure 5b. The highest in vivo uptake of18F activity in the periphery was observed in the liver. The uptake increased in the liver during the first 60 min of PET imaging and was almost constant until the end of the scanning (i.e., until 120 min after injection).
Figure 7

Animal PET-CT image of [ 18 F]CFT accumulation in the brain of rats. Data were collected for 2 to 120 min post injection.

Dosimetry

The effective dose equivalent [EDE] estimated for the standard human model was 12.8 μSv/MBq. Effective dose [ED] was 9.17 μSv/MBq.

Discussion

Post-target-produced [18F]F2 [25] offers a feasible method to produce PET tracers with high SA for neuroimaging through electrophilic fluorination. When using post-target-produced [18F]F2, the SA depends on several factors, such as the initial amount of [18F]F- and the amount of carrier fluorine used in the19F-18F exchange reaction [25]. The SA of [18F]CFT can potentially be increased by further optimizing this19F-18F exchange reaction by decreasing the amount of carrier F2. However, in our hands, this resulted in a dramatic decrease in RCY. The amount of carrier F2 used in this study (290 to 400 nmol) is a compromise, offering SA and RCY that are high enough for several human PET studies from one production run. The radiochemical and chemical purities of the final product were verified by HPLC, and both were found to fulfill the requirements for human injection (i.e., RCP > 95.0% and the absence of unknown signals in the UV trace; Figure 3). Signals from compounds other than CFT observed in the UV trace were from the formulation solution.

For radioligands having very high SA, the sensitivity limitation of UV detection means that LC/MS can be the only method to determine the SA [29]. In the present case where [18F]CFT is synthesized through electrophilic fluorination at high SA, we therefore compared the HPLC/UV absorption and the LC/MS technique for the determination of SA. In quantitative analyses, LC/MS is a faster and more sensitive method than HPLC combined with a UV detector. However, LC/MS is more easily affected by changes in the sample matrix. In this study, the SAs were significantly higher when determined by the LC/MS method than by the HPLC method (i.e., the concentration of CFT was lower when measured by LC/MS than by HPLC). This could be due to ion suppression in LC/MS [30]. The effect of ion suppression could be diminished by more extensive chromatographic separation or sample preparation prior to MS. However, both methods of analysis are suitable for analysis in the present case.

In the biodistribution study, the highest level of18F activity was found in the main excretory organs. Additionally, the uptake in the bone was low even at 120 min, reflecting the good stability of the carbon-fluorine bond.18F activity accumulated in the liver with the highest value at 120 min, indicating slow excretion and low metabolism. In all other organs studied, the18F activity peaked 20 min after injection (see Table 3). The results from the in vivo study were in accordance with the ex vivo findings. [18F]CFT has been reported to be relatively resistant to metabolism; in a microdialysis study of 120 min in rodents, the amount of unmetabolized [18F]CFT was approximately 64% of the total18F activity [31].

In the periphery, non-neuronal DAT expression and DAT immunoreactivity have been found in the stomach, pancreas, and kidneys [32]. [18F]CFT uptake in the pancreas, stomach, and kidneys was moderate in the present study. After GBR12909 pretreatment, the18F-activity uptake decreased significantly in the pancreas, indicating DAT-specific binding. In this study, no NET- or SERT-specific binding of18F activity was found in the periphery even though extraneuronal NET expression has been found in the lungs, adrenal medulla, and placenta [32].

In the brain, the accumulation of18F activity in the striatum was specific for DAT; it was significantly decreased with GBR12909 pretreatment (Figure 4). In addition to DAT, the striatum contains a low density of SERT, and NET is virtually absent [33]. Neither fluoxetine nor nisoxetine pretreatment affected the18F-activity uptake in the striatum. High18F-activity accumulation was seen in the locus coeruleus, a brain region with high NET density as has been earlier shown by Burchett et al. [34]. A similar finding in monkeys using [3H]CFT was observed by Kaufman and Madras [19]. The18F-activity accumulation in locus coeruleus was significantly decreased in rats pretreated with nisoxetine, which indicates that NET sites also bind with [18F]CFT. Because NET is virtually absent in the striatum, [18F]CFT is suitable for imaging striatal DAT sites. However, the accumulation of18F activity in locus coeruleus was also significantly decreased in rats pretreated with GBR12909. The affinity of CFT for DAT and NET is of the same order of magnitude (Table 1). With the relatively high dose of GBR12909 used in the pretreatment of the animals, it is evident that although the affinity of GBR12909 for NET is 50-fold less than for DAT, this dosage is high enough to displace [18F]CFT from the NET sites in the locus coeruleus. It is noteworthy that the p value in the statistical analyses is higher for the locus coeruleus than for the striatum in the GBR12909 blocking study.

In the ex vivo study, the uptake ratios for the striatum, locus coeruleus, and cortex versus the cerebellum reached a maximum between 40 and 120 min. In the in vivo study, the maximum striatum-to-cerebellum ratio was reached at 60 min. In both studies, the absolute values for this ratio were similar in the range of 9 to 10. It is noteworthy that due to its small size, the locus coeruleus cannot be analyzed from the in vivo PET study. These parallel studies provide a good demonstration of the strengths and weaknesses of different methods in radiopharmacological studies. Overall, the distribution of18F activity in rats after [18F]CFT injection was in good agreement with our earlier preliminary studies [5, 8] and with studies using [3H]CFT [19, 35].

The human ED and EDE values for [18F]CFT are 9.17 μSv/MBq and 12.8 μSv/MBq, respectively, and they are in line with those of another dopamine transporter ligand,18F-FPCIT [36]. Extrapolation of the animal data to humans to estimate the human radiation dose is inexact, but the order of magnitude of the EDE and ED values for [18F]CFT correspond well with those of other18F-labeled radioligands.

Conclusions

Post-target-produced high-SA [18F]F2 was used to incorporate18F directly into the phenyl ring of [18F]CFT. The final product had high radiochemical and chemical purities and a high SA for neurotransmitter studies in vivo. It is noteworthy that as [18F]CFT shows a specific binding to NET in addition to DAT, [18F]CFT can also be used for imaging NET. The finding that [18F]CFT shows specific uptake in the pancreas also warrants future studies in humans with respect to potential utility in pancreatic imaging.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland grant numbers 116084 and 128591 and by the Oskar Öflunds Stiftelse.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry Laboratory, Turku PET Centre, University of Turku
(2)
MediCity/PET Preclinical Imaging, Turku PET Centre, University of Turku
(3)
Accelerator Laboratory, Åbo Akademi University

References

  1. Wong DF, Yung B, Dannals RF, Shaya EK, Ravert HT, Chen CA, Chan B, Folio T, Scheffel U, Ricaurte GA, Neumeyer JL, Wagner HN Jr, Kuhar MJ: In vivo imaging of baboon and human dopamine transporters by positron emission tomography using [ 11 C]WIN 35,428. Synapse 1993, 15: 130–142. 10.1002/syn.890150205PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Stehouwer JS, Goodman MM: Fluorine-18 radiolabeled PET tracers for imaging monoamine transporters: dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. PET Clin 2009, 4: 101–128. 10.1016/j.cpet.2009.05.006PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Schou M, Steiger C, Varrone A, Guilloteau D, Halldin C: Synthesis, radiolabeling and preliminary in vivo evaluation of [ 18 F]FE-PE2I, a new probe for the dopamine transporter. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2009, 19: 4843–4845. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.06.032PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Varrone A, Steiger C, Schou M, Takano A, Finnema SJ, Guilloteau D, Gulyás B, Halldin C: In vitro autoradiography and in vivo evaluation in cynomolgus monkey of [ 18 F]FE-PE2I, a new dopamine transporter PET radioligand. Synapse 2009, 10: 871–880.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Haaparanta M, Bergman J, Laakso A, Hietala J, Solin O: [ 18 F]CFT ([ 18 F]WIN 35,428), a radioligand to study the dopamine transporter with PET: biodistribution in rats. Synapse 1996, 23: 321–327. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199608)23:4<321::AID-SYN10>3.0.CO;2-#PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Solin O: A novel radioisotope labelled compound, a mixture comprising said compound and a method for its preparation. Finnish Patent 96603, WO 96/20940Google Scholar
  7. Forsback S, Niemi R, Marjamäki P, Eskola O, Bergman J, Grönroos T, Haaparanta M, Haapalinna A, Rinne J, Solin O: Uptake of 6-[ 18 F]fluoro-L-dopa and [ 18 F]CFT reflect nigral neuronal loss in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Synapse 2004, 51: 119–127. 10.1002/syn.10293PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Marjamäki P, Haaparanta M, Forsback S, Koivula T, Fagerholm V, Grönroos T, Eskola O, Solin O: Comparison of 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-[ 18 F]fluorophenyl)tropane and N-(3-[ 18 F]fluoropropyl)-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-[ 18 F]fluorophenyl)nortropane, tracers for imaging dopamine transporters in rat. Mol Imaging Biol 2009, 12: 269–277.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Laakso A, Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Vilkman H, Solin O, Hietala J: [ 18 F]CFT [( 18 F)WIN 35,428], a radioligand to study the dopamine transporter with PET: characterization in human subjects. Synapse 1998, 28: 244–250. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199803)28:3<244::AID-SYN7>3.0.CO;2-APubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rinne JO, Bergman J, Ruottinen H, Haaparanta M, Eronen E, Oikonen V, Sonninen P, Solin O: Striatal uptake of a novel PET ligand, [ 18 F]beta-CFT, is reduced in early Parkinson's disease. Synapse 1999, 31: 119–124. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199902)31:2<119::AID-SYN4>3.0.CO;2-OPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rinne JO, Ruottinen H, Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Sonninen P, Solin O: Usefulness of a dopamine transporter PET ligand [ 18 F]beta-CFT in assessing disability in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999, 67: 737–741. 10.1136/jnnp.67.6.737PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nurmi E, Ruottinen HM, Kaasinen V, Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Solin O, Rinne JO: Progression in Parkinson's disease: a positron emission tomography study with a dopamine transporter ligand [ 18 F]CFT. Ann Neurol 2000, 47: 804–808. 10.1002/1531-8249(200006)47:6<804::AID-ANA14>3.0.CO;2-FPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nurmi E, Bergman J, Eskola O, Solin O, Hinkka SM, Sonninen P, Rinne JO: Reproducibility and effect of levodopa on dopamine transporter function measurements: a [ 18 F]CFT PET study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000, 20: 1604–1609.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rinne OJ, Nurmi E, Ruottinen HM, Bergman J, Eskola O, Solin O: [ 18 F]FDOPA and [ 18 F]CFT are both sensitive PET markers to detect presynaptic dopaminergic hypofunction in early Parkinson's disease. Synapse 2001, 40: 193–200. 10.1002/syn.1042PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nurmi E, Bergman J, Eskola O, Solin O, Vahlberg T, Sonninen P, Rinne JO: Progression of dopaminergic hypofunction in striatal subregions in Parkinson's disease using [ 18 F]CFT PET. Synapse 2003, 48: 109–115. 10.1002/syn.10192PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Laakso A, Vilkman H, Alakare B, Haaparanta M, Bergman J, Solin O, Peurasaari J, Räkköläinen V, Syvälahti E, Hietala J: Striatal dopamine transporter binding in neuroleptic-naive patients with schizophrenia studied with positron emission tomography. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157: 269–271. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.2.269PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Laakso A, Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Vilkman H, Solin O, Syvälahti E, Hietala J: Decreased striatal dopamine transporter binding in vivo in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2001, 52: 115–120. 10.1016/S0920-9964(00)00095-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Laakso A, Vilkman H, Kajander J, Bergman J, Paranta M, Solin O, Hietala J: Prediction of detached personality in healthy subjects by low dopamine transporter binding. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157: 290–292. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.2.290PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufman MJ, Madras BK: [ 3 H]CFT ([ 3 H]WIN 35,428) accumulation in dopamine regions of monkey brain: comparison of a mature and aged monkey. Brain Res 1993, 611: 322–325. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90519-SPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Aloyo VJ, Ruffin JS, Pazdalski PS, Kirifides AL, Harvey JA: [ 3 H]WIN 35,428 binding in the caudate nucleus of the rabbit: evidence for a single site on the dopamine transporter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995, 273: 435–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koivula T, Marjamäki P, Haaparanta M, Fagerholm V, Grönroos T, Lipponen T, Perhola O, Vepsäläinen J, Solin O: Ex vivo evaluation of N-(3-[ 18 F]fluoropropyl)-2 beta-carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-fluorophenyl)nortropane in rats. Nucl Med Biol 2008, 35: 177–183. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.09.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Casella V, Ido T, Wolf AP, Fowler JS, MacGregor RR, Ruth TJ: Anhydrous F-18 labeled elemental fluorine for radiopharmaceutical preparation. J Nucl Med 1980, 21: 750–757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiracal R, Adams RM, Firnau G, Schrobilgen GJ, Coates G, Garnett ES: Electrophilic 18 F from a Siemens 11 MeV proton-only cyclotron. Nucl Med Biol 1995, 22: 111–116. 10.1016/0969-8051(94)E0064-PView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruth TJ, Wolf AP: Absolute cross sections for the production of 18 F via the 18 O(p, n) 18 F reaction. Radiochemica Acta 1979, 26: 21–24.Google Scholar
  25. Bergman J, Solin O: Fluorine-18-labeled fluorine gas for synthesis of tracer molecules. Nucl Med Biol 1997, 24: 677–684. 10.1016/S0969-8051(97)00078-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E: OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 2005, 46: 1023–1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Paxinos G, Watson C: The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  28. Kirschner A, Ice R, Beierwaltes W: Radiation dosimetry of 131I-19-iodocholesterol: the pitfalls of using tissue concentration data, the author's reply. J Nucl Med 1975, 16: 248–249.Google Scholar
  29. Solin O, Eskola O, Hamill TG, Bergman J, Lehikoinen P, Grönroos T, Forsback S, Haaparanta M, Viljanen T, Ryan C, Gibson R, Kieczykowski G, Hietala J, Hargreaves R, Burns HD: Synthesis and characterization of a potent, selective, radiolabeled substance-P antagonist for NK1 receptor quantitation: ([ 18 F]SPA-RQ). Mol Imaging Biol 2004, 6: 373–384. 10.1016/j.mibio.2004.08.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Annesley TM: Ion suppression in mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2003, 49: 1041–1044. 10.1373/49.7.1041PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Haaparanta M, Grönroos T, Marjamäki P, Eskola O, Bergman J, Paul R, Solin O: In vivo sampling for pharmacokinetic studies in small experimental animals: a combination of microdialysis, planar chromatography and digital autoradiography. Mol Imaging Biol 2004, 6: 27–33. 10.1016/j.mibio.2003.12.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Eisenhofer G: The role of neuronal and extraneuronal plasma membrane transporters in the inactivation of peripheral catecholamines. Pharmacol Ther 2001, 91: 35–62. 10.1016/S0163-7258(01)00144-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoffman BJ, Hansson SR, Mezey É, Palkovits M: Localization and dynamic regulation of biogenic amine transporters in the mammalian central nervous system. Front Neuroendocrinol 1998, 19: 187–231. 10.1006/frne.1998.0168PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Burchett S, Bannon M: Serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine transporter mRNAs: heterogeneity of distribution and response to 'binge' cocaine administration. Mol Brain Res 1997, 49: 95–102. 10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00131-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheffel U, Pögün S, Stathis M, Boja JW, Kuhar MJ: In vivo labeling of cocaine binding sites on dopamine transporters with [ 3 H]WIN 35,428. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991, 257: 954–958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Robeson W, Dhawan V, Belakhlef A, Ma Y, Pillai V, Chaly T, Margouleff C, Bjelke D, Eidelberg D: Dosimetry of the dopamine transporter radioligand 18F-FPCIT in human subjects. J Nucl Med 2003, 44: 961–966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh S: Chemistry, design, and structure-activity relationship of cocaine antagonists. Chem Rev 2000, 100: 925–1024. 10.1021/cr9700538PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang Y, Joseph DB, Bowen WD, Flippen-Anderson JL, Dersch CM, Rothman RB, Jacobson AE, Rice KC: Synthesis and biological evaluation of tropane-like 1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine (GBR 12909) analogues. J Med Chem 2001, 44: 3937–3945. 10.1021/jm0101592PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tatsumi M, Groshan K, Blakely RD, Richelson E: Pharmacological profile of antidepressants and related compounds at human monoamine transporters. Eur J Pharmacol 1997, 340: 249–258. 10.1016/S0014-2999(97)01393-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Walter MW: Monoamine reuptake inhibitors: highlights of recent research developments. Drug Dev Res 2005, 65: 97–118. 10.1002/ddr.20013View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Forsback et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.